Switch Theme:

Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit  [RSS] 

Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/21 23:50:49


Post by: IvanTih


My small rant.

You know what is "so utterly ridiculous as to not merely strain credibility, but throw it to the ground, stomp on it, and then put it through the shredder for good measure"? That a civilization can go from cavemen to matching the elder species of 40k in a mere six thousand years. Here's a hint, it took humans tens of millenia to reach this point.

The Tau could have pulled it off if they displayed levels of competence that would make the Moties look like a bunch of slowed children, but their technology has stagnated for centuries, too.

THAT is why I despise the Tau. Their very existence is an affront to logic and common sense.

I also hate Tau fanboys that state that Tau are more advanced than Imperium which they are not.



Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 00:05:34


Post by: Mr Nobody


I don't think the tau have technology that equals the eldar, and I believe that their technology is close to the imperium's. The reason tau advanced so quickly is because, by their , they adapt quickly, becoming vastly different when isolated long enough from other tau. This carried over to society as well, but this was also because the ethereals brought almost total peace, allowing them to advance without setbacks like humanity did.

The tau do have some plot holes, which I believe can be easily filled with some effort, and tau are an effort to bring something that isn't old, beaten, evil or has a crappy life.

(I'm not a tau fanboy).


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 00:14:33


Post by: IvanTih


Mr Nobody wrote:I don't think the tau have technology that equals the tau, and I believe that their technology is close to the imperium's. The reason tau advanced so quickly is because, by their , they adapt quickly, becoming vastly different when isolated long enough from other tau. This carried over to society as well, but this was also because the ethereals brought almost total peace, allowing them to advance without setbacks like humanity did.

The tau do have some plot holes, which I believe can be easily filled with some effort, and tau are an effort to bring something that isn't old, beaten, evil or has a crappy life.

(I'm not a tau fanboy).

No,their tech advancment is Mary Sure!
And in particular how it stacks up to the Imperium, can be summed up in one word. Consistency. That is their big edge ove the Imperium really. It's not so much that they are all-around better, per se (because they aren't), its that they manage to standardize their tech and gear better, and to apply it more consistently. They are more unified, and more focused, and tend not to be as distracted as the Imperium is (partly a result of how they are organized, partly because of their small size, and partly because they're on the ass end of nowhere and tend to only catch the backlash from other major powers conflicts.) Their sensitivity to causalties (much like what the US has with its citizen soldiers) will lead to more upteching (pursuant to tactics and presumably logistics.) Also, your average Fire Warrior is probably more in line with a Storm Trooper, while auxiliaries are either specialists or the more expendable grunts (and aren't neccesarily as well teched, but could be more numerous.) Of course, Guard "quality" varies dramatically as well (logistics, planet of origin, standing/importance of the tithe, etc.)


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 00:37:16


Post by: Mustela


I don't like Tau because they have a 40K army, and they are so tiny, they are pointless from the bigger picture - So why are they even an army? Especially when there are much cooler, much more relevant, things that GW could make (CODEX: Mechanicus?).

Oh yeah, and all my friends play them.

+Ultramr is WAAAAAYYYYY bigger than the Tau empire on the map in the rulebook.
+They can't last forever - no psykers means communications issues
+No warp drives - that'll give any significant expansion a real roadblock
+If they recruit psykers from other races, they just got themselves a free daemon portal.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 00:43:27


Post by: Retribution


40k in general is an affront to logic; in a universe with Space Jesus and Space Elves you're completely thrown off by the time-span in which a species advanced technologically


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 00:49:21


Post by: juraigamer


IvanTih wrote:
THAT is why I despise the Tau. Their very existence is an affront to logic and common sense.


Of course. I mean, all other of the codex races and the general 40k fluff is completely logical and make sense. There's absolutely nothing else in any other codex or even in the 40k universe that doesn't make sense, except the tau. Right?


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 00:53:24


Post by: Grey Templar


the biggest problem with the T'au is

1) GW has written their Tech in a way as to block them into a corner. their method of FTL/half-warp jump has meant they can't leave their current area of space.

2) they could easily fix it, but the GW codex machine has had the Cheese and Marine buttons jammed in the "On" position for the last 2 years. Fortunantly, they must have fixed the problem because DE came out. the other problem is that there are at least 3 codexs in line before the T'au(DH, WH, and Necrons)


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 00:55:26


Post by: Retribution


Grey Templar wrote:the biggest problem with the T'au is

1) GW has written their Tech in a way as to block them into a corner. their method of FTL/half-warp jump has meant they can't leave their current area of space.

That can be fixed by having the Tau piggyback with an allied warp-capable race, but i don't see them expanding drastically anytime soon


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 01:00:00


Post by: Grey Templar


Retribution wrote:
Grey Templar wrote:the biggest problem with the T'au is

1) GW has written their Tech in a way as to block them into a corner. their method of FTL/half-warp jump has meant they can't leave their current area of space.

That can be fixed by having the Tau piggyback with an allied warp-capable race, but i don't see them expanding drastically anytime soon


yes, but GW is known for ignoring codexs for loooong periods of time.









prehaps the T'au are the new DE


all T'au players

learn to use your codex well

you shall have it for the next 12 years


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 01:01:43


Post by: Avatar 720


Ivan, you forget that the Tau world was enclosed in a Warp storm, and that the Warp doesn't treat time normally. A Space Marine Battle Barge could enter the warp, 10 minutes could pass inside it, and they could exit hundreds of years into the future.

We don't know how much time passed inside the warp storm, we only know that the amount of time that passes outside of it is irrelevant.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 01:06:15


Post by: Retribution


Grey Templar wrote:
Retribution wrote:
Grey Templar wrote:the biggest problem with the T'au is

1) GW has written their Tech in a way as to block them into a corner. their method of FTL/half-warp jump has meant they can't leave their current area of space.

That can be fixed by having the Tau piggyback with an allied warp-capable race, but i don't see them expanding drastically anytime soon


yes, but GW is known for ignoring codexs for loooong periods of time.









prehaps the T'au are the new DE


all T'au players

learn to use your codex well

you shall have it for the next 12 years

And this is why i put off making a Tau army...well...that and the fact that im broke


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 01:09:16


Post by: Exopheric


Humans may be an "elder race" but they've been largely stagnant/losing ground technologically for about 10,000 years, AFTER losing 90% of their tech support database in the Age of Strife. perhaps aside from the limited FTL, Tau are about where humans hypothetically would have been in the year 5100. They are nowhere near the Eldar.

Besides, there are hints that they've been manipulated from the start by a more advanced species.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 01:21:46


Post by: Warboss Imbad Ironskull


See, when someone starts saying that the established fluff of a race which exists in a fictional universe strains credibility I can't help but laugh. Especially because there is so much in the 40k universe that makes sense and can be credible.

And if examples could be given as to how the Imperium is as advanced as the Tau technologically please do give them. At one point the Imperium may have been but I don't see how they are now?

And the Tau aren't on the same level as the Eldar simply because the Eldar as a whole are a psychic race and their technology centers around that. Just because they both have anti-grav vehicles does not make them the same (which can also be said for the Imperium and Tau).

Oh and you don't have to be a fan boy to think that the Tau are more advanced then the Imperium. I think they are and my main army and favorite are the Space Wolves and always have been.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 01:30:40


Post by: Avatar 720


Tau have successfully contained plasma in the same way that Eldar have, the Imperium no longer has the knowledge to do this (if they ever did) and is stuck with a more volatile (albeit stronger because of it) version.

The Imperium have lost all knowledge of anti-grav bar Land Speeders.

Just two examples of how Tau are more advanced than the Imperium. However, if STCs were suddenly found in abundance, i'd say the Imperium would gain a lot more technological credibility.

But since that doesn't look to be happening, i don't see how the Imperium could, at this stage, be considered as advanced as Tau.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 01:40:26


Post by: Mr Nobody


I think tau were meant to be the "up and coming star", where they advance quickly and would one day be stronger than the imperium.

I personally like the feel of tau, being a 40k light when it comes to grimdarkness.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 01:47:46


Post by: Asherian Command


If the tau deevolve and one side follows Farsight I call Rights to brag and say I won the fight.
Also I had an agruement over this for several hours and this is what I learned. Tau Suck.
Their codex fluff is bland and very boring. IT makes them out to be the most uber. And Read many books containing them and Only one guy came out as awesome....
Farsight. He has the right Idea. Still tech and use it against the enemy.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 02:36:54


Post by: Grey Templar


Exopheric wrote:Humans may be an "elder race" but they've been largely stagnant/losing ground technologically for about 10,000 years, AFTER losing 90% of their tech support database in the Age of Strife. perhaps aside from the limited FTL, Tau are about where humans hypothetically would have been in the year 5100. They are nowhere near the Eldar.

Besides, there are hints that they've been manipulated from the start by a more advanced species.


the impierium may have lost a significant amount of their technology, but they are recovering much of what was lost and that which was lost permanantly can be relearned.

the Admech does reaserch. it's. just. at. a. snails. pace. and. will. take. a very. long. time to. finish.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 02:44:37


Post by: Nurglitch


In an Imperium spanning an entire galaxy, consisting of about 1 million worlds at any given time, and with around 10,000 years of history, one can imagine that technology advances and regresses all the time in the Imperium.

Speaking of, I don't suppose the original poster can give us all the low-down on how technological advancement is supposed to go? Because it's pretty easy to find rates of technological advancement to be incredible if you don't understand what technology is, and how it advances.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 02:45:31


Post by: Mordoskul


You make a good point. In six thousand years (humans took 10k to reach our current level of tech) how do a bunch of backwards savages rise to the top of the tech tree?


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 02:48:34


Post by: Grey Templar


Nurglitch wrote:In an Imperium spanning an entire galaxy, consisting of about 1 million worlds at any given time, and with around 10,000 years of history, one can imagine that technology advances and regresses all the time in the Imperium.

Speaking of, I don't suppose the original poster can give us all the low-down on how technological advancement is supposed to go? Because it's pretty easy to find rates of technological advancement to be incredible if you don't understand what technology is, and how it advances.



when you think about it, Advanced Tech is just putting old, simpler, tech together in new and interesting ways

the Admech has all the tech right in front of them, they just have to fit everything back together. it's the most nightmarishly complex jigsaw puzzle ever and the pieces are scattered all over the table, floor, front yard, and down the kitchin sink.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 02:50:04


Post by: Mordoskul


Consider that the Imperium has actually branded Progress as a FALSE GOD.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 02:51:49


Post by: Nurglitch


Mordoskul wrote:Consider that the Imperium has actually branded Progress as a FALSE GOD.

Citation needed.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 03:47:42


Post by: MekanobSamael


Nurglitch wrote:
Mordoskul wrote:Consider that the Imperium has actually branded Progress as a FALSE GOD.

Citation needed.
Win.

Here's why I dislike the Tau: they have exactly ONE aesthetic.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 05:14:30


Post by: Shaman


Retribution wrote:40k in general is an affront to logic; in a universe with Space Jesus and Space Elves you're completely thrown off by the time-span in which a species advanced technologically


I read space elves as Space Elvis. And I was thinking who is meant to be space elvis? Answer me that dakka.


Also it seems like OP is just jealous of the codex saying they are so advanced.

The reason I don't like tau is I got sick of how they play.. (used to have them in 4th)


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 05:38:13


Post by: Ledabot


Tau are not dumb. Has anyone considered that they have over 100 IQ? some one with 132 IQ is 1/1000. thats rare. If the Tau were only a tad smarter that humans, they could advance far faster. I hope there smart. That would boost my ego.

Really though. its not hard to believe that they have the same lv of tech as the imperium. They have been spinning their wheels since the horrus herisy thing.

Avatar 720 wrote:Ivan, you forget that the Tau world was enclosed in a Warp storm, and that the Warp doesn't treat time normally. A Space Marine Battle Barge could enter the warp, 10 minutes could pass inside it, and they could exit hundreds of years into the future.


This is true. how many more years did they gain unknowingly??? a thousand? ten thousand? a hundread thousand?


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 05:45:59


Post by: IvanTih


Their technological advancment is very Sue because how do they manage to advance so much in 6k years while it took Humans and Eldar much more.Tau only survive by living on the edge of Astronomican and if they continiue to be arrogant and naive that'll doom them.
That Warp strom argument won't work because the planet has to be inside the warp for the effect.
Only DH actually hates progress I can throw many other sources to support slow advancment it the Imperium.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 05:57:33


Post by: Tekeino


IvanTih wrote:I also hate Tau fanboys that state that Tau are more advanced than Imperium which they are not.



And i hate Imperium fanboys who think that a rapidly evolving race isnt possible and implies that all of the rest of 40k is logical. OMG ORKS ARE GIANT LIVING MUSHROOMS OH NO FUNGUS CANT BE HUMANOID. NOT LOGICAL.

Im not even a tau fanboy, but i think the only possible objective of topics like this is to annoy.

Also, you claim that tau are illogical because they managed to accomplish more in 6k years then humans and eldar. Maybe they are more focused, maybe they are smarter there doesnt seem to be much evidence to point to the fact that humans are more or even as intellegent. And Eldar are not solely on "advancing the greater good" like tau are, Eldar have art and music as well as perfecting their skills.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 06:08:27


Post by: Jubear


Sigh why do people get so worked up over fluff? I mean who cares the whole 40k universe only exist to be a place we kick each others ass in....Do we really need to argue about fiction


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 06:09:09


Post by: Warboss Imbad Ironskull


Sooo where does it say that the planet wasen't enveloped by the storm? If no navigators or captains could reach it in anyway that means that that the planet had no safe zones around it not covered by the Warp Storm, ergo the planet was covered with the storm.

And also there is the fact that the Tau codex has an entire page of the concerning their advancments in technology and culture 2/3rds of which discusses the rapid evolution of the Tau race which better allowed them to survive their chosen environments, that includes technological adaptations.

So those of you who say "oh well the it's Mary Sueish for Tau to have this level of tech because it took everyone else forever to get it" I say to you did everyone else have the adaptive divergence of the Tau? um nope never read one scrap of fluff that says they did.

Fluff supports what you don't like or say can't happen, quit being sore losers


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 08:22:21


Post by: LeetBix


The whole reason (ok maybs just a bit of it) for GW's ridiculous fluff for the tau's rapid advancement was because they were trying to tap into the eastern market.

Tau were supposed to basically be chasing after eastern ideals of unity and strength through that unity yadda yadda yadda.

Point is the weren't really thinking about fluff sensibilities when they made the tau fluff just more dollar dollar dollar.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 10:41:00


Post by: Avatar 720


That Warp strom argument won't work because the planet has to be inside the warp for the effect.


The world was surrounded by a warp storm, T'au was at the centre of it as it swirled around the planet, making it completely inaccessible. I want to know where you're getting the information regarding how the warp and warp storms work, because you seem to know more than any of us about it.

Nowhere does it state that being engulfed by a warp storm does not place the engulfed planet under the warp's conditions. To me, it's safe to assume that a planet completely closed in by a warp storm will be affected by it.

Tau also survive because the Imperium has more pressing issues. The Imperium were forced to retreat from the Damocles Gulf due to the emergance of the Tyranids, a threat that is far greater than the Tau. The only other enemies the Tau have are Tyranids, Orks and Necrons if they happen to colonise or land on a tomb world and wake them up. The Imperium are more concerned with Tyranids and there are no recorded instances of Tau/(D)Eldar contact, nor Tau/Chaos, unless you count the Fire Warrior and DoW games. Cockiness won't get the Tau killed until the Imperium sees them a larger threat than they currently are, or a Tyranid Hive Fleet eats them/they get beaten down by a large WAAAGH!


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 12:40:29


Post by: Retribution


LeetBix wrote:The whole reason (ok maybs just a bit of it) for GW's ridiculous fluff for the tau's rapid advancement was because they were trying to tap into the eastern market.

Tau were supposed to basically be chasing after eastern ideals of unity and strength through that unity yadda yadda yadda.

Point is the weren't really thinking about fluff sensibilities when they made the tau fluff just more dollar dollar dollar.

Except for the fact that they come off as more of a realized version of Plato's Republic than anything


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 14:51:04


Post by: Mustela


Tekeino wrote:
IvanTih wrote:I also hate Tau fanboys that state that Tau are more advanced than Imperium which they are not.



And i hate Imperium fanboys who think that a rapidly evolving race isnt possible and implies that all of the rest of 40k is logical. OMG ORKS ARE GIANT LIVING MUSHROOMS OH NO FUNGUS CANT BE HUMANOID. NOT LOGICAL.

Im not even a tau fanboy, but i think the only possible objective of topics like this is to annoy.

Also, you claim that tau are illogical because they managed to accomplish more in 6k years then humans and eldar. Maybe they are more focused, maybe they are smarter there doesnt seem to be much evidence to point to the fact that humans are more or even as intellegent. And Eldar are not solely on "advancing the greater good" like tau are, Eldar have art and music as well as perfecting their skills.


Now that's not right, orks are a fungus symbiote, and orks are orks, they win no matter what, 'cause if they die in a fluff battle, it don't count.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 14:59:41


Post by: Kilkrazy


IvanTih wrote:My small rant.

You know what is "so utterly ridiculous as to not merely strain credibility, but throw it to the ground, stomp on it, and then put it through the shredder for good measure"? That a civilization can go from cavemen to matching the elder species of 40k in a mere six thousand years. Here's a hint, it took humans tens of millenia to reach this point.

The Tau could have pulled it off if they displayed levels of competence that would make the Moties look like a bunch of slowed children, but their technology has stagnated for centuries, too.

THAT is why I despise the Tau. Their very existence is an affront to logic and common sense.

I also hate Tau fanboys that state that Tau are more advanced than Imperium which they are not.



All of 40K is an affront to logic and common sense.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 15:12:41


Post by: IvanTih


Avatar 720 wrote:
That Warp strom argument won't work because the planet has to be inside the warp for the effect.


The world was surrounded by a warp storm, T'au was at the centre of it as it swirled around the planet, making it completely inaccessible. I want to know where you're getting the information regarding how the warp and warp storms work, because you seem to know more than any of us about it.

Nowhere does it state that being engulfed by a warp storm does not place the engulfed planet under the warp's conditions. To me, it's safe to assume that a planet completely closed in by a warp storm will be affected by it.

Tau also survive because the Imperium has more pressing issues. The Imperium were forced to retreat from the Damocles Gulf due to the emergance of the Tyranids, a threat that is far greater than the Tau. The only other enemies the Tau have are Tyranids, Orks and Necrons if they happen to colonise or land on a tomb world and wake them up. The Imperium are more concerned with Tyranids and there are no recorded instances of Tau/(D)Eldar contact, nor Tau/Chaos, unless you count the Fire Warrior and DoW games. Cockiness won't get the Tau killed until the Imperium sees them a larger threat than they currently are, or a Tyranid Hive Fleet eats them/they get beaten down by a large WAAAGH!

You see planets are directly affect by the warp storm if the storm directly touches them and that usually ends bad for the life living there(it mutates and then the planets get sucked into the warp or it turns to Daemon world).There's one instance of Dark Eldar contact,read latest DE codex.If they continiue to expand then they will get wiped out by the Imperium who has crushed larger Alien empires.
Kilkrazy wrote:
IvanTih wrote:My small rant.

You know what is "so utterly ridiculous as to not merely strain credibility, but throw it to the ground, stomp on it, and then put it through the shredder for good measure"? That a civilization can go from cavemen to matching the elder species of 40k in a mere six thousand years. Here's a hint, it took humans tens of millenia to reach this point.

The Tau could have pulled it off if they displayed levels of competence that would make the Moties look like a bunch of slowed children, but their technology has stagnated for centuries, too.

THAT is why I despise the Tau. Their very existence is an affront to logic and common sense.

I also hate Tau fanboys that state that Tau are more advanced than Imperium which they are not.



All of 40K is an affront to logic and common sense.

OFT.

In the end only the industrial amounts of plot armor save Tau.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 16:04:52


Post by: Pilau Rice


IvanTih wrote:Their technological advancment is very Sue because how do they manage to advance so much in 6k years while it took Humans and Eldar much more.


They are a race that trades with other races. Rather then actually kill them on first site they actually get to benefit from forming alliances. The Ion Technology came from the Demiurg supposedly

A little insight from BFG: Tau

Other additions to the Empire are advanced in themselves, and the union of two such cultures provides valuable new knowledge, technology and understanding for both parties. Such races, where able, fulfil their debt to the Tau Empire by a series of tithes which suit their own particular abilities. Able craftsmen, for instance, may be called upon to provide manufacturing capacity, while aggressive or warlike races will be obligated to provide troops to the armies of the Tau.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 16:15:37


Post by: agnosto


Want to know how the Tau advanced so quickly? It's simple really. They stopped killing each other. While all the other races were running around their respective corners of the universe offing each other, the Tau were sitting quietly at home tinkering with their toys.

The oppposite is true for the Imperium. They decided to kill each other off and lost 1/2 their tech.

The moral? Join the greater good, we'll send an ethereal out to talk to you and don't worry about the pheromones.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 16:45:32


Post by: jmurph


Retribution wrote:
LeetBix wrote:The whole reason (ok maybs just a bit of it) for GW's ridiculous fluff for the tau's rapid advancement was because they were trying to tap into the eastern market.

Tau were supposed to basically be chasing after eastern ideals of unity and strength through that unity yadda yadda yadda.

Point is the weren't really thinking about fluff sensibilities when they made the tau fluff just more dollar dollar dollar.

Except for the fact that they come off as more of a realized version of Plato's Republic than anything


How so? They seem to emulate a sort of homogenized view of Eastern cultures and emphasis on community and harmony. The castes seem to borrow heavily from pseudo Asian views (yet they have no Wood or Metal caste....). Their leaders wear monk-like robes and the army has a very anime/star wars aesthetic. Indeed, the design of the tau physiology in general seem a pretty bad Asian stereotype ala the Star Wars Trade Federation fish faces.

The Greater Good seems rather Daoist. (Gue'vesa seems a bit like a Cantonese attempt- Gue'la is remarkably similar to Gue'lo.)

Not to mention that The Republic is highly thereotical with imagery that is long separated from it's audience and often difficult for modern readers to understand (almost impossible without a pretty good knowledge of ancient Greece). Indeed, many writers on it have conflicting views or interpretations.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 16:50:25


Post by: IvanTih


agnosto wrote:Want to know how the Tau advanced so quickly? It's simple really. They stopped killing each other. While all the other races were running around their respective corners of the universe offing each other, the Tau were sitting quietly at home tinkering with their toys.

The oppposite is true for the Imperium. They decided to kill each other off and lost 1/2 their tech.

The moral? Join the greater good, we'll send an ethereal out to talk to you and don't worry about the pheromones.

Then you ignore Eldar who had plenty of time to advance,they did the same thing and had far longer time to do it than 6k years that Tau had.
Also advances have been made from Horus Heresy and plenty of them,new ship classes,better las weapons,improved Lance and Plasma weapons,planet Tesla is full of experimental technology,experimental torpedoes from Exectuion Hour etc....


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 16:59:14


Post by: 4M2A


Tau and Humans are very different. Their society and the way the think is not the same as humans.

As Agnosto pointed out the Tau work so effectively because they work together. Even now we would be advancing much faster if some people weren't holding others back. Thats only with a small percentage of the population working out new ideas. If we had (about) a quarter of the population trained from birth to invent new technology while the rest of the people did everything they could to support them we would be moving forward much faster.

Most humans are cautious when it comes to change (while this has decreased in recent years it still exists and is clear in the imperium), the majority of people like what they know and are afraid of large changes. Humans need to improve gradually for it to be accepted. Tau support change, if there is no logical reason no to improve they aren't afraid of new technology or ideas. This helps the Tau not only in technology but also in developing tactics.

Finally the Tau also utilise other races. It's not just Tau who are thinking of new technology but many other species also contributing. As they think in different ways they get a lot of vastly different ideas. A problem which cannot be overcome by the Tau mentality may be easy to a kroot, ect.

P.s. Look at the weapon stats Tau are clearly better than the imperial technology wise. While the imperiums best technology beats a lot of the Tau's equipment, the Tau fundamental understanding of how it actually works is much better. Only the top tech priests understand a lot of imperial technology, whereas the most of the Earth caste understand how their weapons work. The imperium reproduces the Tau invent.

Thinking all machines are controlled by gods who need to be worshiped shows a very low level of true understanding- whether this is the technique needed to use the item or just superstion is irrelevant they still think there is a god in their tank.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 17:05:06


Post by: Pilau Rice


The Eldar had the old ones to guide them. They fell at their peak and don't seem to have advanced any further.

The Imperium might be far more advanced than its current status, but the AdMech is very restrictive on the technology that sees the light of day, abhorring stuff like AI.

The Tau just seem to be more ... sensible with the way they go about things. They don't have to recite a 30 page instruction manual to turn the ignition switch

First chime the third bell of supplication to rouse the machine spirit from its slumber
Rub the anointment oil anti clockwise for the past design
Rub the anointment oil clockwise for the work to come .. etc etc


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 17:37:18


Post by: agnosto


IvanTih wrote:Then you ignore Eldar who had plenty of time to advance,they did the same thing and had far longer time to do it than 6k years that Tau had.
Also advances have been made from Horus Heresy and plenty of them,new ship classes,better las weapons,improved Lance and Plasma weapons,planet Tesla is full of experimental technology,experimental torpedoes from Exectuion Hour etc....


