Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/16 00:45:56
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 5/11/13: Transports, Priests, Eisenhorn and more!
|
 |
Repentia Mistress
|
Crimson wrote:One question: can Inquisitors finally get an invulnerable save? (Other than 5+ from termie armour.)
Doesn't look like it. Only Malleus can take Termie armor and no one gets anything like a Rosarius or Storm Shield as an option that I can see. There's a Warlord Trait that gives a 6++
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/16 00:46:19
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 5/11/13: Transports, Priests, Eisenhorn and more!
|
 |
Secret Inquisitorial Eldar Xenexecutor
|
Crimson wrote:One question: can Inquisitors finally get an invulnerable save? (Other than 5+ from termie armour.)
Not that I can see on a quick search, and only one ordos can take terminator armour.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/16 00:46:51
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 5/11/13: Transports, Priests, Eisenhorn and more!
|
 |
Legendary Master of the Chapter
|
Amerikon wrote:The Scouts thing only works before the start of the game and you can only do each ability once.
I'm pretty sure you can't put Marines in an INQ Valkyrie since Allies can't share transports.
Ah didnt see they counted as allies.
|
Unit1126PLL wrote: Scott-S6 wrote:And yet another thread is hijacked for Unit to ask for the same advice, receive the same answers and make the same excuses.
Oh my god I'm becoming martel.
Send help!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/16 00:47:40
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 5/11/13: Transports, Priests, Eisenhorn and more!
|
 |
Repentia Mistress
|
Troike wrote:Amerikon wrote:No mention of the ladies other than that the Ordo Hereticus "keeps and eye on them" along with a few other groups.
Huh, that's really odd. I think of all Imperial organisations, the Hereticus should have very little cause to "keep an eye on" the Sisters.
I think the idea is that they're just the internal watchdogs. So while the other Ordos look for external enemies, Hereticus looks for enemies within.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/16 00:48:34
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 5/11/13: Transports, Priests, Eisenhorn and more!
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
4 Sub Ordos (Chronus, Scriptorum, Machinum, Sicarius)
Fluff on the Philosophies.
Tons of Inquisitor fluff on different famous Inqs\
Take as Primary of a special Ally, in addition to existing allies
Different FOC chart (1 HQ (Req), 1 HQ, 3 Elites)
If primary, Warbands are scoring
BB to BA, DA, GK, IG, Inq, SOB, SM, SW
Desperate to DE
AOC to Eldar, Tau
CtA Ork, Tyranid, Necron, Chaos, Chaos Daemons
Hereticus Warlod Traits
1) Choose to pass/fail morale
2) Roll two and choose for Reserves, OUtflank and Mysterious
3) Orbital Bombardment
4) PE Psyker
5) Adamantium Will
6) No inflitrate within 24 of Warlord
Malleus
1) Choose to pass/fail morale
2) Roll two and choose for Reserves, OUtflank and Mysterious
3) Orbital Bombardment
4) PE Daemon
5) -1 to all daemon invuls within 12"
6) +1 Warp Charge or Adamantium Will
Xenos
1) Choose to pass/fail morale
2) Roll two and choose for Reserves, OUtflank and Mysterious
3) Orbital Bombardment
4) PE vs any Xenos list
5) 6+ Invul, +1 S and Rending on a ranged weapon
6) Hatred
Conversion Beamers
Hellrifle (36, S6 AP3, H1 Rend
Orbital Strike with three different types of bombs ., Can still charge. Lol
S6 AP4, Ord D3, Large
S10 AP1, Heavy 1 Lance, Blast
S6 AP4, Ord 1, Large Blast, PsiShock
Daemonblades
Null rod
Sythian Venom Talon
Special Issue
Brain Mines
Psybolt
Psychotroke
Psyk-out
Psyocculum
Rad Grenades
Servo Skulls
Plasma Syphon
Psychic
Hammerhand
Dark Exc
Sanctuary
Psy Communion
Psy Barrage (S3, AP6, Assault 1, Large Blast, 36", S and AP increase by 1 for each model who knows the model after the first.)
Relics
Liber Heresius (15)
Take a Ld Test at start of friendly turn, bearer and unit gain: Scouts, Split-fire, Counter-attack, fear, Hatred. Scouts is pregame leadership test. Each one only once.
Grimoire of TN (5): If in a challenge with daemon, tehy get -5 WS, Init and Ld
Tome of Vehtric (20): Bearer gains abilities depending on opponent's list. Ex: Against DE, you get night vision. Eldar, split fire. Orks, counter-attack. Necrons, tank hunter. Tau, furious charge. Tyranids, Monster hunter.
Coteaz and Kara Looks the same
Inquisitors look the same as GK inqs.
Henchmen look pretty comparable. They get Power Weapons, not swords for Crusaders and DCA.
They get Priests now in Henchmen squads which work like AS priests (i.e. War Hymns)
Rhinos, Razors, CHimera, Valks, LR, LRC, LRR are all DT
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/16 00:49:59
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 5/11/13: Transports, Priests, Eisenhorn and more!
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
Troike wrote:Amerikon wrote:No mention of the ladies other than that the Ordo Hereticus "keeps and eye on them" along with a few other groups.
Huh, that's really odd. I think of all Imperial organisations, the Hereticus should have very little cause to "keep an eye on" the Sisters.
Remember that the Ecclesiarchy is not immune to having heretics and rabblerousers in their midst. The Sororitas follow the Ecclesiarchy and while they might not necessarily do it blindly, there's always that chance.
I am very intrigued as to what the "Hellrifle" is. It sounds familiar, like Codex: Witchhunters familiar.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/11/16 00:51:11
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/16 00:52:10
Subject: Re:Codex: Inquisition - Update 5/11/13: Transports, Priests, Eisenhorn and more!
|
 |
Preacher of the Emperor
|
So there's not even any mention of them working together anymore, just the Hereticus treating them like any other Imperial organisation. Guess that puts that question to rest, then.
But I still think that having the Hereticus watching the Sisters makes no sense...
|
Order of the Righteous Armour - 542 points so far. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/16 00:52:30
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 5/11/13: Transports, Priests, Eisenhorn and more!
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Kanluwen wrote:I am very intrigued as to what the "Hellrifle" is. It sounds familiar, like Codex: Witchhunters familiar.
Hellrifle (36, S6 AP3, H1 Rend
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/16 00:53:03
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 5/11/13: Transports, Priests, Eisenhorn and more!
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
pretre wrote: Kanluwen wrote:I am very intrigued as to what the "Hellrifle" is. It sounds familiar, like Codex: Witchhunters familiar.
Hellrifle (36, S6 AP3, H1 Rend
No, I read that. I'm meaning more the background on it.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/16 00:53:07
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 5/11/13: Transports, Priests, Eisenhorn and more!
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
What is the troop option?
|
The plural of codex is codexes.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/16 00:53:34
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 5/11/13: Transports, Priests, Eisenhorn and more!
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Liber Heresius with Ordo Xenos inquisitor with Rad and Psychotroke in an SOB blob.
Scout forward 6. Go ahead and charge me.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/16 00:54:14
Subject: Re:Codex: Inquisition - Update 5/11/13: Transports, Priests, Eisenhorn and more!
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Rules copied from GK and fluff copied from the free Inquisitor rule book and the rpg's.
1/10 laziest effort by gw yet and a waste of money.
For fanatics only
|
Your last point is especially laughable and comical, because not only the 7th ed Valkyrie shown dumber things (like being able to throw the troopers without parachutes out of its hatches, no harm done) - Irbis |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/16 00:54:48
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 5/11/13: Transports, Priests, Eisenhorn and more!
|
 |
Legendary Master of the Chapter
|
Oh my. im still not sure how scout could possibly work if it must take a LD at the start of a friendly turn. are Rad grenades only in CC like GK or can it be thrown? Edit: MK Perfect just wanted to make sure. Edit:2 BOOOOOO.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2013/11/16 00:56:50
Unit1126PLL wrote: Scott-S6 wrote:And yet another thread is hijacked for Unit to ask for the same advice, receive the same answers and make the same excuses.
Oh my god I'm becoming martel.
Send help!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/16 00:55:53
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 5/11/13: Transports, Priests, Eisenhorn and more!
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Desubot wrote:Oh my. im still not sure how scout could possibly work if it must take a LD at the start of a friendly turn.
are Rad grenades only in CC like GK or can it be thrown?
Scout has an exception to make a pre-game LD test to get scout. Automatically Appended Next Post: Rad are only in assault. Automatically Appended Next Post: SeanDrake wrote:Rules copied from GK and fluff copied from the free Inquisitor rule book and the rpg's.
1/10 laziest effort by gw yet and a waste of money.
For fanatics only
Or people who want to add inquisitors to their armies.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2013/11/16 00:56:47
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/16 00:56:48
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 5/11/13: Transports, Priests, Eisenhorn and more!
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Is anyone going to tell me what the troop option is? Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaseeeeee?
|
The plural of codex is codexes.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/16 00:56:59
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 5/11/13: Transports, Priests, Eisenhorn and more!
|
 |
Preacher of the Emperor
|
Kanluwen wrote:Remember that the Ecclesiarchy is not immune to having heretics and rabblerousers in their midst. The Sororitas follow the Ecclesiarchy and while they might not necessarily do it blindly, there's always that chance.
True, but the Sisters also police the Ecclesiarchy, so they too are specifically on the lookout for that sort of thing. Though I suppose that they may not also be 100% objective, so having the Hereticus watching too makes sense. But the Sisters themselves are a non-risk when it comes to heresy.
It just seems like a really odd change in tone, to me. I mean, the Sisters and Hereticus being buds makes a lot of sense, IMO. Both extremely zealous, both hate heretics, both hunt down Imperial forces who go heretic. They've gone from working closely together (to the point of sharing a codex) to pretty much nothing. Automatically Appended Next Post: pretre wrote:Liber Heresius with Ordo Xenos inquisitor with Rad and Psychotroke in an SOB blob.
Oh, so we get the special allies rules with them? The Red Hunters thing is valid?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/11/16 00:57:59
Order of the Righteous Armour - 542 points so far. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/16 00:58:10
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 5/11/13: Transports, Priests, Eisenhorn and more!
|
 |
Legendary Master of the Chapter
|
xruslanx wrote:Is anyone going to tell me what the troop option is? Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaseeeeee?
Take as Primary of a special Ally, in addition to existing allies
Different FOC chart (1 HQ (Req), 1 HQ, 3 Elites)
If primary, Warbands are scoring
|
Unit1126PLL wrote: Scott-S6 wrote:And yet another thread is hijacked for Unit to ask for the same advice, receive the same answers and make the same excuses.
Oh my god I'm becoming martel.
Send help!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/16 00:58:14
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 5/11/13: Transports, Priests, Eisenhorn and more!
|
 |
Secret Inquisitorial Eldar Xenexecutor
|
All in all I'm quite happy with the codex to have a small inquisitorial warband without taking Coteaz. The limit to having 3 warbands (and upto 2 inquisitors) really does keep it to being primary at sub 700 points for me, however it odes give the option to expand a previous ally detachment into becoming the primary one.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/16 00:59:23
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 5/11/13: Transports, Priests, Eisenhorn and more!
|
 |
Courageous Space Marine Captain
|
Amerikon wrote: Crimson wrote:One question: can Inquisitors finally get an invulnerable save? (Other than 5+ from termie armour.)
Doesn't look like it. Only Malleus can take Termie armor and no one gets anything like a Rosarius or Storm Shield as an option that I can see. There's a Warlord Trait that gives a 6++
For feth's sake, even IG officers get a refractor field, and every bloody priest has rosarius, yet the most powerful agents of the Imperium cannot get either!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/16 01:05:56
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 5/11/13: Transports, Priests, Eisenhorn and more!
|
 |
Calculating Commissar
|
pretre wrote: Desubot wrote:Oh my. im still not sure how scout could possibly work if it must take a LD at the start of a friendly turn.
are Rad grenades only in CC like GK or can it be thrown?
Scout has an exception to make a pre-game LD test to get scout.
So, is there a way to make your Inquisitor outflank?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/16 01:09:53
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 5/11/13: Transports, Priests, Eisenhorn and more!
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Desubot wrote:xruslanx wrote:Is anyone going to tell me what the troop option is? Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaseeeeee?
Take as Primary of a special Ally, in addition to existing allies
Different FOC chart (1 HQ (Req), 1 HQ, 3 Elites)
If primary, Warbands are scoring
Ah so there's no stormtroopers or anything? No actual troop choice?
|
The plural of codex is codexes.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/16 01:11:07
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 5/11/13: Transports, Priests, Eisenhorn and more!
|
 |
Legendary Master of the Chapter
|
xruslanx wrote: Desubot wrote:xruslanx wrote:Is anyone going to tell me what the troop option is? Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaseeeeee?
