Switch Theme:

Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit  [RSS] 

Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/26 21:29:25


Post by: Neconilis


They're more hyena like, not wolves.


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/26 22:58:04


Post by: Chaoslord


By gods, those razorgors are awful...

It seems that during this millenium, whenever there's a real stinker figure in the GW lineup (monsters in particular), the Morrisons are to blame. It's not that they are totally unable to produce at least decent miniatures, but have some quality control for heaven's sake.



Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/27 00:09:34


Post by: lasgunpacker


Therion wrote:Well I kept repeating myself about this subject already back in the days of Portent.net. Gary Morley and Aly & Trish Morrison sculpt (in my opinion) absolutely horrible miniatures by GW's modern standards. Trish usually gets to sculpt the animals and monsters and has (in my opinion) miserably failed every single time apart from the unrealistic and weird-but-still-cool-looking Carnosaur. The other two can't sculpt faces without making females look like transvestites or monsters, and the way they pose the models are straight from the early 1990's. I believe the only model by either of them that is still used and generally liked is Prince Tyrion which seems to have been a one hit wonder. The reason they have been able to keep their jobs (in my opinion) has to have something to do with their long standing work history at the company instead of the actual results.

People were predicting a massive 'Beastfail' already when they heard about the sculptor lineup for the release, and although I wouldn't call all of the models absolutely useless they certainly aren't even close to what I've come to expect from Citadel Miniatures. Juan Diaz, Jes Goodwin and Alex Hedström are all household names I hold to a very high regard. Seb Perbet and Brian Nelson are very talented too, although Nelson's work is sometimes a bit more inspired than some other times. Feel free to disagree, and I'm sure there are exceptions to everything.


All three of them have made SOME good models, e.g. for the LotR line.

However, plenty of stinkers have been produced, particularly in the range of monsters and dragons, miniatures which should be the iconic center of any army, not the ignored.

Maybe the design team should be pared back to just the Perrys, Brian Nelson, and Jes... sure, we would wait longer for figures, but at least they would be good ones when they came out.


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/27 00:14:07


Post by: Buttlerthepug


Hmmm I dont think the "sculpting" on the razorgors are bad at all... the concept? Oh yeah... but hell i couldnt scuplt anything like that if i tryd to. I still will probably stick to using the karanak model for them if its the right size... anyone know how big it is compared to them?


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/27 03:26:41


Post by: cygnnus


Finally saw some Minotaurs in person today. Yes, they do look better than those horrible studio paint jobs make 'em look, but they're still, IMHO, still FAR below what one would hope to see, especially when folks like Avatars of War, among others, are around.

Vale,

JohnS


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/27 03:50:40


Post by: grobbicull


I have to agree with Buttlerthepug: good execution, bad concept. I think the Razorgor would be a really great addition to the VC army, it meshes well with their new direwolves. I just don't think that it particularly matches the Beasts army that well. I am still on the fence over the minotaurs, I need to see them in more traditional beasty colours before I make my judgement (I used to hate the old models, then I saw them up close and really like them now, so we'll see).

As for the rules, from what I have heard this will be a solid book, meant to compete with the majority of the others, while not joining in the powercreep. And I say good job GW. It is easy to keep pumping out more and more powerfull lists, it takes guts to put out a book that is going to perform on par with an average codex. Leave the three WAACy armies alone, and let the new edition sort them out (fear rules changes would severely weaken all 3).


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/27 04:04:07


Post by: Cheese Elemental


Lunahound wrote:I not sure what Gnolls are , but they look like wolves? im using these:

What? But weren't you a Warcraft player? Gnolls are those hyena/wolf people (it depends on the setting), and they've been around since the early days of D&D.


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/27 04:07:52


Post by: LunaHound


Alliance FTW


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/27 06:27:14


Post by: Buttlerthepug


LunaHound wrote:Alliance FTW


No...no! Unacceptable in the extreme! Just...NO!!!!! AHHHHHHH...

Horde


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/27 09:51:44


Post by: G_Model101


They are waxing lyrical about the Razorgor's in the new WD. Something about the vision of them having slabs of over the top muscle with lots of spikes and then more spikes thrown on top in a "typical Warhammer fashion".