As others have mentioned, the Eldar fell...an honest to goodness God of Chaos came out of the warp and ate most of their souls. I don't know about you, but I wouldn't be too concerned with advancing technology when I'm being hunted by a hungry, soul devouring god.

You proved my point in your second sentence. If the Imperium has all the great advances, why don't they use them? Because humans form cliques or factions instead of producing a concerted effort for the advancement of their race. The Tau all work together towards a common goal and are more than happy to enlist the aid or other species, they do not run around screaming "Purge the unclean, Kill the alien!". Exchanges of ideas produce greater exposure to different thought modes which in turn produce better results. The Tau learn from each race they encounter; Ion technology from the Demiurg, transportation from the Nicassar and manpower from kroot, vespid and the occasional human.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 18:38:57


Post by: Exopheric


Grey Templar wrote:
Nurglitch wrote:In an Imperium spanning an entire galaxy, consisting of about 1 million worlds at any given time, and with around 10,000 years of history, one can imagine that technology advances and regresses all the time in the Imperium.

Speaking of, I don't suppose the original poster can give us all the low-down on how technological advancement is supposed to go? Because it's pretty easy to find rates of technological advancement to be incredible if you don't understand what technology is, and how it advances.



when you think about it, Advanced Tech is just putting old, simpler, tech together in new and interesting ways

the Admech has all the tech right in front of them, they just have to fit everything back together. it's the most nightmarishly complex jigsaw puzzle ever and the pieces are scattered all over the table, floor, front yard, and down the kitchin sink.


True, "advancement" is relative... I remember a quote from Rogue Trader where they pointed out that despite the overall Dark Ages feel, HUDs and integrated circuits would be as innovative in the 41st Millennium as stone circles are now.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 18:54:00


Post by: 1hadhq


agnosto wrote:
The Tau learn from each race they encounter.


No.They don't.

Ran into almost every other race and got their asses kicked all the time.
Doesn't sound like a learning process.



Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 19:07:45


Post by: agnosto


1hadhq wrote:
agnosto wrote:
The Tau learn from each race they encounter.


No.They don't.

Ran into almost every other race and got their asses kicked all the time.
Doesn't sound like a learning process.



Well, they learned that Tyranids like to eat them and Orks like to kill them, it's a learning process; they learned which races to shoot on sight.

Not sure about the butt-kicking since they destroyed hive fleet Gorgon (Codex: Tyranids p. 18-21), there's that whole book about Tau beating on IG (Imperial Armour III) and Farsight has kicked the Orks around quite a bit but you go ahead and believe what you want to.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 19:10:04


Post by: KamikazeCanuck


IvanTih wrote:My small rant.

You know what is "so utterly ridiculous as to not merely strain credibility, but throw it to the ground, stomp on it, and then put it through the shredder for good measure"? That a civilization can go from cavemen to matching the elder species of 40k in a mere six thousand years. Here's a hint, it took humans tens of millenia to reach this point.

The Tau could have pulled it off if they displayed levels of competence that would make the Moties look like a bunch of slowed children, but their technology has stagnated for centuries, too.

THAT is why I despise the Tau. Their very existence is an affront to logic and common sense.

I also hate Tau fanboys that state that Tau are more advanced than Imperium which they are not.



Tau are actually just advancing at the same rate as us (real life humans). It's quite plausible. In 400 years who knows what we'll have but it'll probably be quite tau like if not more advanced.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 19:16:25


Post by: Kroothawk


It took humans 6000 years to get from a primitive to a high tech space faring civiization. That's what history tells us (well, some of us )
It took Tau 6000 years to get from primitive civilizations to high tech space faring species.
That is obviousy totally overpowered, Mary Sue and unfair!

Wait, this is the monthly "I hate Tau" thread, where facts and logical reasoning are not welcome, so forget about that!


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 19:16:27


Post by: 1hadhq


agnosto wrote:

Not sure about the butt-kicking since they destroyed hive fleet Gorgon (Codex: Tyranids p. 18-21), there's that whole book about Tau beating on IG (Imperial Armour III) and Farsight has kicked the Orks around quite a bit but you go ahead and believe what you want to.


Youre not aware of the trend?

Nids are encircling the eastern fringe and most of the Tau storys in 5th ed codices contain nids having some fish....

So go ahead and believe what you want, right back to you sir.

I for one prefer to carefully listen. As GW may have a plan.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 19:33:28


Post by: KamikazeCanuck


Kroothawk wrote:It took humans 6000 years to get from a primitive to a high tech space faring civiization. That's what history tells us (well, some of us )
It took Tau 6000 years to get from primitive civilizations to high tech space faring species.
That is obviousy totally overpowered, Mary Sue and unfair!

Wait, this is the monthly "I hate Tau" thread, where facts and logical reasoning are not welcome, so forget about that!


Yes, : Tau are exactly as smart and inventive as humans. (maybe a little less actually). Problem is Humans have a tendency to reset their technology level every now and then with dark ages. Tau fixed that by having a lack of religion and by eliminating civil strife (and civil war) with magic pixy dust.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 19:50:51


Post by: punkow


Blah.... You dislike the Taus??? You can't even imagine how much I like them.... A totally out of sync race with the rest of the setting, an horrid cancer here to disrupt the majesty of a long time written space opera... they're totally meaningless, they came out just to blink the eye to a younger audience, making a kind of Gundam wing army.... oooooh... and they are so goooooood.... Pathetic...
Fortunately their codex will have to wait very long before coming, because my truly hope is them totally wiped out from the 40k universe and all their puny miniatures molten to reuse the plastic for shiny new guardsmen.

By the Emperor it will be done
Inquisitorial order no 193467289
Thought of the day: Do not suffer the grey stupid E.T to live.
....
little bit flaming ???? :-*


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 19:52:36


Post by: KamikazeCanuck


little bit


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 19:56:03


Post by: punkow


eheh... jsut asking to take my flamin with sense of humour...


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 20:03:46


Post by: IvanTih


agnosto wrote:
1hadhq wrote:
agnosto wrote:
The Tau learn from each race they encounter.


No.They don't.

Ran into almost every other race and got their asses kicked all the time.
Doesn't sound like a learning process.



Well, they learned that Tyranids like to eat them and Orks like to kill them, it's a learning process; they learned which races to shoot on sight.

Not sure about the butt-kicking since they destroyed hive fleet Gorgon (Codex: Tyranids p. 18-21), there's that whole book about Tau beating on IG (Imperial Armour III) and Farsight has kicked the Orks around quite a bit but you go ahead and believe what you want to.

Orks also outsmarted them.
Taros was extremly small campaign for the IOM while it was big for the Tau,but that IA is one of the greatest fluff fails if not greater than IA8,the marines act completely out of character and what's worse they had orbital superiority(well I consider Courage and Honor a payback in which Tau also do the same thing).


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 20:07:05


Post by: punkow


IA 8 is the worst FW material we ever had....
But also the third....


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 20:08:15


Post by: KamikazeCanuck


Really? the previous ones were so good...


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 20:11:47


Post by: IvanTih


Yes, their weapons are really quite good - but it's more a matter of design than technology. The IoM can construct weapons, armor, forcefields and so on just as good as those of the Tau. The lasgun is designed to be a technologically simple, robust, low-logistic weapon - but the IoM can also build Bolters or Hellguns.
A suit of battle armor might be better than a suit of power armor, but it's also significantly larger. With an equivalent size increase, the IoM could also build a set of Terminator Armor with a Jump Pack - and they already have that for power armor.
The IoM once had technology to craft fully sentient machines, and they can still build machine spirits that are about as good as Tau drones.

But the IoM has a lot of technology the Tau could not replicated. For example, conversion beamers are more advanced than anything the Tau have. They also lack all of the IoMs warp technology.

The point is that the Tau are not more technologically advanced than the IoM - they are more capable of fielding their high-end stuff, but what you actually see IS their high-end stuff - while the IoM is mostly using simpler technology.



Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 20:15:09


Post by: punkow


I say it for raven guard players... They deserved a lot more....
In general I like IA but the tau one and the eight sucks....
IA3 saty low just because is about tau ( My apologies... I really can't stand them)
The 8th simply has a totally unnecessary story, with elysians , orks and ravens stuck together for reasons not furtherly explained


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/22 22:27:59


Post by: Mr Nobody


It might have taken 6000 years to reach the moon, but the time to reach planes to ships was less then a century. Technology's rate of expansion became exponential after the industrial revolution, so if the tau reached the revolution earleir than us, then they could easily be advancing faster than us.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 00:06:41


Post by: Ledabot


I still dont understand why people hate tau. everything cant be evil or its a pritty pointless game eh. tau are serposed to fill the giant gap filled were the honorable species from every other si-fi thing ever went.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 00:06:54


Post by: Avatar 720


You see planets are directly affect by the warp storm if the storm directly touches them and that usually ends bad for the life living there(it mutates and then the planets get sucked into the warp or it turns to Daemon world).


Again with all the warp storm knowledge nobody else seems to have. I'd love to know your reference for this.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 00:08:09


Post by: GalacticDefender


Mustela wrote:I don't like Tau because they have a 40K army, and they are so tiny, they are pointless from the bigger picture - So why are they even an army? Especially when there are much cooler, much more relevant, things that GW could make (CODEX: Mechanicus?).

Oh yeah, and all my friends play them.

+Ultramr is WAAAAAYYYYY bigger than the Tau empire on the map in the rulebook.
+They can't last forever - no psykers means communications issues
+No warp drives - that'll give any significant expansion a real roadblock
+If they recruit psykers from other races, they just got themselves a free daemon portal.


They do have warp drives, but they just "skim" the edge of the warp. This is safer, but not as fast.


(Off topic: I really hate anime but really like Tau Battlesuits. Weird, huh?)


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Shaman wrote:
Retribution wrote:40k in general is an affront to logic; in a universe with Space Jesus and Space Elves you're completely thrown off by the time-span in which a species advanced technologically


I read space elves as Space Elvis. And I was thinking who is meant to be space elvis? Answer me that dakka.


Also it seems like OP is just jealous of the codex saying they are so advanced.

The reason I don't like tau is I got sick of how they play.. (used to have them in 4th)



Here we go again. Nobody ever likes snipers, in tabletop games or otherwise.

One of my friends was convinced that Tau sucked, until I wiped out about half of his green tide in one turn.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 01:01:53


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


Ya the Tau advancement seems like the human advancement in the Mass Effect fluff. We FINALY got to mars and we found super advanced tech wich we replicated. That would make sense for the Tau story i think.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 03:27:38


Post by: ShadowAngel159


Ledabot wrote:I still dont understand why people hate tau. everything cant be evil or its a pretty pointless game eh? Tau are supposed to fill the giant gap where the honorable species from every other sci-fi thing ever went.


Honorable? The Tau? I don't think that "Join us or die" is very honorable.

Here's a standard expansion of the Tau Empire:

Tau: Hello, new world! Would you like to join our empire for the Greater Good? We'll treat you as second-rate citizens, use your military as cannon fodder for our superior military and guns, and force you to help us make better technology by taking yours! All for the Greater Good! Would you like to join us?
Planet: No. Go away now.
Tau: Fine... then we'll do this the hard way.
**Tau invasion fleet comes in and takes over. Native population becomes second-rate citizens. Laws for population control take place. Majority of people become labor force. Military becomes cannon fodder for Tau Fire Caste. Any and all useful technology is taken away and used by the Tau for future conquests. All for the "Greater Good."**

Now, I don't know about you, but I don't find socialism (or communism, whatever you want to call it) very honorable. Because that is what the Tau are: Socialists. In Space. They say "Everyone is equal." Here is how it really is: "Everyone is equal. The Tau are just more equal. And the Ethereals are even more equal." Also, their policy for expansion is "Join us or die" pretty much.

Yes, I will admit that the Tau are unified unlike the Imperium, and maybe even a little more advanced than the Imperium (please don't kill me, Imperial fanboys. I'm on your side [sorta]). But NO race in all of 40k is truly honorable. None. Not even the Tau and their so-called "Greater Good." If you say no to what they want from you, they will pick up their rifle and shoot you in between the eyes, just like every other race in all of Warhammer 40,000. All for the "Greater Good."

Citations? Tau codex, Dawn of War (yes I use that as a citation. I consider that game to be fluff) tau ending, various books with the Tau in them (I do not remember specific names so please do not ask me for them), a lot of the Tau Empire fluff.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 04:35:09


Post by: asimo77


Every race gets to have their one thing that they're really good at or makes them stand out.

Why does everyone else get some badass defining characteristics, which draws in players, but the tau can't?.

Their thing is tech, the necrons have their resilience, eldar are psychic space ninjas, the IG are your everyman, and so on for everyrace.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 05:19:31


Post by: Retribution


ShadowAngel159 wrote:
Ledabot wrote:I still dont understand why people hate tau. everything cant be evil or its a pretty pointless game eh? Tau are supposed to fill the giant gap where the honorable species from every other sci-fi thing ever went.


Honorable? The Tau? I don't think that "Join us or die" is very honorable.

Here's a standard expansion of the Tau Empire:

Tau: Hello, new world! Would you like to join our empire for the Greater Good? We'll treat you as second-rate citizens, use your military as cannon fodder for our superior military and guns, and force you to help us make better technology by taking yours! All for the Greater Good! Would you like to join us?
Planet: No. Go away now.
Tau: Fine... then we'll do this the hard way.
**Tau invasion fleet comes in and takes over. Native population becomes second-rate citizens. Laws for population control take place. Majority of people become labor force. Military becomes cannon fodder for Tau Fire Caste. Any and all useful technology is taken away and used by the Tau for future conquests. All for the "Greater Good."**

Now, I don't know about you, but I don't find socialism (or communism, whatever you want to call it) very honorable. Because that is what the Tau are: Socialists. In Space. They say "Everyone is equal." Here is how it really is: "Everyone is equal. The Tau are just more equal. And the Ethereals are even more equal." Also, their policy for expansion is "Join us or die" pretty much.

Yes, I will admit that the Tau are unified unlike the Imperium, and maybe even a little more advanced than the Imperium (please don't kill me, Imperial fanboys. I'm on your side [sorta]). But NO race in all of 40k is truly honorable. None. Not even the Tau and their so-called "Greater Good." If you say no to what they want from you, they will pick up their rifle and shoot you in between the eyes, just like every other race in all of Warhammer 40,000. All for the "Greater Good."

Citations? Tau codex, Dawn of War (yes I use that as a citation. I consider that game to be fluff) tau ending, various books with the Tau in them (I do not remember specific names so please do not ask me for them), a lot of the Tau Empire fluff.

I'd say the option to join is far and away above flat-out xenocide on the spot. "Join us or die" is better than"...DIE"; and please, go read up on the actual meaning behind socialism and communism


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 05:24:50


Post by: Warboss Imbad Ironskull


Also those who say the Tau are communists because of the Greater Good need to realise that the Imperium once did the exact same thing as the Tau (it's called the Great Crusade) and where even open to negotiation and peace with alien races before the Emperor fell.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
And they should probably read the Communist Manifesto so they actually know what a communist is


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 07:09:45


Post by: Ledabot


and btw

TAU ARE NOT COMMUNISTS. THEY ARE UTLITARIALSTS!!!

thats one of my fave lines


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 07:09:50


Post by: blazinpsycho&typhooni


Please don't bring politics into this... though I think actually reading up on terminology would be beneficial to both you and the rest of the posters, it saves a lot of angry hate filled posts.

I actually don't mind Tau, I see them as just better guard, though not as numerous. But I also see them as the new kid on the block with some flashy new toys, somebody gonna get a hurt real bad.

People just dislike tau cuz their stupid camper snipers, it's annoying, but hey it works.

Also I think it is entirely plausible to advance that quickly. Look at us, 2000 years ago we were building with stone, and had to actually walk places. Now our buildings are created to withstand earthquakes, and travel time has shortened, though slightly more tedious. Our technology, at the moment, is growing at an exponential rate. Look at our technology, our lifestyle. Can you guys remember having things like these 20 years ago? I can't, but that may because I flew a couple feet and smashed headfirst into the pavement....


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 07:12:42


Post by: Bryce-2-Good87


The point is that they did evolve so fast. Its a game dude, chill out.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 07:21:50


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


I know next to nothing about the Tau, so correct me if im wrong. If it isnt mentioned how they advanced to their present age of tech, is it possible they found some old tech from the Imperium or Eldar? Then fiddled with it and ended up improving it? Plz correct me if im wrong cuz I have a felling that it is explained somewhere and I havent read it yet.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 09:41:18


Post by: IvanTih


xXSir MontyXx wrote:I know next to nothing about the Tau, so correct me if im wrong. If it isnt mentioned how they advanced to their present age of tech, is it possible they found some old tech from the Imperium or Eldar? Then fiddled with it and ended up improving it? Plz correct me if im wrong cuz I have a felling that it is explained somewhere and I havent read it yet.

That's not correct,except for their FTL they have found some ship and managed to create the FTL drive from the ship's FTL drive.
They're not more advanced than them,they are small and thus every soldier can get high-end gear,Imperium on the other hand prefers to use simplier tech.
Take Lasgun for example,it's simple,ammo is easy to find same matters for replacment parts.
Pulse rifles are on contrary harder to replace and their ammo is harder to replace.
Plus Tau don't have anything like Conversion Beamer or the Warp technologies.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Ledabot wrote:I still dont understand why people hate tau. everything cant be evil or its a pritty pointless game eh. tau are serposed to fill the giant gap filled were the honorable species from every other si-fi thing ever went.

They are evil,Sons of Dorn mentions Tau commiting genocide,then we have planet Nimbosa from Planetstrike where Tau forces also commit genocide which prompts crusade in which SM kick their ass and would continiue soo if they haven't been recalled,in Deathwatch RPG we have concetration camps,people disapearing for saying something wrong etc....



Automatically Appended Next Post:
Avatar 720 wrote:
You see planets are directly affect by the warp storm if the storm directly touches them and that usually ends bad for the life living there(it mutates and then the planets get sucked into the warp or it turns to Daemon world).


Again with all the warp storm knowledge nobody else seems to have. I'd love to know your reference for this.

Remember Aurelia,the planet was directly touched by the warp storm and it was consumed by the warp.
Only when you're inside warp then the time dilation kicks in.
Their planet was surrounded was by the warp storm,but not touched by it otherwise the life on the planet would mutate or the planet would suffer the fate of Aurelia(also remember planet Medusa which was also consumed by the Warp storm).


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 10:53:24


Post by: Ledabot


IvanTih wrote:
xXSir MontyXx wrote:I know next to nothing about the Tau, so correct me if im wrong. If it isnt mentioned how they advanced to their present age of tech, is it possible they found some old tech from the Imperium or Eldar? Then fiddled with it and ended up improving it? Plz correct me if im wrong cuz I have a felling that it is explained somewhere and I havent read it yet.

That's not correct,except for their FTL they have found some ship and managed to create the FTL drive from the ship's FTL drive.
They're not more advanced than them,they are small and thus every soldier can get high-end gear,Imperium on the other hand prefers to use simplier tech.
Take Lasgun for example,it's simple,ammo is easy to find same matters for replacment parts.
Pulse rifles are on contrary harder to replace and their ammo is harder to replace.
Plus Tau don't have anything like Conversion Beamer or the Warp technologies.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Ledabot wrote:I still dont understand why people hate tau. everything cant be evil or its a pritty pointless game eh. tau are serposed to fill the giant gap filled were the honorable species from every other si-fi thing ever went.

They are evil,Sons of Dorn mentions Tau commiting genocide,then we have planet Nimbosa from Planetstrike where Tau forces also commit genocide which prompts crusade in which SM kick their ass and would continiue soo if they haven't been recalled,in Deathwatch RPG we have concetration camps,people disapearing for saying something wrong etc....



Automatically Appended Next Post:
Avatar 720 wrote:
You see planets are directly affect by the warp storm if the storm directly touches them and that usually ends bad for the life living there(it mutates and then the planets get sucked into the warp or it turns to Daemon world).


Again with all the warp storm knowledge nobody else seems to have. I'd love to know your reference for this.

Remember Aurelia,the planet was directly touched by the warp storm and it was consumed by the warp.
Only when you're inside warp then the time dilation kicks in.
Their planet was surrounded was by the warp storm,but not touched by it otherwise the life on the planet would mutate or the planet would suffer the fate of Aurelia(also remember planet Medusa which was also consumed by the Warp storm).


because there evil sooo does not cut it. SM commit genocide dayly. on problems there


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 11:08:33


Post by: IvanTih


It doesn't make them anymore nicer than the rest of 40k.



Automatically Appended Next Post:
The Tau in the Jericho Reach region are the closest we've got to a look at what life can be like under the Tau at its worst.

Forced sterilisation, indoctrination camps, people disappear when they express discontent, and either don't reappear, or reappear as brainwashed cheerleaders.

The Tau use subject species as test subjects for dangerous enviroments, rather than risking the lives of Tau, and in one situation are basically firing off ships with subject race pilots into the stellar equivalent of an industrial potato peeler.

Secret labs with Nazi style medical experiments and "psychological" testing as well.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 11:31:01


Post by: Rubberanvil


The Tau is facing an extinction without even knowing it with their caste system. It is one for the caste to be based on labor or politics where individuals transferred from one caste to another. It is borderline suicidal doing it by making each caste an almost biologically different sub-species.





Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 11:32:51


Post by: IvanTih


Rubberanvil wrote:The Tau is facing an extinction without even knowing it with their caste system. It is one for the caste to be based on labor or politics where individuals transferred from one caste to another. It is borderline suicidal doing it by making each caste an almost biologically different sub-species.




Nah,they'll piss off the IoM enough to launch a big crusade on them.
Imperium steamrolls over them.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 11:39:11


Post by: ChaosGalvatron


Maybe the Tau represent just how much trouble the imperium is in. They cant even wipe out these jerks. Back in the Great Crusade days the Tau would have been a blip. heck most of the mentioned troublesome compliances in the HH series would have a tech level as good as the tau.
the only reason the tau matter is because they have a codex. in universe they should be irrelevant.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 11:55:19


Post by: IvanTih


ChaosGalvatron wrote:Maybe the Tau represent just how much trouble the imperium is in. They cant even wipe out these jerks. Back in the Great Crusade days the Tau would have been a blip. heck most of the mentioned troublesome compliances in the HH series would have a tech level as good as the tau.
the only reason the tau matter is because they have a codex. in universe they should be irrelevant.

The Imperium isn't in such trouble.
They steamroll Tau,but they won't because they have better things to do,but if Tau continiue to expand then the Imperium will send a crusade(Sabbath Worlds crusade had 10,000 ships,imagine Tau facing that).


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 12:00:47


Post by: Ledabot


IvanTih wrote:
ChaosGalvatron wrote:Maybe the Tau represent just how much trouble the imperium is in. They cant even wipe out these jerks. Back in the Great Crusade days the Tau would have been a blip. heck most of the mentioned troublesome compliances in the HH series would have a tech level as good as the tau.
the only reason the tau matter is because they have a codex. in universe they should be irrelevant.

The Imperium isn't in such trouble.
They steamroll Tau,but they won't because they have better things to do,but if Tau continiue to expand then the Imperium will send a crusade(Sabbath Worlds crusade had 10,000 ships,imagine Tau facing that).


Thats right. both of you. the imperium could steamroll the tau, but they cant afford to. removing recorces on one front to squidge the tau would mean an incersion from another race. they are a perfict example of how limited the imperiums resources are and how bad the're in the poo,


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 12:09:03


Post by: IvanTih


Ledabot wrote:
IvanTih wrote:
ChaosGalvatron wrote:Maybe the Tau represent just how much trouble the imperium is in. They cant even wipe out these jerks. Back in the Great Crusade days the Tau would have been a blip. heck most of the mentioned troublesome compliances in the HH series would have a tech level as good as the tau.
the only reason the tau matter is because they have a codex. in universe they should be irrelevant.

The Imperium isn't in such trouble.
They steamroll Tau,but they won't because they have better things to do,but if Tau continiue to expand then the Imperium will send a crusade(Sabbath Worlds crusade had 10,000 ships,imagine Tau facing that).


Thats right. both of you. the imperium could steamroll the tau, but they cant afford to. removing recorces on one front to squidge the tau would mean an incersion from another race. they are a perfict example of how limited the imperiums resources are and how bad the're in the poo,

Actually that says how large and important are Tyranid and Chaos incursions.
The Imperium just doesn't care for Tau right now.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 12:11:25


Post by: ChaosGalvatron


Ledabot wrote:
IvanTih wrote:
ChaosGalvatron wrote:Maybe the Tau represent just how much trouble the imperium is in. They cant even wipe out these jerks. Back in the Great Crusade days the Tau would have been a blip. heck most of the mentioned troublesome compliances in the HH series would have a tech level as good as the tau.
the only reason the tau matter is because they have a codex. in universe they should be irrelevant.

The Imperium isn't in such trouble.
They steamroll Tau,but they won't because they have better things to do,but if Tau continiue to expand then the Imperium will send a crusade(Sabbath Worlds crusade had 10,000 ships,imagine Tau facing that).


Thats right. both of you. the imperium could steamroll the tau, but they cant afford to. removing recorces on one front to squidge the tau would mean an incersion from another race. they are a perfict example of how limited the imperiums resources are and how bad the're in the poo,

Yeah. unrestricted, the imperium could steamroll anyone. But it is been pulled in so many directions, so many foes, both external and internal that it cant deal with everything. Sure the imperium can smack down abaddon every time, but what is been lost otherwise? The sabbat worlds crusade was a big one, but hardly big enough for the task. If not for gaunts the crusade would have failed.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 12:22:09


Post by: Zweischneid


IvanTih wrote:My small rant.

