Poll |
 |
|
 |
Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/19 23:34:05
Subject: [V5] YMTC - Shrike's 'See, But Remain Unseen' special rule
|
 |
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
FOR THIS POLL, PLEASE ANSWER HOW YOU CHOOSE TO PLAY THE GAME, NOT NECESSARILY WHAT THE RULES AS WRITTEN (RAW) SAY.
Shrike's 'See But Remain Unseen' special rule says (SM codex, pg92):
"Shrike (and all models in his squad) benfit from the infiltrate special rule (see the Warhammer 40,000 rulebook)."
The 'Infiltrate' special rule (rulebook, pg75) says:
"Infiltrate*: Units with this special rule are deployed last, after all other units (friends and foe) have been deployed."
The 'Universal Special Rules' section (pgs 74-76) says:
"The special rules marked with an asterisk (*) are automatically lost by an Independent Character joining a unit that does not have the same special rule. These rules are also lost by a unit that is joined by an independent character that does not have the same special rule."
The Independent Characters Joining & Leaving Units: Special Rules (rulebook, pg48) says:
"When an independent character joins a unit, it might have different special rules from those of the unit. Unless specified otherwise in the rule itself (as in the 'stubborn' special rule), the unit's special rules are not conferred upon the character, and the character's special rules are not conferred upon the unit."
QUESTION: Can Shrike's 'See, But Remain Unseen' rule actually be used to infiltrate a friendly unit since (outside of going into Reserves) there are no rules allowing him to join a unit before deployment? And If so, can another IC join the unit and gain the infiltrate special rule?
OPTION A. I play that since (outside of going into Reserves) there are no rules allowing infiltrating ICs to join a unit before the game the only thing Shrike's special rule is good for is to allow him to join a unit in Reserves and give them the ability to outflank when they arrive. And yes, if another IC is also joined to the unit in reserve it can then outflank along with the rest of the unit.
OPTION B. The same as option 'A' except that I play that other ICs joining the unit wouldn't benefit from his special rule (and therefore cannot do so).
OPTION C. I play that, despite the fact that there are no rules written allowing it to happen, Shrike is allowed to join a unit before the game begins and then deploy this entire unit together using the 'infiltrate' special rule. And yes, another IC can be joined to the unit and infiltrate along with them.
OPTION D. The same as option 'C' except that I play that other ICs joining the unit wouldn't benefit from his special rule (and therefore cannot do so).
OPTION E. Something else entirely: reply exactly what it is below.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2008/12/19 23:47:27
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/19 23:44:32
Subject: [V5] YMTC - Shrike's 'See, But Remain Unseen' special rule
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
B and D are the same...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/19 23:47:49
Subject: [V5] YMTC - Shrike's 'See, But Remain Unseen' special rule
|
 |
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
frgsinwntr wrote:B and D are the same...
Whoops! Fixed that.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/20 00:04:41
Subject: [V5] YMTC - Shrike's 'See, But Remain Unseen' special rule
|
 |
Death-Dealing Dark Angels Devastator
Colorado
|
I think there is more to this one Yakface.
Command Squads appear as though they can be a retinue for Shrike.
Bottom-left paragraph, SM pg. 55
If this is the case, then Shrike would behave as an upgrade character for the Command Squad, and thus that entire squad WOULD have Infiltrate at the start of deployment, since pg. 48 BRB only applies to units and ICs interacting together. Without using a Command Squad as a retinue however, option B is the RAW answer.
BRB 48 wrote:Retinues
Some Codex books allow you to field characters
together with a special unit that they cannot leave
during the game (which is normally called a ‘retinue’,
‘bodyguard’ or similar). Where this is the case, the
character counts as an upgrade character until all of
the other members of this unit are killed, at which
point it starts counting as an independent character
and it will do so for the rest of the game.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2008/12/20 00:05:56
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/20 00:13:01
Subject: [V5] YMTC - Shrike's 'See, But Remain Unseen' special rule
|
 |
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Trekari wrote:I think there is more to this one Yakface.
Command Squads appear as though they can be a retinue for Shrike.
Bottom-left paragraph, SM pg. 55
If this is the case, then Shrike would behave as an upgrade character for the Command Squad, and thus that entire squad WOULD have Infiltrate at the start of deployment, since pg. 48 BRB only applies to units and ICs interacting together. Without using a Command Squad as a retinue however, option B is the RAW answer.
No. Command squads are not retinues as there is no rule stating that the character and the squad form a single unit. While they both are a single HQ choice, as pg 92 of the rulebook ("Mutliple Unit Choices") clearly states, multiple units that come from a single force org choice DOES NOT mean they form a single unit. This is similar to multiple IG units for a single Platoon taking up only one Troops force org choice.
A SM IC and command squad are entirely separate units.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2008/12/20 00:14:12
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/20 00:17:22
Subject: [V5] YMTC - Shrike's 'See, But Remain Unseen' special rule
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
My impression has been that they basically left deployment rules out of the 5th edition rule book. You have situtations like this and the "Can I deploy my tank into impassible terrain?" question because someone thought the rules would be obvious and left them out...
It just makes more sense to me that IC's should be able to join units and apply their special rules before being placed on the table.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/20 00:25:55
Subject: [V5] YMTC - Shrike's 'See, But Remain Unseen' special rule
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I voted D. The rules are obviously clear cut as to when an IC joins a unit and by RAW I'd agree that A is the correct option. This is one of those situations where I personally feel it's ludicrous to follow RAW concerning when the IC actually joins the unit.
As for other IC's being able to join and also share in this special rule, I just don't see it. I personally feel that IC's are on an equal tier and because of that they don't share special abilities with one another. I know there are lot's of people that will rage and roar at me for saying that, but it's a sensible judgement. I think it would be very cheesy to have multiple IC's joining one another to form some 'uber' special rule squad.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/20 00:46:51
Subject: [V5] YMTC - Shrike's 'See, But Remain Unseen' special rule
|
 |
Death-Dealing Dark Angels Devastator
Colorado
|
yakface wrote:Trekari wrote:I think there is more to this one Yakface.
Command Squads appear as though they can be a retinue for Shrike.
Bottom-left paragraph, SM pg. 55
If this is the case, then Shrike would behave as an upgrade character for the Command Squad, and thus that entire squad WOULD have Infiltrate at the start of deployment, since pg. 48 BRB only applies to units and ICs interacting together. Without using a Command Squad as a retinue however, option B is the RAW answer.
No. Command squads are not retinues as there is no rule stating that the character and the squad form a single unit. While they both are a single HQ choice, as pg 92 of the rulebook ("Mutliple Unit Choices") clearly states, multiple units that come from a single force org choice DOES NOT mean they form a single unit. This is similar to multiple IG units for a single Platoon taking up only one Troops force org choice.
A SM IC and command squad are entirely separate units.
The entry of Honor Guard and Command squad on pages 53 and 55 appear to conflict with your take given that they actually use the words "retinue."
Honor Guard 53 wrote:In battle, the Honor Guard commonly act as the Chapter Master's retinue.
Command Squad 55 wrote:Command squads accompany high-ranking Space Marine offiers on the field of battle.
...most Captains fill their retinues with
These fit the description of retinues per the BRB. Also, the rulebook itself contradicts pg. 92 with the very definition of retinue that I quoted. Beyond that, Honor Guards can only be purchased on a 1-to-1 ratio of Chapter Masters, and Command Squads can only be purchased 1-to-1 with Captains.
If Honor Guards can be retinues for Chapter Masters as their text indicates, and if Command Squads can be retinues for Captains as their text indicates, then Shrike's rule (and its wording) makes perfect sense.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/20 02:08:53
Subject: [V5] YMTC - Shrike's 'See, But Remain Unseen' special rule
|
 |
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
[quote=Trekari
The entry of Honor Guard and Command squad on pages 53 and 55 appear to conflict with your take given that they actually use the words "retinue."
Honor Guard 53 wrote:In battle, the Honor Guard commonly act as the Chapter Master's retinue.
Command Squad 55 wrote:Command squads accompany high-ranking Space Marine offiers on the field of battle.
...most Captains fill their retinues with
These fit the description of retinues per the BRB. Also, the rulebook itself contradicts pg. 92 with the very definition of retinue that I quoted. Beyond that, Honor Guards can only be purchased on a 1-to-1 ratio of Chapter Masters, and Command Squads can only be purchased 1-to-1 with Captains.
If Honor Guards can be retinues for Chapter Masters as their text indicates, and if Command Squads can be retinues for Captains as their text indicates, then Shrike's rule (and its wording) makes perfect sense.
The "retinue" rule on page 48 applies to any unit that the IC is part of for the whole game and cannot leave. Yes, this rule is called "retinues" but that doesn't mean that any unit referred to in their unit description as a retinue follows this rule.
The codex must actually say that the unit and the IC form a permanent unit, otherwise they are not "retinue" as defined on page 48, regardless of whether the unit's fluff describes them as a retinue.
All codexes published before the Eldar codex contain retinues. They have ICs and units that are explicitly explained as being a single unit for the entire game.
Starting with the Eldar, all codexes since have not had any retinues in that the typical "retinue" style units (command squads, ork nobs, warlocks, etc) are no longer described as being a single unit with their character.
I asked Jervis Johnson at Adepticon if this change was intentional (at the time only Eldar and Dark Angels didn't have retinues) and he said yes, moving forward they weren't going to be making codexes with characters 'stuck' with units anymore because it was additional rules that really didn't benefit the game. He said, if a character really wants to leave his bodyguard, he's going to do so.