But those bug eyes.....they are like Andrewsarchus on steroids, just plain wrong!


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/27 14:09:02


Post by: Llamahead


I've started a thread on alternative Beastmen miniatures in the Warhammer Discussion box it seemed to me far more constructive than just whinging! Any suggestions bung them there!


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/27 14:36:36


Post by: gorgon


Miniatures like the Razorgor are just a reminder that GW views its products as stuff for *children*. Having said that, I think even 8-year-olds will laugh at it. Still, for some reason I like it more than the Minos. The Razorgor is so over-the-top bad that it's somehow...good. Well okay, not good at all, but at least a conversation piece along the lines of Nagash.

The Minos on the other hand, aren't bad enough to come out around the other end. They're just stuck solidly in "bad". I've seen them in person. And sure, in grey plastic they look slightly better, if still ridiculous. However, I feel like when they're painted all those silly muscles are going to "pop" again unless you stick with some really subtle shading. I think I have enough of the metal Minos, thank god.

I know the Bestigors have their critics, but those sprues seem just fine to me. If the Minos and Razorgor were to their quality, it'd be a darn good range, really.


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/27 19:28:59


Post by: Kanluwen


Except once again, that ridiculous expression doesn't come standard.

It really is the eyes giving the Razorgor that comical effect.

Yeah, the models themselves aren't that great--but they're not a big honking joke model like it's made out to be.


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/27 19:51:43


Post by: Alpharius


Kanluwen wrote:Except once again, that ridiculous expression doesn't come standard.

It really is the eyes giving the Razorgor that comical effect.

Yeah, the models themselves aren't that great--but they're not a big honking joke model like it's made out to be.


Actually, I think they might be.

Seriously, they are NOT up to the recent GW 'standard'.


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/27 20:18:25


Post by: Kanluwen


I still maintain that it's the eyes really throwing them off, much like it was the overaccentuated paintjob on the Minotaurs doing the same.

Or heck, look at the Land Speeder Storm. People complained that it looked far, far, far too toylike when it was shown as bare plastic.


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/28 02:04:31


Post by: Railguns


The painters probably used the paint job to make what was an outright downsy model a great ironic joke about GW miniature design.


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/28 09:33:11


Post by: JOHIRA


Kanluwen wrote:I still maintain that it's the eyes really throwing them off, much like it was the overaccentuated paintjob on the Minotaurs doing the same.


We'll have to respectfully agree to vehemently disagree then. Say I'm overly confident in my ability to identify 3-dimensional shapes in a 2-dimensional image, but I don't agree with you. I think the whole models are bad, from concept to finished product, from stupid facial expression to the tip of their clown-tails. I cannot believe that any paint job can save those models. Even if Bongo, the god of model painting, came down from Olympus and put a perfect paint job on these, they would still be the worst models Games Workshop has ever made. Worse than Lamartes. Worse than the Dark Eldar Warp Beasts. Worse than Nagash.

But feel free to prove me wrong. Paint one up and post it here. Maybe that could even be the theme of a Dakka painting challenge- see who can get the most out of the worst model.


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/28 12:30:11


Post by: Alpharius


JOHIRA wrote:
Kanluwen wrote:I still maintain that it's the eyes really throwing them off, much like it was the overaccentuated paintjob on the Minotaurs doing the same.


We'll have to respectfully agree to vehemently disagree then. Say I'm overly confident in my ability to identify 3-dimensional shapes in a 2-dimensional image, but I don't agree with you. I think the whole models are bad, from concept to finished product, from stupid facial expression to the tip of their clown-tails. I cannot believe that any paint job can save those models. Even if Bongo, the god of model painting, came down from Olympus and put a perfect paint job on these, they would still be the worst models Games Workshop has ever made. Worse than Lamartes. Worse than the Dark Eldar Warp Beasts. Worse than Nagash.

But feel free to prove me wrong. Paint one up and post it here. Maybe that could even be the theme of a Dakka painting challenge- see who can get the most out of the worst model.


This is almost a great idea...

...if we could somehow get the Razorgor models FREE.

There is NO WAY anyone should help GW think that hideous thing is at all a success.

