Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/08/14 18:06:40
Subject: Invincible Behemoth Vs Str D
|
 |
Painlord Titan Princeps of Slaanesh
|
So does Str D still strip d3 hull points on rolls of 2s-5s?
So does Str D rolls of 6s strip d6+6 hull points?
I thought Invincible behemoth nerfed the 6s into d3.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/08/14 18:13:53
Subject: Invincible Behemoth Vs Str D
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Filch wrote:So does Str D still strip d3 hull points on rolls of 2s-5s?
So does Str D rolls of 6s strip d6+6 hull points?
I thought Invincible behemoth nerfed the 6s into d3.
Yes, and yes.
The Invincible Behemoth states how results on the vehicle damage table apply to super-heavies so doesn't tie in with the results of rolling on the d-weapon table (until the point you get a pen and check to see what it does).
Regards
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/08/14 18:30:46
Subject: Invincible Behemoth Vs Str D
|
 |
Painlord Titan Princeps of Slaanesh
|
what I ment was str d shooting or hitting a super heavy walker with the rule invincible behemoth.
I read this article and was still confused.
http://atomicspud40k.blogspot.com/2014/05/how-do-d-weapons-work-in-7th-edition.html?m=1
at the end he says that 2s-5s only take off 1hp
But does a 6s still strip off 6 hp?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/08/14 18:42:03
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/08/14 18:53:05
Subject: Invincible Behemoth Vs Str D
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
The author of the article states that best case, on a 2-5 a super heavy 'may only lose a single hull point' which is true (i.e. you roll 1 on the d3).
The Invincible Behemoth rule does not prevent the results when you roll a 6 on the D weapon chart, so a super heavy vehicle (walker or tank or whatever else there may be) will still suffer the full result.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/08/14 19:43:32
Subject: Invincible Behemoth Vs Str D
|
 |
Painlord Titan Princeps of Slaanesh
|
I think I am still in the denial stage of grief.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/08/14 22:36:45
Subject: Invincible Behemoth Vs Str D
|
 |
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps
Phoenix, AZ, USA
|
It's a bit worse, actually. A D hit is still an AP2 penetrating hit, which means a roll on the Vehicle Pen table at a +1, and a possible chance at exploding for an addition d3 hull points.
SJ
|
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world.”
- Ephesians 6:12
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/08/15 00:20:15
Subject: Invincible Behemoth Vs Str D
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
jeffersonian000 wrote:It's a bit worse, actually. A D hit is still an AP2 penetrating hit, which means a roll on the Vehicle Pen table at a +1, and a possible chance at exploding for an addition d3 hull points.
SJ
Most strength D attacks may be AP 1 or 2, but it will go on the weapon profile rather than being an inherent bonus.
Regards
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/08/15 01:03:29
Subject: Invincible Behemoth Vs Str D
|
 |
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps
Phoenix, AZ, USA
|
Bellyfluff wrote: jeffersonian000 wrote:It's a bit worse, actually. A D hit is still an AP2 penetrating hit, which means a roll on the Vehicle Pen table at a +1, and a possible chance at exploding for an addition d3 hull points.
SJ
Most strength D attacks may be AP 1 or 2, but it will go on the weapon profile rather than being an inherent bonus.
Regards
Not sure if you were attempting to or correct.
SJ
|
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world.”
- Ephesians 6:12
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/08/15 01:16:04
Subject: Invincible Behemoth Vs Str D
|
 |
Auspicious Daemonic Herald
|
jeffersonian000 wrote:Bellyfluff wrote: jeffersonian000 wrote:It's a bit worse, actually. A D hit is still an AP2 penetrating hit, which means a roll on the Vehicle Pen table at a +1, and a possible chance at exploding for an addition d3 hull points.
SJ
Most strength D attacks may be AP 1 or 2, but it will go on the weapon profile rather than being an inherent bonus.
Regards
Not sure if you were attempting to or correct.
SJ
There is nothing make D weapons AP2. Its possible for there to be a D weapon thats AP- or AP1
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/08/15 02:48:05
Subject: Invincible Behemoth Vs Str D
|
 |
Painlord Titan Princeps of Slaanesh
|
I am desperately trying to find a loop hole or some sort of rules lawyering to see Str D getting nerfed by invincible behemoth ruling...
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/08/15 04:59:54
Subject: Invincible Behemoth Vs Str D
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
Vanished Completely
|
Sorry, The Invincible Behemoth Special Rule triggers on destroyed, wrecked, Explodes! or is otherwise removed from play and mentions nothing about negating weapons that strip more then one Hull Point per hit.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/08/15 05:00:20
8th made it so I can no longer sway Tau onto the side of Chaos, but they will eventually turn aside from their idea of the Greater Good to embrace the Greatest of pleasures. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/08/15 07:17:55
Subject: Invincible Behemoth Vs Str D
|
 |
Painlord Titan Princeps of Slaanesh
|
Anger->Denial->sadness->bargaining -> acceptance->
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/08/15 21:12:45
Subject: Invincible Behemoth Vs Str D
|
 |
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps
Phoenix, AZ, USA
|
CrownAxe wrote: jeffersonian000 wrote:Bellyfluff wrote: jeffersonian000 wrote:It's a bit worse, actually. A D hit is still an AP2 penetrating hit, which means a roll on the Vehicle Pen table at a +1, and a possible chance at exploding for an addition d3 hull points.
SJ
Most strength D attacks may be AP 1 or 2, but it will go on the weapon profile rather than being an inherent bonus.
Regards
Not sure if you were attempting to or correct.
SJ
There is nothing make D weapons AP2. Its possible for there to be a D weapon thats AP- or AP1
Oh, I'm sorry, my bad. Can you please give me an example of a D weapon to isn't AP 1 or 2?
SJ
|
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world.”
- Ephesians 6:12
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/08/15 21:53:07
Subject: Invincible Behemoth Vs Str D
|
 |
Glorious Lord of Chaos
The burning pits of Hades, also known as Sweden in summer
|
To my knowledge, no such weapon exists yet, but it still doesn't mean Ap2 is inherently part of D.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/08/16 06:54:51
Subject: Invincible Behemoth Vs Str D
|
 |
Deranged Necron Destroyer
|
jeffersonian000 wrote: CrownAxe wrote: jeffersonian000 wrote:Bellyfluff wrote: jeffersonian000 wrote:It's a bit worse, actually. A D hit is still an AP2 penetrating hit, which means a roll on the Vehicle Pen table at a +1, and a possible chance at exploding for an addition d3 hull points.
SJ
Most strength D attacks may be AP 1 or 2, but it will go on the weapon profile rather than being an inherent bonus.
Regards
Not sure if you were attempting to or correct.
SJ
There is nothing make D weapons AP2. Its possible for there to be a D weapon thats AP- or AP1
Oh, I'm sorry, my bad. Can you please give me an example of a D weapon to isn't AP 1 or 2?
SJ
The Transcendent C'tan from escalation has the Transliminal Stride that is Str D with ap-. Not really a 'current' example since the new necron codex but was shortly an example that was once an option in 7th.
|
It's easy to assume that people arguing an interpretation you disagree with are just looking for an advantage for themselves... But it's quite often not the case. |
|
 |
 |
|