Switch Theme:

Passangers can't assault from destroyed/exploded vehicle.  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in pl
Screaming Shining Spear




NeoGliwice III

Just to be sure, I have some questions.
First of all a couple of short cuts to the rules:
A]
p79. Disembarking restrictions
"[..] cannot declare a charge in their subsequent Assault phase".
B]
p.80 And Damage effect on passengers.
Wrecked
"The passengers [...] disembark..."
Explodes
"placed"; No mention of disembarking.
C]
Another rule that was in FAQ (but the BRB FAQ went away) that stated that, if vehicle is gone, all the benefits to passengers are gone.
D]
p.33 Assault Vehicle
"Passengers disembarking [...] can charge in the turn they do so, even when the vehicle was destroyed"
E]
p.9 The turn
"Whenever a rule refers to 'a turn' it always means 'player turn' unless it specifically refers to a 'game turn'.

So, let's have a situation:
My enemy has Land Raider full of Khorne Berzerkers. In my turn I move my Fire Dragons and melt Land Rider away. A couple of questions:
1) First of all, does rule C] exist anywhere RAW? I don't remember this one in 6th BRB. If not, does it still apply?
2) If I wreck LR, can Berks assault my Fire Dragons or can I ride safely into the sunset in the nearby Serpent.
2b) What if LR is a Rhino.....
3) If I make LR explode, can Berks assault my Fire Dragons or can I ride safely into the sunset in the nearby Serpent.
3b) What if LR is a Rhino.....

EDIT:
Added Assault vehicle.
EDIT 2:
Added Turn.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2012/07/05 20:31:39


Good things are good,.. so it's good
Keep our city clean.
Report your death to the Department of Expiration
 
   
Made in tr
Willing Inquisitorial Excruciator





these are really good questions.

Weyland-Yutani
Building Better Terrains

https://www.weyland-yutani-inc.com/

https://www.facebook.com/weylandyutaniinc/

 Grey Templar wrote:
The Riptide can't be a giant death robot, its completely lacking a sword or massive chainsaw. All giant death robots have swords or massive chainsaws.
 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





Macok wrote:
1) First of all, does rule C] exist anywhere RAW? I don't remember this one in 6th BRB. If not, does it still apply?
2) If I wreck LR, can Berks assault my Fire Dragons or can I ride safely into the sunset in the nearby Serpent.
2b) What if LR is a Rhino.....
3) If I make LR explode, can Berks assault my Fire Dragons or can I ride safely into the sunset in the nearby Serpent.
3b) What if LR is a Rhino.....

1. This wasn't so much a rule as clarification. You don't benefit from things that don't exist. It's that simple.
2. Wreck is disembarking, no. There's no longer a Land Raider around to let you benefit from Assault Vehicle.
3. Wreck is disembarking, no.
3. Explodes is not disembarking, yes.
4. Explodes is not disembarking, yes.

"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."

This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.


Freelance Ontologist

When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. 
   
Made in ca
Implacable Black Templar Initiate




Ontario

Time to drive backwards at my enemy!

"In space, nobody can hear you scream unless it's a battle cry for the Emperor!"
 
   
Made in fi
Dakka Veteran




Funnily enough, rulebook is contradictory on what to do with passengers from exploding vehicles.
Page 80 says they're placed where vehicle used to be, page 426 says that they must disembark and are limited to 3" move.

1) It was not a rule per se, but FAQ answer. It probably still exists as Assault Vehicle USR specifically says that it works even on the player turn that vehicle was destroyed.

2) No, as it's their subsequent assault phase they cannot declare charge and assault Vehicle USR only benefits them during your turn in this case.
2b) Same as 2

3) Now, this depends on which is correct, page 80 or page 426. If page 80 is correct, they can assault you as they technically didn't disembark. If page 426, answer is same as 2)
3b) Same as 3
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




Wait, if you blow it up on your turn, on their turn they should be able to assault you...

I don't have a BRB in front of me, but I'm pretty sure If I disembark on MY turn I can't assault you in my subsequent assault phase.

But if you blow up a vehicle and I disembark on your turn, assuming i'm not pinned or anything, i'm going to move, shoot and assault like normal.

Is this the question we're answering?
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





Luide wrote:
Page 80 says they're placed where vehicle used to be, page 426 says that they must disembark and are limited to 3" move.