A wave of 'counts as' Razorgors should show up at official tournaments worldwide.

Sure, it will not be allowed!

So that's when you just take out your alternative army list, with alternative models, and play away!

Fun is still had, message still sent!


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/28 13:03:28


Post by: Sidstyler


...holy god.

I just...um...I'm going to go away for a while. I don't know when I'll be back...

*stares at the razorgor models for 10 minutes straight without blinking, then turns and slowly walks away while whispering "The horror..." over and over*


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/28 16:27:28


Post by: Alpharius


Sidstyler wrote:...holy god.

I just...um...I'm going to go away for a while. I don't know when I'll be back...

*stares at the razorgor models for 10 minutes straight without blinking, then turns and slowly walks away while whispering "The horror..." over and over*


(Looks at Sid's avatar)

(Realizes Sid's avatar looks like it is looking at the new Razorgor models)

(Laughing begins!)


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/28 20:12:21


Post by: Thorgut


I'm confused. If they're the Razorgors, what's up with the model GW just released?
EDIT: Are these just conversions?


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/28 20:36:50


Post by: Morathi's Darkest Sin


LunaHound wrote:Alliance FTW


+1


As to the Razorgor thingies, omg I haven't laughed that hard in ages, especially with Luna's descriptions. Once again, the blind fella in charge of final approval has let the side down. I knew they shouldn't have hired Bennie 'Snake Eyes' Wilson.


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/28 21:08:07


Post by: LunaHound


Morathi's Darkest Sin wrote:As to the Razorgor thingies, omg I haven't laughed that hard in ages, especially with Luna's descriptions.

Yay!


Back on Topic , i agree with JOHIRA about the "Simpsons Eye ball" on the Razorgors .
because 2D pic or not , "bad" paint job or not , i would like to see anyone make them look not comedic.
Photo shop would suffice .

@Alpharius i found some count as razorgor for you!


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/29 00:59:47


Post by: Olaf the Hairy


[quote

A wave of 'counts as' Razorgors should show up at official tournaments worldwide.

Sure, it will not be allowed!

So that's when you just take out your alternative army list, with alternative models, and play away!

Fun is still had, message still sent! quote] (having some difficulty with the quote funtcion there)

Here are some alternatives.

Hellbeasts by Heresy Miniatures. Those are 40mm bases they are barely fitting on. Imagine them painted like Dobermans.


[Thumb - hm006_1.jpg]
[Thumb - hm007_1.jpg]
[Thumb - hm008_3.jpg]


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/29 02:02:12


Post by: The Crippler


Ok, I have seen the assembled minotaur plastics in person and done a complete 180 on them. They're actually pretty sweet. That was indeed one ridiculous and horrible paint job.


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/29 02:42:50


Post by: Waaagh_Gonads


Thorgut wrote:I'm confused. If they're the Razorgors, what's up with the model GW just released?
EDIT: Are these just conversions?


Yes the unit of razorgors is made up of conversions on the original model.


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/29 05:42:26


Post by: Buttlerthepug


Waaagh_Gonads wrote:
Thorgut wrote:I'm confused. If they're the Razorgors, what's up with the model GW just released?
EDIT: Are these just conversions?


Yes the unit of razorgors is made up of conversions on the original model.


Oh... well then why is there so much fuss about the models... did I miss it or was it never said that they were conversions? I thought they were at first since there was one tail in there I recognized from spawn kit but since i didnt see it mentioned at all I assumed it wasnt a conversion...


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/29 07:03:48


Post by: LunaHound


Inspiration of Minotaur sculpt:


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/29 07:11:06


Post by: Buttlerthepug


Oh gosh... that means that Al gore now infulences gw sculpts? starting with man bear pig?


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/29 07:21:00


Post by: LunaHound


Do you guys feel some skaven models look close enough to beastman to be fielded?

like clan rat for spear ungors
or storm vermin for bestigors


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/29 07:35:27


Post by: Buttlerthepug


I personally think they would look to small, and without any conversion it would confuse the hell out of people!


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/29 16:10:48


Post by: BrassScorpion


I've now had a good look at the Minotaur sprue and fully painted models and they've started to grow on me, in fact I think I kind of like them in spite of that GW online photo that none of us seem to like. The sprue also contains every weapon option combo a player or modeler could want and the designs on the shields and other parts are pretty cool.

