Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
Just finished it again, and have a lot of questions:
SPOILERS, OBVIOUSLY
Spoiler:
1. Why is Tanith "lost"? If it was just taken over by Chaos warbands, surely it can be taken back. Unless, did I miss the part where they called in Exterminatus?
2. Was Heldane always a radical? Wasn't he the protoge of Voke, one of the greatest Puritans of all time? I also remember him being all Puritanical about Eisenhorne, who was pretty far radical at that point.
3. Brag lifted and used an Assault Cannon in the book. I want it as a squad weapon for Bullgryns. For every 4 Bullgryns, 1 can take an Assault Cannon.
4. How is Dravere allowed to exist? Let alone create a massive Chaos Heretic network of spies and assassins. Surely if a spy of Makaroth was able to learn of all his treachery, an imperial assassin would have been dispatched?
5. How is a machine like an STC able to be corrupted? Doesn't it have an AI? Wouldn't it's Men of Iron protect it?
6. What is the type of Leviathan that Dravere rides around in?
7. What rank is Commissar Col.? Is he like a Colonel+ or is he just a REALLY big Lord Commissar? He has men of equal rank in his unit, so is he along side them or does he have control over them?
8. Seriously, I want man portable AC for the Guard.
2022/03/09 18:15:34
Subject: Re:First and Only: Retrospective SPOILERS
1 - Tanith wasn't taken over by the forces of Chaos, it was razed. Tanith was one of many planets destroyed in response to the death of Archon Nadzydbar and the loss of Balhaut to the Imperials. It was vengeance plain and simple.
2 - By the time of the Sabbat Crusade, Heldane was about 400 years old. That's a lot of time to change his views and become a Radical.
3 - Remember the book was written back in '99. 40k wasn't nearly as solidified back then and Assault Cannons and Auto Cannons are interchanged in the Ghosts series until later novels.
4 - Because he didn't use Chaos spies just ones that weren't allied to Macaroth. Dravere also didn't actually do anything that would warrant his death by the Assassinorum. Also, Dravere was one of the choices to be the replacement Warmaster after Slaydo's death, and removing someone that high-ranking takes a lot of political maneuvering, especially when they have the backing of an Inquisitor.
5 - Because corruption doesn't necessarily mean you sign a pact then turn spikey and Chaos filled. Reread what Gaunt says when he goes to blow it up.
6 - It's a big mobile Command and Control center.
7 - Gaunt is a Colonel and a Commisar. Normal Commissars don't exist within the military command structure, whereas Gaunt does.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2022/03/09 18:16:10
Given what we know about them, could the Men of Iron, with 1 STC beat back all of Humanities problems? This might be Abnett exaggerating, But if you could make 300/hour, and each one is the equal of a squad of Guardsmen, is that a legit theory that they could beat back the necrons, or the Nids, or the Chaos?
Depends on the STC, which is kind of the point of that section in the book. As the spy says, it could be one that makes good knives or it could be one that makes doomsday weapons. In the end, all STCs are prizes to the Imperium.
As for the Men of Iron, they aren't specifically one type of machine and if they were fully functional then they could likely also build the world-ending weapons they made during the Cybernetic Revolt. Things like nanite swarms that consumed planets, sun eaters or massive gravity weapons. Weapons that make the Planet Killer and Blackstone Fortresses look like small fries. So yes, the Men of Iron are potentially that strong.
2022/03/10 00:29:33
Subject: Re:First and Only: Retrospective SPOILERS
I get this is a lore conflict, but Gaunt and a few ghosts literally kill like 10 in the 2nd to last chapter with melee weapons and lasguns. Granted they were corrupted, but still. Hardly "world ending threat"
I feel like if Abnett wanted us to take things more seriously, he should actually show the capability of it's power. Case in Point - The death of a powerful certain psyker near the end that ends up
Two things.
1 - You didn't read what I wrote Fezz. One Man of Iron can be beaten but thousands being made from a machine that will replicate them continuously? No. The potential limit of their power is similar to that of the Necrons and Aeldari at the height of their power. That isn't going to present itself in a corrupted Man of Iron variant that's been inactive for thousands of years.