I know it won't necessarily convince anyone, and it's not official, but in the gaming world, rules usually take precedence over summaries.

Pg 80 has the rule, pg 426 is a summary.

But like I said, this may convince no one.

"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."

This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.


Freelance Ontologist

When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. 
   
Made in us
Daring Dark Eldar Raider Rider




The BRB does say open top vehicles the guys can still assault even if it was destroyed that turn. I'm guess that non open topped wouldn't get to assault.



www.gametableadventures.com 
   
Made in us
Captain of the Forlorn Hope





Chicago, IL

DarknessEternal wrote:1. This wasn't so much a rule as clarification. You don't benefit from things that don't exist. It's that simple.

That is false.

Page 33: Assault Vehicle rule says they can charge on the turn their vehicle was destroyed.

"Did you notice a sign out in front of my chapel that said "Land Raider Storage"?" -High Chaplain Astorath the Grim Redeemer of the Lost.

I sold my soul to the devil and now the bastard is demanding a refund!

We do not have an attorney-client relationship. I am not your lawyer. The statements I make do not constitute legal advice. Any statements made by me are based upon the limited facts you have presented, and under the premise that you will consult with a local attorney. This is not an attempt to solicit business. This disclaimer is in addition to any disclaimers that this website has made.
 
   
Made in gb
Agile Revenant Titan




In the Casualty section of a Blood Bowl dugout

jcress410 wrote:Wait, if you blow it up on your turn, on their turn they should be able to assault you...

I don't have a BRB in front of me, but I'm pretty sure If I disembark on MY turn I can't assault you in my subsequent assault phase.

But if you blow up a vehicle and I disembark on your turn, assuming i'm not pinned or anything, i'm going to move, shoot and assault like normal.

Is this the question we're answering?

I'm with jcress. I'm quite confused.

So, we're all wondering that if Player X blows up Player Y's Vehicle with stuff in it, can that stuff assault in the next assault phase? Hmm, well... Hang on a minute, they can't anyway, because it's Player X's turn. And the stuff being unable to act in Player Y's next turn doesn't seem right, so I can't see the problem.

I'm missing something, aren't I?

DT:90S+++G++MB++IPwhfb06#+++D+A+++/eWD309R+T(T)DM+

9th Age Fantasy Rules

 
   
Made in us
Dark Angels Librarian with Book of Secrets






Assault Vehicle specifically states you may assault from the vehicle, even if it was destroyed.
   
Made in tr
Willing Inquisitorial Excruciator





The Shadow wrote:
jcress410 wrote:Wait, if you blow it up on your turn, on their turn they should be able to assault you...

I don't have a BRB in front of me, but I'm pretty sure If I disembark on MY turn I can't assault you in my subsequent assault phase.

But if you blow up a vehicle and I disembark on your turn, assuming i'm not pinned or anything, i'm going to move, shoot and assault like normal.

Is this the question we're answering?

I'm with jcress. I'm quite confused.

So, we're all wondering that if Player X blows up Player Y's Vehicle with stuff in it, can that stuff assault in the next assault phase? Hmm, well... Hang on a minute, they can't anyway, because it's Player X's turn. And the stuff being unable to act in Player Y's next turn doesn't seem right, so I can't see the problem.

I'm missing something, aren't I?


The problem here is Player Y wouldn't be able to assault if his vehicle was wrecked. But when the transport explodes it seems like they can. (so as wereat says : time to drive bavkwards to enemy!!)

Weyland-Yutani
Building Better Terrains

https://www.weyland-yutani-inc.com/

https://www.facebook.com/weylandyutaniinc/

 Grey Templar wrote:
The Riptide can't be a giant death robot, its completely lacking a sword or massive chainsaw. All giant death robots have swords or massive chainsaws.
 
   
Made in fi
Dakka Veteran




jcress410 wrote:Wait, if you blow it up on your turn, on their turn they should be able to assault you...

They aren't though.
jcress410 wrote:
I don't have a BRB in front of me, but I'm pretty sure If I disembark on MY turn I can't assault you in my subsequent assault phase.
But if you blow up a vehicle and I disembark on your turn, assuming i'm not pinned or anything, i'm going to move, shoot and assault like normal.

Here you're wrong. The restrictions from disembarking apply to the units subsequent Shooting and Assault phase. So if I'm player A and my opponent is player B and I wreck my opponents LR with berzerkers inside in Turn 2 A, he cannot declare assault on me during Turn 2 B as it is the berzerkers subsequent assault phase.
If the rule lacked "their" you'd be right though.
jcress410 wrote:
Is this the question we're answering?