One thing that intrigues me about the Army Book are the large monsters for which there are no models, like the Cygor, Ghorgon (giant Minotaur) and Jabberslythe. None of these look particularly easy to build from the current plastic Warhammer Giant without major conversion work. I'm interested to see what some of the clever modelers out there do with these new monsters.


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/29 16:39:02


Post by: It


BrassScorpion wrote:One thing that intrigues me about the Army Book are the large monsters for which there are no models, like the Cygor, Ghorgon (giant Minotaur) and Jabberslythe.


Not to mention there isn't even a picture for the Jabberslythe...
It'll be espcially interesting to see what people come up with for that.


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/29 17:09:36


Post by: Boss Salvage


It wrote:Not to mention there isn't even a picture for the Jabberslythe...
It'll be espcially interesting to see what people come up with for that.

I went googling to find the GW Jabberwocky conversion from years back, but instead found this, from the 2008 GW Market Report:
As the years have passed our life as a public company has gone through several phases. We are now in one that seems
destined to be the quo that will be our status for a long time. Once upon a time, when we were, sadly, fashionable, many and
varied were our owners. Today just four own, cumulatively, over 60% of our stock. They are the Nomad Partnership, Phoenix,
Investec and Schroder. Three of that four bought more stock in the last year. I mention this to allow me to talk about the
distinction between these, our owners, and a mythical beast called 'The Market'. The Market is not an entity, it is not a person
in the legal sense. It is a collective noun. As with all collective nouns it covers a great deal of ground and includes a wide range
of attitudes and expectations. You cannot please all of the people all of the time. Abraham Lincoln said that. You cannot please
all of The Market at all. I said that*. I can now discuss the business on first name terms rather than presenting to a thousand
anonymous institutions. In the future, as in the past, we will be concerned with what our owners think, but not what we are told
The Market thinks. When you hear the words 'The Market' think: Jabberwocky! It helps.



BUT here are some other companies' jabberwocks:

Blood Moon Miniatures - $30 (that is ... large)


Ex-Ral Partha, Now Iron Wind - $10 (looks a bit wee)


Jeff Valent Studios - $20 (may be defunct, can't reach new store site)


Probably more too, and if the Jabber from GW was in a troll I can scan that, unless somebody finds the web version of it ...

- Salvage


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/29 18:31:45


Post by: Kanluwen


The GW Jabberwocky was in one of the Bretonnian WDs, if I remember right.


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/29 18:44:42


Post by: GentlemanGuy


It was a conversion project on the US GW website for a brettonian campaign


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/29 18:57:38


Post by: Buttlerthepug


They still have it on the old website in brettonian section... let me grab some pictures really quick.

Edit: heres a link http://web.archive.org/web/20080423060139/us.games-workshop.com/games/warhammer/bretonnians/painting/jabberwocky/default.htm

I sure hope when they got the idea to add this in the book, they werent thinking that the models would like theirs... otherwise its going to fit in with the razorgor!



Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/29 19:24:20


Post by: Llamahead


I'm planning on using this model as the Jabberwocky

Its the Legion of Everblight Seraph from Privateer Press
The pictures one of Malfreds, partly as its a model I've wanted to paint for a while and will never field the army for!


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/29 20:00:05


Post by: malfred


Aw, thanks llamahead.

*manlove*


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/30 12:09:56


Post by: reds8n


A nice list of magic stuff from the book, shouts out to Messrs. Govenor Gallagher and decker_cky from Warseer for the work


GIFTS (can only be taken once per army (big disappointment since there are only 8 and most are cheap...))
-Crown of Horns: The wearer and any unit he is with is Stubborn.
-Every combat round all enemy minis in base contact take a strength 3 hit before other blows are struck.
-Lots of Arms! Plus one attack at basic stats.
-Armour Piercing (doesn’t say can’t combine with magic weapon).
-5+ Scaly Skin that can be combined with other armor.
-Rune of The True Beast: Animals (mounts, swarms, monsters, chariot pullers, ect) at –1 to hit bearer.
-+1 Initiative.
-If the model is even partially within cover enemy gets an additional –1 to hit with shooting (on top of usual –1).

