Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/06/10 15:27:10
Subject: Doom scythe night scythe weapon mount question
|
 |
Wicked Canoptek Wraith
|
Hi,
Just trying to get people's opinion on whether the weapons on the Necron Scythes are hull mounted or turret mounted. There is nothing in the rules mentioning a turret mount, but I'm pretty sure even Leman Russ rules don't specify the battle cannon is turret mounted. The Fluff on page 51 of the Necron codex does state "With it's turret mounted tesla destructor, and the nerve shredding shriek of its engines, the night scythe is a formidable fighter craft in its own right."
On the actual model, the tesla destructors are fixed to the hull by two large plastic lugs but this appears to just be a model design consideration as the destructors are far to big to be held by just the mounts that connect them to the death ray or portal. The main weapon is connect by a ball joint and it appears to be able to at least the limits of the two power cables contacting up to the hull.
So what's your opinion? Is the whole thing a turret with 360 degree rotation, a limited arc turret or a 45 degree hull mounted weapon?
I'll add pics in a sec.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/06/10 15:42:01
Flashman
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/06/10 16:09:20
Subject: Doom scythe night scythe weapon mount question
|
 |
Lord of the Fleet
|
Fluff =/= rules. It looks hull-mounted to me.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/06/10 18:53:48
Subject: Doom scythe night scythe weapon mount question
|
 |
Wicked Canoptek Wraith
|
Looking closely at it again it does appear the destructors are fixed, but the death ray still appears to have a limited traverse.
|
Flashman
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/06/10 19:01:37
Subject: Doom scythe night scythe weapon mount question
|
 |
Shas'o Commanding the Hunter Kadre
|
Look hull on the destructors for sure. As for the ray it doesn't matter much since it's a ranged line weapon.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/06/10 20:32:45
Subject: Doom scythe night scythe weapon mount question
|
 |
Death-Dealing Ultramarine Devastator
|
Have one my self and when I played a game with it I used a 90 degree fire arc for placing the starting point of the line but then fron the way the rules are written it could go anyway.
|
DarknessEternal wrote:Christianity; Jesus may have had some ideas, but Paul made it popular. Omegus wrote:It's hard to fight a guy when your nipples are daemons. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/06/11 13:34:09
Subject: Doom scythe night scythe weapon mount question
|
 |
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus
|
Even if the fluff says they are turret mounted, I would think the "unless the design of the model prevents this" caveat would kick in to limit the firing arcs of the Tesla weapons, of course, I have no idea what the result would be, since the design of the model allows for 0 degrees of lateral movement it seems, I'd think the safest thing is to go for a 45 degree arc a-la a Hull Mounted weapon
|
Interceptor Drones can disembark at any point during the Sun Shark's move (even though models cannot normally disembark from Zooming Flyers).
-Jeremy Vetock, only man at Games Workshop who understands Zooming Flyers |
|
 |
 |
|