Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/14 15:37:58
Subject: Sample Mark II unit summary
|
 |
[MOD]
Madrak Ironhide
|
http://www.dakkadakka.com/wiki/en/Captain_E._Dominic_Darius
As you can see, I'm using MK II as the naming convention for unit summary. No statlines
are entered, though sometimes they can be construed from the analysis of strengths and
weaknesses. I've started adding certain phrases as tactical links where you can click on
them and see a list of similar effects. They are "piped" meaning they link to a location, but
the word for the link is different from the location.
Power Attack:Slam
Disruption Effects
Critical Effect
Knockdown
Stationary Effect
Dice minus I think I should rename to Target dice or something.
Any suggestions with layout and information?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/15 01:13:49
Subject: Sample Mark II unit summary
|
 |
[MOD]
Madrak Ironhide
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/15 07:28:44
Subject: Sample Mark II unit summary
|
 |
[MOD]
Madrak Ironhide
|
http://www.dakkadakka.com/wiki/en/Major_Victoria_Haley
I'm not sure if I'm getting the feats and synergy portion correct, but trying my best.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/16 04:50:14
Subject: Sample Mark II unit summary
|
 |
[MOD]
Madrak Ironhide
|
http://www.dakkadakka.com/wiki/en/Captain_Jeremiah_Kraye
Does anyone know if Iron Horse allows heavy warjacks to ride by attack without spending focus?
And can they buy additional attacks when they're done moving?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/05/16 04:50:37
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/16 05:16:35
Subject: Sample Mark II unit summary
|
 |
Storm Guard
|
I'm really digging these articles, man.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/16 13:20:37
Subject: Sample Mark II unit summary
|
 |
[MOD]
Madrak Ironhide
|
tinman_xl wrote:I'm really digging these articles, man.
Thanks.
Have some Nemo:
http://www.dakkadakka.com/wiki/en/Commander_Adept_Nemo
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/18 15:35:17
Subject: Sample Mark II unit summary
|
 |
[MOD]
Madrak Ironhide
|
Got up to the weaknesses part of eNemo.
http://www.dakkadakka.com/wiki/en/General_Adept_Nemo
These pdf cards from the field test make it really easy for me to mark up a text with
ideas before I edit. Wonderful stuff, really.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/18 15:59:38
Subject: Sample Mark II unit summary
|
 |
Widowmaker
|
malfred wrote:http://www.dakkadakka.com/wiki/en/Captain_Jeremiah_Kraye
Does anyone know if Iron Horse allows heavy warjacks to ride by attack without spending focus?
And can they buy additional attacks when they're done moving?
There's no rule that says heavy jacks have to spend focus to perform Ride By attacks. Iron Horse allows them to do something that they cannot normally do straight up.
Per the rules for Ride By attack, you don't get the second part of your movement until after you finish your combat action. So no additional attacks after the second Ride By movement.
|
DS:80S++G+++M----B--I--Pwmhd03/f#+D++A++++/sWD250R++T(S)DM+++
Elvis needs boats. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/18 16:39:29
Subject: Sample Mark II unit summary
|
 |
[MOD]
Madrak Ironhide
|
Thank you for that. It makes sense.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/18 17:31:05
Subject: Sample Mark II unit summary
|
 |
[MOD]
Madrak Ironhide
|
Formatting question:
Is it easier for you to read the spells with bullets or in a condensed summary?
Also, do you think the spells need its own section for the warcaster, or is it fine included in the mix?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/19 06:17:31
Subject: Sample Mark II unit summary
|
 |
Paingiver
|
I think the current format is fine as the spells are easy to find in the Special abilities section and the bullets make them readable. Hit the spell names with bold and it's close to perfect in my opinion.
Edit: So I think the format in eNemo is better than the format in pHaley, I hadn't looked at the newest format you had done before jumping to comment
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/05/19 10:45:03
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/19 16:45:05
Subject: Sample Mark II unit summary
|
 |
[MOD]
Madrak Ironhide
|
I've made a template. If you edit the template, you can cut and paste the code to use in
new articles. I'll probably just go in and edit.
Next article is probably Commander Stryker.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/20 13:30:06
Subject: Sample Mark II unit summary
|
 |
Paingiver
|
I did initial article on Siege.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/20 15:06:36
Subject: Sample Mark II unit summary
|
 |
[MOD]
Madrak Ironhide
|
Nice. Do you use Siege? I'm currently using the card printouts (a godsend!) from the
field test to scratch out notes on unit abilities. My coworkers keep thinking that I have a fancy
new rubric to play with. Automatically Appended Next Post: http://www.dakkadakka.com/wiki/en/Commander_Coleman_Stryker
One thing that I'm trying to do is standardize the name based on what's on the Field Test Card.
I think that's a good way to go about it... Automatically Appended Next Post: I've also added the Minimum Deviation table:
http://www.dakkadakka.com/wiki/en/Warmachine_Deviation_Table
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2009/05/20 17:48:46
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/21 06:32:30
Subject: Sample Mark II unit summary
|
 |
Paingiver
|
malfred wrote:Nice. Do you use Siege?
No yet, been trying to figure out him since Stryker is getting a bit old for me and Siege seemed to fit with the other models I've painted. So the article is based on how I've figured him out and the obvious synergies in my meta environment with Mk2.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/22 16:06:19
Subject: Sample Mark II unit summary
|
 |
[MOD]
Madrak Ironhide
|
Started with Lord Stryker.
http://www.dakkadakka.com/wiki/en/Lord_Commander_Stryker
At this rate, I'll be on to the warjacks by next week
|
|
|
 |
 |
|