Please, please, please don't muck up this poll thread trying to argue about command squads in the SM codex. If this is something you really want to argue about, start another thread.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2008/12/20 02:09:47
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/20 02:11:10
Subject: [V5] YMTC - Shrike's 'See, But Remain Unseen' special rule
|
 |
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus
|
Apparently when special rules refer to "his unit" it's not specific enough for you trekari, yet you let fluff paragraphs influence how you rule on command squads and honour guards?
look at other units with retinues...
Tyranid Hive Tyrant wrote:has the special rule "Retinue" which states 'The Hive Tyrant may take a retinue of Tyrant Guard, as listed on page 36'.
Tau Commander wrote:has the special rule "Bodyguard" which states 'The commander may be accompanied by a bodyguard, see the separate entry below. The commander and his bodyguard count as a single HQ choice'.
There's nothing in the Honour Guard or Command Squad RULES (Note: Not the fluff, the actual rules which tell you how to play the game) which imply they would be a retinue by any means.
|
Interceptor Drones can disembark at any point during the Sun Shark's move (even though models cannot normally disembark from Zooming Flyers).
-Jeremy Vetock, only man at Games Workshop who understands Zooming Flyers |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/20 05:39:44
Subject: [V5] YMTC - Shrike's 'See, But Remain Unseen' special rule
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
I vote D. Giving Infiltrate to a unit is useless unless you can join them before the game starts. I'd also allow Outflanking, of course.
It makes sense to me since the previous incarnation of Shrike could lead Shrike's Wing, a squad of elite marines able to use the same deployment options as he had.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/20 05:46:39
Subject: [V5] YMTC - Shrike's 'See, But Remain Unseen' special rule
|
 |
Death-Dealing Dark Angels Devastator
Colorado
|
Yakface -I was not trying to muck up the thread. I noticed something that MIGHT have been relevant to your poll, as well as make Shrike's rule easily understandable via RAW.
Drunkspleen - I asked a question. I am positive about my understanding regarding how special rules are shared or not shared. And they don't f-in allow WARGEAR to make that determination.
This was a question and comment about Shrike and retinues - leave it at that.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/20 05:51:58
Subject: [V5] YMTC - Shrike's 'See, But Remain Unseen' special rule
|
 |
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus
|
Admittedly the comment regarding the "his unit" was unnecessary, but the rest of the post is relevant, you aren't applying rules, because the things you cite aren't in the rules, they are in the fluff.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2008/12/20 05:52:53
Interceptor Drones can disembark at any point during the Sun Shark's move (even though models cannot normally disembark from Zooming Flyers).
-Jeremy Vetock, only man at Games Workshop who understands Zooming Flyers |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/20 16:59:21
Subject: [V5] YMTC - Shrike's 'See, But Remain Unseen' special rule
|
 |
Incorporating Wet-Blending
|
I voted D as well. It's the only way to make Shrike's rules work.
|
Mannahnin wrote:A lot of folks online (and in emails in other parts of life) use pretty mangled English. The idea is that it takes extra effort and time to write properly, and they’d rather save the time. If you can still be understood, what’s the harm? While most of the time a sloppy post CAN be understood, the use of proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling is generally seen as respectable and desirable on most forums. It demonstrates an effort made to be understood, and to make your post an easy and pleasant read. By making this effort, you can often elicit more positive responses from the community, and instantly mark yourself as someone worth talking to.
insaniak wrote: Every time someone threatens violence over the internet as a result of someone's hypothetical actions at the gaming table, the earth shakes infinitisemally in its orbit as millions of eyeballs behind millions of monitors all roll simultaneously.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/20 18:46:07
Subject: [V5] YMTC - Shrike's 'See, But Remain Unseen' special rule
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
I voted D.
But I disagree that there is no rule that says Shrike cannot join a unit out of Reserves. pg 48 top of the right column,
"Alternatively an IC may begin the game already with a unit, by being deployed in coherency with them."
I think that right there lets Shrike get to use Infiltrate with a unit, not just for outflank. Now this is a special rule under Shrike and Infiltrate has a * in the USR section of the rules, so any IC without Infiltrate that joins the unit ruins it for everyone.
Zero
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/20 19:37:39
Subject: [V5] YMTC - Shrike's 'See, But Remain Unseen' special rule
|
 |
Lead-Footed Trukkboy Driver
|
I went with D. Makes the most sense, for fluff and game balance.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/20 20:05:15
Subject: Re:[V5] YMTC - Shrike's 'See, But Remain Unseen' special rule
|
 |
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander
|
I voted D.
Its the only way for Shrike. Would be funny if you deploy a squad an shrike comes by and orders them to infiltrate.
Tactical moves like infiltrate will never "gather" the units on the battlefield to do so.
|
Target locked,ready to fire
In dedicatio imperatum ultra articulo mortis.
H.B.M.C :
We were wrong. It's not the 40k End Times. It's the Trademarkening.
|
|
 |
 |
|