Take as Primary of a special Ally, in addition to existing allies
Different FOC chart (1 HQ (Req), 1 HQ, 3 Elites)
If primary, Warbands are scoring
Ah so there's no stormtroopers or anything? No actual troop choice?
It seems so. you have to make them out of acolytes like the GK book but they score if you take them as a primary whatever that means (im to assume taken as your warlord)
|
Unit1126PLL wrote: Scott-S6 wrote:And yet another thread is hijacked for Unit to ask for the same advice, receive the same answers and make the same excuses.
Oh my god I'm becoming martel.
Send help!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/16 01:13:52
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 5/11/13: Transports, Priests, Eisenhorn and more!
|
 |
Enigmatic Chaos Sorcerer
|
If you use the inquisitorial ally rule to take models from three factions are you required to take 3 HQs?
Or can an Inquisitor be the mandatory HQ from your primary detachment?
|
BlaxicanX wrote:A young business man named Tom Kirby, who was a pupil of mine until he turned greedy, helped the capitalists hunt down and destroy the wargamers. He betrayed and murdered Games Workshop.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/16 01:14:27
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 5/11/13: Transports, Priests, Eisenhorn and more!
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Desubot wrote:xruslanx wrote: Desubot wrote:xruslanx wrote:Is anyone going to tell me what the troop option is? Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaseeeeee?
Take as Primary of a special Ally, in addition to existing allies
Different FOC chart (1 HQ (Req), 1 HQ, 3 Elites)
If primary, Warbands are scoring
Ah so there's no stormtroopers or anything? No actual troop choice?
It seems so. you have to make them out of acolytes like the GK book but they score if you take them as a primary whatever that means (im to assume taken as your warlord)
I see. Thanks for the answers.
|
The plural of codex is codexes.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/16 01:15:46
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 5/11/13: Transports, Priests, Eisenhorn and more!
|
 |
Enigmatic Chaos Sorcerer
|
And even though a lot of this seems to be a lot like the Inq section of C:GK being battle brothers will allow some previously unavaliable options.
Chaplain in DCA etc.
|
BlaxicanX wrote:A young business man named Tom Kirby, who was a pupil of mine until he turned greedy, helped the capitalists hunt down and destroy the wargamers. He betrayed and murdered Games Workshop.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/16 01:23:11
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 5/11/13: Transports, Priests, Eisenhorn and more!
|
 |
Wraith
|
So I should buy this because it allows me to put Coteaz as a Battle Brother in my Sisters army?
If that's true... SOLD.
|
Shine on, Kaldor Dayglow!
Not Ken Lobb
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/16 01:26:41
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 5/11/13: Transports, Priests, Eisenhorn and more!
|
 |
Hooded Inquisitorial Interrogator
|
So how about taking:
Primary detatchment: IG with who cares
Allied Inquisition: HQ, Coteaz
Allied GK: HQ, Coteaz
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/16 01:29:08
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 5/11/13: Transports, Priests, Eisenhorn and more!
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
So Karamatzov is just a cut and paste from C  H then? Guess there's no reason for me to buy C:I then... If I can field him with my Sisters without "needing" to buy anything else...
Uh, thanks GW?
Valete,
JohnS
|
Valete,
JohnS
"You don't believe data - you test data. If I could put my finger on the moment we genuinely <expletive deleted> ourselves, it was the moment we decided that data was something you could use words like believe or disbelieve around"
-Jamie Sanderson |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/16 01:33:01
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 5/11/13: Transports, Priests, Eisenhorn and more!
|
 |
Sniping Gŭiláng
|
Eldarain wrote:If you use the inquisitorial ally rule to take models from three factions are you required to take 3 HQs?
Or can an Inquisitor be the mandatory HQ from your primary detachment?
You (currently) have to have a HQ for each detachment. Codex inquisitor allows you to nominate an inquisitor- HQ as your warlord, instead of your main detachment HQ, but doesn't remove requirement of taking a HQ choice.
2x coteaz: He is unique, so only one in an army.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/11/16 01:38:08
Subject: Codex: Inquisition - Update 5/11/13: Transports, Priests, Eisenhorn and more!
|
 |
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
Not really a full Codex. I am disappoint. xruslanx wrote:Ah so there's no stormtroopers or anything? No actual troop choice? I said there weren't going to be any Storm Troopers as "Inquisitorial Storm Troopers" don't exist.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2013/11/16 01:39:21
|
|
 |
 |
|