You know what is "so utterly ridiculous as to not merely strain credibility, but throw it to the ground, stomp on it, and then put it through the shredder for good measure"? That a civilization can go from cavemen to matching the elder species of 40k in a mere six thousand years. Here's a hint, it took humans tens of millenia to reach this point.

The Tau could have pulled it off if they displayed levels of competence that would make the Moties look like a bunch of slowed children, but their technology has stagnated for centuries, too.

THAT is why I despise the Tau. Their very existence is an affront to logic and common sense.

I also hate Tau fanboys that state that Tau are more advanced than Imperium which they are not.



Um. I think that the "couldn't pull it off, yet did" is the whole point of the backstory.

Tau advanced unnaturally fast as a civilization and in their technology; the Codex stresses that point explicity. Add to that the convenient, unnatural warpstorm. Later the sudden appareance of the Etheral with a Tau-controling organ from half a galaxy away, etc.. , etc.. , . The Codex is choke-full of that.. and on purpose.

The whole point of the Tau background is that it isn't natural evolution but that "someone" or "somethings" been tinkering with them. GW could've just made them an old civilization. They purposfully added the "paradox" or "riddle" of their rapid advancement that you complain about to the Tau Background as a little "mystery" to fuel some grimdark speculation that would be different to "the just evolved like any other civilization".


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 15:20:26


Post by: nosferatu1001


Ivan - bolters arent "advanced" - powerful, yes, but not advanced.

THey require constant maintenance to keep working (ref: cleaning at every oppurtunity) and re mainly designed for SHock&Awe (or thunderbolt and lightning) effects. Same as the space marines.

Tau have advanced at about the same rate as humans have to this point, if slightly quicker - which given they were likely given a leg up by the Eldar isnt surprising.

Additionally: IoM does NOT create, and has NEVER created, sentient machines. The robot war was pre heresy remember!

Remember there have been more than 1 beat back for humanity, and then has lost most technology - and rebuilding technology (bootstrapping) is known to be hard. The amount of knowledge needed to innovate increases exponentially, and if you lose knowledge of the basics you can end up unable to innovate - maintain, yes, but no "new" stuff! This accounts for 10k years of slow degredation - the most common phrase being "older is better" - older ships are better ships. Older titans are better titans. The waxing occasional pushes (incremental increases it seems - improvements to existing tech, not truly revolutionary) upwards seem FAR outweighed by the losses.

For example the Throne cant be replicated, and is failing. Once it does the AStronomicon is dead and so is long distance, fast warp travel.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 16:20:39


Post by: IvanTih


Still all of Tau soldiers are armed with their High end gear,they can afford it because they are small and they don' have problems with arming trillions of men like the IoM does.
Still in universe they aren't especially dangerous alien empire,they may conquer several system,but that will invite Imperial Retribution.
Well AdMech created an AI in a short story(in Collected Visions) and remember some of the Khamrians have created inteliigent robotic serveants,but I was mainly reffering to the Golden Age humans,sorry.
Regardless IoM would love to arm every soldier with high-end gear which would make every fire warrior ashame(high end for Human scale,Marines would still be the only ones to get certain things).
Regardless 40k is inconsistent in the regression,we have many examples of innovation.
We have experimental torpedoes from Execution Hour,Hellfire bolter shells(variant which uses acids and poisons which are effective against Tyranids who have very,very good immune system).
They reverse engineer personal cloaking device from Tau(Deathwatch),they also had cloak technology long before Tau(Deathwatch RPG,Horus Heresy and Kill Team(They cloak five metre shuttle)).
Then we have new space ships classes and advances which happened after Horus Heresy.Power Armor has also improved by little,vehicles also advanced,advances in lance(perfected in M37) and plasma weaponry(they actually innovated and discovered a lost technlogy from Golden Age of Technology).
Adeptus Mechanicus aren't so stangnant(we have planet named Tesla which was full of new experimental weaponry,Codex:Tyranids 5th edition).



Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 17:08:52


Post by: nosferatu1001


Remember: AI = tech heresy of the highest order!

As I said: incremental upgrades.

Nothing NEW, totally new, has been created.

BTW: just because they had cloaks before Tau doesnt mean they still can cloak - in fact they cant. Nemesis showed just how much has been lost - even around the Great Crusade.

This is why most of the AdMechs drive is in rediscovering STCs - they simply dont understand the technology as well as they would like.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 17:14:58


Post by: IvanTih


nosferatu1001 wrote:Remember: AI = tech heresy of the highest order!

As I said: incremental upgrades.

Nothing NEW, totally new, has been created.

BTW: just because they had cloaks before Tau doesnt mean they still can cloak - in fact they cant. Nemesis showed just how much has been lost - even around the Great Crusade.

This is why most of the AdMechs drive is in rediscovering STCs - they simply dont understand the technology as well as they would like.

Well Deathwatch RPG says otherwise(they have ships that can cloak,personal cloaking fields were reverse engineered from the Tau,also Tyranid codex from the 4th edition says that,Kill Team has cloaked five metre shuttle).


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 17:14:59


Post by: Pilau Rice


You seem fond of the Mechanicum so i guess you have read the book of the same name where some technology was deemed to dangerous and locked any and never used, until the Heresy.

The AdMech is very careful about what tech it employs. If it doesn't understand it or doesn't have an STC or it's something they can't reverse engineer, they won't use it. Ok, if it's currently in use by the Imperium, like Plasma Weaponry, and they can maintain it then it's a bit different but new tech is generally a


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 17:15:35


Post by: 4M2A


The problem isn't only they don't understand but that they don't want to.

If they looked at the technology they have as machines to be examined rather than holy items, they could relearn how to invent.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 17:22:01


Post by: IvanTih


4M2A wrote:The problem isn't only they don't understand but that they don't want to.

If they looked at the technology they have as machines to be examined rather than holy items, they could relearn how to invent.

Some sources,my post above points that they understand a great deal of it.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 17:41:50


Post by: KamikazeCanuck


Ledabot wrote:and btw

TAU ARE NOT COMMUNISTS. THEY ARE UTLITARIALSTS!!!

thats one of my fave lines


I know, wtf. Another Tau thread ruined by Stalin! Damn you Stalin!


Automatically Appended Next Post:
xXSir MontyXx wrote:Ya the Tau advancement seems like the human advancement in the Mass Effect fluff. We FINALY got to mars and we found super advanced tech wich we replicated. That would make sense for the Tau story i think.


I supose that's fair. So protheans for them was Orks!?


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 18:10:56


Post by: punkow


Don't offend comrade stalin! Or Superman the red son will punish you! eheh
Anyway guys... there isn't anything in tau ideology of greater good even far comparable to communism (I know it, read all Marx (yes, even Das Kapital), Lenin, Bucharin and even a little bit of Planned economy principles for my last exam).

They're more similar to the corporativist Italian fascist state, without all the racist gak, moved in a pan-alien view ( something like HiroHito japan panasiatism)... after all they're Anime mecha's Fans

Anyway let's not talk about politics ( I love to talk about politics so this makes me suffer) ... let's talk about how much Tau sucks!!!


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 18:16:45


Post by: Grey Templar


punkow wrote:Don't offend comrade stalin! Or Superman the red son will punish you! eheh
Anyway guys... there isn't anything in tau ideology of greater good even far comparable to communism (I know it, read all Marx (yes, even Das Kapital), Lenin, Bucharin and even a little bit of Planned economy principles for my last exam).

They're more similar to the corporativist Italian fascist state, without all the racist gak, moved in a pan-alien view ( something like HiroHito japan panasiatism)... after all they're Anime mecha's Fans

Anyway let's not talk about politics ( I love to talk about politics so this makes me suffer) ... let's talk about how much Tau sucks!!!


have you read about how the T'au actually organize their Empire internally. they are incredibly favorable to T'au over other allies.


when a planet is conquored they immediatly Sterilize all disenting individuals so only those who are loyal to the T'au empire can reproduce.

Non-T'au are treated as 2nd class citizens. they have to work much harder then a T'au in a similer job would have to. they explain it by saying "You must prove your loyalty to the Greater Good"

the T'au use non-t'au soldiers as cannon fodder. Humans, Vespids, and Kroot are all viewed as expendable troops.

the T'au also compress the 4 castes. neither can cross breed with the other and are stuck with doing the jobs in their particular sphere.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 18:31:16


Post by: Medium of Death


Grey Templar wrote:
have you read about how the T'au actually organize their Empire internally. they are incredibly favorable to T'au over other allies.


when a planet is conquored they immediatly Sterilize all disenting individuals so only those who are loyal to the T'au empire can reproduce.

Non-T'au are treated as 2nd class citizens. they have to work much harder then a T'au in a similer job would have to. they explain it by saying "You must prove your loyalty to the Greater Good"

the T'au use non-t'au soldiers as cannon fodder. Humans, Vespids, and Kroot are all viewed as expendable troops.

the T'au also compress the 4 castes. neither can cross breed with the other and are stuck with doing the jobs in their particular sphere.


Where did you get all this from? AFAIK the only thing that is somewhat close to being true is the sterilisation thing. Which is from a videogame, so not actually present in any background material that I am aware of.

Why do people always want to paint the Tau with the same grimdarkness that everything else is soaked in?


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 18:38:27


Post by: 1hadhq


Grimdark is Mandatory in 40k.

T'au have this "more equal" thing going on and also fail at real alliances ( ie 2 powerful allies not this star trekkian style empire they run ).
Sooner or later T'au end as nid food.
Why? Because they choose to undermine other Races grip on their worlds instead of joining in the fight against nids.



Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 18:38:39


Post by: KamikazeCanuck


Medium of Death wrote:
Grey Templar wrote:
have you read about how the T'au actually organize their Empire internally. they are incredibly favorable to T'au over other allies.


when a planet is conquored they immediatly Sterilize all disenting individuals so only those who are loyal to the T'au empire can reproduce.

Non-T'au are treated as 2nd class citizens. they have to work much harder then a T'au in a similer job would have to. they explain it by saying "You must prove your loyalty to the Greater Good"

the T'au use non-t'au soldiers as cannon fodder. Humans, Vespids, and Kroot are all viewed as expendable troops.

the T'au also compress the 4 castes. neither can cross breed with the other and are stuck with doing the jobs in their particular sphere.


Where did you get all this from? AFAIK the only thing that is somewhat close to being true is the sterilisation thing. Which is from a videogame, so not actually present in any background material that I am aware of.

Why do people always want to paint the Tau with the same grimdarkness that everything else is soaked in?


To try to make them cool.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 19:15:55


Post by: IvanTih


Medium of Death wrote:Where did you get all this from? AFAIK the only thing that is somewhat close to being true is the sterilisation thing. Which is from a videogame, so not actually present in any background material that I am aware of.

Why do people always want to paint the Tau with the same grimdarkness that everything else is soaked in?

Deathwatch RPG.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 19:33:30


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


Um. I think that the "couldn't pull it off, yet did" is the whole point of the backstory.

Tau advanced unnaturally fast as a civilization and in their technology; the Codex stresses that point explicity. Add to that the convenient, unnatural warpstorm. Later the sudden appareance of the Etheral with a Tau-controling organ from half a galaxy away, etc.. , etc.. , . The Codex is choke-full of that.. and on purpose.

The whole point of the Tau background is that it isn't natural evolution but that "someone" or "somethings" been tinkering with them. GW could've just made them an old civilization. They purposfully added the "paradox" or "riddle" of their rapid advancement that you complain about to the Tau Background as a little "mystery" to fuel some grimdark speculation that would be different to "the just evolved like any other civilization".


I agree 100%, GW clearly made them evolve this fast so that the other races would look down on them, so that they would always seem like toddlers with nice toys. This is probably the best explanation of why they are the way they are. Really they seem quite oblivious to the way the milky way works.


Ledabot wrote:
IvanTih wrote:
ChaosGalvatron wrote:
Maybe the Tau represent just how much trouble the imperium is in. They cant even wipe out these jerks. Back in the Great Crusade days the Tau would have been a blip. heck most of the mentioned troublesome compliances in the HH series would have a tech level as good as the tau.
the only reason the tau matter is because they have a codex. in universe they should be irrelevant.


The Imperium isn't in such trouble.
They steamroll Tau,but they won't because they have better things to do,but if Tau continiue to expand then the Imperium will send a crusade(Sabbath Worlds crusade had 10,000 ships,imagine Tau facing that).


Thats right. both of you. the imperium could steamroll the tau, but they cant afford to. removing recorces on one front to squidge the tau would mean an incersion from another race. they are a perfict example of how limited the imperiums resources are and how bad the're in the poo,

Actually that says how large and important are Tyranid and Chaos incursions.
The Imperium just doesn't care for Tau right now.


Again, agree 100% I would not bother taking men from the cadian gate or outer worlds for the next 'nid attack for the Tau, in comparison to a black crusade or hive fleet they are quite a mediocre threat. They are evil, but theyre acts dont justify exterminating them as a race............ yet.



Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 19:37:45


Post by: punkow


have you read about how the T'au actually organize their Empire internally. they are incredibly favorable to T'au over other allies.


when a planet is conquored they immediatly Sterilize all disenting individuals so only those who are loyal to the T'au empire can reproduce.

Non-T'au are treated as 2nd class citizens. they have to work much harder then a T'au in a similer job would have to. they explain it by saying "You must prove your loyalty to the Greater Good"

the T'au use non-t'au soldiers as cannon fodder. Humans, Vespids, and Kroot are all viewed as expendable troops.

the T'au also compress the 4 castes. neither can cross breed with the other and are stuck with doing the jobs in their particular sphere.


It's all true... but... where is the communism here???

IoM is much more like the soviet union than Tau... Pervasive ideology driven in citizen's mind, vast economic planification, an entire soviet-style army (IG with commissars and so on )... Yes Iom have also a lot of Nazi (purges, xenophoby) and Spanish inquisition (well... the inquisition) stuff... but saying Tau are commies... means you really don't know what communism has been...


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 19:43:20


Post by: KamikazeCanuck


IvanTih wrote:
Medium of Death wrote:Where did you get all this from? AFAIK the only thing that is somewhat close to being true is the sterilisation thing. Which is from a videogame, so not actually present in any background material that I am aware of.

Why do people always want to paint the Tau with the same grimdarkness that everything else is soaked in?

Deathwatch RPG.


What? What they do in Deathwatch?


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 19:44:38


Post by: IvanTih


Tau are in essence collective utilitarists in my opion.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 19:56:07


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


These are the biggest threats to the IoM IMO; Chaos, Necrons, Tyranid, Orks, Tau, Dark Eldar, Eldar.

Tyranid and orks are kinda low right now cuz they are busy killing each other.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 20:00:16


Post by: IvanTih


KamikazeCanuck wrote:
IvanTih wrote:
Medium of Death wrote:Where did you get all this from? AFAIK the only thing that is somewhat close to being true is the sterilisation thing. Which is from a videogame, so not actually present in any background material that I am aware of.

Why do people always want to paint the Tau with the same grimdarkness that everything else is soaked in?

Deathwatch RPG.


What? What they do in Deathwatch?

The Tau in the Jericho Reach region are the closest we've got to a look at what life can be like under the Tau at its worst.

Forced sterilisation, indoctrination camps, people disappear when they express discontent, and either don't reappear, or reappear as brainwashed cheerleaders.

The Tau use subject species as test subjects for dangerous enviroments, rather than risking the lives of Tau, and in one situation are basically firing off ships with subject race pilots into the stellar equivalent of an industrial potato peeler.

Secret labs with Nazi style medical experiments and "psychological" testing as well.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 20:21:50


Post by: Warboss Imbad Ironskull


IvanTih wrote:
Medium of Death wrote:Where did you get all this from? AFAIK the only thing that is somewhat close to being true is the sterilisation thing. Which is from a videogame, so not actually present in any background material that I am aware of.

Why do people always want to paint the Tau with the same grimdarkness that everything else is soaked in?

Deathwatch RPG.


Gee would that be the same Deathwatch RPG that was made by a company which isn't even a subsidiary of GW? The same Deathwatch RPG that GW has never claimed is official cannon.

And for those who use the Dawn of War games as fluff how do you explain that the differant factions have differant versions of what happened which if you consider it fluff means that all of it happened and by extension none of it did.

I agree that the Tau have a Grim-dark side to them, every race does. But the extent has not officially been shown as there is just not enough official fluff behind them.

And for those who say that the Tau and Imperium are equal in technology it's just the Tau are better at applying it across a wider area then the Imperium. I hate to break it to you but that equals more advanced technology. The ability to miniaturise and diversify your technology requires new processes and new techniques which the Tau have done and is the key to advanced technology. Yes the Imperium miniaturised forms of their technology but they are hardly produced on a mass scale and are often ancient devices. So the Imperium has variants of Bolter shell? ok well with the exception of Rail guns the Tau have moved past solid round projectiles.

Sure the old computers that filled entire rooms can still be called computers the same way that modern day laptops can be called computers. But does that mean that the technology is equal? No.

If you really want to know which race has the best technology it is the Orks simply because they have everyones technology.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 20:28:38


Post by: KamikazeCanuck


IvanTih wrote:
KamikazeCanuck wrote:
IvanTih wrote:
Medium of Death wrote:Where did you get all this from? AFAIK the only thing that is somewhat close to being true is the sterilisation thing. Which is from a videogame, so not actually present in any background material that I am aware of.

Why do people always want to paint the Tau with the same grimdarkness that everything else is soaked in?

Deathwatch RPG.


What? What they do in Deathwatch?

The Tau in the Jericho Reach region are the closest we've got to a look at what life can be like under the Tau at its worst.

Forced sterilisation, indoctrination camps, people disappear when they express discontent, and either don't reappear, or reappear as brainwashed cheerleaders.

The Tau use subject species as test subjects for dangerous enviroments, rather than risking the lives of Tau, and in one situation are basically firing off ships with subject race pilots into the stellar equivalent of an industrial potato peeler.

Secret labs with Nazi style medical experiments and "psychological" testing as well.


Sweet. Looks like I'm buying deathwatch!


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Warboss Imbad Ironskull wrote:
IvanTih wrote:
Medium of Death wrote:Where did you get all this from? AFAIK the only thing that is somewhat close to being true is the sterilisation thing. Which is from a videogame, so not actually present in any background material that I am aware of.

Why do people always want to paint the Tau with the same grimdarkness that everything else is soaked in?

Deathwatch RPG.


Gee would that be the same Deathwatch RPG that was made by a company which isn't even a subsidiary of GW? The same Deathwatch RPG that GW has never claimed is official cannon.

And for those who use the Dawn of War games as fluff how do you explain that the differant factions have differant versions of what happened which if you consider it fluff means that all of it happened and by extension none of it did.

I agree that the Tau have a Grim-dark side to them, every race does. But the extent has not officially been shown as there is just not enough official fluff behind them.

And for those who say that the Tau and Imperium are equal in technology it's just the Tau are better at applying it across a wider area then the Imperium. I hate to break it to you but that equals more advanced technology. The ability to miniaturise and diversify your technology requires new processes and new techniques which the Tau have done and is the key to advanced technology. Yes the Imperium miniaturised forms of their technology but they are hardly produced on a mass scale and are often ancient devices. So the Imperium has variants of Bolter shell? ok well with the exception of Rail guns the Tau have moved past solid round projectiles.

Sure the old computers that filled entire rooms can still be called computers the same way that modern day laptops can be called computers. But does that mean that the technology is equal? No.

If you really want to know which race has the best technology it is the Orks simply because they have everyones technology.


Gee, something from GW disagrees with my opinion so it doesn't count. That's what I can't stand about Tau fans. They're the only ones that actually act like they've been brainwashed by propaganda.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 20:37:32


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


Gee would that be the same Deathwatch RPG that was made by a company which isn't even a subsidiary of GW? The same Deathwatch RPG that GW has never claimed is official cannon.

And for those who use the Dawn of War games as fluff how do you explain that the differant factions have differant versions of what happened which if you consider it fluff means that all of it happened and by extension none of it did.

I agree that the Tau have a Grim-dark side to them, every race does. But the extent has not officially been shown as there is just not enough official fluff behind them.

And for those who say that the Tau and Imperium are equal in technology it's just the Tau are better at applying it across a wider area then the Imperium. I hate to break it to you but that equals more advanced technology. The ability to miniaturise and diversify your technology requires new processes and new techniques which the Tau have done and is the key to advanced technology. Yes the Imperium miniaturised forms of their technology but they are hardly produced on a mass scale and are often ancient devices. So the Imperium has variants of Bolter shell? ok well with the exception of Rail guns the Tau have moved past solid round projectiles.

Sure the old computers that filled entire rooms can still be called computers the same way that modern day laptops can be called computers. But does that mean that the technology is equal? No.

If you really want to know which race has the best technology it is the Orks simply because they have everyones technology.



It is litterally impossible for the IoM to equip their men in the way the Tau do, yes Tau tech is advanced. but only because they dont have billions upon billions of troops. It like nazi germany, (not to start more political stuff for a game). Im talking about the manufacturing. The king tiger tank was a beast of a tank for its day, but it was immensley expensive and hard to make. Along with their jet fighter and the first assault rifle. All encorporated by germany. They seemed much like the Tau do with tech. Advanced, but ended up falling to lower technological forces because of productibility. So with this brought to light, I believe the Tau will fall the same way. They have extremely advanced tech but they cant produce it at the rate required to fend off a full blown IoM attack, or any other full blown invasion force of ANY race to be truthful.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 20:49:13


Post by: IvanTih


@xxSir
Excuse me,IOM has better plasma weaponry,better broadsides on ships(besides Tau suck in BFG) and they also have railguns.The biggest Tau fanboy is Andy Hoare who wrote fluff for Deathwatch RPG and those pile of shi* Rogue Trader novels(Tau wan* isn't his only sin,he also makes combat ranges extremly short and which are hundreds of kilometres while every other source tells us tens of thousand kilometres or more,he also ignores the fact that Imperium has railguns).


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 20:54:11


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


I understand that, what I am saying is that they are advanced for their age, and their stuff does not seem easy to produce, wwwwwaaaaayyyyy to much personal tech for it to be mass produced like the IoM does. Im on your side haha the Tau are not my favorite army at all. btw mass production is the best when you can get it right. (Like the IoM)


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 20:57:15


Post by: IvanTih


xXSir MontyXx wrote:I understand that, what I am saying is that they are advanced for their age, and their stuff does not seem easy to produce, wwwwwaaaaayyyyy to much personal tech for it to be mass produced like the IoM does. Im on your side haha the Tau are not my favorite army at all. btw mass production is the best when you can get it right. (Like the IoM)

I know,but Tau haven't got "extremly advanced tech".
Besides Tau battlesuits get raped by three Astartes bolter shells in Kill Team.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 21:01:10


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


In comparison to all the other races, no. For the time that they have been a space faring recognized empire by the rest of the 40k universe. They have advanced very quickly, to quickly. This is GW's plan though so its ok, cuz I know any race could plow through them if they felt like it.

Cuz one day theyre going to try "the greater good" thing on the wrong imperium world, then ya........ self explanitory from then on.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 21:03:36


Post by: IvanTih


xXSir MontyXx wrote:In comparison to all the other races, no. For the time that they have been a space faring recognized empire by the rest of the 40k universe. They have advanced very quickly, to quickly. This is GW's plan though so its ok, cuz I know any race could plow through them if they felt like it.

Well I find it very humorous that kunning Ork had outsmarted them and started using their weaponry.That is priceless sight(everything else you get with Mastercard).


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 21:07:31


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


Exactly! As i said, they seem very naive of the way the galaxy works. "hey those green fellas over there seem like some good guys, im sure they will help our cause."


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 21:14:17


Post by: GalacticDefender


ShadowAngel159 wrote:
Ledabot wrote:I still dont understand why people hate tau. everything cant be evil or its a pretty pointless game eh? Tau are supposed to fill the giant gap where the honorable species from every other sci-fi thing ever went.


Honorable? The Tau? I don't think that "Join us or die" is very honorable.

Here's a standard expansion of the Tau Empire:

Tau: Hello, new world! Would you like to join our empire for the Greater Good? We'll treat you as second-rate citizens, use your military as cannon fodder for our superior military and guns, and force you to help us make better technology by taking yours! All for the Greater Good! Would you like to join us?
Planet: No. Go away now.
Tau: Fine... then we'll do this the hard way.
**Tau invasion fleet comes in and takes over. Native population becomes second-rate citizens. Laws for population control take place. Majority of people become labor force. Military becomes cannon fodder for Tau Fire Caste. Any and all useful technology is taken away and used by the Tau for future conquests. All for the "Greater Good."**

Now, I don't know about you, but I don't find socialism (or communism, whatever you want to call it) very honorable. Because that is what the Tau are: Socialists. In Space. They say "Everyone is equal." Here is how it really is: "Everyone is equal. The Tau are just more equal. And the Ethereals are even more equal." Also, their policy for expansion is "Join us or die" pretty much.

Yes, I will admit that the Tau are unified unlike the Imperium, and maybe even a little more advanced than the Imperium (please don't kill me, Imperial fanboys. I'm on your side [sorta]). But NO race in all of 40k is truly honorable. None. Not even the Tau and their so-called "Greater Good." If you say no to what they want from you, they will pick up their rifle and shoot you in between the eyes, just like every other race in all of Warhammer 40,000. All for the "Greater Good."

Citations? Tau codex, Dawn of War (yes I use that as a citation. I consider that game to be fluff) tau ending, various books with the Tau in them (I do not remember specific names so please do not ask me for them), a lot of the Tau Empire fluff.


"Join us or die" is way better than "Die". Also, people who join the Tau do get some rights and stuff, and usually have a better life than say, a Hive City.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 21:15:45


Post by: Warboss Imbad Ironskull


So does anyone want to provide an official source where it says that the Tau have trouble producing their tech in large numbers or are you guys just going to keep saying it without proof.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 21:16:28


Post by: IvanTih


xXSir MontyXx wrote:Exactly! As i said, they seem very naive of the way the galaxy works. "hey those green fellas over there seem like some good guys, im sure they will help our cause."

That also happens in Tyranid codex where they throw party for Necrons when they destroy Tyranid ships,then the Necrons proceed to kill every Tau on the planet(can't remember the name right now) and also happens when they give Tau from each cast to this guy as a part of cultural exchange,after that DE kill every Tau and their allies on the planet and after that their bodies are used to form sigils which could be interpret as ALLYOURBASEBELONGTOUS! answer from Vect.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 21:18:13


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


"Join us or die" is way better than "Die". Also, people who join the Tau do get some rights and stuff, and usually have a better life than say, a Hive City.


So do the Tau rebuild a subjugated world from the ground up when they agree to join them? For instance, say the Tau have talks with a IoM hive world. would they get rid of those horrid conditions because they joined up? Or would they take whatever they can carry and turn tail and run before the IoM comes to extinguish a world of heretics?


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 21:19:18


Post by: IvanTih


Warboss Imbad Ironskull wrote:So does anyone want to provide an official source where it says that the Tau have trouble producing their tech in large numbers or are you guys just going to keep saying it without proof.

Well to cite one poster.

Wall of Text ahead!



Ground combat: We don't know. Again hypervelocity and hypersonic have both been used to describe them, but that just tells us they'd be at least as fast, or faster than modern tank weapons (close to or over several km/s at least.) It could be faster, but I will point out speed is not neccesaril a be all, end-all as far as penetration goes (indeed hypervelocity impacts can introduce the possibility of cratering, which while increasing damage redues penetration and penetration typically matters alot for tank guns.)

In the case of the Hammerhead railgun specifically, it is consistnetly noted to perform better than conventional battle cannon (but not neccesarily Vanquisher cannon, and is ins ome ways outperformed by Earthshakers) and be highly effective at penetrating Russ armor. I tend not to read too deeply into the "punch a hole in and liquify everything inside it" since its quite possible that the physics behind that is unrealistic (we'd be talking a massive shockwave to do it, and prboabl knocking the tank around with some violent accelerations.)

I'm not even going to touch on game mechanics.

Andy Hoare: Like alot of 40K writers, he has his good moments and bad moments. the Rogue trader novels are his bad moments. Basically his version of Soul Drinkers. HE does write decent stuff though (Hunt for Voldorius was mentioned, and he had a hand in the 13th Black Crusade and Tactica Imperialis big books, which were both interesting reading. And he's written some decent short stories like Hunter, Prey.) Graham McNeill has Honsou and "Dead Sky, Black Sun" to his name. Abnett has his own lackluster showings (Legion, Straight Silver, etc.) Goto has Eldar Prophecy (which is to date the worst 40K novel I've read.) and there is of course Ben "liquid plasma" Counter who is consistently hit and miss.

Anyhow, the Rogue Trader novels have their annoyances, but then again lots of novels do (I get tird of Abnett making laser bullet weapons.)

Tau tactics and technology: And in particular how it stacks up to the Imperium, can be summed up in one word. Consistency. That is their big edge ove the Imperium really. It's not so much that they are all-around better, per se (because they aren't), its that they manage to standardize their tech and gear better, and to apply it more consistently. They are more unified, and more focused, and tend not to be as distracted as the Imperium is (partly a result of how they are organized, partly because of their small size, and partly because they're on the ass end of nowhere and tend to only catch the backlash from other major powers conflicts.) Their sensitivity to causalties (much like what the US has with its citizen soldiers) will lead to more upteching (pursuant to tactics and presumably logistics.) Also, your average Fire Warrior is probably more in line with a Storm Trooper, while auxiliaries are either specialists or the more expendable grunts (and aren't neccesarily as well teched, but could be more numerous.) Of course, Guard "quality" varies dramatically as well (logistics, planet of origin, standing/importance of the tithe, etc.)

Tau tech can, I suspect, vary quite a bit in performance, which may account for the variable performance. Tau armor could be upgraded by stronger plates (and thus be as good as flak or better depending on how configured) but this may have drawbacks (greater weight, which reduces mobility.) In some cases the Tau probably want greater protection, but not in all cases.

Pulse weapons probably have similar issues. It is unlikely there is just ONE kind of pulse weapon, any more than there is one kind of assautl rifle, or lasgun, or bolter. (and I mean more than just the "pulse rifle and pulse carbine.) We know pulse rifles as a rule are better than lasguns at least in terms of per shot firepower and range, but that doesn't mean "all around" better. Range will mean that they either behave like a semi-auto rifle (aimed shots) or as a machine gun (spray and pray.)

The former is more along the lines of Tau tactics. Setting may also play a role in firepower (It isn't impossible for a pulse weapon to exceed the destructive output of a bolter, although quanitfying the comparison is a bit complex methinks.) but it needn't apply in all cases (Arguably, it doesn't. hell, Bolter firepower can vary quite a bit on its own, so better has to be reflected in that context as well.)

Tactics wise, again consistecny seems to matter. The Imperium doesnt really have a defined set of tactics despite what some claim (either way) but they embrace a little bit of everything. This is a bit of a problem, since they tend to leave it up to individual commanders to decide, and this can create wildly varying effects (from intelligent fighting to not so intelligent "choke them with our numbers" Brannigan-style.) The Imperium can (to an extent) afford this though, since they are a large, industrious empire. The Tau are industrious, but they aren't numerous, and their tactics must reflect this. I suspect alot of the earlier "codex" thinking I have commented on from the previous Tau Codexes are their version of the "tactica Imperialis/Uplifting Primer/Munitorum guidelines" bits.. basically thats "theoretical" stuff laid down by their adminstration. In practice, like with the Imperium, capability can vary according to the leader they have (Taros illustrates this nicely) since some Commanders clearly are brilliant and others, less so. The "less so" however will beneift from a more consistent (and cautious) doctrine that emphasize mobility and firepower (which their tech base can support, to an extent), so any shortcomings are liekly mitigated (assuming numbers aren't a factor.)

Later stuff to come out so far in 5th edition (Planetstrike and such) have hinted the Tau are proving more willing to adopt their basic tactics (as laid down in earlier codexes) to other concepts - they follow the "abandoning territory no matter what" philosohpy alot less blindly, for example. They still hate static warfare, and probably arne't as good at it, but they will do it if they NEED to (and still incoroprate the elements of their other doctrines if they can.)

You also have to remember that being on the edge of the galaxy, they tend to be hard to reach by many conventional powers and they also face a huge logistical advantage compared to others (say the Imperium, especialyl since the Astronomican problems cropped up with the edges of the Empire.) Supply lines (and information) have often been a problem the Imperium faces in fighting the tau, and location plays a huge role in that.

As an aside, I dont draw any particular significance from stuff about the tau "sterilizing" humans - I now expect the tau to contain their own share of donkey-caves like the Imperium does. The Imperium has good and bad people too.

Lasgun/bolter/Hellgun vs Pulse rifle
The biggest advantages (as far as we know evidence wise) that the Lasguns will have will be reliability and durability, sheer versatility, and [possibly] rate of fire and ammo. The first is a no-brainer, given how easy to build and repair lasguns can be. They also are doubtless easier to train folk on as far as usage and maintenance go. Versatility is not quite so obvious, and refers to the tendency for lasguns to encompass many different variants, to be modular (long las, or las carbines being modified lasguns, as well as long and short barreled lasguns, assault lasguns, etc.) and can have differing performance (power output, range, etc.) by something as simple as changing a barrel and sights (range/accuracy) or powerpack (using hotshots, which even normal lasgun can do.) But lasguns can have variable modes too (wide beam "flamethrower/shotgun" modes, like in Legion, or sustained piercing/cutting/slicing beams, as well as the thermal/explosive modes.) As far as Rate of fire goes? Lasgun ROF form a few shots a sec (uplifting primer) to tens/hundreds of shots a second (Blood Pact, Only in Death and 13th Legion novels, to name a few examples) and I've never heard of pulse weapons matching that. Ammo usage can also vary from as fwe as 40-50 shots per powerpack (depending on setting) to hundreds, whilst I havent heard pulse rifles being much more than the 40-50 shot category (agian setting matters, but still..)

Hellguns by extension ought to share the versatility and ammo/rate of fire advantage. They may be similiar in performance to bolters and pulse weapons though (As I said, it can depend on alot.

Bolters are phyiscal projectiles, so they have explosive eccect with kinetic effects to contend with. This could give them better penetration. (remember Space Marine bolters arguably can be anti-vehicle weapons consistently. I dont think the same can always be said of pulse rifles) Bolters though are basically meant to be fired by power armored troops, so they would lack alot of advantages wielded by anyone else (lacking stocks for one thing, but also targeter sights and similar.) And yes this is ignoring the whole "how bolters work" angle (which is "not how GW envisions them")

Orbital Bombardment While it is a huge asset, I DO have to point out that even if you disregard GT+ firepower for Imperial ships, the energy release of orbital bombardment can do Bad Things to the surface and climate of a planet in the long term. How is it going to effect climate and weather patterns to consistently inject kilotons or megatons of energy via bombardment (which we know the Imperium has done), especially over some of the longer and more protracted ground wars? (Of course that tends to be a central grimdark feature of 40K anyhow and often comes about from overuse of conventional artillery and gas/chemical weapons or bioweapons rather than just nukes. ) But it could still be a cause for concern on some worlds (say, Agri-worlds) but not others (the older and more populous Hive worlds)


Tau in general: I think its worth noting that we can distinguish between in and out universe at least when it comes to Tau "w anking." The tau by themselves are fine. Its the fanboys (And arguably this can include some authors, but then again that can be said of alot of factions in 40K too.. Goto seemed to hte the Eldar for example and there ar always the pro Space Marine authors who can be grating..) Its the fanboys who tend to elicit the most negative reactions when it comes to the tau. Personally I hate tau fanboys, but the tau themselves aren't too bad (tactics masturbation wise they've changed a bit with more recent editions too, which I'll touch on later.)

In universe the Tau surviving can be attributed to luck (which can be tangible, if weird. and it has been hinted tau survival has been deliberately contrived in universe by someone) and the fact they are way out on the ass end of nowhere (and thus either hard for other powers to crush, or end up conflicting with one of the larger powers like the Imperium, who often seem to provide a buffer to the tau.) This is counterbalanced by their combined arrogance and blind adherence to their manifest destin- err Greater Good, coupled with sheer naivety when it comes to the universe at large (Take Chaos for example. I dont know if they've actually admitted Chaos Gods, Chaos, and daemons exist yet. And as we know historically that is a recipe for disaster sooner or later, and the Tau having a minimal presence in the warp cannot wholly mitigate that.)


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 21:22:10


Post by: SanguinaryGuard


Tau is gay because their plasmas dont overheat. The Imperium needs that gak


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 21:23:15


Post by: IvanTih


SanguinaryGuard wrote:Tau is gay because their plasmas dont overheat. The Imperium needs that gak

Plasma weapons generally overheat only on higher settings,lower settings are usually used.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 21:26:08


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


xXSir MontyXx wrote:
Exactly! As i said, they seem very naive of the way the galaxy works. "hey those green fellas over there seem like some good guys, im sure they will help our cause."

That also happens in Tyranid codex where they throw party for Necrons when they destroy Tyranid ships,then the Necrons proceed to kill every Tau on the planet(can't remember the name right now) and also happens when they give Tau from each cast to this guy as a part of cultural exchange,after that DE kill every Tau and their allies on the planet and after that their bodies are used to form sigils which could be interpret as ALLYOURBASEBELONGTOUS! answer from Vect.


Are you saying he doesnt look trust worthy, cuz I think quite the opposite

So does anyone want to provide an official source where it says that the Tau have trouble producing their tech in large numbers or are you guys just going to keep saying it without proof


So do you want to provide proof that its not? I will gladly say im wrong if I am, but you cannot tell me that common sense doesnt dictate the a flak vest is harder to mass produce than watever it is Tau wear, and that a plasma rifle is less expensive than a LASGUN





Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 21:27:49


Post by: IvanTih


xXSir MontyXx wrote:
xXSir MontyXx wrote:
Exactly! As i said, they seem very naive of the way the galaxy works. "hey those green fellas over there seem like some good guys, im sure they will help our cause."

That also happens in Tyranid codex where they throw party for Necrons when they destroy Tyranid ships,then the Necrons proceed to kill every Tau on the planet(can't remember the name right now) and also happens when they give Tau from each cast to this guy as a part of cultural exchange,after that DE kill every Tau and their allies on the planet and after that their bodies are used to form sigils which could be interpret as ALLYOURBASEBELONGTOUS! answer from Vect.


Are you saying he doesnt look trust worthy, cuz I think quite the opposite

Well he can give you an extra hand.



Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 21:32:58


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


Ya maybe if the necrons decided to cuddle with the Tau after they had their way with them


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 21:33:59


Post by: IvanTih


xXSir MontyXx wrote:Ya maybe if the necrons decided to cuddle with the Tau after they had their way with them

That piece fluff reminds me of Mars Attacks film.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 21:36:15


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


I think I may have seen that, cant remember. How are they alike?


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 21:39:35


Post by: IvanTih


xXSir MontyXx wrote:I think I may have seen that, cant remember. How are they alike?

That movie is essentially parody of the Independece day(not officially).
Aliens look like classical Marsians with advanced tech who want to conquer the Earth and their weakness are loud sounds,the film is from 1996 and it's funny.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 21:45:42


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


That movie is essentially parody of the Independece day(not officially).
Aliens look like classical Marsians with advanced tech who want to conquer the Earth and their weakness are loud sounds,the film is from 1996 and it's funny.


OH YEAH i remember that movie! I knew I had seen it! Really though the question is.... did the Necrons cuddle after forced intercourse with the Tau? I dont think they did, they are cold unfeeling machines. But the Tau seem to LOVE technology, maybe it wasnt forced! So many plot holes in the Tau fluff



Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 22:01:45


Post by: IvanTih


That movie would be even more awesome if SMs start suddenly launching drop pods and boarding actions against the aliens,way too awesome.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 22:02:50


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


Hopefully next time they will invite the Swarmlord to their homeworld for peace talks, ofcourse the Swarmlord will have its best 4 billion bodyguard to make sure it doesnt come to any harm


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 22:31:35


Post by: Kilkrazy


IvanTih wrote:
xXSir MontyXx wrote:Ya maybe if the necrons decided to cuddle with the Tau after they had their way with them

That piece fluff reminds me of Mars Attacks film.


Back back back, back back!


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 22:38:15


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


Back back back, back back!


Sry was that to far? My bad, still learning the ropes

Sry wont happen again, except the other one I have on this thread after that one, I apologize for that to.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 22:43:16


Post by: nosferatu1001


Ivan - you dont rate IA books as canon, but include in canon FFG books? Really?

Just because they HAVE them doesnt mean they UNDERSTAND them. There is a difference between running a production line and understanding how it works. Most people can operate a computer, can possibly even build one from basic components - but ask them to understand microcode, or how an FPU works, or how you deal with binary vs decimal numbver representations, and you would have a series of blank looks.

IoM have "better" plasma? By "better" do you mean 1/6 chance of harming the operator (top canon, gets hot!) or with prolonged use can explode, shredding a carapace armoured scout? (Sons of Dorn) You say they are only "rarely" used on higher settings, but canon disagrees with you...

The IoM is, on the whole, regressing technology wise. Old ships that they CANNOT replace are destroyed. Inferior replacements for key battle lines are made (ref: macharius as an inferior baneblade, some "inferior" russ knock offs on non mainline forgeworlds, and so on) and they are gradually losing knowledge.

Yes, they make advances. Incremental ones.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 22:51:51


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


Im not sure the IoM could regress much further to be honest, alot of their old stuff is better yes. However they do make GOOD things still, not as good no, but they cant lose knowledge of what they are currently making.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 22:58:26


Post by: 4M2A


When you compare the weapons roles Tau beat the imperium in almost every category. While the imperium is slowly making very small changes, the Tau are possibly the fastest technologicaly advancing race (thats the point of them, not a real threat now but they will be if they keep growing).

A lot of the most powerful equipment the IoM has is being destroyed without the ability to replace it. As Nosferatu said they can make very basic copies (the same way I could assemble a computer from parts without understanding how they work) but they aren't as good. Thats why old SM chapters value their relic equipment. It's not just emotional, the older armour and weapons are better.

Unfoprtunately I have forgeotten the source (I believe it was a WD) but there was a paragraph about forge worlds. Lots of items are only made on one forgeworld. If that forge world is lost the information is gone.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 23:00:18


Post by: IvanTih


nosferatu1001 wrote:Ivan - you dont rate IA books as canon, but include in canon FFG books? Really?

Just because they HAVE them doesnt mean they UNDERSTAND them. There is a difference between running a production line and understanding how it works. Most people can operate a computer, can possibly even build one from basic components - but ask them to understand microcode, or how an FPU works, or how you deal with binary vs decimal numbver representations, and you would have a series of blank looks.

IoM have "better" plasma? By "better" do you mean 1/6 chance of harming the operator (top canon, gets hot!) or with prolonged use can explode, shredding a carapace armoured scout? (Sons of Dorn) You say they are only "rarely" used on higher settings, but canon disagrees with you...

The IoM is, on the whole, regressing technology wise. Old ships that they CANNOT replace are destroyed. Inferior replacements for key battle lines are made (ref: macharius as an inferior baneblade, some "inferior" russ knock offs on non mainline forgeworlds, and so on) and they are gradually losing knowledge.

Yes, they make advances. Incremental ones.

I rate them as cannon,but I don't use them because they contradict everything else(idiotic events like SM acting out of character in Taros and IA8 when ships in orbit are totally ignored).
Yet Imperium has millions of commercial ships as per 3rd edition rulebook and using 1 in 10 war ships are argument we get minimum 200,000 warp capable warships(and that probably doesn't include SM and Adeptus Mechanicus fleets).
Common aproach to 40k that everything is cannon,that means that 610 gigaton torpedo from Space Hulk 1st editon is cannon.
Besides Kill Team says that Pulse Rifles aren't fully energy weapons.
Using the heresy numer of 16'000 odd fleets.

Low end. Using 50 ships per fleet. = 800'000 Ships
Med end. Using 75 ships per fleet. = 1'200'000 Ships
High End. Using 150 ships per fleet. = 2'400'000 Ships


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 23:05:46


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


Im sure the Imperial forces would do what they did on Tyran, the first invasion of 'nids. Shoot a blackbox into the crust with valuable tech blueprints, and know-how. They arent dumb.

Or send it out via astropath, with their distrss signal.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 23:12:18


Post by: Mr Nobody


I wonder if eldar have the same gripe about the imperium when they were on the great crusade.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 23:17:17


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


I wonder if eldar have the same gripe about the imperium when they were on the great crusade.


Haha probably, but it took the Imperium alot longer to get to where it is. However the Imperium was PRETTY BRUTAL. I just dislike the Tau and their Naivity of the galaxy. As I said before, I hope they invite the Swarmlord to their main sector of space for peacetalks, with his billions of body guards.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/23 23:36:54


Post by: Ledabot


xXSir MontyXx wrote:
xXSir MontyXx wrote:
Exactly! As i said, they seem very naive of the way the galaxy works. "hey those green fellas over there seem like some good guys, im sure they will help our cause."

That also happens in Tyranid codex where they throw party for Necrons when they destroy Tyranid ships,then the Necrons proceed to kill every Tau on the planet(can't remember the name right now) and also happens when they give Tau from each cast to this guy as a part of cultural exchange,after that DE kill every Tau and their allies on the planet and after that their bodies are used to form sigils which could be interpret as ALLYOURBASEBELONGTOUS! answer from Vect.


Are you saying he doesnt look trust worthy, cuz I think quite the opposite

So does anyone want to provide an official source where it says that the Tau have trouble producing their tech in large numbers or are you guys just going to keep saying it without proof


So do you want to provide proof that its not? I will gladly say im wrong if I am, but you cannot tell me that common sense doesnt dictate the a flak vest is harder to mass produce than watever it is Tau wear, and that a plasma rifle is less expensive than a LASGUN


about the production. You could say that IoM has Economies of scale on there side. that is, as more is produced, the cheeper it is do produce more. they dont have production anyware on the same scale. Tau i think went for the, lets serply or small number of troops with good guns as aposed to lets supply our large numbr of troops with no so good weapons.



Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 00:02:49


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


about the production. You could say that IoM has Economies of scale on there side. that is, as more is produced, the cheeper it is do produce more. they dont have production anyware on the same scale. Tau i think went for the, lets serply or small number of troops with good guns as aposed to lets supply our large numbr of troops with no so good weapons.


Yes exactly my point, the Tau equips each person better than the average IG, only because they have the ability to. The IoM cannot. It basically this. A couple million Tau, equipped with excellent weapons. Or a couple billion IG with crappy armor and average guns. Its a numbers game really. If you have billions of rounds coming at you from down range, it doesnt matter how good your armour or weapons are. You will drownd in the las fire.

Its good that the Tau can do this though, good for them. As far as winning a full scale war with another race except MAYBE Eldar, I will always have to side with the opponent of the Tau for pure logic.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 00:23:50


Post by: GalacticDefender


nosferatu1001 wrote:Remember: AI = tech heresy of the highest order!

As I said: incremental upgrades.

Nothing NEW, totally new, has been created.

BTW: just because they had cloaks before Tau doesnt mean they still can cloak - in fact they cant. Nemesis showed just how much has been lost - even around the Great Crusade.

This is why most of the AdMechs drive is in rediscovering STCs - they simply dont understand the technology as well as they would like.


It's kind of funny though because a Machine Spirit is just an AI.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 00:27:34


Post by: Guitardian


The Imperium has the serious stagnation of technology because of superstition and ridiculous dogma like "bolters have to be blessed" and "the machine starts up because the priests perform the "ritual" and the need to hardwire lobotomized zombies in place of a computer. Yeah yeah at least they finally accepted that the world was flat and revolved around the sun and such despite the silly superstitions what held scientists back (took a bit though). The Tau only have one dogma and that is whatever is good for the Tau. Imagine the leaps and bounds in 2 centuries here on real Earth, compared to the thousands of years beforehand, just because the stranglehold of dogma loosended its hold a bit. Too bad we couldn't keep that up for thousands of years at the exponential rate that gave birth to the industrial revolution and so on, maybe then the IG would be carrying hald-held-computer-guided-super-powered-ammo-efficient etc etc guns. Instead, they get lasguns, which are at least ammo efficient, if you perform the ritual of maintenance on it first and burn a candle in the emprah's name. (or a campfire, whatever).


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 00:33:26


Post by: GalacticDefender


IvanTih wrote:@xxSir
Excuse me,IOM has better plasma weaponry,better broadsides on ships(besides Tau suck in BFG) and they also have railguns.The biggest Tau fanboy is Andy Hoare who wrote fluff for Deathwatch RPG and those pile of shi* Rogue Trader novels(Tau wan* isn't his only sin,he also makes combat ranges extremly short and which are hundreds of kilometres while every other source tells us tens of thousand kilometres or more,he also ignores the fact that Imperium has railguns).


No, the Tau have better Broadsides!





Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 00:44:58


Post by: SagesStone


xXSir MontyXx wrote:
Back back back, back back!


Sry was that to far? My bad, still learning the ropes

Sry wont happen again, except the other one I have on this thread after that one, I apologize for that to.


I think he was just saying the sounds the aliens in the film made, but it is kind of off topic.


Really the main thing that helped out the Tau was that warpstorm. They were discovered in their crappy primitive state and it was pretty much the main reason why the planet wasn't cleansed then and there. If it hadn't happened it would just be some IoM planet right now, probably dead after a nid attack. Also it mentioned the Warpstorms consumed the ships on the way there and surrounded the planet rather than engulf it. With travel impossible and the Ethereals they basically had 6000 years of peace and nothing to interrupt their progress.

As it has been mentioned their story is pretty bad.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 01:12:51


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


o ok I assumed since he was a moderator..........


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 01:15:17


Post by: Sgt_Scruffy


how does quoting a random forum poster equate to an official citation? Although I'll admit that there are elements of plot armor to the Tau race's survival, I refuse to believe it's any more mary sue-ish than space marines, blood angels, or a host of the memorable events in the 40k world. We've seen that they have trouble stopping concentrated Imperial assaults (damocles gulf, the aftermath of Hive Fleet Gorgon, Taros) and that for the most part, they are ignored as a secondary threat in light of the tyranid encroachments along the eastern fringe. Their technology is locally superior in direct ground combat, yet they lack massed artillery and some of the more advanced space ship tech. So far, the major engagements we've heard about Damocles Gulf/Taros et al have been wars of manuever and precision which is where the Tau excel.

Tau warfare (at least as it applies to the various Imperium invasions) can be compared to the responses to the various hive fleets by the Imperium, except on a micro scale. They fall back, fight delaying actions, destroy small pockets of enemy forces and generally cede ground until sufficient strength has been accrued to launch an assault on the weakened foe or make a stand at a particularly important place. Massed numbers and overall more powerful tech doesn't mean squat if you can't bring those numbers or tech to bear. Again, local superiority wins the day over general killy-ness. It has been stated time and again that the IoM does not lightly bombard planets as they are a precious and finite resource so generally speaking, that option is out except in the most dire circumstances.

As for punching a hole and liquefying characteristics of tau railgun technology. I suggest that you look up Armor Piercing Fin Stabilized Discarding Sabot rounds for modern battle tanks as well as "spall" damage. The kinetic energy of a super dense material traveling at hypersonic speeds impacting a sheet of armor at rest is quite substantial. Should the penetrator be surrounded by a ballistic sheeth, you can have several various effects happen. The sheeth will liquify or simply convert to heat energy while the penetrator continues, penetrates the armor and perhaps continues out the other side.

According to fluff (3rd edition tau codex), railguns "set the air on fire" which to me sounds like incredible friction from the round passing through the air (perhaps even peeling away the sheeth which could be the range limitation). the incredible speed of the round will create shockwaves in front of it and perhaps even a vacuum behind it as it penetrates armor. Extreme, ultra-rapid pressure changes can substantially harm human.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 01:22:17


Post by: Kroothawk


ShadowAngel159 wrote:Honorable? The Tau? I don't think that "Join us or die" is very honorable.

Here's a standard expansion of the Tau Empire:

Tau: Hello, new world! Would you like to join our empire for the Greater Good? We'll treat you as second-rate citizens, use your military as cannon fodder for our superior military and guns, and force you to help us make better technology by taking yours! All for the Greater Good! Would you like to join us?
Planet: No. Go away now.
Tau: Fine... then we'll do this the hard way.
**Tau invasion fleet comes in and takes over. Native population becomes second-rate citizens. Laws for population control take place. Majority of people become labor force. Military becomes cannon fodder for Tau Fire Caste. Any and all useful technology is taken away and used by the Tau for future conquests. All for the "Greater Good."**

Now, I don't know about you, but I don't find socialism (or communism, whatever you want to call it) very honorable. Because that is what the Tau are: Socialists. In Space. They say "Everyone is equal." Here is how it really is: "Everyone is equal. The Tau are just more equal. And the Ethereals are even more equal." Also, their policy for expansion is "Join us or die" pretty much.

Yes, I will admit that the Tau are unified unlike the Imperium, and maybe even a little more advanced than the Imperium (please don't kill me, Imperial fanboys. I'm on your side [sorta]). But NO race in all of 40k is truly honorable. None. Not even the Tau and their so-called "Greater Good." If you say no to what they want from you, they will pick up their rifle and shoot you in between the eyes, just like every other race in all of Warhammer 40,000. All for the "Greater Good."

Citations? Tau codex, Dawn of War (yes I use that as a citation. I consider that game to be fluff) tau ending, various books with the Tau in them (I do not remember specific names so please do not ask me for them), a lot of the Tau Empire fluff.

Grey Templar wrote:have you read about how the T'au actually organize their Empire internally. they are incredibly favorable to T'au over other allies.

when a planet is conquored they immediatly Sterilize all disenting individuals so only those who are loyal to the T'au empire can reproduce.

Non-T'au are treated as 2nd class citizens. they have to work much harder then a T'au in a similer job would have to. they explain it by saying "You must prove your loyalty to the Greater Good"

the T'au use non-t'au soldiers as cannon fodder. Humans, Vespids, and Kroot are all viewed as expendable troops.

the T'au also compress the 4 castes. neither can cross breed with the other and are stuck with doing the jobs in their particular sphere.

I am really sick of all the people who have absolutely no clue about the Tau but intentionally make up stuff that is in direct contradiction to official texts and present it as facts. But hate and racism are no substitute for competence. Instead of proving all the nonsense in the above posts wrong, I just quote the original designer notes:
Original designer notes wrote:In contrast to other races, we wanted the Tau to be altruistic and idealistic, believing heartily in unification as the way forward. This meant that they would happily incorporate other races into their empire without subjugating them, instead enticing them in with the benefits of mutual protection, trade and technology.(emphasis by me)





Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 01:59:30


Post by: Grey Templar


sorry, but the stuff i said is in the fluff.

naturally the T'au codex won't say anything bad about them.


those things are in many different sources. BL books like Courage and Honor(Fire Caste members are hyper agressive and can only be controlled by Etherials. likely a result of selective breeding overseen by the Etherials) and the role playing games(which offer a more intimate view of the fluff)





in the end the T'au are no better then any other race even if they are willing to ally(in fact, those attempts have gotten them into trouble before. they tried to have peace settlements with orks, the result was the War of Dakka)

someday they will try to buddy up to a race and it won't result in a bloody nose and damaged ego. they really should expand the Farsight enclaves and make them more important. they could be really interesting.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 02:02:08


Post by: Ledabot


Kroothawk wrote:
ShadowAngel159 wrote:Honorable? The Tau? I don't think that "Join us or die" is very honorable.

Here's a standard expansion of the Tau Empire:

Tau: Hello, new world! Would you like to join our empire for the Greater Good? We'll treat you as second-rate citizens, use your military as cannon fodder for our superior military and guns, and force you to help us make better technology by taking yours! All for the Greater Good! Would you like to join us?
Planet: No. Go away now.
Tau: Fine... then we'll do this the hard way.
**Tau invasion fleet comes in and takes over. Native population becomes second-rate citizens. Laws for population control take place. Majority of people become labor force. Military becomes cannon fodder for Tau Fire Caste. Any and all useful technology is taken away and used by the Tau for future conquests. All for the "Greater Good."**

Now, I don't know about you, but I don't find socialism (or communism, whatever you want to call it) very honorable. Because that is what the Tau are: Socialists. In Space. They say "Everyone is equal." Here is how it really is: "Everyone is equal. The Tau are just more equal. And the Ethereals are even more equal." Also, their policy for expansion is "Join us or die" pretty much.

Yes, I will admit that the Tau are unified unlike the Imperium, and maybe even a little more advanced than the Imperium (please don't kill me, Imperial fanboys. I'm on your side [sorta]). But NO race in all of 40k is truly honorable. None. Not even the Tau and their so-called "Greater Good." If you say no to what they want from you, they will pick up their rifle and shoot you in between the eyes, just like every other race in all of Warhammer 40,000. All for the "Greater Good."

Citations? Tau codex, Dawn of War (yes I use that as a citation. I consider that game to be fluff) tau ending, various books with the Tau in them (I do not remember specific names so please do not ask me for them), a lot of the Tau Empire fluff.

Grey Templar wrote:have you read about how the T'au actually organize their Empire internally. they are incredibly favorable to T'au over other allies.

when a planet is conquored they immediatly Sterilize all disenting individuals so only those who are loyal to the T'au empire can reproduce.

Non-T'au are treated as 2nd class citizens. they have to work much harder then a T'au in a similer job would have to. they explain it by saying "You must prove your loyalty to the Greater Good"

the T'au use non-t'au soldiers as cannon fodder. Humans, Vespids, and Kroot are all viewed as expendable troops.

the T'au also compress the 4 castes. neither can cross breed with the other and are stuck with doing the jobs in their particular sphere.

I am really sick of all the people who have absolutely no clue about the Tau but intentionally make up stuff that is in direct contradiction to official texts and present it as facts. But hate and racism are no substitute for competence. Instead of proving all the nonsense in the above posts wrong, I just quote the original designer notes:
Original designer notes wrote:In contrast to other races, we wanted the Tau to be altruistic and idealistic, believing heartily in unification as the way forward. This meant that they would happily incorporate other races into their empire without subjugating them, instead enticing them in with the benefits of mutual protection, trade and technology.(emphasis by me)





about the same thing i said, just without the formality


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 02:36:31


Post by: punkow


Blaha Blahaha!!!!!!!
You can tell what you want... Tau are just an unhappy add-on to the 40K universe...
Oooooh..... better weapons??? How many shots do you have in that pulse rifle??? 500??? impressive!
We are 10.000 only in the smallest ship dude!!! muhahahah
FORR THE EMPEROR!!!!

... And.... what are you doing here??? uuuuuhuuuu.... what a nice ordered world.... So bad it's full of xenos... let us make you a present; it's called Cyclonic Torpedo... Wanna see how does it work?

... a race designed to be the bunch of fooll geeks in the galaxy can't be taken seriously!
Space otakus eheh


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 02:39:12


Post by: Ledabot


punkow wrote:Blaha Blahaha!!!!!!!
You can tell what you want... Tau are just an unhappy add-on to the 40K universe...
Oooooh..... better weapons??? How many shots do you have in that pulse rifle??? 500??? impressive!
We are 10.000 only in the smallest ship dude!!! muhahahah
FORR THE EMPEROR!!!!

... And.... what are you doing here??? uuuuuhuuuu.... what a nice ordered world.... So bad it's full of xenos... let us make you a present; it's called Cyclonic Torpedo... Wanna see how does it work?

... a race designed to be the bunch of fooll geeks in the galaxy can't be taken seriously!
Space otakus eheh


Are you ok


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 02:45:45


Post by: Grey Templar


That and the release of the first T'au codex matched perfectly with the first GW in Japan and happened in the middle of the Gundam craze.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 03:23:31


Post by: stompydakka


did it really?

:(
I was hoping there was no correlation...


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 03:26:40


Post by: Asherian Command


I dislike the Tau alot.... Hence why I have at least 20 dead tau warriors in my warrior. As My friend plays them and every time I play that one squad. He is brushed with anger. And I destroy, leaving nothing behind but his dead devilfishes.
Anyway the Tau are a young but agnorant race as The AI one day will betray them as it did humanity and every other race that has ever made AI. (necrons do not count as an AI)

AI's have a habit of turning on their creators, especially when they become self aware. Hence why so many of the Imperium banned it because the Iron Men caused the Dark Age of Humanity, Hence their hate for all Technology, I would be too if it almost annihilated your entire species.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 04:01:03


Post by: KamikazeCanuck


IvanTih wrote:
SanguinaryGuard wrote:Tau is gay because their plasmas dont overheat. The Imperium needs that gak

Plasma weapons generally overheat only on higher settings,lower settings are usually used.


if by "usually" you mean "never".


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 04:16:28


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


The Tau IMO are just naive, ive said it before I know and Im saying it again. NAIVE. They think they can come of their rock and clean up the galaxy without knowing anything about what theyre cleaning up? Seriously, trying to make an alliance with ork's when what you want to do is "for the greater good". My god even a blind man could see this universe is beyond repair! The only way that there will be no fightning is if there are no more intelligent beings. Not even one, cuz then theres civil war. There is no "greater good". In a quote we all know; "In the grim darkness of the far future there is only war". If the Tau continue their goody good little quest on galactic flowers and teddy bears they will be the first to die out.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 04:49:10


Post by: Ledabot


Ok. thats just sad. GW should have at least tryed not to look bad


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 05:52:20


Post by: Retribution


xXSir MontyXx wrote:
about the production. You could say that IoM has Economies of scale on there side. that is, as more is produced, the cheeper it is do produce more. they dont have production anyware on the same scale. Tau i think went for the, lets serply or small number of troops with good guns as aposed to lets supply our large numbr of troops with no so good weapons.


Its good that the Tau can do this though, good for them. As far as winning a full scale war with another race except MAYBE Eldar, I will always have to side with the opponent of the Tau for pure logic.

Would make sense...you know...if you ignore all the fluff of them...winning


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 06:14:31


Post by: JDM


Mordoskul wrote:You make a good point. In six thousand years (humans took 10k to reach our current level of tech) how do a bunch of backwards savages rise to the top of the tech tree?


Because the Tau are not held back by religon, unlilke humans. As true as this is, history wise, it is also true in the 40kverse. That is the reson it looks all dark and gothic. People are going to flip, but I think the UNSC, ONI, Navicom,etc, etc, etc, are more advanced than the Imperium of MAN. Not SM. In one BL book it made refrence to computers and Tech Heritcle, where as computers and the internet have a strong presence in the Halo Series. The Cole Proticale data file is downloaded via the internet, so yeah.
The Tau are moved by their unfaltering faith in the idea of the Greater Good, which is what pushes them forward.

So Yeah.........,


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 06:15:39


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


Would make sense...you know...if you ignore all the fluff of them...winning


from wat, their codex?

even if you got that info from somewhere else im not talking skirmishes, im talking full crusade scale invasion, something along those lines. Not the leftovers of a hive fleet or isolated world, even if im blatantly wrong they are still inaive on multiple occasions


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 06:23:41


Post by: Retribution


xXSir MontyXx wrote:
Would make sense...you know...if you ignore all the fluff of them...winning


from wat, their codex?

even if you got that info from somewhere else im not talking skirmishes, im talking full crusade scale invasion, something along those lines. Not the leftovers of a hive fleet or isolated world, even if im blatantly wrong they are still inaive on multiple occasions

So what if it is; a codex is the first source for fluff, no?

Taros Campaign, a complete victory
Damocles Crusade, which i would consider it a Tau victory given their ability to stall a full-on imperial crusade for so long they just gave up
Shadowsun wiping out an entire splinter fleet without losing a single ship (pretty mary-sue, but it's official)

Granted, Tau battle fluff is veryyy lite, but what're we gonna do until they update the 'dex?


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 06:34:19


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


So what if it is; a codex is the first source for fluff, no?

Taros Campaign, a complete victory
Damocles Crusade, which i would consider it a Tau victory given their ability to stall a full-on imperial crusade for so long they just gave up
Shadowsun wiping out an entire splinter fleet without losing a single ship (pretty mary-sue, but it's official)

Granted, Tau battle fluff is veryyy lite, but what're we gonna do until they update the 'dex?


because codex's highlight only good points for their army, ur not gonna go buy a twenty dollar book to have it say, "oh well the Tau are cool I guess but if other races got tired of them they wouldnt stand a chance."

come on man, my nid codex told of nothing but flawless victory until the end, so if I went only by my codex the tyranid only lost one battle to lose the entire hive fleet? no. It doesnt tell of all the hive fleets still being hunted down and killed. or the sure losses they are suffering to the orks. There are victories but lots of loss to. I dont ave the new 'nid dex but im sure it only has good points for 'nids in it.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Not to mention they have almost zero defensive know-how. If the tyranid were to come into their empire FULL FORCE not just splinter fleets, they would be very hard pressed to repel them. They get attacked they dismantle their tech and leave to attack later. Problem is that when they leave a world for 'nid theres nothing to come back to. They would have to beat them in space and I dont think the Tau have the numbers to halt a full hive fleet, even with their naval prowess.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 07:12:22


Post by: Ledabot


On the chart showing the space that the tau empire controls shows that the area is about 12 light years radius. the tau must have some very dencely populated worlds. they would need meny fire warrors to take out a hive fleet. They must have some very good ways of reproducing colonests so that the worlds "fill up" quickly.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 09:11:37


Post by: Kilkrazy


xXSir MontyXx wrote:
Back back back, back back!


Sry was that to far? My bad, still learning the ropes

Sry wont happen again, except the other one I have on this thread after that one, I apologize for that to.


I was just being an alien for a moment. Nothing to worry about.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 09:21:23


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


haha awesome thanks


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 09:22:29


Post by: Ledabot


We come in pease. please do not run away.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 09:34:47


Post by: Sgt_Scruffy


So it seems the Tau haters here hate tau because the imperium or tyranids haven't wiped them out yet. Yet there are a multitude of minor races that have not been wiped out.

Why? Because it would be boring. If the only stipulation for races that should be allowed to exist is that they must fit some arbitrary scale of power, then I move that all races except Necrons, Orks, and Tyranids be removed from the game as they are the strongest.

The Tau exist because the Imperium doesn't have the resources to fully commit to destroying them. At last count we have major wars happening all over the imperium including, but no means limited to:

War for Armageddon
13th Black Crusade
Waagh whatever on Ryza
Leviathan containment operations
Kraken Splinter Fleets
Hive Fleet Jormungandr
Numerous Ork Waaghs in progress
M'kanda(sp?) the Reborn bearing down on Baal

Not to mention the literally thousands of other campaigns being waged across the Imperium. Attacking a concentrated grouping of worlds held by a highly professional and competent army that is dug in, fortified, and rapidly subverting Imperial Citizens to fight for them is not an easy matter.

Taros: 6-8 IG regiments, 2 full Space Marine companies, demi-scout titan legion backed up by a fairly substantial fleet. Result: defeat.

Damocles Gulf: Titan Legion, several regiments of Brimlock Dragoons, Scythes of the Emperor. Result: stalemate and eventual retreat.

Third Shere of Expansion: take several dozen worlds (IIRC) followed by quite substantial counter-attack. Some worlds retaken, others not.

Hive Fleet Gorgon (Tyranid Fluff, not Tau): Not a splinter fleet but a hive fleet in it's own right. Killed by the Tau. Yes, the IG were there but the outcome was not in doubt by that point.

Everyone can say what they want about the Imperium outnumbering the Tau a million to one. It's true. Doesn't matter. Imperium has bigger fish to fry and in the meantime, the Tau will take advantage.

Damocles Gulf Crusade: 742.M41 Tau first encounter titan class weapons. Tau fleet mauled by Imperial Crusade Fleet. Considered a disaster by the Air Caste

Taros Campaign: 998.M41 Tau begin fielding anti-titan aircraft in the AX 1-0 Tiger Shark. Naval fleet gives a better account of itself but is still ultimately defeated by the combined Space Marine/Imperial Navy fleet.

that's two and a half centuries of research and development yet both the Tigershark and the new classes of Tau warships are both noted as being "test beds" or "experimental" units. 250 years of concentrated research doesn't seem very Mary Sue to me - not when the Tau Empire lack the stagnation and beauracracy of the IoM.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 09:38:53


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


So it seems the Tau haters here hate tau because the imperium or tyranids haven't wiped them out yet. Yet there are a multitude of minor races that have not been wiped out.

Why? Because it would be boring. If the only stipulation for races that should be allowed to exist is that they must fit some arbitrary scale of power, then I move that all races except Necrons, Orks, and Tyranids be removed from the game as they are the strongest.

The Tau exist because the Imperium doesn't have the resources to fully commit to destroying them. At last count we have major wars happening all over the imperium including, but no means limited to:

War for Armageddon
13th Black Crusade
Waagh whatever on Ryza
Leviathan containment operations
Kraken Splinter Fleets
Hive Fleet Jormungandr
Numerous Ork Waaghs in progress
M'kanda(sp?) the Reborn bearing down on Baal

Not to mention the literally thousands of other campaigns being waged across the Imperium. Attacking a concentrated grouping of worlds held by a highly professional and competent army that is dug in, fortified, and rapidly subverting Imperial Citizens to fight for them is not an easy matter.

Taros: 6-8 IG regiments, 2 full Space Marine companies, demi-scout titan legion backed up by a fairly substantial fleet. Result: defeat.

Damocles Gulf: Titan Legion, several regiments of Brimlock Dragoons, Scythes of the Emperor. Result: stalemate and eventual retreat.

Third Shere of Expansion: take several dozen worlds (IIRC) followed by quite substantial counter-attack. Some worlds retaken, others not.

Hive Fleet Gorgon (Tyranid Fluff, not Tau): Not a splinter fleet but a hive fleet in it's own right. Killed by the Tau. Yes, the IG were there but the outcome was not in doubt by that point.

Everyone can say what they want about the Imperium outnumbering the Tau a million to one. It's true. Doesn't matter. Imperium has bigger fish to fry and in the meantime, the Tau will take advantage.

Damocles Gulf Crusade: 742.M41 Tau first encounter titan class weapons. Tau fleet mauled by Imperial Crusade Fleet. Considered a disaster by the Air Caste

Taros Campaign: 998.M41 Tau begin fielding anti-titan aircraft in the AX 1-0 Tiger Shark. Naval fleet gives a better account of itself but is still ultimately defeated by the combined Space Marine/Imperial Navy fleet.

that's two and a half centuries of research and development yet both the Tigershark and the new classes of Tau warships are both noted as being "test beds" or "experimental" units. 250 years of concentrated research doesn't seem very Mary Sue to me - not when the Tau Empire lack the stagnation and beauracracy of the IoM.


haha no my friend, I dislike Tau because they are naive, If I hated all races not wiped out by the IoM or Tyranid I would be a shallow minded idiot. What would be the point???

no, I dislike the Tau for the simple fact that they come into the picture thinking they are the sould good race in the universe. (Self quote ahead)




Automatically Appended Next Post:
The Tau IMO are just naive, ive said it before I know and Im saying it again. NAIVE. They think they can come of their rock and clean up the galaxy without knowing anything about what theyre cleaning up? Seriously, trying to make an alliance with ork's when what you want to do is "for the greater good". My god even a blind man could see this universe is beyond repair! The only way that there will be no fightning is if there are no more intelligent beings. Not even one, cuz then theres civil war. There is no "greater good". In a quote we all know; "In the grim darkness of the far future there is only war". If the Tau continue their goody good little quest on galactic flowers and teddy bears they will be the first to die out.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 10:19:53


Post by: asimo77


I think their naivety is their most endearing and appealing aspect. As a friend once described: they are the "I'm twelve years old and what is this" meme of the 40k universe. If that kid had a railgun strapped to his head.

Plus all that makes for great stories, like Necron Party 2: Electric Boogaloo.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 10:39:45


Post by: Kroothawk


Grey Templar wrote:sorry, but the stuff i said is in the fluff.
naturally the T'au codex won't say anything bad about them.

Then give exact quotes, but your second sentences is a good sign that you can't give a credible source that negates Codex and expressed designers' will.

BTW the sterilization nonsense comes from a non-GW PC game and the speculation by an Imperial narrator, why men and women not living together might not get children (ask Mom and Dad about it ). It is the third likeliest explanation even by him, taking place in a parallel 40k universe that definitely doesn't happen in the official 40k background, as the PC game structure had to present versions for every race winning. And even this non-GW alternative 40k universe speculated PC version was very far from the "when a planet is conquored they immediatly Sterilize all disenting individuals so only those who are loyal to the T'au empire can reproduce", that you presented as fact.

I am in the process of reading Courage and Honour (up to now a really bad novel), written by a man who let's an Eldar Avatar be choked to death while it doesn't even breath (in Fulgrim), just to show how UEBER Space marines are.



Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 11:26:15


Post by: nosferatu1001


Ivan - nothing you posted alters that a) your assertion that IoM has "superior plasma tech" is plain *wrong*, or that b) the IoM is slowly regressing.

Your low, medium, high numbers have no basis. You also assume zero losses since heresy....unlikely, given how many were destroyed in the heresy itself.

Face it: the IoM IS REGRESSING. It has no choice otherwise - when you have rigid, religious control over technology, and have to repress your ciitizens in the way they do, no true innovation can take place.

AS to the Machine Spirit = AI - not at all. MS is an element of the Emperor, in machine form. Or its the void dragon. It's also bits and pieces of everyone who has connected via MIU, with the more you connect / longer you connect the more is stored / uploaded / integrated. It doesnt appear to be "true" AI, even in the biggest machines - see the souldrinkers old mechanicus explorator fleet - the MS in there really doesnt sound like an AI, not cmopared to say Minds (IM Banks, Culture novels) anyway.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 12:27:04


Post by: Retribution


xXSir MontyXx wrote:
So what if it is; a codex is the first source for fluff, no?

Taros Campaign, a complete victory
Damocles Crusade, which i would consider it a Tau victory given their ability to stall a full-on imperial crusade for so long they just gave up
Shadowsun wiping out an entire splinter fleet without losing a single ship (pretty mary-sue, but it's official)

Granted, Tau battle fluff is veryyy lite, but what're we gonna do until they update the 'dex?


because codex's highlight only good points for their army, ur not gonna go buy a twenty dollar book to have it say, "oh well the Tau are cool I guess but if other races got tired of them they wouldnt stand a chance."

come on man, my nid codex told of nothing but flawless victory until the end, so if I went only by my codex the tyranid only lost one battle to lose the entire hive fleet? no. It doesnt tell of all the hive fleets still being hunted down and killed. or the sure losses they are suffering to the orks. There are victories but lots of loss to. I dont ave the new 'nid dex but im sure it only has good points for 'nids in it.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Not to mention they have almost zero defensive know-how. If the tyranid were to come into their empire FULL FORCE not just splinter fleets, they would be very hard pressed to repel them. They get attacked they dismantle their tech and leave to attack later. Problem is that when they leave a world for 'nid theres nothing to come back to. They would have to beat them in space and I dont think the Tau have the numbers to halt a full hive fleet, even with their naval prowess.


So you're logic says...let's just disregard fluff...right?

And if the 'Nids attacked ANYONE in full force they would be "hard pressed" to repel it; you're argument is ignorance


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 13:00:04


Post by: Asherian Command


OK who here hates small races? No one
One race that I really like are the shapeshifters.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 13:22:34


Post by: punkow


Are you ok


Absolutely no!!!
Have you ever seen someone grown up in the Imperium sane??


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 14:13:01


Post by: IvanTih


GalacticDefender wrote:@xxSir
Excuse me,IOM has better plasma weaponry,better broadsides on ships(besides Tau suck in BFG) and they also have railguns.The biggest Tau fanboy is Andy Hoare who wrote fluff for Deathwatch RPG and those pile of shi* Rogue Trader novels(Tau wan* isn't his only sin,he also makes combat ranges extremly short and which are hundreds of kilometres while every other source tells us tens of thousand kilometres or more,he also ignores the fact that Imperium has railguns).


