Switch Theme:

What were people’s thoughts on Force organization charts?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus







Just thought id plonk this stuff here to add to the variety ITT....

Spoiler:



The 'detriments' aren't really detrimental or even particularly restrictive - the bit about automata means you could still have a force compromised of an HQ, two Thallax Cohorts and NINE Thanatars (three maniples of 3)

Oh no, i have to take two units of Thallax...

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-px27tzAtVwZpZ4ljopV2w "ashtrays and teacups do not count as cover"
"jack of all trades, master of none; certainly better than a master of one"
The Ordo Reductor - the guy's who make wonderful things like the Landraider Achillies, but can't use them in battle..  
   
Made in us
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus






 SirDonlad wrote:
Just thought id plonk this stuff here to add to the variety ITT....

Spoiler:



The 'detriments' aren't really detrimental or even particularly restrictive - the bit about automata means you could still have a force compromised of an HQ, two Thallax Cohorts and NINE Thanatars (three maniples of 3)

Oh no, i have to take two units of Thallax...


yea, my mind went to that as a fellow mechanicum player, but that list was pretty overpowered from what I heard and With people already complaining it wasn't the best example imo. Really most of the HH1 FOC's are the prime examples of how they could be used.

"Do you really think 7th edition was the best edition?"

"Yes, and I'm tired of thinking otherwise."

 
   
Made in gb
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus







 Tiger9gamer wrote:


yea, my mind went to that as a fellow mechanicum player, but that list was pretty overpowered from what I heard and With people already complaining it wasn't the best example imo. Really most of the HH1 FOC's are the prime examples of how they could be used.


The problem was people were using it to play a taghmata army with Ordo Reductor rules.
This is a sticking point for me that usually i hold my tongue over, because "who am i to say what models are 'right' or not?" but i really despise an Ordo Reductor list which has krios venators or more than one automata.
The ones id see around basicly didnt use ORAT or Minotaurs and that is Tech-Heresy in my eye.
Same with the secondary HQ choice, essentially turning the army into a taghmata/cybernetica hybrid with Magos Ordinator or Magos Dominus.
The only type of Dominus that should be in an Ordo Reductor Cohort is a "Dominus Triple-Bombard" artillery tank!

/Rant

Spot on and agreed regarding the HH force org stuff- it was really well done; the extra elite and HQ choice over the normal 40k FOC was perfectly judged for the intention for the setting.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-px27tzAtVwZpZ4ljopV2w "ashtrays and teacups do not count as cover"
"jack of all trades, master of none; certainly better than a master of one"
The Ordo Reductor - the guy's who make wonderful things like the Landraider Achillies, but can't use them in battle..  
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: