Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/30 23:38:42
Subject: Can someone please confirm my monolith rule interpretation?
|
 |
Sinewy Scourge
|
The way I read it, the monolith is only damaged by natural strength +1d6 weapons, correct?
So a dreadnought would only be attacking at 6 + 1D6, not the normal 10+1d6 if it has a CCW?
Same with thunderhammers huitting at Strength 4 +1d6 instead of 8+1D6?
If this is true is the only weapon in the space marine codex that can get a penetrating hit on a monolith the lascannon?
|
Salamander Marines 65-12-13
Dark Eldar Wych Cult 4-1-0
Dark Eldar Kabal 36-10-4
2010 Indy GT Tournament Record: 11-6-3
Golden Ticket Winner with Dark Eldar
Timmah wrote:Best way to use lysander:
Set in your storage bin, pick up vulkan model, place in list. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/30 23:42:31
Subject: Can someone please confirm my monolith rule interpretation?
|
 |
Death-Dealing Dark Angels Devastator
Colorado
|
No.
You never roll 'extra' D6.
a Dreadnought CCW is still 10 +d6
a Thunderhammer is still 8 +d6
A Chainfist however, is 8 + 1d6, not 2d6.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/30 23:43:55
Subject: Re:Can someone please confirm my monolith rule interpretation?
|
 |
Deadshot Weapon Moderati
|
The monolith does not stop a model from receiving double strength from a weapon or from being monstrous. It just stops adl. dice from being used. Like melta or the like. This I believe appears in the FAQ.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/30 23:47:34
Subject: Can someone please confirm my monolith rule interpretation?
|
 |
Sinewy Scourge
|
Thanks! Forgot about the FAQS!
|
Salamander Marines 65-12-13
Dark Eldar Wych Cult 4-1-0
Dark Eldar Kabal 36-10-4
2010 Indy GT Tournament Record: 11-6-3
Golden Ticket Winner with Dark Eldar
Timmah wrote:Best way to use lysander:
Set in your storage bin, pick up vulkan model, place in list. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/30 23:49:39
Subject: Re:Can someone please confirm my monolith rule interpretation?
|
 |
Deadshot Weapon Moderati
|
No problem. I have been reminded by others to check them out from time to time. We all forget. Sometimes posting is just faster.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/31 00:49:58
Subject: Can someone please confirm my monolith rule interpretation?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Some more info.
AP1 weapons still get a +1 on the vehicle damage table.
Vin Assassin still get 3d6 but no rending. This 3d6 is the power of the shot. It's not 1d6 plus 2d6 for the shot.
|
1850 1850+ 1850+ 1850+ 1850+ 1850+ 1850+ 1850+ 1850+ 1850+ 1850+ 1850+ 1000 and counting |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/31 01:37:08
Subject: Can someone please confirm my monolith rule interpretation?
|
 |
Dominar
|
And honestly, even with FAQs living metal and We'll Be Back are still fething horrible rules to comprehend.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/31 01:40:33
Subject: Can someone please confirm my monolith rule interpretation?
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
Agreed. They're one of the main reasons I decided not to do Necrons when they first got a codex.
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/31 22:09:14
Subject: Can someone please confirm my monolith rule interpretation?
|
 |
The Hammer of Witches
A new day, a new time zone.
|
I've only found it difficult to comprehend only when various people on the internet got involved, tossing around incomplete or just plain incorrect paraphrases of the rules. In person, it's always been pretty easy to resolve with just a couple minutes pointing out the relevant rules and reading them over.
It's always amused me with how pfist-monolith threads would spiral out of control, when the first time it came up in person, we worked out the correct answer on our own in probably less than five minutes.
*edit* Of course, there is one sticky spot, what to do with multiple 'weapon destroyed' results and the gauss flayer, but that really lies more in the realm of the hypothetical than an actual in play problem.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2008/12/31 22:11:36
"-Nonsense, the Inquisitor and his retinue are our hounoured guests, of course we should invite them to celebrate Four-armed Emperor-day with us..." Thought for the Day - Never use the powerfist hand to wipe. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/31 22:58:41
Subject: Can someone please confirm my monolith rule interpretation?
|
 |
Dominar
|
And, you know, WBB and nearby units, WBB and morale tests, teleporting downed Necrons, moving models in relation to downed necrons....