No, the Tau have better Broadsides!



I was reffering to the ships.I'll dig up the quote.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Sgt_Scruffy wrote:*snips*

Yet Damocles crusade was very small compared to the Sabbath's World crusade which has 10,000 ships(and more important it was only for one sector).



Automatically Appended Next Post:
nosferatu1001 wrote:Ivan - nothing you posted alters that a) your assertion that IoM has "superior plasma tech" is plain *wrong*, or that b) the IoM is slowly regressing.

Your low, medium, high numbers have no basis. You also assume zero losses since heresy....unlikely, given how many were destroyed in the heresy itself.

Face it: the IoM IS REGRESSING. It has no choice otherwise - when you have rigid, religious control over technology, and have to repress your ciitizens in the way they do, no true innovation can take place.

AS to the Machine Spirit = AI - not at all. MS is an element of the Emperor, in machine form. Or its the void dragon. It's also bits and pieces of everyone who has connected via MIU, with the more you connect / longer you connect the more is stored / uploaded / integrated. It doesnt appear to be "true" AI, even in the biggest machines - see the souldrinkers old mechanicus explorator fleet - the MS in there really doesnt sound like an AI, not cmopared to say Minds (IM Banks, Culture novels) anyway.

They regress I admit that.I'll provide following quotes to shut you up about the number of the ships.
At that time, according to War Council logs, there were four thousand two hundred and eighty-seven primary expedition fleets engaged upon the business of the crusade, as well as sixty thousand odd secondary deployment groups involved in compliance or occupation endeavours, with a further three hundred and seventy-two primary expeditions in regroup and refit, or resupplying as they awaited new tasking orders.
Horus Rising

Warhammer 40K Rulebook, 3rd edition, page 100 The psychic beam stretches across 70,000 light years of space, a focus for the millions of commercial craft and warships that navigate through the tumultuous waves of the warp.

And that doesn't even include system monitors.



Automatically Appended Next Post:
And to all read Kill Team,much of the Tau wan* is debunked there.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 14:53:26


Post by: Frazzled


IvanTih wrote:My small rant.

You know what is "so utterly ridiculous as to not merely strain credibility, but throw it to the ground, stomp on it, and then put it through the shredder for good measure"? That a civilization can go from cavemen to matching the elder species of 40k in a mere six thousand years. Here's a hint, it took humans tens of millenia to reach this point.

The Tau could have pulled it off if they displayed levels of competence that would make the Moties look like a bunch of slowed children, but their technology has stagnated for centuries, too.

THAT is why I despise the Tau. Their very existence is an affront to logic and common sense.

I also hate Tau fanboys that state that Tau are more advanced than Imperium which they are not.


6000 years is roughly 3500 BC to 2500 AD. Frankly, they're a bit slow, compared to those bipedal monkey boys.

BFG: Tau ships are noted as being substantially less advanced than Imperium ships. Their best ships are just now getting to cruiser strength.
40K: Definitely not more advanced, just advanced.
Compare them to mech IG
-better plasma tech (plasma cannons)
-better long range antitank (vanquisher superior, Tau Tank inferior)
-better short range special weapons (melta guns) and crew served weapons.
-better tanks (punisher)
-better aircraft/landers (Valkyrie superior, Tau craft inferior)

Compare them to the Chicks with Sticks which are arguably more in line with technologically advanced troops.
-Exorcists - so choice
-Melta weaponry
-standard bolter equivalent to Tau small arms.
-better troop armor and BS due to technology.



Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 15:14:40


Post by: agnosto


Frazzled wrote:-better aircraft/landers (Valkyrie superior, Tau craft inferior)


Not going to argue on the tech stuff; different doesn't always mean better. Railguns are hands-down the most efficient, ranged tank killers in the game. Combine a railgun with a cheap wargear that turns your tank into a fires as fast vehicle with a built-in 4+ invulnerable....yeah IG tanks are not as nice. Anecdotally, I've offed 3 IG tanks in 1 turn with a squad of broadsides and a hammerhead.

Now, the aircraft. Have you not seen a Manta? Here, take a look:


We're talking about something that kills titans and carries an entire army in the cargo hold. Yeah, you can have your thunderhawk.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 15:16:54


Post by: Mr Nobody


Aircraft are also more logically sound than titans, a flying target is better than a walking taget.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 15:17:25


Post by: IvanTih


Yeah they need a small space ship to kill a Titan really shows us how powerful are their ships(in a negative way).


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 15:25:09


Post by: agnosto


IvanTih wrote:Yeah they need a small space ship to kill a Titan really shows us how powerful are their ships(in a negative way).


Actually it's just a difference in combat tactics. The entire combat philosophy of the Tau (fluff and army composition-wise) is the whole "stick and 'git" philosophy; don't maintain a battlefield presence when you can cause the damage and leave before your enemy is able to retaliate.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 15:31:28


Post by: Mr Nobody


The tau have giant ships, instead of giant robots.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 15:34:54


Post by: Frazzled



****Not going to argue on the tech stuff; different doesn't always mean better. Railguns are hands-down the most efficient, ranged tank killers in the game.
No way Jose. Vanq: Str 8 2d6. railgun Str 10. how is that better?

***Combine a railgun with a cheap wargear that turns your tank into a fires as fast vehicle with a built-in 4+ invulnerable....yeah IG tanks are not as nice. Anecdotally, I've offed 3 IG tanks in 1 turn with a squad of broadsides and a hammerhead.
Cover save is a function of V5.
Armor 14 with similar cover save most times.
And yea I've run through a whole wing of crisis suits with a pissed off obliterator, not sure what your point was.

***Now, the aircraft. Have you not seen a Manta? Here, take a look:

Manta is a super heavy/BFG craft. I'll see your manta and raise you a Warlord Titan, or BFG bomber (note I like Tau super heavies).
In other news my eldar remind me to note: Mantas drool, Revenant Titan rules.

****We're talking about something that kills titans and carries an entire army in the cargo hold. Yeah, you can have your thunderhawk.
They're pretty equivalent actually. Again my eldar remind me that none of these vehicles are fit to carry a good bourdeaux. If you're going to fly in style you have to fly Air Vampire.
http://www.forgeworld.co.uk/Warhammer-40000/ELDAR-VAMPIRE-RAIDER.html


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 15:37:03


Post by: IvanTih


From what I rememer IoM also has space fighters(some are 200m or even more long) which are quite frankly good anti-titan force.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 15:45:00


Post by: agnosto


Frazzled wrote:
No way Jose. Vanq: Str 8 2d6. railgun Str 10. how is that better?


+1 on the damage chart. Correct me if I'm wrong, I don't play IG but is the vanq ap1? and being a template, doesn't it scatter? Like I said, I could be wrong, my memory's not the most awesome when it comes to IG weapons.

Frazzled wrote:Cover save is a function of V5.
Armor 14 with similar cover save most times.
And yea I've run through a whole wing of crisis suits with a pissed off obliterator, not sure what your point was.


He wasn't using cover? JSJ is the only way to protect those poor, fragile things. Obliterators do give me a hard time though.

Frazzled wrote:Manta is a super heavy/BFG craft. I'll see your manta and raise you a Warlord Titan, or BFG bomber (note I like Tau super heavies). In other news my eldar remind me to note: Mantas drool, Revenant Titan rules.


It's nifty but still a ground pounder. Fliers get nifty extra rules that let me shoot you on your turn while the broadsides and hammerheads are hitting you on my turn.

Frazzled wrote:They're pretty equivalent actually. Again my eldar remind me that none of these vehicles are fit to carry a good bourdeaux. If you're going to fly in style you have to fly Air Vampire.
http://www.forgeworld.co.uk/Warhammer-40000/ELDAR-VAMPIRE-RAIDER.html


You got me there, that's one sexy beast.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 15:46:52


Post by: Malice


Wow a lot of people hate tau, i dislike them too but not because of logic issues, i just dont like the models.
Oh yes, when tau develop warp drives they will be far more advanced than humans


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 15:50:37


Post by: Frazzled


IvanTih wrote:From what I rememer IoM also has space fighters(some are 200m or even more long) which are quite frankly good anti-titan force.


Indeed, but to the point, Tau are ardvanced and represent an advanced force, a different type of shooter. Thats excellent, although my 2nd ed eldar rile at the notion they are not the tech guys now.

Different human forces and items are lesser, equal, or better, as befits such a large empire. The Tau represent a concentrated force of advanced technology, and something more in line with what we think of as an advanced 21st century Earth force. Works for me.



Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 15:53:07


Post by: IvanTih


Malice wrote:Wow a lot of people hate tau, i dislike them too but not because of logic issues, i just dont like the models.
Oh yes, when tau develop warp drives they will be far more advanced than humans

Oh Christ.
Problem is they can't navigate warp(in 41st millenium Warp has become very dangerous,earlier it was pretty calms in Golden Age of Technology and even then they will be limited to short jumps of 4-5 light years) and they have no psykers.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 15:59:03


Post by: Malice


I read a book called fire warrior, and it says that they can already make short leaps and are constantly striving to improve on this


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 16:02:16


Post by: IvanTih


Malice wrote:I read a book called fire warrior, and it says that they can already make short leaps and are constantly striving to improve on this

And Fire Warrior is sack of shi*,in the book a fire warrior kills marines like they were bad guardsmen.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 16:06:17


Post by: agnosto


IvanTih wrote:And Fire Warrior is sack of shi*,in the book a fire warrior kills marines like they were bad guardsmen.


How's that any different from the other "fluff" people are quoting in this thread. You can't cherry-pick only the things you like. Note, I'm not saying it's a good book or well written just that as fluff sources go it's equally as valid as the other nonsense that people are quoting as fact.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 16:11:43


Post by: Frazzled


IvanTih wrote:
Malice wrote:I read a book called fire warrior, and it says that they can already make short leaps and are constantly striving to improve on this

And Fire Warrior is sack of shi*,in the book a fire warrior kills marines like they were bad guardsmen.

Modquition on:
Play nice Ivan.


I don't know about Firewarrior, but in BFG Tau continue to advance but have no desire to entire warpspace without additional advnaces. They currently skip the edge of the warp and have perfected that process over time to travel ~.25% the speed available in full warp translation, for their newest ships. Considering their version avoids risk thats not a bad tradeoff.

Personal rant: They are constantly pushing the envelope though. Over time they may shift to some sort of completely different FTL method, more in line with the necrons / ST / (and apparently Tyranids WTF?), or find a different dimension tho travel without the risk (Babylon 5). For now it meets the needs of their empire.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 16:17:41


Post by: Mr Nobody


Tau ships are more advanced in combat since their guns are facing forward. Planes use to have turret guns, where one would have to flank the enemy to fire; once the guns were faced forwards, they had a distinct advantage against the other plane. Tau are not pushovers in space.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 16:33:06


Post by: nosferatu1001


Ivan - sigh. M41 /= M31. Number of ships in M31 is highly unlikely to be the same as number of ships in M41. Especially when you have yet to show how many were detroyed in the events of the heresy, or even respond to the question.

Same as stating IoM plasma tech is superior. ANy chance of your accepting you were in error on that? At all?

Stop being so defensive about the IoM.

BS4, twin linked S10 AP1 beats out BS3 single shot every time.

I'm expecting Tau to:
1) Witness Necron FTL
2) Go huh?
3) Have a brightspark moment and invent a way to do it.

At which point you have reliable, faster than warp travel.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 16:39:43


Post by: Frazzled


nosferatu1001 wrote:Ivan - sigh. M41 /= M31. Number of ships in M31 is highly unlikely to be the same as number of ships in M41. Especially when you have yet to show how many were detroyed in the events of the heresy, or even respond to the question.

Same as stating IoM plasma tech is superior. ANy chance of your accepting you were in error on that? At all?

Stop being so defensive about the IoM.

You have to compare oranges to oranges. Tau plasma is based on Tau vehicles (suits and skimmers)
IOM vehicle plasma is reliable and stronger, whats the issue?


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 16:57:26


Post by: IvanTih


nosferatu1001 wrote:Ivan - sigh. M41 /= M31. Number of ships in M31 is highly unlikely to be the same as number of ships in M41. Especially when you have yet to show how many were detroyed in the events of the heresy, or even respond to the question.

Same as stating IoM plasma tech is superior. ANy chance of your accepting you were in error on that? At all?

Stop being so defensive about the IoM.

BS4, twin linked S10 AP1 beats out BS3 single shot every time.

I'm expecting Tau to:
1) Witness Necron FTL
2) Go huh?
3) Have a brightspark moment and invent a way to do it.

At which point you have reliable, faster than warp travel.

I provided quote from 3rd edition.You ignored it.
Anyhow, assuming the bare minimum "million" planets in the Imperium (ignoring references to "millions' of planets in other sources, again which can increase the figure by several times arguably.) and the 200 "inhabited' planet per sector average based on the Gothic sector(we also have smaller and larger sector), we come to about 5,000 Sectors, minimum. Given that, it is safe to say that there are at LEAST 250,000-375,000 warp capable combat ships in the navy. As we already know there are at least "hundreds" of military transports per sector, we can infer that the transport minimums do reach into the millions, so this too seems to be within the established ranges (again, within an order of magnitude or so.)


Now you're entering no limits falacy with Tau.



Automatically Appended Next Post:
Got that from this analysis.
http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?t=108388&highlight=40k


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 17:28:39


Post by: nosferatu1001


Frazzled - you're comparing vehicles weighing tons to tau battlesuits?

The actual "plasma" is no more reliable on an IoM vehicle - you know this because they have to add lots of cooling systems (given as the reason vehicles ignore gets hot!), whereas the same system can be dropped straight onto a tau suit, or to a stealth suit (1w t3 shouldnt make ou think "vehilce" even if W2 T4 does) with no risk of injury.

Not killing the operator seems definitely "superior" there!

Ivan - I didnt ignore it, at all. I queried why you were providing numbers of ships from a known dodgy source (BL) for M31 as providing any evidence for the number of extant ships in M41. It provides an upper bound, and nothing more.

It also doesnt alter that the IoM is regressing, which was my point BEFORE you started thrwoing raw numbers of ships in, as if that had something to do with the argument - it doesnt.

IoM is regressing, both in technology (loss of key forgeworlds = compelte loss of tech, for an example) and in ability to project power (losing the big, irreplaceable stuff even slowly doesnt alter that theyre losing them) - but thats a good thing! IT makes things far more interesting!

I'm just waiting for the necrons to properly get going. And hope that the dragon makes an appearance...


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 17:43:16


Post by: Frazzled


Frazzled - you're comparing vehicles weighing tons to tau battlesuits?
***Nope. Tau battle suit to a simple scout sentinel. Lets get real, a crisis suit is a vehicle and actually shows lesser tech, as your standard marine foottrooper has the same, but smaller. The only thing close is the new experimental crisis suit.


The actual "plasma" is no more reliable on an IoM vehicle
***Sure it is. It has appropriate cooling systems. The hand held ones don't and are more twitchy. Thats the whole point, you have to compare apples to apples. When Firewarrior Bob runs around with a plasma gun that has the same or better strength and doesn't overheat then they can talk. Of course, then they'd have to discuss the wonderful melta gun...




Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 18:01:06


Post by: 1hadhq


nosferatu1001 wrote:

The actual "plasma" is no more reliable on an IoM vehicle - you know this because they have to add lots of cooling systems ...


Add? They don't. Its use of already existant coolant systems.

Maybe just share youre source of 'additional' systems with us?

nosferatu1001 wrote:
IoM is regressing, both in technology (loss of key forgeworlds = compelte loss of tech, for an example) and in ability to project power (losing the big, irreplaceable stuff even slowly doesnt alter that theyre losing them) - but thats a good thing! IT makes things far more interesting!

I'm just waiting for the necrons to properly get going. And hope that the dragon makes an appearance...


You did notice how GW inserted vehicles into new codices?
It takes only a single line to have a complete STC available...
Regressing has been dropped. example: LR Executioner. Was rare when a FW kit, now ( as GW plastic kit) any restriction has gone and you may fill whole divisions with Executioners.

Plus your Dragon may find the mechanicum most pleasant and offer to repair the golden toilet as payment for 10k years of entertainment.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 18:02:05


Post by: Kilkrazy


It doesn't matter how fast anyone's technology is advancing or degrading, because the timeline never advances.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 18:04:29


Post by: Kroothawk


Frazzled wrote:BFG: Tau ships are noted as being substantially less advanced than Imperium ships. Their best ships are just now getting to cruiser strength.
40K: Definitely not more advanced, just advanced.
Compare them to mech IG
-better plasma tech (plasma cannons)
-better long range antitank (vanquisher superior, Tau Tank inferior)
-better short range special weapons (melta guns) and crew served weapons.
-better tanks (punisher)
-better aircraft/landers (Valkyrie superior, Tau craft inferior)

Well, first of all, Tau have mastered anti-grav and AI which both are common in the Tau army, allowing them to save the lives of Fire Warriors.
Then if anything gets broke, they simply repair it instead of start singning a praise to the Machine God, so Tau know what they are doing.

Concerning flyers, Aeronautica Imperialis says about the Barracuda that it is equal to Imperial fighters in dogfights, the Tiger Shark A-X-1-0 is a perfect Titan hunter. We currently know no Imperial equivalent to the Orca, which is a good medium sized transporter, and Manta, being a good large sized transporter. And we shouldn't forget the Air caste pilots which have superior 3D-awareness and slightly better acceleration and gravitation tolerances than Imperial pilots, giving them an advantage in dogfights (even when they lack the fighting experience of some Imperial pilots).

Concerning BFG, I guess you are talking about the old classic box-type starships. Guess we should compare Imperial ships to the current Tau ships as described in IA3: Taros campaign which look quite advanced even if I have no experience about their technical/gaming value.

IvanTih wrote:
Malice wrote:I read a book called fire warrior, and it says that they can already make short leaps and are constantly striving to improve on this

And Fire Warrior is sack of shi*,in the book a fire warrior kills marines like they were bad guardsmen.

Well, it looks like all SM novels are written in the same juvenile style with one SM easily killing a whole craftworld
So this is just justice done (and BTW the book is not that bad for an ego-shooter novelisation even if the main character is VERy different from normal Fire Warriors)


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 18:09:19


Post by: Frazzled


Well, first of all, Tau have mastered anti-grav and AI which both are common in the Tau army, allowing them to save the lives of Fire Warriors.
Then if anything gets broke, they simply repair it instead of start singning a praise to the Machine God, so Tau know what they are doing.
***Yes quite advanced. I am not disagreeing with you. Of course IoM has it down to putting it in skulls for kicks.

Concerning flyers, Aeronautica Imperialis says about the Barracuda that it is equal to Imperial fighters in dogfights, the Tiger Shark A-X-1-0 is a perfect Titan hunter. ***Lightnings are better ( )
We currently know no Imperial equivalent to the Orca, which is a good medium sized transporter, and Manta, being a good large sized transporter. And we shouldn't forget the Air caste pilots which have superior 3D-awareness and slightly better acceleration and gravitation tolerances than Imperial pilots, giving them an advantage in dogfights (even when they lack the fighting experience of some Imperial pilots).
***Er, yea there are. Orcas are just light craft in BFG. The IoM uses them as well. Its no big deal. Now I am not saying its a bad tactic. I like and think it fits them.

Concerning BFG, I guess you are talking about the old classic box-type starships. Guess we should compare Imperial ships to the current Tau ships as described in IA3: Taros campaign which look quite advanced even if I have no experience about their technical/gaming value.
***No. Current BFG Tau rules, thanks.



Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 18:10:59


Post by: IvanTih


I don't consider it cannon because in the novel a measly Fire Warrior massacres SMs,at one point he runs under the legs of one marine which causes the marine to shoot another marine.
See now?


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 18:29:51


Post by: Sgt_Scruffy


Ivan, I'm not sure I understand what the point of this thread is. In your OP, you accuse the tau fluff of defying belief because they, in your words, "go from cavemen to matchin the eldar in 6000 years" which is of course ludicrous since the Eldar created the webway, "quenched suns" and so on and so forth.

Then you say that their technology has stagnated for centuries which of course is false. New suit designs come out, new tank variants, the tiger shark etc etc.

Then, in complete opposition to your first sentence, you say you can't stand Tau fan boys because they say that Tau are more advanced than humans - which you claim is false.

So which is it? Are the equal to Eldar or are they less advanced than humans?

What does the fact that IoM has millions of ships have anything to do with anything? Might I also point out that probably a small percentage of the ships in those millions are actually combat vessels. The vast majority will be rogue traders, chartist vessles, transports, tankers, bulk cargo haulers, Mining vessels, black ships, and so on and so forth.

Yes, we get it. IF the IoM was so inclined and had the ships to spare, they could wipe out a fairly insignificant alien empire on the edge of the Ultima Segmentum. They may lose a sector or two to the Tyranids or Chaos or Orks in the meantime, but whatever - Tau must die, right?

The Tau are not a hyper-violent species and no where near the greatest threat to the IoM. They are occupying habitable worlds that will likely stay that way - as well as acting as a nice buffer or flank guard for the Imperium against various hive fleets.

If, at some point, the Imperium gets the breathing room to launch an assault on Tau, I'm sure they will.

I think the key is that they are habitable worlds on the eastern fringe - a rare commodity to begin with and even rarer now that hive fleets are NOM NOMing their way through the segmentum. You don't just go in there and cyclonic torpedo them, and you are busy right now trying to hold the worlds you do have. Those worlds aren't going to get up and leave - they'll wait.

In the meantime the Tau slowly grow and learn the true bitterness of the grimdark universe.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 19:41:55


Post by: IvanTih


@Sgt_Scruffy
Imperial warships number in hundreds of thousands(3rd edition states millions of commercial vessel,other sources state one warship per 10,so under millions we assume literally 2-10 million ships,or less literally everything between 2-999 milllion.



Automatically Appended Next Post:
Andy Chambers also said the same thing about the IoM Navy's numbers.

rom: HDS
Sent: Sunday, February 2, 2003 9:07 PM
To: Andy Chambers
Subject: A quick question about the Imperium of Man's fleets

I was speaking to Gordon Rennie once on the BFG-list on yahoogroups, to make it short he came up with some rough approximations for the IoM's total fleet, somewhere inbetween 275.000 to 375.000 ships

I was wondering what you feel about that figure, is it plausible? Too high? Too low?

Thanks for your time


Gordons estimates do fit well with the patrolling approaching, which is exactly how it works. However I should point out that in all likelihood the Imperium itslef doesn't have an accurate idea of fleet strength, galactic communication being what it is

AndyC
40K Overfiend
Wars mongered,
civilisations crushed


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 21:05:31


Post by: prussia59


And they're commies.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 21:12:32


Post by: Kilkrazy


IvanTih wrote:I don't consider it cannon because in the novel a measly Fire Warrior massacres SMs,at one point he runs under the legs of one marine which causes the marine to shoot another marine.
See now?


That is the disadvantage of being 10 feet tall. Puny creatures can run right underneath you.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 21:17:37


Post by: agnosto


Kilkrazy wrote:
That is the disadvantage of being 10 feet tall. Puny creatures can run right underneath you.


Ouch. Pulse rifle shot to the groin....enough to take down anybody.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 21:33:51


Post by: Kilkrazy


SMs have no 'nads, though.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 21:35:26


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


So you're logic says...let's just disregard fluff...right?

And if the 'Nids attacked ANYONE in full force they would be "hard pressed" to repel it; you're argument is ignorance


Really? Well I think I need to word it better.

Codex's are not the best sources of fluff because they do not tell the WHOLE story. I never once said to disregard fluff, EVER. Putting words in each others mouths wont get us anywhere. I say the Tau are naive for thinking they can come in and fix the galaxy, the only way to fix a galaxy like 40k is for something to wipe out EVERYTHING and leave. Say the Tau complete their greater good idea. There will still be uprisings and rebels, civil war eventually everything that happens now. Intelligent life will always have something to fight over. Don't disregard any fluff I never said that, I just pointed out the Codex's of ANY race don't point out the whole spectrum of the race it represents.

And I say they would lose to the other races because they have nowhere near the numbers to win. As I said before 2 billion lasguns and other projectile weapons vs 900 Million plasma rifles and rail guns turns into a numbers game. How effective are your weapons if you can never stand up to shoot them without getting turned to swiss cheese?



Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 21:43:23


Post by: 1hadhq


agnosto wrote:
Kilkrazy wrote:
That is the disadvantage of being 10 feet tall. Puny creatures can run right underneath you.


Ouch. Pulse rifle shot to the groin....enough to take down anybody.


PA vs pointless unfluffy action = zero damage, the offender will be hurt seriously in retaliation, as usual, since these aggressive blue-greys in their crazed violence
cannot be allowed to scratch the Imperial Paint from Imperial wargear without consequences.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/24 22:48:49


Post by: nosferatu1001


Kilkrazy wrote:SMs have no 'nads, though.


except they do.....nothing states they are removed. They are likely rendered infertile by the process, as was mentioned in one book (breeding programme with failed aspirants who HADNT been rendered impotent) but nothing states they have no balls.



Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/25 00:56:39


Post by: Avatar 720


Seeing dogs who've had them removed or have otherwise had the snip would make you wonder what effect it'd have on a Marine:

"Bob? Are you okay?"
"Yeah, just... just feels like something's missing, ya know? The magic's... gone... *sigh* Just leave me a while... i'll be here if you need me..."


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/25 01:00:03


Post by: Kroothawk


prussia59 wrote:And they're commies.

Actually, Tau always are whatever conservative cracker-barrel philosophers hate most in their region. So it is commie for USA and Nazi for Europe. Tau share this insult with every other group these people hate. Consider this an emotional response, not something that is based on rationality or facts.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/25 01:12:12


Post by: Nurglitch


Avatar 720:

I always wondered about the tutoring-engines to which recruits are subjected.

Kroothawk:

Which is ironic because they're conservative. They're from a galactic backwater, love guns and hunting, and even have their own religious leader who is totally not religious or the pope because that would be catholic. Have you ever seen a gay-married Tau? I don't think so...


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/25 01:56:53


Post by: Klawz


Nurglitch wrote:Avatar 720:

I always wondered about the tutoring-engines to which recruits are subjected.

Kroothawk:

Which is ironic because they're conservative. They're from a galactic backwater, love guns and hunting, and even have their own religious leader who is totally not religious or the pope because that would be catholic. Have you ever seen a gay-married Tau? I don't think so...
That makes them Rednecks, not conservative.
They're liberals by the defiinition of the term.
EDIT: Spelling.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/25 02:02:06


Post by: Nurglitch


Klawz:

What is the definition of "librals"?


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/25 05:03:37


Post by: Ledabot


Im not so shore what you guys are no about now. look at my signiture


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/25 05:23:50


Post by: blazinpsycho&typhooni


I think this is getting a little out of hand and slightly personal...

Tau are naive... that's that...


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/25 05:35:15


Post by: Evaelc


I agree that it is getting a little too personal as i'm pretty sure that these topics and others are not meant to be full on arguments. The game brings us together it shouldn't set us apart.
Gosh I sound like a hippy.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
No offense to hippies there.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/25 06:08:28


Post by: Warboss Imbad Ironskull


xXSir MontyXx wrote:
xXSir MontyXx wrote:
Exactly! As i said, they seem very naive of the way the galaxy works. "hey those green fellas over there seem like some good guys, im sure they will help our cause."

That also happens in Tyranid codex where they throw party for Necrons when they destroy Tyranid ships,then the Necrons proceed to kill every Tau on the planet(can't remember the name right now) and also happens when they give Tau from each cast to this guy as a part of cultural exchange,after that DE kill every Tau and their allies on the planet and after that their bodies are used to form sigils which could be interpret as ALLYOURBASEBELONGTOUS! answer from Vect.


Are you saying he doesnt look trust worthy, cuz I think quite the opposite

So does anyone want to provide an official source where it says that the Tau have trouble producing their tech in large numbers or are you guys just going to keep saying it without proof


So do you want to provide proof that its not? I will gladly say im wrong if I am, but you cannot tell me that common sense doesnt dictate the a flak vest is harder to mass produce than watever it is Tau wear, and that a plasma rifle is less expensive than a LASGUN





Ok if you're going to ask a comparrison between production prices between 2 differant weapons 1 you need to have some kind of idea as to how the currency of one race compares in value to the other because they may very well equal the same price in production.

And also if you're going to ask a compareson between the prices of weapons you need to make sure that the weapons are comparable in an unbiased manner. Beings as the Lasgun is a weapon of the rank and file troopers and is smaller in profile then a Plasma rifle (which i'sn't a weapon of rank and file) asking if it would cost less to make is quiet frankly an unfair question because sheer size alone would cause the price to differ and beings as Plasma Rifles have no need to be produced at the same level as Las Guns because not every soldier needs them. So next time compare a Lasgun to a Pulse Rifle or a Plasma Rifle to a Plasma Gun.

But to prove you wrong that the Tau have trouble replacing their technology on the required scale. If the Tau have trouble replacing their tech then how do you explain the fact that the Tau are constantly developing new technology, if they had trouble replacing it then they would spend their time finding better more effecient ways to produce it instead of developing completly new technologies.

Then there is the fact that the Tau units are given the best equiptment to complete the task assigned to them. If the Tau had limited resources or trouble replacing their equipment then they would not have such a wide range of equipment available to their units throughout their campaigns at all times. Nor would they have the capacity to improve the technology of those races who are also apart of the Empire.

And to whoever went on earlier about how Tau Fanboys always believe propaganda dn it was your opinion and all that (I don't feel like scrolling through to find it). When you start quoting things that aren't official fluff as if they actually are that isn't your opinion. And when someone points out that what you're quoting as fluff in a fluff based discussion isn't official it has nothing to do with "propaganda" or being a "Tau Fanboy". It's simply pointing out that the basis for your argument has no grounds because your source isn't official cannon.



Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/25 12:47:06


Post by: AndrewC


Ivan, not one of your better threads.

Look at it from this perspective. GW have decided that the 40K game needs a different genre and have inserted a race into a complete universe. How do they go about doing so? They will be unknown in any earlier publications and have to be of a sufficient technology level to compete. Any method of doing so is going to annoy someone! Would it have been better if they were just another intergalactic race deciding to invade 'our' galaxy? They used that excuse for the nids.

Advancement of technology. Most technology is generational, as each generation moves on then the acceptance of what is or is not acceptable moves with it. Since the generations in the Tau are significantly faster that humans, by about 40 to 60% then advancements will be 'assimilated' faster and the boundries pushed quicker than a human would.

The use of fluff to determine who should not be in a game aint that useful as a solid base. For example, there was a book in which a SM picked up a slab of rock, somewhere between 5 to 20 tonnes, in one hand. Right....

No leverage, no grip, no bracing, right really factual that one.

It's called willing suspension of disbelief.

Cheers

Andrew

Oh and for those of you who don't like their form of government, ask yourself this question. If any of the 40K races were to invade our planet, which one would you prefer to be invaded by?

Nids - eaten.
Elder - Extermination, probably.
DE - Hellraiser anyone?
Orks - We die.
Chaos - Blood for etc.
IoM - Armageddon anyone?
Tau - ?


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/25 12:50:59


Post by: Klawz


Nurglitch wrote:Klawz:

What is the definition of "librals"?

*Liberals* are people who are open to change.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/25 13:24:21


Post by: undivided


Tau was made to attract mecha fanbois


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/25 13:24:42


Post by: stompydakka


I laugh at tau hate.
Seriously Ivan, I dont remember who posted what now resides in my sig, but it could've been you being completely serious.
I put it there because it is funny.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/25 13:47:05


Post by: IvanTih


AndrewC wrote:*snip*

In overall terms, the Imperium's tech base is static; regressed in some areas, advancing in others (an example of the latter; Astartes equipment. Astartes kit c. M41 is much better than that possessed by the Legions c. M31; there's a reason the Traitor Legions nick it whenever they can).

After all IoM can stomp Tau,currently they're small threat.

Okay, lets look at a fullscale Imperial offensive, the Sabbat Worlds Crusade. The mobile portion of the Crusade (over a decade in, so without a good deal of ships, which have been detached for garrision duties), consists of more than ten thousand ships, just under a bilion Guardsmen, multiple Titan Legions, and several provisional companies of SMs.

All this for a relatively insignificant subsector.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
In one sense, the Imperium is largely stagnant in science: minimal pure research, very little employment of devices that did not exist in clearly recognizable form ten thousand years ago.

In another sense, the Imperium does sometimes advance in technology, especially military technology, because they do have an active engineering establishment, and it does make incremental improvements every century or two.

In SF people often talk about 'technology' in terms of drastically new devices and fundamental scientific discovery. Not so much the equivalent of tinkering with your airplane engine to get another fifty horsepower out of it. And I think that's the thing.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/25 15:04:43


Post by: AndrewC


But thats not what the OT was about is it?

Ultimately, Tau are whatever GW decide they are. They have plot devices thrown in all over the place, and the writings of any author is biased to the view of the protaganist in the story. The Tau version of events is not the IoM version of event. Complaining about it won't make it change.



I don't think the the advances shown by the Tau are excessive. Okay maybe poorly though out but, average 'useful' lifespan of a human is what? 60 years. So a generation would be what 30 years Average useful lifespan of a Tau is 25/30?. Taking the same ratio generation 12 years.

Generational from year 0, humans are 30,000/30 = 1000 generations. (I know this may/should be more but since advances in technology would lengthen life expectancy I've averaged it. Shorter life at the beginning counteracts longer life at the end)
Tau 6,000/12 = 500 not too bad. We also have the plot devices thrown in Demiurg, conveniently found space ships etc.

I do not think that it is beyond the pale that Tau can equal humans. I do think that Tau are more advanced than IoM, not necessarily technologically, because they understand what they are using, and so can change it unlike the IoM.

Cheers

Andrew


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/25 15:26:54


Post by: IvanTih


I agree,but sadly in universe they'll get wiped by the Imperium and only saved through the industrial amounts of plot armor and deus ex machinima.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/25 16:04:53


Post by: Kilkrazy


Nothing will happen in universe because the timeline doesn't advance.

If you want to imagine the timeline advancing, and the "realism" of operations, the IoM would find it hard to muster a large enough force to attack the Tau without leaving themselves dangerously exposed in other areas. That is part of why the Damocles Crusade failed.

It is standard military strategy to attack your most powerful enemy first.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/25 16:41:33


Post by: IvanTih


Kilkrazy wrote:Nothing will happen in universe because the timeline doesn't advance.

If you want to imagine the timeline advancing, and the "realism" of operations, the IoM would find it hard to muster a large enough force to attack the Tau without leaving themselves dangerously exposed in other areas. That is part of why the Damocles Crusade failed.

It is standard military strategy to attack your most powerful enemy first.

Well Gaunt's Ghosts series disagree with you.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/25 17:02:19


Post by: KamikazeCanuck


What do you mean by that?


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/25 17:14:32


Post by: IvanTih


KamikazeCanuck wrote:What do you mean by that?


Okay, lets look at a fullscale Imperial offensive, the Sabbat Worlds Crusade. The mobile portion of the Crusade (over a decade in, so without a good deal of ships, which have been detached for garrision duties), consists of more than ten thousand ships, just under a bilion Guardsmen, multiple Titan Legions, and several provisional companies of SMs.

All this for a relatively insignificant subsector.

Or my post above.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/25 17:19:51


Post by: KamikazeCanuck


Ah I see what you mean. I guess the difference is The Tau Empire also is in the war-torn East. Where the MIperium has a lot on its plate especially the Tyranic Wars. The Sabbat worlds are in the (somewhat) calmer west iirc.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/25 17:27:56


Post by: IvanTih


KamikazeCanuck wrote:Ah I see what you mean. I guess the difference is The Tau Empire also is in the war-torn East. Where the MIperium has a lot on its plate especially the Tyranic Wars. The Sabbat worlds are in the (somewhat) calmer west iirc.

Yes,Segmentum Pacificus and Solar are considered relativley peaciful.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/25 18:07:33


Post by: Kilkrazy


IvanTih wrote:
Kilkrazy wrote:Nothing will happen in universe because the timeline doesn't advance.

If you want to imagine the timeline advancing, and the "realism" of operations, the IoM would find it hard to muster a large enough force to attack the Tau without leaving themselves dangerously exposed in other areas. That is part of why the Damocles Crusade failed.

It is standard military strategy to attack your most powerful enemy first.

Well Gaunt's Ghosts series disagree with you.


Which bit, or all of it?


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/25 20:26:45


Post by: Kommissar Kel


I am not sure if this has been brought up yet, I meant to post it a few days(and several less pages) ago:

Human Society has taken 10,000 years to advance to our current level of technology for several reasons:

1) Times of (Relative)Peace: we advance in technology swiftest in times of War; all of our modern technology is a byproduct of war tech.

2) Religious upheaval/scientific oppression: Do a little research, Monotheism Stagnated human technological development for almost 2,000 years

3) Geographic/Climate Isolation: Eurasia is an extremely large Land mass concentrated across 1-2 Climate Zones, this makes the Sharing of ideas and the transplanting of Plants and animals extremely easy. Much more difficult to do this across the Americas or Africa. Couple this with the Above(individual polytheist groups withheld information/technologies from others simply because they were not the same "peoples").

By the Way most of our Technology was developed(and some regained) in the last 200 years. So 6,000 Years is nothing for the Following reasons:

Now examine the tau in comparison to the Above: Religion was replaced by the Ethereals and "The Greater Good"; which Championed research and increased technology along with working together. This came after a long period of eternal war.

So for a few 1000 years you had quickly advancing War technology, with the Fire Caste figuring out better better ways to break down the Walls of the Earth Cast cities, and the Earth Caste figuring out better ways to protect themselves in turn. Then you had the Water Caste and the Air caste travelling across the planet trading in those technologies(or bringing news of the new technologies to the other Cadres). Then one day along come the Etherals(seemingly from fluff, to all Cadres in the same night) and all of Tau society immediately Rallies under their ideas. you know have the already accelerated Tech from the Warring Fire and Earth Castes, and Global communication/Trade routes established by the Air and Water Castes; and the "religion(Ideals)" of the Etherals that all tau should work together in harmony to advance Tau society and technology further. Honestly had the Ethereals shown up 100-200 years earlier the Tau would probably be even more high-tech than they are now. Look at the, what 200 years(in-game), between the original Tau 'dex, and the Tau Empire 'dex; while the base technology is the same most of the wargear has been further refined and expanded on(Special Issue Gear, The New Stealth suit design with optional fusion Blasters, marker light and Sniper Drones, new Vehicles, etc).

I am looking forward to a new Tau 'dex to see if they advance their storyline and include cool new tech/gear.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/25 20:36:27


Post by: KamikazeCanuck


IvanTih wrote:
KamikazeCanuck wrote:Ah I see what you mean. I guess the difference is The Tau Empire also is in the war-torn East. Where the MIperium has a lot on its plate especially the Tyranic Wars. The Sabbat worlds are in the (somewhat) calmer west iirc.

Yes,Segmentum Pacificus and Solar are considered relativley peaciful.


Yes, of course by Imperial standards "relativiley peaceful" means only 1,000 ongoing conflicts


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/25 21:09:58


Post by: Lord Chiasson


I also dislike the Tau, but more so cause there just as bad as modern governments of today trying to justify there actions of war behind fancy slogans just be honest, I want, you have, I take . Hey why did you just kill all those babies? Why for the Greater Good of course of course! . Thats why i love the Imperium there not ashamed to kill mass amounts of aliens(babies) and not ashamed to hide it, there justification? Well there aliens(babies)


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/25 22:00:31


Post by: Kroothawk


stompydakka wrote:I laugh at tau hate.
Seriously Ivan, I dont remember who posted what now resides in my sig, but it could've been you being completely serious.
I put it there because it is funny.

Actually I posted that to summarize all the Tau hate


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/25 22:13:49


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


Ok if you're going to ask a comparrison between production prices between 2 differant weapons 1 you need to have some kind of idea as to how the currency of one race compares in value to the other because they may very well equal the same price in production.

And also if you're going to ask a compareson between the prices of weapons you need to make sure that the weapons are comparable in an unbiased manner. Beings as the Lasgun is a weapon of the rank and file troopers and is smaller in profile then a Plasma rifle (which i'sn't a weapon of rank and file) asking if it would cost less to make is quiet frankly an unfair question because sheer size alone would cause the price to differ and beings as Plasma Rifles have no need to be produced at the same level as Las Guns because not every soldier needs them. So next time compare a Lasgun to a Pulse Rifle or a Plasma Rifle to a Plasma Gun.

But to prove you wrong that the Tau have trouble replacing their technology on the required scale. If the Tau have trouble replacing their tech then how do you explain the fact that the Tau are constantly developing new technology, if they had trouble replacing it then they would spend their time finding better more effecient ways to produce it instead of developing completly new technologies.

Then there is the fact that the Tau units are given the best equiptment to complete the task assigned to them. If the Tau had limited resources or trouble replacing their equipment then they would not have such a wide range of equipment available to their units throughout their campaigns at all times. Nor would they have the capacity to improve the technology of those races who are also apart of the Empire.

And to whoever went on earlier about how Tau Fanboys always believe propaganda dn it was your opinion and all that (I don't feel like scrolling through to find it). When you start quoting things that aren't official fluff as if they actually are that isn't your opinion. And when someone points out that what you're quoting as fluff in a fluff based discussion isn't official it has nothing to do with "propaganda" or being a "Tau Fanboy". It's simply pointing out that the basis for your argument has no grounds because your source isn't official cannon.


haha yes I completely forgot to look up the weapons and corresponding ranks, thats my bad. What im saying however is this. A Tau fire warrior, is much better equiped than a guardsmen. In a way that IS more advanced. Though on a larger scale its not at the same time. The sheer size of the IoM is impressive to say the least. The meer fact that they can produce the arms and armor for that many people is staggering.

So, the Tau and the IoM are advanced in their own way. The Tau advanced extremely quickly, GW did that on purpose I think, to make them look like the "teenage race" young race with cool toys.

Also, lets be honest here, how many guardmen live long enouph to get to the point to have better guns???


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/26 02:05:40


Post by: Warboss Imbad Ironskull


Agreed


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/26 02:09:58


Post by: Mr Nobody


I second that motion.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/26 05:49:27


Post by: Doombot001


/troll post.

I'm a Tau "fanboy" and always will be. Look at humanity, it always turns in upon itself. It's fractured, selfish, and always "about me".

Tau come around and get to the point where they are almost exterminated and they say "its about US".

History lesson, the burning of the Library and Alexandria where technology was lost for a thousand years?

Think of humanity united with one purpose without infighting and with inspiration for at least 1000 years. I'll bet you we'd be far better off than we are now.

(That's where the Tau are and where we'd should be)


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/26 16:39:30


Post by: KamikazeCanuck


Doombot001 wrote:/troll post.

I'm a Tau "fanboy" and always will be. Look at humanity, it always turns in upon itself. It's fractured, selfish, and always "about me".

Tau come around and get to the point where they are almost exterminated and they say "its about US".

History lesson, the burning of the Library and Alexandria where technology was lost for a thousand years?

Think of humanity united with one purpose without infighting and with inspiration for at least 1000 years. I'll bet you we'd be far better off than we are now.

(That's where the Tau are and where we'd should be)


Humanity doesn't have Etherals with magic pixie dust.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/26 18:09:41


Post by: chromedog


IvanTih wrote:deus ex machinima.


God made from video game movie animations?

Cool, I dig Red v Blue and "A clone apart" as much as any other geek - but not exactly what i think you intended.

"Deus Ex Machina" is the "god from the box" phrase.

I don't understand any of your hate threads. If you hate the background so much, why play the frigging game?
Perhaps you hate the tau because they were created to tap into the mecha-fan demographic and as part of that global region (let's face it, the overwhelming majority of mecha fanboys IS from your 'region' - as in NOT Europe, the Americas, or Middle East/Sub-Saharan Africa) you feel obliged to resist the pull?

It's a game. It's called suspension of disbelief.
Build a bridge and get over yourself.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/26 18:16:47


Post by: Mr Nobody


Humans did have ethereals with magic pixie dust, still do in places.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/26 18:17:44


Post by: KamikazeCanuck


Fraid your going to have to elaborate on that one sir.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/26 18:24:59


Post by: Greenmind


I was reading a story in the Tyranid codex about the tau adapting and outfoxing the Tyranids, i really thought it epitomises the Tau empire and led me to the conclusion that......Tau kick ass. Although my opinion means little in this vast universe.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/26 18:43:32


Post by: Mr Nobody


Shamans, priests, cardinals, prophets. Many old religions used incense or other chemicals in their rituals, even psychotropic drugs; if you were refering to the pheromone thing, then my mistake.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/26 19:16:20


Post by: KamikazeCanuck


I am. Those cause more strife not less. Tau don't have to deal with social issues just because. All the other factions have internecine strife except Tau. Even Necrons and Tyranid have plausible scenarios for this. (Farsight doesn't count.) It makes them less interesting imo.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/26 19:20:45


Post by: Doombot001


chromedog wrote:
IvanTih wrote:deus ex machinima.


God made from video game movie animations?

Cool, I dig Red v Blue and "A clone apart" as much as any other geek - but not exactly what i think you intended.

"Deus Ex Machina" is the "god from the box" phrase.

I don't understand any of your hate threads. If you hate the background so much, why play the frigging game?
Perhaps you hate the tau because they were created to tap into the mecha-fan demographic and as part of that global region (let's face it, the overwhelming majority of mecha fanboys IS from your 'region' - as in NOT Europe, the Americas, or Middle East/Sub-Saharan Africa) you feel obliged to resist the pull?

It's a game. It's called suspension of disbelief.
Build a bridge and get over yourself.


Get this man a cookie, steak, or beer! I believe he's got IT surrounded.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/26 19:25:27


Post by: 1hadhq


None of the Shamans , priests or prophets had any control gained with 'magic pixie dust' equivalent.

T'au magic pixie dust = control of the minds gained
Earthlings religious leaders magic pixie dust = covers the stink or was a sacrifice

Those leaders were also not undoubted. They often fought each other too, So where do etherals strive for power or declare another etheral a heretic?


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/26 19:27:58


Post by: KamikazeCanuck


1hadhq wrote:None of the Shamans , priests or prophets had any control gained with 'magic pixie dust' equivalent.

T'au magic pixie dust = control of the minds gained
Earthlings religious leaders magic pixie dust = covers the stink or was a sacrifice

Those leaders were also not undoubted. They often fought each other too, So where do etherals strive for power or declare another etheral a heretic?


That's a good point. Why do they Etherals themselves seem to have a hive-mind? There hasn't been a single thing any of them have disagreed about in the last 6,000 years!?!


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/26 20:04:24


Post by: Kilkrazy


1hadhq wrote:None of the Shamans , priests or prophets had any control gained with 'magic pixie dust' equivalent.

T'au magic pixie dust = control of the minds gained
Earthlings religious leaders magic pixie dust = covers the stink or was a sacrifice

Those leaders were also not undoubted. They often fought each other too, So where do etherals strive for power or declare another etheral a heretic?


Actually a number of real world religions involve the use of psychotropic drugs as sacraments.

Other religions have made use of humans' ability to achieve a state of mystic exaltation through song and dance, or asceticism, for example, Sufism, the Elysian mysteries and hermetic Christianity. This of course is a way of generating psychotropic drugs from the body's own metabolism.



Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/26 20:56:23


Post by: 1hadhq


@ Cary Grant avatar MOD:

And?
Any influence was internal, 'visions' and alike, when Tau are about external influence.
Do T'au etherals dance and sing to enact their special ability upon their fellow T'au?
Last I heard was psychic drugs don't work as pheromones do.
So dance and song may be part of a ritual but the pheromones enact the etherals will....

Are drugged DE easy to control? or Assassins ( eversor& co ) ?
Until you subscribe to voodoo and zombies.....
Hmmm their faces are bit pale already...and this monotone 'greater good'...




Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/26 21:02:32


Post by: KamikazeCanuck


1hadhq wrote:@ Cary Grant avatar MOD:

And?
Any influence was internal, 'visions' and alike, when Tau are about external influence.
Do T'au etherals dance and sing to enact their special ability upon their fellow T'au?
Last I heard was psychic drugs don't work as pheromones do.
So dance and song may be part of a ritual but the pheromones enact the etherals will....

Are drugged DE easy to control? or Assassins ( eversor& co ) ?
Until you subscribe to voodoo and zombies.....
Hmmm their faces are bit pale already...and this monotone 'greater good'...




That's what I was going to say but then I figured Killrazy was just giving us our fun-fact-of-the-day or something.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/26 21:03:33


Post by: Kilkrazy


The fluff is unclear about how influential the Ethereals are.

It may be that they exert a calming influence on the Tau, and get them to intellectually consider the best way forward, rather than rigidly controlling all thoughts. In other words, they have a sort of super charisma. It is a bit difficult to think they control all thought, as there would been to be at several Ethereals for every non-Ethereal member of society, which we know is very far from the case.

Systems of social control can be fairly rigid in human society, even without the help of drugs and religion.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/26 21:12:14


Post by: KamikazeCanuck


Kilkrazy wrote:The fluff is unclear about how influential the Ethereals are.



I hope you are joking. The fluff is very clear that The Etherals have complete and under control of the Tau. That fact itself is the most defining trait of the Tau.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/26 21:20:59


Post by: Kilkrazy


How could that possibly work? Every Fire Warrior would have to be accompanied by an Ethereal to tell him when to shoot his gun.

It's very obviously ridiculous.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/26 21:34:01


Post by: IvanTih


Kilkrazy wrote:
IvanTih wrote:
Kilkrazy wrote:Nothing will happen in universe because the timeline doesn't advance.

If you want to imagine the timeline advancing, and the "realism" of operations, the IoM would find it hard to muster a large enough force to attack the Tau without leaving themselves dangerously exposed in other areas. That is part of why the Damocles Crusade failed.

It is standard military strategy to attack your most powerful enemy first.

Well Gaunt's Ghosts series disagree with you.


Which bit, or all of it?

Well the size of the Crusade,10k+ ships,almost a billion guardsmen,several titan legions with skiitarii support and SMs companies.
All this for a relativley unsignificant subsector.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/26 21:34:04


Post by: KamikazeCanuck


exactly.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/26 21:36:51


Post by: Kilkrazy


IvanTih wrote:
Kilkrazy wrote:
IvanTih wrote:
Kilkrazy wrote:Nothing will happen in universe because the timeline doesn't advance.

If you want to imagine the timeline advancing, and the "realism" of operations, the IoM would find it hard to muster a large enough force to attack the Tau without leaving themselves dangerously exposed in other areas. That is part of why the Damocles Crusade failed.

It is standard military strategy to attack your most powerful enemy first.

Well Gaunt's Ghosts series disagree with you.


Which bit, or all of it?

Well the size of the Crusade,10k+ ships,almost a billion guardsmen,several titan legions with skiitarii support and SMs companies.
All this for a relativley unsignificant subsector.


I don't understand your point. It doesn't seem to address any of my three points.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/26 21:37:26


Post by: IvanTih


Kilkrazy wrote:
IvanTih wrote:
Kilkrazy wrote:
IvanTih wrote:
Kilkrazy wrote:Nothing will happen in universe because the timeline doesn't advance.

If you want to imagine the timeline advancing, and the "realism" of operations, the IoM would find it hard to muster a large enough force to attack the Tau without leaving themselves dangerously exposed in other areas. That is part of why the Damocles Crusade failed.

It is standard military strategy to attack your most powerful enemy first.

Well Gaunt's Ghosts series disagree with you.


Which bit, or all of it?

Well the size of the Crusade,10k+ ships,almost a billion guardsmen,several titan legions with skiitarii support and SMs companies.
All this for a relativley unsignificant subsector.


I don't understand your point. It doesn't seem to address any of my three points.

The full Imperial offensive on some enemy.
That's what I meant.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/26 21:53:36


Post by: BluntmanDC


Kommissar Kel wrote:I am not sure if this has been brought up yet, I meant to post it a few days(and several less pages) ago:

Human Society has taken 10,000 years to advance to our current level of technology for several reasons:

1) Times of (Relative)Peace: we advance in technology swiftest in times of War; all of our modern technology is a byproduct of war tech.

2) Religious upheaval/scientific oppression: Do a little research, Monotheism Stagnated human technological development for almost 2,000 years

3) Geographic/Climate Isolation: Eurasia is an extremely large Land mass concentrated across 1-2 Climate Zones, this makes the Sharing of ideas and the transplanting of Plants and animals extremely easy. Much more difficult to do this across the Americas or Africa. Couple this with the Above(individual polytheist groups withheld information/technologies from others simply because they were not the same "peoples").

By the Way most of our Technology was developed(and some regained) in the last 200 years. So 6,000 Years is nothing for the Following reasons:

Now examine the tau in comparison to the Above: Religion was replaced by the Ethereals and "The Greater Good"; which Championed research and increased technology along with working together. This came after a long period of eternal war.

So for a few 1000 years you had quickly advancing War technology, with the Fire Caste figuring out better better ways to break down the Walls of the Earth Cast cities, and the Earth Caste figuring out better ways to protect themselves in turn. Then you had the Water Caste and the Air caste travelling across the planet trading in those technologies(or bringing news of the new technologies to the other Cadres). Then one day along come the Etherals(seemingly from fluff, to all Cadres in the same night) and all of Tau society immediately Rallies under their ideas. you know have the already accelerated Tech from the Warring Fire and Earth Castes, and Global communication/Trade routes established by the Air and Water Castes; and the "religion(Ideals)" of the Etherals that all tau should work together in harmony to advance Tau society and technology further. Honestly had the Ethereals shown up 100-200 years earlier the Tau would probably be even more high-tech than they are now. Look at the, what 200 years(in-game), between the original Tau 'dex, and the Tau Empire 'dex; while the base technology is the same most of the wargear has been further refined and expanded on(Special Issue Gear, The New Stealth suit design with optional fusion Blasters, marker light and Sniper Drones, new Vehicles, etc).

I am looking forward to a new Tau 'dex to see if they advance their storyline and include cool new tech/gear.


just think of all the technology that had been been lost when civilisations fell, ancient china invented a whole lot of stuff that was lost due to the mongals, the roman, egypian and mayan civilisations had architectual wonders unsurpassable for hundreds and in some cases more than a thousand years.

technology advances alot faster when you have a continuous line of goverment and good, clear record keeping.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/26 22:01:32


Post by: KamikazeCanuck


Anyways got ninja'd by Ivan. But exactly, Killrazy it is ridiculus. That why its magic-pixie-dust not just the regular kind.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/27 00:26:32


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


I was reading a story in the Tyranid codex about the tau adapting and outfoxing the Tyranids, i really thought it epitomises the Tau empire and led me to the conclusion that......Tau kick ass. Although my opinion means little in this vast universe.


Was this the Ed. 5 codex? Also, was this outsmarting in space?

If they out smarted the nids im not sure that means they "kick ass". (Especially since they can never do that same tactic again.) The Tyranid dex's always end up in defeat at the end of a story though, for the simple fact if they didnt GW would have to erase a species from 40K haha.

Yes the Tyranid are outsmarted on multiple occasions, the thing that negates these instances however are the fact that the hive-mind learns from its mistakes and in turn so does EVERY 'nid from ripper to bio-titan.

Sorry though started going on about 'nids!

I have a point I promise! They out smarted the Tyranid..... but the attempted alliance with Ork's.......... I think thats gonna take ALOT of time to live down

And the Necron thing....... allowing them through their front door and then having their planet massacred.......

NAIVE


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/27 00:30:25


Post by: Klawz


He's talking about Hive Fleet Gorgon.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/27 11:08:11


Post by: Ledabot


Were did you read bout the necrons? I want to read the whole thing for lols.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/27 11:23:41


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


Well that I heard from Ivanteh I have to admit, ask him. I have heard about the Ork thing on multiple occasions.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/27 11:25:28


Post by: Ledabot


oh. did he post it on here? dident see it while ive been reading through the thread


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/27 15:16:16


Post by: Klawz


Ledabot wrote:Were did you read bout the necrons? I want to read the whole thing for lols.
Also Hive Fleet Gorgon.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/27 17:41:07


Post by: Kommissar Kel


1hadhq wrote:@ Cary Grant avatar MOD:

And?
Any influence was internal, 'visions' and alike, when Tau are about external influence.
Do T'au etherals dance and sing to enact their special ability upon their fellow T'au?
Last I heard was psychic drugs don't work as pheromones do.
So dance and song may be part of a ritual but the pheromones enact the etherals will....

Are drugged DE easy to control? or Assassins ( eversor& co ) ?
Until you subscribe to voodoo and zombies.....
Hmmm their faces are bit pale already...and this monotone 'greater good'...




Many older Religions(and some more modern Cults) Didn't just have the Priests drugged; they had their entire "flock" drugged. And yes this did make them very easy to control, especially when you add in what was basically hypno-therapy.

DE Drugs are specifically designed with Combat in mind, they are not Psychotropics; they are Adrenal boosters/steroids, the same goes for Eversors.

SM Chemo/Hypno therapies would be more akin to the Drugged for Worship variety.

Drugged can mean a great many different things; most Sedatives and hallucinogens open the mind to suggestion allowing for guided hallucinations or easier brainwashing.

For reference look up: Peyote Rituals, Hashish Rituals(that were used by the hashishans, were we get the word "assassins"), and many of the "new-wave Majick" rituals(Many of which use incenses or teas that include toxic compounds).


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/27 17:54:21


Post by: 1hadhq


@komissar kel:

I see your point.

But the etherals way of influence has more to do with the relations of insects and pheromones than humans and religious leaders.

The assasins are a fine example of a small group. Still 40k's scale isn't that small and some options aren't available at every level.






Ledabot wrote:Were did you read bout the necrons? I want to read the whole thing for lols.


Codex tyranids (5th ed): page 20 - 21.

Firstly vanguard elements of hivefleet gorgon enter Tau space.
from 599899.M41 to 901901.m41, nids slowly advance and assimilate tau colonies. Nids evolve to a immunity to pulse weapons.

then it comes to the meeting of tau and necrons:

-075902.M41 Nids of hivefleet gorgon attack the tau colony ka'mais.

a fleet of necron ships start on ka'mais moon and annihilates the nids fleet.

-078902.M41 celebration at ka'mais. Etheral aun'taniel welcomes the necrons.

-079902.M41 Aun'taniel is killed by the necrons. The Harvest of ka'mais begins...

-098902.M41 the etherals of kel'shan decide to evacuate the colonies between ka'mais and kel'shan.

-235902.M41 a evacuation fleet of ho'sarn is intercepted by nids. The tau loose 300 ships in less than 3 hours.
the nids hunt the fleeing survivors down..

-550902M41 The Tau oppose the leaving hive fleet gorgon ( ka'mais system ) and kill most of its narvhales ( bioships neccessary to navigate/move ) but has to withdraw.

-689902M41 hivefleet gorgon swallows Roksh, home of a trader coalition. Tau loose several trading fleets and a secret base.

-709902.M41 tau refit and reconfigure their ships to cope with the nids immunity to ion weaponry.

- 760902.M41 an imperial fleet, delayed and suspected to be at the damocles crusade, reach kel'shan.

-785902.M41 nids join the fight of iom and tau.

-830902.M41 IoM and tau decide to get rid of the nids first, soon hivefleet gorgon is reduced to 3 bioships that flee.

-920902.M41 the tau chase the fleeing bioships, destroy 1 but leave the sept worlds behind badly guarded..

-011903.M41 - 490903.M41 cadians and tau cleanse kel'shan of nids. Nids cannot adapt to both.

-500903.M41 hivefleet gorgon exterminated.



sorry if capitalization is screwed, the machine spirit of the 'shift-keys' seems to sleep.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/27 17:57:21


Post by: Asherian Command


Wow tau got owned it seems.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/27 18:13:17


Post by: Kommissar Kel


Initially; and in the long Run, but it was gorgon that got "owned"; Tau survived, Nid Fleet annihilated, Tau have Humies and 'Crons left to deal with. Tau may have just abandoned the World the 'Crons were harvesting and the 'Crons would have left after stripping the world of what they wanted/needed. Net Loss for Tau: Several ships a few thousand Tau, and having to re-colonize Ka'mais(So lost time, which is precious to the short-lived Tau).

All the Tau really have left to deal with are the IoM; who will likely leave as soon as they learn/realize that the Damocles crusade has been over for awhile(and might even apologize for the mix-up).


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/27 18:19:28


Post by: Asherian Command


Kommissar Kel wrote:Initially; and in the long Run, but it was gorgon that got "owned"; Tau survived, Nid Fleet annihilated, Tau have Humies and 'Crons left to deal with. Tau may have just abandoned the World the 'Crons were harvesting and the 'Crons would have left after stripping the world of what they wanted/needed. Net Loss for Tau: Several ships a few thousand Tau, and having to re-colonize Ka'mais(So lost time, which is precious to the short-lived Tau).

All the Tau really have left to deal with are the IoM; who will likely leave as soon as they learn/realize that the Damocles crusade has been over for awhile(and might even apologize for the mix-up).

Yeah but the Tau lost 5 planets and 1,000 ships. I call that a loss. The overall damage of the hivefleet was too catastrophic for the tau.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/27 18:21:31


Post by: Mordoskul


Tau players- please get off it, the Tau ar'nt exactly choir boys.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/27 18:25:18


Post by: 1hadhq


Necrons arent renown to leave survivors, so ka'mais is bereft of tau.
tau did loose a lot:
several colonies got assimilated, fleets destroyed, allies eaten, and nids evolving to immunitys to tau's favorite weapons.
remember: nids are still not immune to imperial weapons.

plus, any new fluff plays on nids encircling the tau empire.

Generally the tau need to learn to have alliances without the ally ever joining the greater good.Maybe even support the fight against nid-fleets without gaining anything.





Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/27 18:37:20


Post by: Asherian Command


1hadhq wrote:Necrons arent renown to leave survivors, so ka'mais is bereft of tau.
tau did loose a lot:
several colonies got assimilated, fleets destroyed, allies eaten, and nids evolving to immunitys to tau's favorite weapons.
remember: nids are still not immune to imperial weapons.

plus, any new fluff plays on nids encircling the tau empire.

Generally the tau need to learn to have alliances without the ally ever joining the greater good.Maybe even support the fight against nid-fleets without gaining anything.




yep.
Imperium has pusle weapons they just found them extremely ineffective.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/27 19:03:43


Post by: Kommissar Kel


Depends on your definition of both victory and Defeat.

When the Enemy wishes your total destruction and you survive(Even barely); You've won.

When the Enemy wishes your total destruction and you Utterly destroy the Enemy; You've definitely won.

1hadHQ: I didn't say anything about survivors on Ka'mais. I said that after the necrons are done, they will likely leave(it's what Necrons do) after they have left the tau can just go back and re-colonize(if their is anything left worth re-colonizing). The best way to "win" against necrons is to avoid them, and wait for them to leave.

I also never said the Tau had a great victory; they got beat up bad in that chain of events, but in the End they destroyed a Hive fleet, Evaded a major Necron Harvest, and the IOM may not even stick around(their campaign is over; it may take them awhile to find that out but they will eventually, or at least will not receive the supplies needed to continue their efforts). The Tau came out Broken, bloodied, and bruised; but alive.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/27 19:33:46


Post by: 1hadhq


oh did they evade the necrons?
no, they threw a party and got harvested.

Sounds like necrons got what they want and left. Still necron drives allow to move fast and unnoticed, who's to say they don't come back if the tau re-settle ka'mais?

hive fleet gorgon lost to a combo it can't beat.
- necron ships
- imperial guard
- tau

why in this order?
1) since necrons had a full success.
-drove off other predators aiming to 'steal' their prey.
-harvested prey.
-leave without any mentioned casualties, thus perfectly performed.

2) IG identified the real threat and acted accordingly.
-wasn't fooled by xenophobia to fight both
-didn't create new features of tyranids which may be used later

3) tau made lots of mistakes dealing with nids.
- lost worlds = more biomass
- lost fleets and allies = more biomass
- got nids to adapt in the worst way = immunity to tau weapons
- misunderstood the ancient space robots in their undead design as saviours
- were not able to catch them all. mind you, gorgon's last survivors were not all caugth...
- gave the cadians the impression they are easy beaten, thus the cadians may not leave but call for reinforcements....

yes the tau are not dead, yet.
but the nids seem to close in on them....

Tau were saved from other races, not just once. But will those be there when the nids come again?
So far we have Necrons, IG, D-eldar. who's left? Choas or Orks won't side with Tau, imo.

definitions:
victory against nids = every single creature of that hive fleet is dead.
defeat against nids = allow some of them to survive to return later./ allow them to adapt and share that info with other nids. / add to their biomass







Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/27 19:38:45


Post by: Asherian Command


Yep. That is basically what I was thinking.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/27 20:29:05


Post by: Mr Nobody


I remember reading star of democles, where the imperium first meet tau. The tau fly circles around imperium ships, but eventually lose. The imperial ships congradulate themselves until they realise every single ystem and planet have their own self sufficient army and fleet. Imperium pull back, unable to deal with the concentration of tau forces.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/27 20:37:56


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


So thats how you beat 'nids, never as a single race or they will just out evolve you. The Tau would have been screwed without the IoM just cuz the 'nids were going to be immune to their weapons


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/27 20:40:25


Post by: 1hadhq


Star of damocles was a single capital ship right?
More proof the imperial military isn't dumb.

They don't attempt to ally with Nids or necrons or DE, nor do they underestimate chaos and orks.

Codex nids does hint at another IoM vs Tau event, so we may have to wait.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/27 20:42:50


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


Yes that is true, the imperium is much more spread out. The Tau are able to concentrate all their forces to repel stuff easier.

To put in in perspective imagine the IoM empire, the forces are spread out and fortified on te Outskirts. In the inside however, they are much less fortified. The IoM relies on Space marines to respond to inner threats.

The Tau however have balanced fortifacation throughout their empire due to their size. So if the Tau were as spread out as the IoM, I gaurantee teir tech would be much less advanced per person.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/27 20:43:34


Post by: Kommissar Kel


Pay attention to the Timeline:

-098902.M41 the etherals of kel'shan decide to evacuate the colonies between ka'mais and kel'shan.

So Yes, While quite a Few Tau were lost(Quite Possibly everyone from Ka'mais); the rest evaded the nids for at least 400 years. The necrons were probably done with Ka'mais far sooner than the Nids were destroyed.

That brings me to this:

-500903.M41 hivefleet gorgon exterminated.

Exterminated, not beaten back; They are all dead. Even by your(Extremely accurate) Definition that equals victory over the nids.

Hivefleet gorgon is gone; The necrons are probably done with Ka'mais and gone(yes they could come back, but there would need to be a reason for them to come back). The IoM is still fighting the tau, but we do not know how long that will last.

The entire reason I am defending the Tau in this is that you are portraying this as some sort of Crushing defeat when it is, in fact, not. In nearly 500 years the Nids show up, Then the Necrons, then The IoM; The Nids get destroyed and the 'Crons get what they want and leave(Which is what the 'Crons do) the only thing left for the tau to deal with is the IoM Fleet that, as I said, may or may not stick around for too long(Remember they are their for a war that is already over).


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/27 20:47:25


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


I thought ur timeline said IoM and Tau decide to destroy 'Nids first?


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/27 20:59:51


Post by: 1hadhq


I hope the citation of mine of page 20-21 was correct, but I am sure the story at page 18 says the Tau still hunted the remaining ships of gorgon and if youve paid attention there was only 1 of 3 confirmed as destroyed. If one escapes, it does not need to tell any nid as his info is coded in genetics and may even help other
nids if they just devour the gorgon-fleet ship.

I do portray it as the failure it is, losing world after world and instead of stopping the nids they trained them to become immune to Tau weapons, a thing that did not happen to other races fighting against nids.
I blame the Tau's tactic of withdrawal for this. Other races made sure no nid survived to tell. Tau withdrew and allowed the nids to adapt.

secondly, Tau got issues with alliances.
Tried necrons, which are not looking like nice neighbours at all and I doubt the crons offered any help or communicated at all.
Tried DE, again a questionable choice even considering the Tau are used to lots of different xenos.

Choosing the soulless and evil as allies does not get you far.

Plus, codex nids states another campaign of the imperium will happen ' ...but this is another story...' ( please excuse the translation in my own words here ).

The interesting part of codex nids is the fact nids are shown to loose. Not once, but several times against different armies.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/27 21:35:17


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


tey have to lose thoough haha. If they dont there would be alot less playable armies


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/27 22:58:59


Post by: Henners91


IvanTih wrote:My small rant.

You know what is "so utterly ridiculous as to not merely strain credibility, but throw it to the ground, stomp on it, and then put it through the shredder for good measure"? That a civilization can go from cavemen to matching the elder species of 40k in a mere six thousand years. Here's a hint, it took humans tens of millenia to reach this point.

The Tau could have pulled it off if they displayed levels of competence that would make the Moties look like a bunch of slowed children, but their technology has stagnated for centuries, too.

THAT is why I despise the Tau. Their very existence is an affront to logic and common sense.

I also hate Tau fanboys that state that Tau are more advanced than Imperium which they are not.



It didn't take mankind "tens of thousands of years" as far as I know.

The Imperium are simply survivors of a great technological apocalypse: The Dark Age of Technology.

We have no idea how long it took to get to the tech levels before the Dark Age: That's why IMO 40k can fit in with so many sci-fi settings... Humanity created all kinds of crazy doodads like STCs and digital weapons that now are rarely found, because they are relics from the past.

For all we know, Humanity might have built all this in the year 10,000, prospered for 10,000 years, then had the Dark Age and vwoom, Great Crusade in the year 30,000.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/30 11:30:57


Post by: Ledabot


It took me about 16yrs for my very strange self to develop todays technology. they reached a rapid deceleration at that point.


+ woop!
promotion!


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/30 21:22:16


Post by: Retribution


Asherian Command wrote:
1hadhq wrote:Necrons arent renown to leave survivors, so ka'mais is bereft of tau.
tau did loose a lot:
several colonies got assimilated, fleets destroyed, allies eaten, and nids evolving to immunitys to tau's favorite weapons.
remember: nids are still not immune to imperial weapons.

plus, any new fluff plays on nids encircling the tau empire.

Generally the tau need to learn to have alliances without the ally ever joining the greater good.Maybe even support the fight against nid-fleets without gaining anything.




yep.
Imperium has pusle weapons they just found them extremely ineffective.

And yet the standard Pulse Rifle carried by a Fire Warrior is quite a bit more powerful than a lasgun, let alone the greater range...


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/30 21:50:49


Post by: 1hadhq


Obviously because the Imperial Guard wants to give the xenos a chance to be proud of something before they die under Imperial Guard issue armyboots..



Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/30 22:42:11


Post by: Klawz


1hadhq wrote:Obviously because the Imperial Guard wants to give the xenos a chance to be proud of something before they die under Imperial Guard issue armyboots..

Or becuase the techonlogy to mass-produce Pulse Weapondry is limited, so to arm trillions of guardsmen with pulse weapons would be ridiculous.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/30 22:55:06


Post by: 1hadhq


Plus you can't bajonet-charge with pulse rifles...

The IG doesn't need range with lasguns, if they aim to kill you at range, artillery does the job. Try to beat IG at range ( hint: some weapons have 200 +x " range ).
Strength? IG has faith in the Emperor, he guides their aim thus hitting the weak spots. When you hit where it counts, you don't need "moar powa"...

Nids became immune to pulse weapons. Nids will never be immune to lasguns.

Seems the IG is quite confident with the Lasgun.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/30 23:27:18


Post by: Warboss Imbad Ironskull


Nids will never become immune to las guns hmm? could that be because they aren't powerfull enough for the nids to need to be immune. They just throw more and more hordes at the guard to run down their ammo but the Hive Mind recognises the superiority of Tau weapons and so has to adapt its hordes to be able to survive long enough to destroy the Tau before the superior weapons of the Tau wipe out the Tyranids leader beasts alot easier then lasguns could. Oh and Tau have long range weapons as well


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Oh and while the guard put their faith in the Emperor the Tau have these nifty little lasers that are alot more accurate and and our troops don't have to worry about a gods gaze being else where to be able to hit anything.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/11/30 23:38:12


Post by: Retribution


1hadhq wrote:Plus you can't bajonet-charge with pulse rifles...

The IG doesn't need range with lasguns, if they aim to kill you at range, artillery does the job. Try to beat IG at range ( hint: some weapons have 200 +x " range ).
Strength? IG has faith in the Emperor, he guides their aim thus hitting the weak spots. When you hit where it counts, you don't need "moar powa"...

Nids became immune to pulse weapons. Nids will never be immune to lasguns.

Seems the IG is quite confident with the Lasgun.

True, the guard has impressive amounts of indirect fire artillery, but that doesn't really help when the Tau abhor holding a static line. And when you want to talk about direct fire weaponry, well...there's this little dandy called the railgun


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/12/01 00:18:25


Post by: xXSir MontyXx


Klawz wrote:
1hadhq wrote:Obviously because the Imperial Guard wants to give the xenos a chance to be proud of something before they die under Imperial Guard issue armyboots..

Or becuase the techonlogy to mass-produce Pulse Weapondry is limited, so to arm trillions of guardsmen with pulse weapons would be ridiculous.


Yes, thank you. Finally someone gets it!


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/12/01 01:13:29


Post by: Warboss Imbad Ironskull


Still waiting for an official source that says the ability to mass produce pulse weaponry (or in fact any of the Taus technology) is limited.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/12/01 01:49:01


Post by: Sgt_Scruffy


Warboss Imbad Ironskull wrote:Still waiting for an official source that says the ability to mass produce pulse weaponry (or in fact any of the Taus technology) is limited.


It's because there is no official source. The closest you can come is how various sources have noted that the lasgun is easily produced and infer that anything else is therefore harder to produce (in terms of weapons).

Hive Fleet Gorgon developed an almost total immunity to pulse weapons at the expense of numbers. They are actually a good example of what not to do. Gorgon overspecialized to the point of extinction. They had fewer nids and fewer large assault beasts and it cost them.

Hormogaunts develop immunity to pulse weapons - kroot eat them.
Gaunts develop methods to eat kroot - hard fought fight.
Gaunts become perfectly developed to eat kroot - kroot lose.
Gaunts emerge from woods only to find that they are vulnerable to pulse weapons.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/12/01 03:08:33


Post by: Warboss Imbad Ironskull


So the absence of official fluff stating yay or nay means that people can make flase statements about the Taus ability to produce their weapons and then claim that it's based off of an entire differant factions ability to produce their own weapon.

I'm sorry but that's just stupid and making false statements does nothing to help your arguments. Especially when the actual established fluff of the Tau Empire supports that the Tau have absolutly no problem producing their tech.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/12/01 03:36:34


Post by: Sgt_Scruffy


Warboss Imbad Ironskull wrote:So the absence of official fluff stating yay or nay means that people can make flase statements about the Taus ability to produce their weapons and then claim that it's based off of an entire differant factions ability to produce their own weapon.

I'm sorry but that's just stupid and making false statements does nothing to help your arguments. Especially when the actual established fluff of the Tau Empire supports that the Tau have absolutly no problem producing their tech.


I was agreeing with you.... People make a big deal about plot armor for tau, but it's present at all times. If Chaos had the wherewithal to invade Cadia with mass numbers of troops - why not simply bombard the planet? Why do the necrons depart after helping the BA destroy the Tyranids. They are regenerating, soulless automatons. How can Marneus Calgar be "laid low" all the freakin' time but some miracle saves him. Hell, the Legion of the Damned is an entire unit that screams "plot armor" for space marines. The same can be said for Sanguinor.


Why I dislike Tau! @ 2010/12/01 04:12:20


Post by: Retribution


I think it's safe to assume that the standard equipment for any races most general infantry is very capable of being mass-produced...otherwise it wouldn't be standard equipment for general infantry