| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/09/07 13:54:02
Subject: Found this Tyranid Apocalypse Formation in an Old WD, A Viable Formation?
|
 |
Member of a Lodge? I Can't Say
|
Found this Formation in an Old WD, and it seems good, but i wanted to know what other thought of it and wether it would be good or not
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/09/07 15:27:34
Subject: Found this Tyranid Apocalypse Formation in an Old WD, A Viable Formation?
|
 |
Lethal Lhamean
Birmingham
|
Doesn't seem too bad of a formation. I guess a more modern version would swap the designated Trygon Alpha for a Trygon Prime. Doesn't fix that Trygons are overcosted but certainly gives them a nice boost.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/09/07 18:38:38
Subject: Found this Tyranid Apocalypse Formation in an Old WD, A Viable Formation?
|
 |
Rampaging Carnifex
|
The 4+ Invuln makes this quite useable I think. It's super costly, but is probably better than the majority of available Tyranid formations.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/09/07 20:23:16
Subject: Found this Tyranid Apocalypse Formation in an Old WD, A Viable Formation?
|
 |
Inquisitorial Keeper of the Xenobanks
|
I don't think you can use Apocalypse formations in the standard 40k.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/09/07 22:54:33
Subject: Found this Tyranid Apocalypse Formation in an Old WD, A Viable Formation?
|
 |
Member of a Lodge? I Can't Say
|
godardc wrote:I don't think you can use Apocalypse formations in the standard 40k.
No, its for Apocalypse
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/09/08 04:25:08
Subject: Found this Tyranid Apocalypse Formation in an Old WD, A Viable Formation?
|
 |
Bonkers Buggy Driver with Rockets
|
Seems passable. It turns some weak units into usable ones.
|
40k drinking game: take a shot everytime a book references Skitarii using transports.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/09/08 06:22:17
Subject: Re:Found this Tyranid Apocalypse Formation in an Old WD, A Viable Formation?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
That's the plastic trygon kit pictured in the formation, rather than the old resin forgeworld trygon. Which is interesting as the trygon prime bits and rules came out with that kit.
I guess they just didn't think of primes when coming up with the 'alpha trygon' idea.
The formation looks interesting. Although for the bio-electric tempest, you normally resolve your shooting one unit at a time. So does only the third trygon to fire at a target get the bonus? Or do you just declare before firing any of them that they will fire as a group, and resolve them all at the same time. That's how I'd play it, but I could see people arguing about it.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/09/08 08:12:22
Subject: Re:Found this Tyranid Apocalypse Formation in an Old WD, A Viable Formation?
|
 |
Member of a Lodge? I Can't Say
|
Arson Fire wrote:That's the plastic trygon kit pictured in the formation, rather than the old resin forgeworld trygon. Which is interesting as the trygon prime bits and rules came out with that kit.
I guess they just didn't think of primes when coming up with the 'alpha trygon' idea.
The formation looks interesting. Although for the bio-electric tempest, you normally resolve your shooting one unit at a time. So does only the third trygon to fire at a target get the bonus? Or do you just declare before firing any of them that they will fire as a group, and resolve them all at the same time. That's how I'd play it, but I could see people arguing about it.
I would resolve it as if all were shooting at the same time, and only if all were in range (and LoS)
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|