2 - The Ghosts beat a single entirely corrupted Man of Iron, not 10 and the only reason the 5 of them survived is because of plot armour.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2022/03/10 01:18:58
Gert wrote: Two things.
1 - You didn't read what I wrote Fezz. One Man of Iron can be beaten but thousands being made from a machine that will replicate them continuously? No. The potential limit of their power is similar to that of the Necrons and Aeldari at the height of their power. That isn't going to present itself in a corrupted Man of Iron variant that's been inactive for thousands of years.
2 - The Ghosts beat a single entirely corrupted Man of Iron, not 10 and the only reason the 5 of them survived is because of plot armour.
1. That's transformer logic. One assumes there needs to be resources for the STC to actually function. That's the same logic that begs the question, why haven't the Tyranids swept over and destroyed the galaxy? Or how did the galaxy wipe out the Men of Iron in the first place? Granted this is all speculation, but for the sake of the argument, assuming that all things made require resourced, a single STC cannot function without proper resources, aka an entire dedicated FW. Hence my question, can a single STC solve all the martial problems of the Imperium? My vote is no, because throwing more troops into the mix wouldn't solve the problems facing them now. The problems facing the imperium today are the problems generally caused by the age of strife, which was caused by the DAoT. The cause of the DAoT will not save them from the current situation, unless Men of Iron were somehow incorruptible, which the book proves they were not.
2. The ghosts being plot armored is not the point. The point is severely weakened humans with basic melee weapons took one down. It's corrupted state is also irrelevant, because we have no basis for saying it was weakened. I
am only asking these questions because Gaunt's books have a very bad case of inconsistent narrator, and I was hoping there were other books or lore sources the more clearly explain the actual capability of the MoI.
FezzikDaBullgryn wrote: I was hoping there were other books or lore sources the more clearly explain the actual capability of the MoI.
There are many different types of them, but look into UR-025 from Warhammer Quest Blackstone Fortress or the Excindio from Horus Heresy Book Nine - Crusade.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2022/03/10 13:47:34
Plot armour is precisely the point.
In the same book, one Guardsman also took down a Chaos Dreadnought, you can't take a single instance of the main characters in a book as a datapoint for how powerful something is.
We also have the perfect justification for why the Man of Iron appeared so weak - the STC was corrupted. The manner of corruption was never really specified, it's entirely logical to think this Man of Iron was deformed, weakened, or otherwise lesser in some way(s).
You're absolutely right about the inconsistency in the book though.
IIRC one Guardsman takes a lasround in the arm and has his entire arm blown off.
The next Guardsman takes a lasround square in the throat and survives.
So the conclusion is there's no reason to believe Men of Iron were not a threat based on this one book.
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2022/03/10 13:51:18
FezzikDaBullgryn wrote: 1. That's transformer logic. One assumes there needs to be resources for the STC to actually function. That's the same logic that begs the question, why haven't the Tyranids swept over and destroyed the galaxy? Or how did the galaxy wipe out the Men of Iron in the first place? Granted this is all speculation, but for the sake of the argument, assuming that all things made require resourced, a single STC cannot function without proper resources, aka an entire dedicated FW. Hence my question, can a single STC solve all the martial problems of the Imperium? My vote is no, because throwing more troops into the mix wouldn't solve the problems facing them now. The problems facing the imperium today are the problems generally caused by the age of strife, which was caused by the DAoT. The cause of the DAoT will not save them from the current situation, unless Men of Iron were somehow incorruptible, which the book proves they were not.
*sigh* STCs do not need a whole Forge World to function, that was the whole point of the STC machine. It needed the bare minimum resources to make everything a group of settlers could possibly need when colonising a new world. The STC machine the Ghosts found had been hidden for thousands of years and was already clearly prepared to construct Men of Iron with fuel in the tank i.e. the resources had already been put in thousands of years before.
The Men of Iron were beaten by an alliance of galactic powers including Humanity which was also in its Golden Age and had technology comparable to that of the Men of Iron.
