Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Is it just me or do the bloodbound seem to have a lot more synergy? It seems to me that all of the chaos units buff eachother whereas the sigmarites really don't do that.

I like the aesthetics of both a lot but it seems the rules for the bloodbound might give them the edge.

What do you guys think?

They do have a lot of synergy. It's especially apparent with those Bloodreavers. They're nasty with the right characters but drop like flies on their own.

I don't think Bloodbound has an edge out of the box though. The Stormcast take a lot of hits to go down. I've found the Bloodwarriors are only slightly more powerful than the Liberators even. The box is pretty evenly matched. You especially don't want to put the Khorne lord against the Dracoth Lord Celestant. The reality-splitting axe is a hero/monster killer.