Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/06/17 06:35:55
Subject: Will GW ever make a balanced game?
|
 |
Ork Admiral Kroozin Da Kosmos on Da Hulk
|
Just Tony wrote:When did this turn from the "Balanced game" thread to the "Fragile models" thread?
Are you complaining that the most recent episode of " GW sucks" accidentally turned out to be helpful to someone?
|
7 Ork facts people always get wrong:
Ragnar did not win against Thrakka, but suffered two crushing defeats within a few days of each other.
A lasgun is powerful enough to sever an ork's appendage or head in a single, well aimed shot.
Orks meks have a better understanding of electrics and mechanics than most Tech Priests.
Orks actually do not think that purple makes them harder to see. The joke was made canon by Alex Stewart's Caphias Cain books.
Gharkull Blackfang did not even come close to killing the emperor.
Orks can be corrupted by chaos, but few of them have any interest in what chaos offers.
Orks do not have the power of believe. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/06/17 07:02:50
Subject: Will GW ever make a balanced game?
|
 |
Waaagh! Ork Warboss
Italy
|
Just Tony wrote:When did this turn from the "Balanced game" thread to the "Fragile models" thread?
Models always need "balance" inside the cases  . Magnets are a solution.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/06/17 08:08:15
Subject: Will GW ever make a balanced game?
|
 |
Trazyn's Museum Curator
|
Blackie wrote: Just Tony wrote:When did this turn from the "Balanced game" thread to the "Fragile models" thread? Models always need "balance" inside the cases  . Magnets are a solution.
Top heavy models are OP. They just fall once and it wipes out an entire squad. Nerf nao!
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2022/06/17 08:08:27
What I have
~4100
~1660
Westwood lives in death!
Peace through power!
A longbeard when it comes to Necrons and WHFB. Grumble Grumble
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/06/17 08:57:27
Subject: Re:Will GW ever make a balanced game?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
No they should literally be balanced out of the (storage) box. The fact you have to do anything at your end indicates magnetised boxes are a failure and anyone advocating them is a shill.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/06/17 08:59:40
Subject: Re:Will GW ever make a balanced game?
|
 |
Discriminating Deathmark Assassin
|
Karol wrote:On top of that elite armies are not playable at 1500pts.
You're flat out wrong here.
The style of play you're used to may not work, but that's actually a positive as it makes you see the capabilities of your models in a different way.
They wouldn't create so much content for Combat Patrol and Incursion if a majority of the armies don't work.
|
213PL 60PL 12PL 9-17PL
(she/her) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/06/17 17:22:13
Subject: Will GW ever make a balanced game?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Playing imperial knights with actual imperial knights in it at 1500 is not very fun, same with custodes. GW creates a lot of "content" for stuff people don't play or use. It is not very much in their favour to say that AoS and w40k is played world wide at a certain points size, which is not 500 or 1000 or evern 1500. Automatically Appended Next Post: CthuluIsSpy wrote:
Top heavy models are OP. They just fall once and it wipes out an entire squad. Nerf nao!
Well it is not fun to transports something like 5-6 drakes for a SCE army or 6 raiders for DE or multiple void weavers for harlis etc Plus GW had this idea that modern models should look cinematic and dynamic, creates certain problems for some units and at least one army in AoS.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2022/06/17 17:24:39
If you have to kill, then kill in the best manner. If you slaughter, then slaughter in the best manner. Let one of you sharpen his knife so his animal feels no pain. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/06/17 17:55:42
Subject: Re:Will GW ever make a balanced game?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Blndmage wrote:Karol wrote:On top of that elite armies are not playable at 1500pts.
They wouldn't create so much content for Combat Patrol and Incursion if a majority of the armies don't work.
Um. Why wouldn't they? GW thinking something works doesn't mean it actually works.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/06/17 18:07:14
Subject: Will GW ever make a balanced game?
|
 |
Librarian with Freaky Familiar
|
Not while models are to be sold, and rules are to be stripped down. GW always had balance issues within their games, but you are just noticing it worse now because with the lack more in depth rules comes a lack of ability to balance.
On top of that, GW is first and foremost out to make money, meaning rules reflect the need to sell.
|
To many unpainted models to count. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/06/17 18:12:43
Subject: Will GW ever make a balanced game?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Karol wrote:Playing imperial knights with actual imperial knights in it at 1500 is not very fun, same with custodes. GW creates a lot of "content" for stuff people don't play or use. It is not very much in their favour to say that AoS and w40k is played world wide at a certain points size, which is not 500 or 1000 or evern 1500.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
CthuluIsSpy wrote:
Top heavy models are OP. They just fall once and it wipes out an entire squad. Nerf nao!
Well it is not fun to transports something like 5-6 drakes for a SCE army or 6 raiders for DE or multiple void weavers for harlis etc Plus GW had this idea that modern models should look cinematic and dynamic, creates certain problems for some units and at least one army in AoS.
Oo don't you get like 1 Knight and 6-7 Armigers in 1500 points?
If anything I would imagine such an army would be more powerful in 1.5k then 2k because your opponent is less likely to have a critical mass of AT firepower.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/06/17 20:25:20
Subject: Will GW ever make a balanced game?
|
 |
Discriminating Deathmark Assassin
|
Karol wrote: It is not very much in their favour to say that AoS and w40k is played world wide at a certain points size, which is not 500 or 1000 or evern 1500.
You do know that there a huge Crusade following that plays 25PL ~500 points all the time, right? 1000 points is popular enough to be included in the tournament book.
Just because your local gamers won't play anything other than 2000 point Matched Play tournament games all the time (we have the problem here, I'm trying to make a small board for 25PL/500 point games).
Have you considered asking your local library if they have space you could use, a back table, a study room? That's what my old group did for years. We had to play quiet, roll dice on felt or something soft, but we played.
Hell's, we used to use any tables, and put boards across as bridges. Totally non standard, but, again, I got to play.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2022/06/17 21:06:37
213PL 60PL 12PL 9-17PL
(she/her) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/06/17 20:47:45
Subject: Will GW ever make a balanced game?
|
 |
Ancient Venerable Dreadnought
|
Something tells me that the store is the only "safe" place for them to play...period.
|
|
 |
 |
|