Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/04 14:58:11
Subject: Majority WS and toughness in challenges?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Hey all, a search didn't answer my question. So here we go.
There is no rule stating that, when fighting challenges you respect the models true weapon skill and true toughness. Their seems to be only one section talking about determining to hit values and to wound values, and in both cases they make no mention of anything but unit-wide.
In the challenge section, the only passage I could find was that the models in a challenge are treated as being in base to base with only each other, this would not invalidate majority WS and toughness...
Is this an oversight? Working as intended?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/04 15:24:08
Subject: Re:Majority WS and toughness in challenges?
|
 |
The Conquerer
Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios
|
Hmmm, it would appear to be an oversight. They seem to have copy-pasted it directly over from Fantesy and forgotten that Fantesy doesn't use majority toughness or WS.
|
Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines
Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.
MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/04 15:43:12
Subject: Majority WS and toughness in challenges?
|
 |
Shas'o Commanding the Hunter Kadre
|
Since the challenge is treated as a completely separate melee, it's working as intended. You still check between the two models.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/04 15:49:32
Subject: Re:Majority WS and toughness in challenges?
|
 |
The Conquerer
Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios
|
But it doesn't say that. It just says they are only in BtB with each other.
|
Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines
Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.
MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/04 15:54:20
Subject: Majority WS and toughness in challenges?
|
 |
Steadfast Grey Hunter
|
You can only allocate to the model you're in the challenge with, though. You can't use the weapon skill/toughness of a unit you can't allocate to to determine what you need to roll.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/04 15:56:54
Subject: Re:Majority WS and toughness in challenges?
|
 |
The Conquerer
Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios
|
Again, the challange rules don't override the overarching rule that units use majority T and WS in combat. The only thing the challange rules say is that LoS can't be taken and the 2 models can only attack each other(which means wounds go on each other)
|
Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines
Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.
MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/04 18:22:03
Subject: Majority WS and toughness in challenges?
|
 |
Resolute Ultramarine Honor Guard
|
Use model T and WS. It's not RAW, but it's RAI (I hope), it's how GTs have ruled it, it's how the GW Midwest Battle Bunker TO has ruled it, and rumors are the FAQ coming out this month says that too.
Pure RAW, seems to say nothing concrete, but depending on how you read 429 in the BRB, it can go either way.
|
DO:70S++G++M+B++I+Pw40k93/f#++D++++A++++/eWD-R++++T(D)DM+
Note: Records since 2010, lists kept current (W-D-L) Blue DP Crusade 126-11-6 Biel-Tan Aspect Waves 2-0-2 Looted Green Horde smash your face in 32-7-8 Broadside/Shield Drone/Kroot blitz goodness 23-3-4 Grey Hunters galore 17-5-5 Khan Bikes Win 63-1-1 Tanith with Pardus Armor 11-0-0 Crimson Tide 59-4-0 Green/Raven/Deathwing 18-0-0 Jumping GK force with Inq. 4-0-0 BTemplars w LRs 7-1-2 IH Legion with Automata 8-0-0 RG Legion w Adepticon medal 6-0-0 Primaris and Little Buddies 7-0-0
QM Templates here, HH army builder app for both v1 and v2
One Page 40k Ruleset for Game Beginners |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/04 21:38:54
Subject: Majority WS and toughness in challenges?
|
 |
Land Raider Pilot on Cruise Control
|
This will have to wait until after the faq comes out and we know for sure if challenge wounds do or do not overflow. If they do not (which they do not but we have to wait to be 100% certain) than what was said earlier is true: since wounds can only be allocated to the opponent in the challenge you use his WS/T. If they do overflow, you would have to use majority since it is not a separate combat.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/04 21:49:55
Subject: Majority WS and toughness in challenges?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Looks like a rules hiccup to me. I can't see anyone trying to abuse this.
|
Unnessesarily extravegant word of the week award goes to jcress410 for this:
jcress wrote:Seem super off topic to complain about epistemology on a thread about tactics. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/08/04 22:26:41
Subject: Majority WS and toughness in challenges?
|
 |
[MOD]
Making Stuff
|
Beamo wrote:You can only allocate to the model you're in the challenge with, though. You can't use the weapon skill/toughness of a unit you can't allocate to to determine what you need to roll.
The model you challenged is still a part of the unit he came from. The challenge rules don't treat him as a separate unit, you just allocate specifically to him.
Having said that, I would definitely agree with the 'oversight' camp on this one.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|