MAGIC WEAPONS
-Nangelder: The wielder causes Terror. In addition, models wounded by the wielder suffer a -1Ld penalty for every wound.
- Unnamed Gauntlet of Elven Blades: +D3 Attacks. If a 6 is rolled for bonus attacks then the wielder's attacks ignore Armour Saves for this turn. Rumor says it was Two-handed but I don't remember...
-Hunting Spear: A Magical Spear. May also be used as a Bolt Thrower, which may shoot after moving (not marching) and may be used to Stand-and-Shoot.
-Axes of Khorgor: +1A, the wielder may re-roll failed "To Hit" rolls. Two-handed.
-Stonecrusher: +3S. The wielder has S10 against Steamtanks, Chariots, Warshrines, Corpse Carts etc.
-Brass Cleaver: The wielder may make a single bonus attack against each enemy model in base-to-base contact at basic strength.
-Everbleed: Whenever the wielder inflicts a wound on an enemy model, roll a D6. On a 6, the model suffers another wound with no saves of any kind allowed, and you must roll again until you do not roll a 6.
-Unnamed Weapon: The wielder treats the opponent's Leadership as his Strength.
-Unnamed Weapon(Manfalyer?): The wielder has Killing Blow. In addition, if the wielder kills an enemy character in a challenge (might have just been an enemy mini, I forget which...), they (and any unit they are with) become Unbreakable and cause Terror.

MAGIC ARMOR
-Trollhide Armour: Light Armour, Confers Regeneration upon the wearer.
-Black (or burnt) Plate Armor: Heavy armor. Confers a 2+ Ward Save against Flaming Attacks upon the bearer, and a 4+ Ward Save against Flaming Attacks for the unit he is with.
-Unnamed Armor: Heavy armor. A hit against the bearer magic weapons allow a D6 to be rolled (just one regardless of number I think). On a roll of a 2+ it looses all magical properties for the rest of the game.
-Unnamed Armour: Light armor. Enemies are at –1 to hit with shooting and get –2 to casting rolls targeting bearer or his unit.
-Unnamed armor: 6+ save (apparently a helm). Successful saves allow one attack per save on inflicting model at basic stats of bearer.

ENCHANTED ITEMS

-Herdstone Shard: Mark one spot within your deployment zone. All friendly wizards casting a spell within 6" of this spot get an additional "free" power dice in the magic phase (not per spell as previously rumored).
-Horn of the Great Hunt: Beastlord/Wargor only. Bound Spell, Level 3. Contains the spell "Bestial Surge" with a range of 36".
-Horn of the First Beast: Beastlord/Wargor only. All Beastmen within 36" of the bearer may re-roll failed Primal Fury rolls.
-Stone of Spite: Bound spell level 5. One use only. All Arcane Items (friend or foe) within 18" of the user are destroyed. The bearer of each item that is destroyed takes D6 S4 hits per item (rumor says this is a bound spell but I don't recall it being one).
-Some sort of manskin that makes the beast look like an ugly peasant!: Confers the scout ability.
-Unamed Item: No enemy musician bonus in bearers combat.

TALISMANS

-Unamed Talisman: Magic Resistance 2. Wizards within 24” that miscast using life, heavens, light, can be forced to re-roll result.
-Unamed Talisman: For one enemy shooting round all shooting is –1 to hit and non-BS shooting attacks only work on a 4+.

ARCANE ITEMS
-Unnamed Item: Al friendly wizards within 6” get +1 to casting rolls.
-Staff of Darkoth: Bound Spell, Power Level 3. Casts "Viletide".
-Unnamed Dagger (not a weapon but described as a dagger): Bray-Shaman only. Put aside every model killed by this weapon - they may be used as one-use Power Dice by the wielder.
-Unnamed Item: Each magic phase pick an enemy unit within 24”. During that phase all failed magic caused wound rolls may be re-rolled.


