| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2010/11/08 22:01:13
Subject: Rune of Determination
|
|
Dakka Veteran
|
One use only. Multiples of this rune have no further effect. The unit may take a Break test on a single d6 rather than 2d6.
does "multiples of this rune have no further effect" mean that:
1) Each unit may only have or use one of these.
2) Only one rune may be used per break test.
Every other rune with this rule either gives a permanent but conditional effect (may re-roll scatter die when firing grudgethrower, +1 to armor save, immune to fear and terror) or is a type of effect that can only ever happen once in a game (i.e. bearer may deploy with a unit of scouts as though he had the rule, bearer has a 2+ ward against the first wound suffered and not saved by armor). This is the only one as far as I can see that the player has the option to choose when to expend, and then it can never be used again.
Thoughts?
|
Manchu wrote:It's a lie, K_K, pure Imperial propaganda. Where's the Talon of Horus, huh? Plus everyone knows the Imperium planned and carried out the invasion of Cadia itself. Bin Abaddon was just a convenient scapegoat.
|
|
|
 |
|
2010/11/08 23:18:23
Subject: Rune of Determination
|
|
Auspicious Aspiring Champion of Chaos
|
By the most literal interpretation, I would have to say each unit may only have/use one, with a possible loophole if there's one on the unit, one on the BSB- but even that's not a sure thing.
RZ
|
“It was in lands of the Chi-An where she finally ran him to ground. There she kissed him deeply as he lay dying, and so stole from him his last, agonized breath.
On a delicate chain at her throat, she keeps it with her to this day.”
|
|
|
|
|
2010/11/09 03:22:10
Subject: Rune of Determination
|
|
Dakka Veteran
|
I was going to ask about the BSB thing.
I'm normally an empire player, but I'm dusting off the dwarfs for a tournament in a couple of weeks. As it turns out, I can't afford the rune anyway, so my ironbreakers will have to do without it.
Remind me why they aren't a2 again?
Thanks!
|
Manchu wrote:It's a lie, K_K, pure Imperial propaganda. Where's the Talon of Horus, huh? Plus everyone knows the Imperium planned and carried out the invasion of Cadia itself. Bin Abaddon was just a convenient scapegoat.
|
|
|
|
|
2010/11/09 04:55:56
Subject: Rune of Determination
|
|
Auspicious Aspiring Champion of Chaos
|
Malleus wrote:
Remind me why they aren't a2 again?
Boy do I wish I had an answer for that. It doesn't do to compare them to Chaos warriors, that's for sure...
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/11/09 04:56:27
“It was in lands of the Chi-An where she finally ran him to ground. There she kissed him deeply as he lay dying, and so stole from him his last, agonized breath.
On a delicate chain at her throat, she keeps it with her to this day.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