Stupid rule that opens itself up to abuse.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/12/31 23:08:35
Subject: Can someone please confirm my monolith rule interpretation?
|
 |
Proud Phantom Titan
|
I've always played it as being 6 weapons ...
it can be destroyed 6 times on the 7th there's nothing left to destroy, so the monolith is Immobilised
... that said i've play some nectron players that clame since the power Matrix can't be destroyed by a weapon destroyed result you need to roll a wrecked or explodes result to kill it ... this can make the monloth unkillable with any thing not Str9 or above ... or a combination of Str8 AP1 and tank hunter...
however you wish to play it make sure you talk it over before the game starts
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/01/01 00:40:42
Subject: Can someone please confirm my monolith rule interpretation?
|
 |
The Hammer of Witches
A new day, a new time zone.
|
I would assume all the Necron players you've faced have claimed that the Power Matrix isn't affected by Weapon Destroyed, since that what the rules clearly say. As for Immobilized after 6 WD results, you'd have just as strong an argument for claiming it should be four, since that's the number of flayers it has.
It's never really been something that was needed clarifying before the game, because it either means you're oppenent is having a terrible run of luck, and thus is a rather rare occurence, or else their tactically inept, focusing a lot of attacks that would be much better suited insta-killing Necrons.
sourclams wrote:And, you know, WBB and nearby units, WBB and morale tests, teleporting downed Necrons, moving models in relation to downed necrons....
Stupid rule that opens itself up to abuse.
I really have no idea what you're talking about, nor does anything you mentioned seem to be any sort of issue. WBB is not a rule solely belonging to the Monolith. All it lets you do is teleport a squad, and any models in that squad failed their first WBB test that turn get to make a second one. So if the models were around at the start of the turn to make their regular WBB test, they're still around to take the second one.
|
"-Nonsense, the Inquisitor and his retinue are our hounoured guests, of course we should invite them to celebrate Four-armed Emperor-day with us..." Thought for the Day - Never use the powerfist hand to wipe. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/01/01 00:57:36
Subject: Can someone please confirm my monolith rule interpretation?
|
 |
Mutating Changebringer
|
Tri wrote:I've always played it as being 6 weapons ...
it can be destroyed 6 times on the 7th there's nothing left to destroy, so the monolith is Immobilised
... that said i've play some nectron players that clame since the power Matrix can't be destroyed by a weapon destroyed result you need to roll a wrecked or explodes result to kill it ... this can make the monloth unkillable with any thing not Str9 or above ... or a combination of Str8 AP1 and tank hunter...
however you wish to play it make sure you talk it over before the game starts
Actually, that's RAW as is noted in the INAT FAQ, since the monolith will never be subject to the rule for "Damaged - Weapons Destroyed" and "Damaged - Immobilised(sic)": "A vehicle that suffers either Damaged result when it has no weapons left and is already immobilised(sic) treats the result as "Destroyed - Wrecked" instead."
Since the power matrix provides a weapon that can never be destroyed, the monolith will never have "no weapons left", ergo it can never be destroyed by plain S8 weapons, no matter how many glances it receives.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/01/01 01:04:15
Subject: Can someone please confirm my monolith rule interpretation?
|
 |
Blackclad Wayfarer
From England. Living in Shanghai
|
unless its ap1...+1 on the damage chart
|
Looking for games in Shanghai? Send a PM |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/01/01 02:54:06
Subject: Can someone please confirm my monolith rule interpretation?
|
 |
Proud Phantom Titan
|
would be nice to play it as 4 but it removes one shot from a D6 so 6 (and then not counting as having any weapons) sounds better IMHO, its just a house rule since no one wants to play against a force that can't die ... RAW fine for most things but there are times when RAI is the way to play ... which is why i say talk it over, end of the day you want to play a fun game
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/01/01 03:01:55
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/01/01 04:14:37
Subject: Can someone please confirm my monolith rule interpretation?
|
 |
Mutating Changebringer
|
Lukus83 wrote:unless its ap1...+1 on the damage chart
Yes, that would be why I stated "plain S8 weapons"...
Tri wrote:would be nice to play it as 4 but it removes one shot from a D6 so 6 (and then not counting as having any weapons) sounds better IMHO, its just a house rule since no one wants to play against a force that can't die ... RAW fine for most things but there are times when RAI is the way to play ... which is why i say talk it over, end of the day you want to play a fun game
Odd, just out of curiosity, what makes you believe that the RAI is in this case any different from the RAW? In the background the monolith is consistently portrayed as an unstoppable engine of destruction, and the rules clearly are intended to make it the most difficult vehicle to destroy in 40k. What makes you think the designers didn't want it to be impossible to glance to death?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/01/01 13:33:26
Subject: Can someone please confirm my monolith rule interpretation?
|
 |
Proud Phantom Titan
|
easy in 4th you could kill a monolith on a glancing hit
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/01/04 18:33:48
Subject: Can someone please confirm my monolith rule interpretation?
|
 |
Sneaky Lictor
|
And they fixed it in 5e allowing the Monolith to scoff at glancing hits  ...at the cost of Warriors dropping like flies in CC.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|