MAGIC BANNERS

-Banner of Rust: All units (enemy or otherwise) within 6" suffer a -1 penalty to their Armour Save. Units in Base-to-Base contact with the banner suffer a -2 penalty (including the bearing unit). This does not affect Scaly Skin saves.
-Unnamed Banner: The unit carrying this banner has +1S.
-Unnamed Banner: All enemy within 6” get –1LD.
-Unnamed Banner: The unit auto-passes all primal fury checks but enemy units in combat with this unit hate this unit.


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/30 18:04:24


Post by: Kurgash


When I read the army book, several things are adding resistance to flame attacks. Maybe 8th is going to boost what fire attacks do?


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/01/30 18:26:32


Post by: The Crippler


I noticed the fire resistance as well. Seems odd since it's not an army that relies on regeneration. I havent' seen many battle reports using the book yet. What is the consensus? Sort of another horde close combat army? It seems like it might play like orcs with more of a reliance on monsters. That's kind of cool, since it means another army that uses combat resolution to win.


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/02/02 17:56:01


Post by: Kiwidru


Does anyone know why (other than the preorder release day) there has been 0 beastmen coverage by the gw website?


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/02/04 22:32:38


Post by: Mister Feral


Kiwidru wrote:Does anyone know why (other than the preorder release day) there has been 0 beastmen coverage by the gw website?


Perhaps because they technically haven't been released yet? (other than the lucky folks who pre-ordered, like me!)

I think the plastic Fellbeast with a new head and another set of sculpted arms would work as a Jabberslyth.

Having gotten my hands on the Army Book, it's rather nice actually. This is from someone who cares about the artwork and fluff far more than the rules though.


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/02/05 00:32:37


Post by: Buttlerthepug


You were thinking the exact same thing as me with that jabberslyth, Mister Feral!


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/02/05 14:36:17


Post by: Catiline


The razorgor is ridiculous, but I quite like the look of the gors and bestigors.

Does anyone think that they would be to scale with Catachan arms and weapons, to make an IG LATD unit, or an IG beastman unit like the old lead minis?


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/02/05 14:52:11


Post by: hubcap


I'm kind of surprised that GW isn't releasing models for any of the new Big Beasts (Cygor, Ghorgon, Jabberslythe). I would think big centerpiece figures (and cool hero figs) appeal to people who wouldn't necessarily invest in a whole army. But I guess GW's sales figures say different.

Thanks for doing that link digging, Boss_Salvage. That Blood Moon Jabberwocky + plastic Balrog wings seems pretty good to me...


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/02/05 15:42:50


Post by: GentlemanGuy


Mister Feral wrote:
I think the plastic Fellbeast with a new head and another set of sculpted arms would work as a Jabberslyth.


Not a bad idea that think I'll give that a try XD


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/02/05 17:16:04


Post by: Sarge


The beastmen book is a great disappointment to me when I compare it to the Dark Elves, Vampire Counts, or Demons. If those books had been properly written, granted that's my opinion, I think this one would be a great book with a lot of character.


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/02/06 18:19:00


Post by: Llamahead


I'm far more impressed with the book than the models the books seem to be getting far better now if only the models stopped losing ground to their competitors for value......


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/02/07 20:06:23


Post by: Kiwidru


The book, in terms of fluff and pictures is pretty sweet. The army rules are a joke and a half.


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/02/09 00:33:19


Post by: bravelybravesirrobin


Those razorgor may actually be my favourite new GW models in ages. They're sooo bad, so gobsmacking pant wettingly bad that they loop round again to good. They're hilarious. I haven't laughed so hard at a model since "flamenco" cortez.

They look like they'd be right at home in the early 90's Orcs and Goblins line.

A shame they cost a fortune or I would figure out some way to use them in my 40K orks (maybe attached to a battlewagon as a deffrolla).


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/02/09 09:43:23


Post by: JOHIRA


bravelybravesirrobin wrote:A shame they cost a fortune or I would figure out some way to use them in my 40K orks (maybe attached to a battlewagon as a deffrolla).


Tied to a rotisserie with an apple in their mouth?


Beasts of Chaos thread... @ 2010/02/09 17:32:36


Post by: Lanceradvanced


I look at the Cygor, and I think it's about time Magnus the Red showed up in Apoc, and I look at the Jabberslythe, and I think they're trying to ride Tim Burton's Coattails..