Switch Theme:

10th Edition Wonky Alliance Mechanics  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Fresh-Faced New User




Does anybody else feel that the rules around allied factions this edition are pretty arbitrary and inconsistent?

I'm a Chaos player, who has traditionally played Tzeentch soups. That option is still pretty open to me this edition; alliances in Chaos are insanely easy. I could theoretically choose Chaos Space Marines as my Army Faction, running Lucius the Eternal with 6 Noise Marine units, then ally in 6 Khorne Berzerkers from World Eaters, 6 Rubric Marines from Thousand Sons, and 6 Plague Marines from Death Guard, followed by an allied Chaos Knight, and then 25% of my points in allied Daemons, for a total of 5 different codices in one Army.

My brother, however, being a longtime Blood Angels player who was just starting to consider expanding into another Chapter, cannot run a Furioso Dreadnought in the same Army as a squad of Deathwing Terminators, because apparently, Space Marines with different paintjobs find it harder to get along than famous rivals in the Great Game like Nurgle and Tzeentch.

Excepting the Ynnari options for the Ældari, and one rule in Genestealer Cults, xenos players are almost completely cut off from alliances altogether.

I understand the desire to cut back on the "run my army, but also take that one overpowered unit that's dominating the meta from another army," problem, but I think it's been dealt with pretty poorly. I'm not sure what I'd suggest instead; does anyone agree and have any ideas?
   
Made in us
Confessor Of Sins





Tacoma, WA, USA

The rules for Chaos and Imperium are pretty equal:
  • Chaos has Daemons while Imperium has Agents of the Imperium
  • Chaos has Chaos Knights while Imperium has Imperial Knights


  • Chaos's access to the Cult Battleline units is a holdover from days of yore. They don't want to produce the units twice, one for CSM and one for the Legion, so you end up with slightly nerfed versions as an add-on to your CSM army. But it is literally 1 datasheet out of a Codex of units and options you get access to.
       
    Made in us
    Loyal Necron Lychguard





    Yeah I would not consider being able to take cult troops allying; they're CSM elites that have only been moved to their own books very recently. A CSM army is still completely incapable of allying in an Exalted Sorcerer as a Thousand Sons army is incapable of allying in a Chaos Lord.
       
    Made in us
    Enigmatic Chaos Sorcerer




    The dark hollows of Kentucky

    Berzerkers, Rubrics, Noise Marines, and Plague Marines are not "Allies" for CSM. They're just members of [INSERT LEGION/RENEGADE WARBAND] that have sworn allegiance to the appropriate Chaos God, and received the "full benefits".
       
    Made in us
    Decrepit Dakkanaut






    Springfield, VA

    And as we all know, the Imperium's strict "no-innovations" policy and slow, hidebound decline in the absence of the Primarchs means that "murdery dreadnoughts with claws that go brr" are Blood Angels only.

    I mean, to start building those, a Chapter forge would have to either steal a closely-held secret STC fragment or INNOVATE.

    I mean, you might as well create some whole new class of Marine complete with a full line of innovative new technologies if you are just going to throw out the old lor- wait a minute
       
    Made in gb
    Mighty Vampire Count






    UK

    My brother, however, being a longtime Blood Angels player who was just starting to consider expanding into another Chapter, cannot run a Furioso Dreadnought in the same Army as a squad of Deathwing Terminators, because apparently, Space Marines with different paintjobs find it harder to get along than famous rivals in the Great Game like Nurgle and Tzeentch.


    All Marine players already have access to a vast bloated range PLUS other Imperial forces...such as Knights and Agents.

    If we are going to pretend that certain Chapters are super special and unique compared to the other 990 Chapters and say the 1000s of Imperial Guard regiments then they have to have some downsides...

    This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2023/07/03 11:28:44


    I AM A MARINE PLAYER

    "Unimaginably ancient xenos artefact somewhere on the planet, hive fleet poised above our heads, hidden 'stealer broods making an early start....and now a bloody Chaos cult crawling out of the woodwork just in case we were bored. Welcome to my world, Ciaphas."
    Inquisitor Amberley Vail, Ordo Xenos

    "I will admit that some Primachs like Russ or Horus could have a chance against an unarmed 12 year old novice but, a full Battle Sister??!! One to one? In close combat? Perhaps three Primarchs fighting together... but just one Primarch?" da001

    www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/528517.page

    A Bloody Road - my Warhammer Fantasy Fiction 
       
    Made in us
    The Marine Standing Behind Marneus Calgar





    Upstate, New York

    On the plus side for marines, unless you are using the chapter specific units, you can mix freely.

    For example if my deathwatch kill teams found a xenos issues they needed extra support, they could borrow some tanks from my Ultras as backup. Just as long as the named characters stay home, legal on the tabletop.

       
    Made in us
    Longtime Dakkanaut




    Scion of Fate wrote:

    My brother, however, being a longtime Blood Angels player who was just starting to consider expanding into another Chapter, cannot run a Furioso Dreadnought in the same Army as a squad of Deathwing Terminators, because apparently, Space Marines with different paintjobs find it harder to get along than famous rivals in the Great Game like Nurgle and Tzeentch.

    That's a problem with GW creating several Terminator datasheets instead of using the Deathwing one as the standard. No, Assault Terminators and Tactical Terminators do not need different entries. Deathwing entry proved you can fit everything just fine.
       
    Made in us
    Resolute Ultramarine Honor Guard





    EviscerationPlague wrote:
    Scion of Fate wrote:

    My brother, however, being a longtime Blood Angels player who was just starting to consider expanding into another Chapter, cannot run a Furioso Dreadnought in the same Army as a squad of Deathwing Terminators, because apparently, Space Marines with different paintjobs find it harder to get along than famous rivals in the Great Game like Nurgle and Tzeentch.

    That's a problem with GW creating several Terminator datasheets instead of using the Deathwing one as the standard. No, Assault Terminators and Tactical Terminators do not need different entries. Deathwing entry proved you can fit everything just fine.


    Nah, I think Terminator and Assault Terminator works as two seperate datasheets (assuming based on history) they don't want generic Terminators to be able to mix and match assult and shootinantor loadouts. That's what has made the Deathwing Terminators "special". We don't need a Primaris Ancient and a BGV Ancient though.

    My WHFB armies were Bretonians and Tomb Kings. 
       
     
    Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
    Go to: