Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2023/02/19 04:43:59
Subject: Mandrakes don't seem to exist any more...
|
 |
Frenzied Berserker Terminator
|
Was just checking my GW wish list ahead of my birthday and noticed the entry for Mandrakes said 'no longer available'. They appear to have been removed from the web store...
Anyone know anything about this?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2023/02/16 17:06:38
Subject: Re:Mandrakes don't seem to exist any more...
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Seeing they don't have last chance to buy mark, it's the exact same thing as in every other thread asking about unit X being gone, lack of stock/reboxing to new art/change of instructions inside the box/whatever other reason GW has for brief stop of unit orders by store software...
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2023/02/16 17:18:25
Subject: Re:Mandrakes don't seem to exist any more...
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
I see them updated for Kill Team, together with Striking Scorpions...
...I did not say this...
...I am not here...
|
Casual gaming, mostly solo-coop these days.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2023/02/16 20:25:26
Subject: Re:Mandrakes don't seem to exist any more...
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
all(?) of the finecast pieces in the Drukari range were put on stock rotation a while ago.
If you want them right now? You'll just have to shop EBay etc for them.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2023/02/16 21:11:19
Subject: Mandrakes don't seem to exist any more...
|
 |
Frenzied Berserker Terminator
|
Oh were they? Completely missed that!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2023/02/16 21:45:40
Subject: Mandrakes don't seem to exist any more...
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
UK
|
Yeah for some reason whilst GW can push out Warcry warbands like crazy, they've been very slow to update finecast to plastic and it seem to have hit a head where they just want the material gone from general circulation. So they've started putting a lot into range rotation. Which I think is a way for them to buy time to replace a bunch of them with plastic versions and every so often do a made-to-order print run to keep customers happy.
It might be a symptom of "design led work practice" where the sculptors work on what they like more than what's "needed". So you end up with new models and new concepts and such and things in popular armies with the sculptors whilst other forces or less popular stuff gets pushed back and back.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2023/02/17 11:39:16
Subject: Mandrakes don't seem to exist any more...
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Silly question - Dark Eldar players are, generally, happy with the Finecast-era design of the Mandrakes, they just want them in a material less prone to defects, right?
I haven't held those Mandrakes in hand, but how undercut-y are they? Should they be tricky to port to plastic?
|
2021-4 Plog - Here we go again... - my fifth attempt at a Dakka PLOG
My Pile of Potential - updates ongoing...
Gamgee on Tau Players wrote:we all kill cats and sell our own families to the devil and eat live puppies.
Kanluwen wrote:This is, emphatically, why I will continue suggesting nuking Guard and starting over again. It's a legacy army that needs to be rebooted with a new focal point.
Confirmation of why no-one should listen to Kanluwen when it comes to the IG - he doesn't want the IG, he want's Kan's New Model Army...
tneva82 wrote:You aren't even trying ty pretend for honest arqument. Open bad faith trolling. - No reason to keep this here, unless people want to use it for something... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2023/02/17 11:51:49
Subject: Mandrakes don't seem to exist any more...
|
 |
Frenzied Berserker Terminator
|
I don't have any yet, but yeah - I really like the design. Am worried any update will bugger them up, same as they did with the Haemonculus. Hate the current one compared to its predecessor.
Wouldn't know about the second part.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2023/02/17 13:07:26
Subject: Mandrakes don't seem to exist any more...
|
 |
Arch Magos w/ 4 Meg of RAM
|
Dysartes wrote:Silly question - Dark Eldar players are, generally, happy with the Finecast-era design of the Mandrakes, they just want them in a material less prone to defects, right?
I haven't held those Mandrakes in hand, but how undercut-y are they? Should they be tricky to port to plastic?
i don't plat DE as much these days but mandrakes pissed me off so much with how fragile their weapon are.
The design is simple enough (and looks amazing), porting them to plastic shouldnt be too hard
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2023/02/17 13:07:40
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2023/02/17 14:48:55
Subject: Mandrakes don't seem to exist any more...
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
VladimirHerzog wrote:i don't plat DE as much these days but mandrakes pissed me off so much with how fragile their weapon are.
The design is simple enough (and looks amazing), porting them to plastic shouldnt be too hard
Yeah, you might tweak some details - but its unclear why its a bigger/more difficult job than say moving Wracks from finecast to plastic. (Or Incubi.)
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2023/02/17 19:07:33
Subject: Mandrakes don't seem to exist any more...
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
The dark behind the eyes.
|
Dysartes wrote:Silly question - Dark Eldar players are, generally, happy with the Finecast-era design of the Mandrakes, they just want them in a material less prone to defects, right?
Yeah, aside from the material I'd say they've held up pretty well. The only issue I can think of is that their skirts are very blocky.
Beyond that, it gets more into wishlist territory (e.g. I'd still like to get a Mandrake character, though that would probably be a separate kit anyway). It might be nice to have more options than 'none', but that's more about rules than models.
|
blood reaper wrote:I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote:Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote:GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
Andilus Greatsword wrote:
"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"
Akiasura wrote:I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.
insaniak wrote:
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2023/02/17 20:03:50
Subject: Re:Mandrakes don't seem to exist any more...
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
I noticed a converted Tree Revenant that made a decent Mandrake. Maybe a bit of putty for the baggy trousers?
|
Casual gaming, mostly solo-coop these days.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2023/02/17 20:26:18
Subject: Re:Mandrakes don't seem to exist any more...
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
The dark behind the eyes.
|
SamusDrake wrote:I noticed a converted Tree Revenant that made a decent Mandrake. Maybe a bit of putty for the baggy trousers?
Do you happen to have a link? I always enjoy seeing conversions.
|
blood reaper wrote:I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote:Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote:GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
Andilus Greatsword wrote:
"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"
Akiasura wrote:I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.
insaniak wrote:
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2023/02/18 09:56:21
Subject: Re:Mandrakes don't seem to exist any more...
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
"tree revenant mandrake conversion" will do the trick with google.
I'd say a box of them and kabalites or even Wyches, but it would depend on size differences, which I'm not entirely sure on. MDs for the upper body, Kabs for the lower bodies. The cool thing about Kabalites is that you'll still have 5 left over for a small unit, possibly a fire team for Kill Team.
|
Casual gaming, mostly solo-coop these days.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2023/02/18 11:24:07
Subject: Mandrakes don't seem to exist any more...
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Also plenty of people using Idoneth Deepkin Namarti Thralls as Mandrake stand-ins. They don’t have the baggy trousers and long hair of the originals, but as creepy elves with big swords, they look just fine, to my eye. A mandrake-style paint job works wonders for them.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2023/02/19 00:23:00
Subject: Re:Mandrakes don't seem to exist any more...
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
The dark behind the eyes.
|
SamusDrake wrote:"tree revenant mandrake conversion" will do the trick with google.
I'd say a box of them and kabalites or even Wyches, but it would depend on size differences, which I'm not entirely sure on. MDs for the upper body, Kabs for the lower bodies. The cool thing about Kabalites is that you'll still have 5 left over for a small unit, possibly a fire team for Kill Team.
Had a look. Yeah, the Tree Revenants work very well for Mandrakes. Their weapons are very similar and they have an appropriately creepy aesthetic.
Also nice to see elven models that aren't either bald or sporting topknots.
Baltika wrote:Also plenty of people using Idoneth Deepkin Namarti Thralls as Mandrake stand-ins. They don’t have the baggy trousers and long hair of the originals, but as creepy elves with big swords, they look just fine, to my eye. A mandrake-style paint job works wonders for them.
Can't say I'm a fan of them, tbh. I get why people use them but for me the lack of hair really kills the aesthetic.
Also, the poses and two-handed weapons put me more in mind of shirtless Incubi than Mandrakes.
|
blood reaper wrote:I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote:Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote:GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
Andilus Greatsword wrote:
"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"
Akiasura wrote:I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.
insaniak wrote:
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet. |
|
 |
 |
|