| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/19 15:19:40
Subject: Another Hacking Question
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
When a hacker attempts to hack a HI, the rules state that the hacker will roll his WIP mod by the BTS of the target. I am unclear on this rule, due to the fact that some HIs have plus or negative BTS mods.
So for example a hacker with a WIP of 13 attempts to hack a HI with a BTS of -6 (Shang Ji Invinc) does the hacker convert this -6 to a positive to create a WIP roll of 19(13WIP Mod BTS -6 coverted to +6)
I understand when to use the BTS (when rolling for the effect of some sort of e/m ammo that ignores ARM).
I just don't understand how it effects the hacking attempt.
I hope I was clear for this post.
Thanks
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/19 15:29:39
Subject: Re:Another Hacking Question
|
 |
Sword-Bearing Inquisitorial Crusader
|
Treat it as you would any other negative modifier to a roll. A WIP 13 hacker would therefore need a 7 to hack a BTS -6 Shang Ji.
(Obviously, the intent isn't that -9 BTS TAGs are autohackable!)
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/19 20:18:26
Subject: Another Hacking Question
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
That's what I thought. But giving the hacker a -6 to the WIP roll, would not that penalize the hacker.
Due to the fact that the Shang Ji Invinc has a -6 to the BTS roll which illustrates the vulnerablity of the HI armor, would not the hacker have a better chance to succeed in the attempt.
thanks for the reply
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/19 20:38:13
Subject: Another Hacking Question
|
 |
Anti-Armour Swiss Guard
|
Shang-ji are NOT particularly vulnerable to hacking, is the point.
BTS is ONLY used as a positive modifier for BTS saves (against E/M, viral and certain other weapons). For hacking purposes it is ALWAYS used as a negative to the attacking hacker's Wip.
|
I'm OVER 50 (and so far over everyone's BS, too).
Old enough to know better, young enough to not give a ****.
That is not dead which can eternal lie ...
... and yet, with strange aeons, even death may die.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/19 21:58:54
Subject: Another Hacking Question
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Ok, I got it. Thanks for the reply.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/20 02:20:53
Subject: Another Hacking Question
|
 |
Sword-Bearing Inquisitorial Crusader
|
Infantry12 wrote:Due to the fact that the Shang Ji Invinc has a -6 to the BTS roll which illustrates the vulnerablity of the HI armor
No, that's represented by them being power armoured, and thus being hackable. A regular light infantry (or Ariadnan heavy infantry) is immune not because he has 0 BTS, but because his armour isn't powered.
A -6 BTS represents that the troop is actually quite resistant to hacking, more so anyway than the -3 that most power armour troops get.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|