The problems faced by the Imperium are similar but not the same as those found in the Age of Strife. Psykers are now commonplace and strictly regulated rather than being new and allowed to freely use their powers. There are a great many enemies the Imperium faces but those enemies are also all fighting each other as well.
And once again, the whole point of that segment of the book is that the Inquisitor is wrong. Fezz it is literally the whole point of the climax that Heldane is insane and wants to use outlawed (and corrupted) technology for his own gains. Did you actually read the book?
2. The ghosts being plot armored is not the point. The point is severely weakened humans with basic melee weapons took one down. It's corrupted state is also irrelevant, because we have no basis for saying it was weakened.
From First and Only (The Founding Omnibus edition), page 255:
There was something wrong with the newborn. It was malformed, grotesque compared to the perfect anatomical symmetry of the other Men of Iron. A good head taller, it was hunched, blackened, one arm longer than the other, draped and massive, the other hideously vestigial and twisted. Corrupt horns sprouted from its over-long skull and its eyes shone a deadened yellow. Oil like stringy pus wept from its eye sockets. It shambled, unsteady. Its exposed teeth and jaws clacked and mashed idiotically
You read that and thought "Hm, this seems like a Man of Iron at its peak proficiency"?
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2022/03/10 14:17:38
FezzikDaBullgryn wrote: 1. That's transformer logic. One assumes there needs to be resources for the STC to actually function. That's the same logic that begs the question, why haven't the Tyranids swept over and destroyed the galaxy? Or how did the galaxy wipe out the Men of Iron in the first place? Granted this is all speculation, but for the sake of the argument, assuming that all things made require resourced, a single STC cannot function without proper resources, aka an entire dedicated FW. Hence my question, can a single STC solve all the martial problems of the Imperium? My vote is no, because throwing more troops into the mix wouldn't solve the problems facing them now. The problems facing the imperium today are the problems generally caused by the age of strife, which was caused by the DAoT. The cause of the DAoT will not save them from the current situation, unless Men of Iron were somehow incorruptible, which the book proves they were not.
*sigh* STCs do not need a whole Forge World to function, that was the whole point of the STC machine. It needed the bare minimum resources to make everything a group of settlers could possibly need when colonising a new world. The STC machine the Ghosts found had been hidden for thousands of years and was already clearly prepared to construct Men of Iron with fuel in the tank i.e. the resources had already been put in thousands of years before.
The Men of Iron were beaten by an alliance of galactic powers including Humanity which was also in its Golden Age and had technology comparable to that of the Men of Iron.
The problems faced by the Imperium are similar but not the same as those found in the Age of Strife. Psykers are now commonplace and strictly regulated rather than being new and allowed to freely use their powers. There are a great many enemies the Imperium faces but those enemies are also all fighting each other as well.
And once again, the whole point of that segment of the book is that the Inquisitor is wrong. Fezz it is literally the whole point of the climax that Heldane is insane and wants to use outlawed (and corrupted) technology for his own gains. Did you actually read the book?
2. The ghosts being plot armored is not the point. The point is severely weakened humans with basic melee weapons took one down. It's corrupted state is also irrelevant, because we have no basis for saying it was weakened.
From First and Only (The Founding Omnibus edition), page 255:
There was something wrong with the newborn. It was malformed, grotesque compared to the perfect anatomical symmetry of the other Men of Iron. A good head taller, it was hunched, blackened, one arm longer than the other, draped and massive, the other hideously vestigial and twisted. Corrupt horns sprouted from its over-long skull and its eyes shone a deadened yellow. Oil like stringy pus wept from its eye sockets. It shambled, unsteady. Its exposed teeth and jaws clacked and mashed idiotically
You read that and thought "Hm, this seems like a Man of Iron at its peak proficiency"?
I feel like I keep putting forward hypotheticals, or suppositions, and you keep retorting with weary facts without source? I am not calling you a liar, I think you are far more knowledgeable than I am on this point, but where is it written that STC's can manufacture infinite supplies without mass amounts of resources?
As to your second bit of snark, I would only suggest that even corrupted, it's still this immense thing that the writer spends literally two sentences on, but says Gaunt is struck dumb with terror because of it. I don't think it's at "peak" efficiency, but Gaunt kills it with a KNIFE. Not even a special knife. It's the scrap bayonette off the Flechette weapon. It's Tolkien-esque. Don't SAY something is powerful, show it. Don't say something is evil, show it. Don't Say Men of Iron are terrifying and unstoppable, then show one getting killed with a knife by a nearly dead commissar.
FezzikDaBullgryn wrote: I feel like I keep putting forward hypotheticals, or suppositions, and you keep retorting with weary facts without source? I am not calling you a liar, I think you are far more knowledgeable than I am on this point, but where is it written that STC's can manufacture infinite supplies without mass amounts of resources?
I never said infinitely, I said continuously. There is a distinct difference. Also:
The STC allowed disparate mankind to maintain a standard level of technology. A complete, functioning STCs system was an evolved computer designed to provide construction details for human colonists, enabling them to build efficient shelters, generators and transports without any prior knowledge and using almost any locally available materials. For example, the user simply asked how to build a house or a tractor and the computer would supply all the necessary plans.
That is from Lexican with the source noted as Warhammer 40k: Rogue Trader. Even disregarding that point entirely, one of the biggest reasons the Mechanicus desperately seeks to find a fully intact STC machine is because it can do the work of many forges and manufactorums without the need for human mistakes. This is not hypotheticals or conjecture, this is canon 40k lore.
As to your second bit of snark, I would only suggest that even corrupted, it's still this immense thing that the writer spends literally two sentences on, but says Gaunt is struck dumb with terror because of it. I don't think it's at "peak" efficiency, but Gaunt kills it with a KNIFE. Not even a special knife. It's the scrap bayonette off the Flechette weapon. It's Tolkien-esque. Don't SAY something is powerful, show it. Don't say something is evil, show it. Don't Say Men of Iron are terrifying and unstoppable, then show one getting killed with a knife by a nearly dead commissar.
1 - The Ghosts were not nearly dead.
2 - It is not a scrap bayonet.
3 - The Men of Iron were a terrible monstrosity that conducted mass genocide against Golden Age Humanity. One cripple and corrupted Man of Iron is not the same level of threat. The other hundred that were stored with the STC and the forty it produced before the Ghosts blew it up is where the threat comes from.
Would you say bears are not dangerous if you killed one with two broken legs and brain damage? That's the logic you are using right now.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2022/03/10 19:43:18
2022/03/12 12:07:45
Subject: Re:First and Only: Retrospective SPOILERS
When I read First and Only back when it first came out (during 3rd edition 40K), I found it odd that STCs were described as making things.
The impression I had from the 2nd ed and 3rd ed background was that STCs were comprehensive databases of plans, blueprints, etc. that explained how the colonists could make useful things. Like the ultimate DIY instruction manual. Not mini-factories that automatically churned out anything you needed like a Terry Pratchett strata machine.
At the time I assumed Abnett had misunderstood STCs (in the same way that he apparently mixed up assault cannons and autocannons). After all, other Black Library writers made far worse mistakes in those days.
Was I the one who misunderstood what STCs were meant to be?
STCs are all of the above but it is usually made more specific. For example, the one the Ghosts found and the one that is owned by House Van Saar on Necromunda are STC machines. The Baal Predator on the other hand came from an STC fragment, a blueprint rather than the full machine. The confusion is also one of the core ideas behind STCs. The Imperium will launch entire crusades even on the rumour of an STC because even though it might turn out to be a blueprint for an industrial smelter that is 1% more efficient than the current model, it could also be a fully functioning and uncorrupted STC machine containing the accumulated knowledge of Golden Age Humanity.
Gert wrote: The Imperium will launch entire crusades even on the rumour of an STC because even though it might turn out to be a blueprint for an industrial smelter that is 1% more efficient than the current model, it could also be a fully functioning and uncorrupted STC machine containing the accumulated knowledge of Golden Age Humanity.
Yes, but is an 'STC machine' just an encyclopedia of knowledge? Or does it build things for you automatically? As far as I can tell, Abnett was the first writer to use the latter interpretation.
Let me see what I can dig up with my limited stash of old books. (I'll put this in spoiler tags because it's a little off-topic.)
Spoiler:
I don't have a copy of Rogue Trader, so I'm not sure how STCs were described in 1st edition 40K (but see below). I'm sure there was a short story in an early collection (the Deathwing anthology?) about a planet that secretly maintains a working STC and manages to keep it hidden from a visiting Imperial ship.
Here's how STCs were described in the Codex Imperialis (the fluff book in the 2nd ed 40K starter box, released in 1993):
Codex Imperialis, p42 wrote:"STC systems were created during the scientific high-point of the Dark Age of Technology ... almost all of these colonies managed to retain a high level of technology thanks to the huge base of computerised information carried from Earth. This massive computer databank was known as the Standard Template Construct (STC) system.
The STCs are often said to embody the sum total of human knowledge. This is probably true as far as technical accomplishment goes. Although most colonists required little more than designs for agricultural machinery, programs were included for all sorts of advanced constructions such as nuclear power grids and fission reactors. However, the early colonists' needs were simple and were met by conventional energy forms and relatively low-level technology.
Today there are no known surviving STC systems, and only a very few examples of first generation print-out."
[stuff about the Ad-Mech searching for the STC]
... Yet the most technically-advanced knowledge eludes the Adeptus Mechanicus, for the early colonists were mostly simple folk whose needs were practical. Only rarely did anyone bother to take copies of the theoretical and advanced work which the STC contained."
The 3rd edition 40K rulebook doesn't seem to have a specific section describing STCs, although I might have missed it because of the way the book is laid out (it's probably in a box-out on some random page). However, it does have an in-universe report in the back of the book about recovered designs:
Warhammer 40,000 3rd edition rulebook p282
wrote:"Contrary to previous designs, the Type XV Leman Russ uses only a single crystal battery generation unit. This has been designed with reference to newly re-discovered Standard Template Constructs on Gravis 5. This has enabled us to reconstruct the power generation units of our battle tanks in accordance with the more combat-effective designs that were in use during the Storming of Vrech."
[Hah, there's also a sly reference to Bill Gates in this section I never noticed before ...]
In White Dwarf during early 3rd edition, after the 3e Chaos Codex was released, we also had a brief sidebar description of STCs in the article 'Harbingers of Doom', about Raptors. It was 'extracted and summarised from the original work by Scribe R Priestley', so I presume it's an edited version of 1st edition Rogue Trader text.
White Dwarf 231 (Aussie edition) p86 wrote:
"Much of the technology used by the Imperium is recovered from Standard Template Constructs, or STCs. These were designed during the Dark Age of Technology for use by human settlers ... Their prime function was to enable the colonists to construct shelters, generators and transports without prior knowledge. The designs were intended to be able to cope with anything - by the standards of the day they were rough and ready, big and brutish, hard to damage and easy to repair. During the Age Of Strife human civilisation reverted to barbarism ... All that survived from before that terrible time were debased and corrupted versions of the old STC designs, scattered and lost on thousands of back-water planets across the galaxy. These documents contain lost knowledge from the Dark Age Of Technology, and the Adeptus Mechanicus make it their business to find them - the STCs are their equivalent to a holy text, a font of all knowledge, a quest for the holy grail."
So from 1st (?) and 2nd ed to early 3rd at least, we only have references to 'designs' as in plans, rather than an automated facility.
Even in the 4th ed rulebook, which capped off 3rd ed's fluff, the STC is described as a pure database that colonists would use as instructions:
Warhammer 40,000 4th edition, p120 wrote:
"[STC systems] were created during the Dark Age of Technology to provide all the technical information needed to construct anything that settlers might need. Even the least technically-accomplished person could build a vehicle, aircraft or weapon given time. One result of the STC system and its pivotal place in human colonisation is that human material culture is very similar, even on worlds which are many thousands of light years apart."