Partially. You're missing the wrecked vs exploded distinction (disembark vs placed).
   
Made in pl
Screaming Shining Spear




NeoGliwice III

SoloFalcon1138 wrote:Assault Vehicle specifically states you may assault from the vehicle, even if it was destroyed.

Yes, but it also states that it's on the turn it was destroyed. I will add this to the OP.

Good things are good,.. so it's good
Keep our city clean.
Report your death to the Department of Expiration
 
   
Made in us
Veteran Wolf Guard Squad Leader





Massachusetts

Macok wrote:
SoloFalcon1138 wrote:Assault Vehicle specifically states you may assault from the vehicle, even if it was destroyed.

Yes, but it also states that it's on the turn it was destroyed. I will add this to the OP.


Yes...but one turn includes both players turn. Example...It's turn 1, Player A goes then Player B goes. Now it's turn 2.

If you guys are going to abuse the wording "their subsequent assault phase", then I'm going to abuse the wording of Turn.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/07/05 20:27:58


2500 pts

Horst wrote:This is how trolling happens. A few cheeky posts are made. Then they get more insulting. Eventually, we revert to our primal animal state, hurling feces at each other while shreeking with glee.



 
   
Made in us
Nihilistic Necron Lord




The best State-Texas

DeathReaper wrote:
DarknessEternal wrote:1. This wasn't so much a rule as clarification. You don't benefit from things that don't exist. It's that simple.

That is false.

Page 33: Assault Vehicle rule says they can charge on the turn their vehicle was destroyed.


Right, but it was wrecked in MY turn, not yours.

4000+
6000+ Order. Unity. Obedience.
Thousand Sons 4000+
:Necron: Necron Discord: https://discord.com/invite/AGtpeD4  
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




I might just not play until all of this kind of stuff gets FAQ'd.

If RAW a unit can't assault in the top of turn 2 because its transport blew up in the bottom of the turn...

That's a crazy advantage for going first, really nerfs every ork army I'd want to play...

   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





Grugknuckle wrote:
Yes...but one turn includes both players turn. Example...It's turn 1, Player A goes then Player B goes. Now it's turn 2.

"Turn" always means "player turn" and not "game turn" unless specified. The rules tell us this.

"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."

This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.


Freelance Ontologist

When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. 
   
Made in us
Veteran Wolf Guard Squad Leader





Massachusetts

Again..it says, "on THE turn their vehicle was destroyed" not on the player turn that the vehicle was destroyed.

In each turn both players get a player turn. So say it's turn 1 and you go first and wreck my Land Raider during your shooting phase. I can still assault on my turn because it is still Turn 1 - the same turn my land raider was destroyed.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
DarknessEternal wrote:
Grugknuckle wrote:
Yes...but one turn includes both players turn. Example...It's turn 1, Player A goes then Player B goes. Now it's turn 2.

"Turn" always means "player turn" and not "game turn" unless specified. The rules tell us this.


page #?

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/07/05 20:33:00


2500 pts

Horst wrote:This is how trolling happens. A few cheeky posts are made. Then they get more insulting. Eventually, we revert to our primal animal state, hurling feces at each other while shreeking with glee.



 
   
Made in pl
Screaming Shining Spear




NeoGliwice III

Grugknuckle wrote:Again..it says, "on THE turn their vehicle was destroyed" not on the player turn that the vehicle was destroyed.

In each turn both players get a player turn. So say it's turn 1 and you go first and wreck my Land Raider during your shooting phase. I can still assault on my turn because it is still Turn 1 - the same turn my land raider was destroyed.

Darkness is correct. I updated OP.

Good things are good,.. so it's good
Keep our city clean.
Report your death to the Department of Expiration
 
   
Made in us
Blood Angel Terminator with Lightning Claws



Sioux Falls, SD

Grugknuckle wrote:
Macok wrote:
SoloFalcon1138 wrote:Assault Vehicle specifically states you may assault from the vehicle, even if it was destroyed.

Yes, but it also states that it's on the turn it was destroyed. I will add this to the OP.


Yes...but one turn includes both players turn. Example...It's turn 1, Player A goes then Player B goes. Now it's turn 2.

