| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/18 18:55:31
Subject: Which is a better army? 90% Nurgle, or 90% Khorne?
|
 |
Cold-Blooded Saurus Warrior
|
I probably want flamers and wizard herald of Tzeench.... but aside from that which is better?
|
Check out my Channel
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheWarhammerFatKids
The Restrictions I Put On My Tallarn Lists:
- Missile Launchers are the only HW teams allowed in Infantry Squads.
- All units able to take the FW Desert Raider special rule, must take it in lists of 750 points or more.
- 1 unit of 10 Rough Riders is required for lists of 1000 points or more.
- 2 units of Mukaali Rough Riders are required for lists of 1000 points or more.
- No vehicles besides Chimera Armoured Transports and Hydra Flak Tank Batteries are allowed.
- Al'Rahem is required in lists of 1000 points or more. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/18 21:23:42
Subject: Re:Which is a better army? 90% Nurgle, or 90% Khorne?
|
 |
Evasive Pleasureseeker
Lost in a blizzard, somewhere near Toronto
|
Nurgle is now paying pts for abilities it can't use all that well. Sure Plaguebearers led by Heralds are still decent and all, but they've lost alot of their resiliance by not being able to make use of their regen + ward anymore. (and have no way to at least gain a better ward save vs burniness like every other regen'ing character!)
Khorne's big drawback is being one-dimensional and lacking magical punch. Basically it's all about running forwards and hitting stuff, as angrily as you can!
VC's on the other hand are shiny & new, and have been given a number of viable builds to toy about with - everything from super punchy to highly magical to anything inbetween!
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/19 01:11:47
Subject: Re:Which is a better army? 90% Nurgle, or 90% Khorne?
|
 |
Hooded Inquisitorial Interrogator
|
Experiment 626 wrote:VC's on the other hand are shiny & new, and have been given a number of viable builds to toy about with - everything from super punchy to highly magical to anything inbetween! 
lol?
I would say Khorne for effectiveness for, well, the exact reasons that are stated above. All Khorne truly lacks is magic, and you are going to add Tzeentch wizards and Flamers. Ta da. I WISH Nurgle was more effective, but I guess that's just what the change to Regen has done. Oh well...
|
Oppressor wrote:You're asking the wrong question.
The correct question is, would I be enjoying this hobby if I did this?
The correct audience is you. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/19 04:41:02
Subject: Which is a better army? 90% Nurgle, or 90% Khorne?
|
 |
Inspiring Icon Bearer
|
Personally I like a mix. at 2250. I run a Blood thirster, 30 bloodletters with herald, 25 daemonettes with herald, 20 horrors with 2 heralds(Life is bsb, Light can leave unit and fly to get big aura spells where needed) and finally 2 fiends, for assassination, charge deniers.
|
3000
4000 Deamons - Mainly a fantasy army now.
Tomb Kings-2500 Escalation League for 2012
href="http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/311987.page ">Painting and Modeling Blog
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/19 12:44:01
Subject: Which is a better army? 90% Nurgle, or 90% Khorne?
|
 |
Manhunter
|
Neither. Go 100% Slanneshi. Whats better then Sex and Drugs and Ronk n Roll? Answer. More sex and drugs and rock n roll.
Jokes aside. I think Khorne is better. Just add some Tnzeech for magic.
|
Proud to be Obliviously Blue since 2011!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/19 18:21:34
Subject: Which is a better army? 90% Nurgle, or 90% Khorne?
|
 |
Omnipotent Lord of Change
|
Acardia wrote:Personally I like a mix.
A mix ... that includes nothing from Nurgle  Though the only green guys I see at this point are the GUO and nurglings, both of which do pretty beastly things that the rest of the factions don't really do better for a change. Also, they look awesome
flamingwalnut wrote:Experiment 626 wrote:VC's on the other hand are shiny & new, and have been given a number of viable builds to toy about with - everything from super punchy to highly magical to anything inbetween! 
lol?
I actually think it's a valid answer. Daemon armies are boring, mindmeltingly similar to each other and universally reviled. The new VC are hopefully none of these things (any longer  )
- Salvage
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/19 18:30:03
Subject: Which is a better army? 90% Nurgle, or 90% Khorne?
|
 |
Shepherd
|
I think the new vc army is entertaining with a few lists worth having that are all unique but some may get reviled til people get used to them. You know the old adage"it's new so it's scares me!"
|
The enemy of my enemy is a bastard so lets kill him too.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|