[emphasis added]
It seems that until the time Dan Abnett wrote First and Only, and for several years afterward, the STC was presented as a database / encyclopedia of plans--not as a 'constructor' to make things for you. Which makes Abnett's description of a literal machine to make knives / robots / etc a bit strange.
I don't have the core background for any edition after 4th (it started to get silly IMO) so I don't know if or how the concept of the STC changed. Did it officially shift to an automated factory--an 'STC machine' as Gert put it? If so, was Abnett's alternative take in his novel responsible?
Whomever wrote Baneblade talked about how the Mechanicus has lost the ability/knowledge to create new Shadowswords, and the factory that makes the new ones does so without the help of the AM, so it's essentially an STC. They lost the blueprint, but still have a functioning Mars pattern STC constructor(?)
I always it strange when they talk about only one planet producing this thing.
The galaxy is a huge place, and one planet is miniscule. There's no way one planet is the sole supplier of anything - not even a vehicle as rare as a Shadowsword.
But you're forgetting the religious nature of manufacturing within the Imperium. It doesn't really matter if it would be more efficient for 12 Forge Worlds to build a vehicle as venerable as a Shadowsword because its essentially a holy relic. You don't give away your holy relics to the other churches (Forgeworlds) because then your church (Forgeworld) is less special in the eyes of God (The Omnissiah).
It's about practicality for the universe. If there's only one planet manufacturing Shadowswords they should be rare as hen's teeth - almost literally.
It gets even worse when you look at something like a Leman Russ Executioner. Apparently Ryza is the only planet capable of manufacturing them. When you spread that across the entire galaxy they're not just rare, they're unheard of.
It's the same problem of scale that 1000 marines have. It's just not physically possible for you to have 1000 Ultramarines and them still pop up, in major force, in every major warzone.
kirotheavenger wrote: I always it strange when they talk about only one planet producing this thing.
The galaxy is a huge place, and one planet is miniscule. There's no way one planet is the sole supplier of anything - not even a vehicle as rare as a Shadowsword.
Like the Baneblade a "true" Shadowsword will have its own number and name and be registered on Mars, where all of its deeds shall be recorded regularly. So-called "counterfeit" Shadowswords are produced by Forge Worlds which don't have access to the same STC data and are consequently less advanced than those which have been properly constructed and consecrated: their logic engines and targeters will be more primitive, their capacitors or engine less efficient, their remote-controlled sponson weapons replaced with crewed versions, and the Volcano Cannon may be replaced with a large Plasma Cannon, a huge Battle Cannon or a Turbo Laser.
Important distinction to be made. Some of these things aren't "X planet is the only supplier", it's that "X planet is the only one with the completeSTC and components necessary and other planets make different versions".
Ryza's Stormblade for example is intended to be an "alternative" to the Shadowsword. And then you have things like the Stormsword--a field replacement for the Shadowsword.
Also, according to Lex which cites Imperial Armour: Volume 1 and IA: Apoc, there are multiple Forgeworlds with the Shadowsword STC. These FWs are ones that also have the capability of producing and maintaining Titan Legions, so still a very small number but not just Mars.
As for the Leman Russ Executioner, it's a case of there being loads during the Crusade and Heresy but their numbers dwindling post-Heresy. Also, the evergreen "Game =/= Background" Kiro.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2022/03/13 12:05:45
I thought it worked that each FW was the only place that made THAT brand of STC. Like how MARS is the only one that makes MARS pattern Shadowswords? Is that wrong?
FezzikDaBullgryn wrote: I thought it worked that each FW was the only place that made THAT brand of STC. Like how MARS is the only one that makes MARS pattern Shadowswords? Is that wrong?
IIRC they're named after the FW that discovered the STC / 'invented' them, but can be built "under licence" on other Forge or Manufacturing Worlds. For example Necromunda produces several different patterns of Lasguns under licence (and the most recent STC stuff is in the Necromunda books).