If you guys are going to abuse the wording "their subsequent assault phase", then I'm going to abuse the wording of Turn.


Unless they changed it and I missed it any reference to turn is player turn not game turn unless stated otherwise.

Blood for the bloo... wait no, I meant for Sanguinius!  
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




Grugknuckle wrote:
Macok wrote:
SoloFalcon1138 wrote:Assault Vehicle specifically states you may assault from the vehicle, even if it was destroyed.

Yes, but it also states that it's on the turn it was destroyed. I will add this to the OP.


Yes...but one turn includes both players turn. Example...It's turn 1, Player A goes then Player B goes. Now it's turn 2.

If you guys are going to abuse the wording "their subsequent assault phase", then I'm going to abuse the wording of Turn.


Except there is a part in the BRB (don't have it on me right now) which specifically says turn means player turn unless it specifically says game turn
   
Made in us
Veteran Wolf Guard Squad Leader





Massachusetts

Someone give me a page number. I need to look that up.


2500 pts

Horst wrote:This is how trolling happens. A few cheeky posts are made. Then they get more insulting. Eventually, we revert to our primal animal state, hurling feces at each other while shreeking with glee.



 
   
Made in us
Nihilistic Necron Lord




The best State-Texas

Grugknuckle wrote:Again..it says, "on THE turn their vehicle was destroyed" not on the player turn that the vehicle was destroyed.

In each turn both players get a player turn. So say it's turn 1 and you go first and wreck my Land Raider during your shooting phase. I can still assault on my turn because it is still Turn 1 - the same turn my land raider was destroyed.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
DarknessEternal wrote:
Grugknuckle wrote:
Yes...but one turn includes both players turn. Example...It's turn 1, Player A goes then Player B goes. Now it's turn 2.

"Turn" always means "player turn" and not "game turn" unless specified. The rules tell us this.


page #?


Page 9.

Is it really that hard to use an index.....

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/07/05 20:37:34


4000+
6000+ Order. Unity. Obedience.
Thousand Sons 4000+
:Necron: Necron Discord: https://discord.com/invite/AGtpeD4  
   
Made in us
Captain of the Forlorn Hope





Chicago, IL

Whenever a rule refers to 'a turn' it always means' player turn' unless it specifically refers to a 'game turn'.

Page 9

This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2012/07/05 20:41:37


"Did you notice a sign out in front of my chapel that said "Land Raider Storage"?" -High Chaplain Astorath the Grim Redeemer of the Lost.

I sold my soul to the devil and now the bastard is demanding a refund!

We do not have an attorney-client relationship. I am not your lawyer. The statements I make do not constitute legal advice. Any statements made by me are based upon the limited facts you have presented, and under the premise that you will consult with a local attorney. This is not an attempt to solicit business. This disclaimer is in addition to any disclaimers that this website has made.
 
   
Made in us
Veteran Wolf Guard Squad Leader





Massachusetts

Gah....

Is this different from 5th ed?

2500 pts

Horst wrote:This is how trolling happens. A few cheeky posts are made. Then they get more insulting. Eventually, we revert to our primal animal state, hurling feces at each other while shreeking with glee.



 
   
Made in pl
Screaming Shining Spear




NeoGliwice III

I quoted the turn rule like 10 minutes ago.
I'm sorry Grugknuckle, but you are incorrect on this matter. Can we move on..?
EDIT:
No, it's the same.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/07/05 20:41:24


Good things are good,.. so it's good
Keep our city clean.
Report your death to the Department of Expiration
 
   
Made in us
Nihilistic Necron Lord




The best State-Texas

Grugknuckle wrote:Gah....

Is this different from 5th ed?


No, 5th had the same rule.

4000+
6000+ Order. Unity. Obedience.
Thousand Sons 4000+
:Necron: Necron Discord: https://discord.com/invite/AGtpeD4  
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




This really seems like a pretty glaring oversight. Doesn't the first game or two of playtesting expose glitches like these?

Why do we have to wait for a faq before the rules are complete?
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





jcress410 wrote:This really seems like a pretty glaring oversight. Doesn't the first game or two of playtesting expose glitches like these?

Why do we have to wait for a faq before the rules are complete?

There's no glitch, everything in his question is defined in the ruleset. (but ignore my first post, I was wrong about the Assault Vehicle non-existence thing)

"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."

This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.


Freelance Ontologist

When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: