Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
A new law was passed that now makes drawings and animations of children count as child pornography. They were looking to the east with a furrowed brow at the time reports say.
Amidst the mists and coldest frosts he thrusts his fists against the posts and still insists he sees the ghosts.
Though that gaks too far out there for me to wrap my head around but whatever floats your boat I guess.
--The whole concept of government granted and government regulated 'permits' and the accompanying government mandate for government approved firearms 'training' prior to being blessed by government with the privilege to carry arms in a government approved and regulated manner, flies directly in the face of the fundamental right to keep and bear arms.
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government.”
Whilst I really hold a dislike of hentai, I wonder how they will make a distinction between an 18 year old big eyed, totally hairless and androgynous looking girl being sexed up and a 17 year old big eyed, totally hairless and ... well, you get the point.
All their female characters are designed to have similar features, geared towards a young look.
I think it will only be the extremely hardcore and unpleasant things they can charge on.
Porn comics for those who are scared of real women will always still be an option, it will just be more limited in scope because ones in which the person receiving tentacles will have to at least appear to be of age. As long as beastie isn't rogering some teen or child it should be ok.
Amidst the mists and coldest frosts he thrusts his fists against the posts and still insists he sees the ghosts.
No no no. For a long time there has been a legal grey area in regards to non-video/non-photographed children/underage. In other words if you took a photo that would get you 10 years in prison but drew it instead you would be fine. They are cracking down on drawn child pornagraphy, as they see it.
Amidst the mists and coldest frosts he thrusts his fists against the posts and still insists he sees the ghosts.
I thought the england lolicon ban went through last year? It's just a silly reactionary banning to something with no real criminality because it "feels" good to ban. Go england.
----------------
Do you remember that time that thing happened?
This is a bad thread and you should all feel bad
ShumaGorath wrote:I thought the england lolicon ban went through last year? It's just a silly reactionary banning to something with no real criminality because it "feels" good to ban. Go england.
I hadn't seen anything about it being passed last year but I know that multiple countries have been grappling with the issue of what to do about it.
Amidst the mists and coldest frosts he thrusts his fists against the posts and still insists he sees the ghosts.
Christ on a stick, I need to get my head examined.
Well, I guess we can't argue about EVERYTHING.
--The whole concept of government granted and government regulated 'permits' and the accompanying government mandate for government approved firearms 'training' prior to being blessed by government with the privilege to carry arms in a government approved and regulated manner, flies directly in the face of the fundamental right to keep and bear arms.
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government.”
Aye tbh I think its more after the obvious CP art, rather than all of Hentai. I'm sure Loli fans are fecked though. Never could stand it myself though so no real issue.
Although I see what your saying MGS, some fo the stuff I watched when younger, such as Urotsukidoji and Bible Black, the characters are still in school. Not sure what age they are, think its japanese High School, so I imagine thats 17-19. So possibly on the line.
There was a anime fan site I belonged to about five years ago, which had some stuff in its Hentai section whihc made me request having my account Banned/deleted as I no longer wanting to be there. With age ranges of 9-14, that I would imagine is what this law is for.
"That's not an Ork, its a girl.." - Last words of High General Daran Ul'tharem, battle of Ursha VII.
Two White Horses (Ipswich Town and Denver Broncos Supporter)
ShumaGorath wrote:I thought the england lolicon ban went through last year? It's just a silly reactionary banning to something with no real criminality because it "feels" good to ban. Go england.
Well it doesn't affect me, so I'm not arsed. I can see why you would be upset if you're into that sort of thing though.
Don't worry Shuma, there's still plenty of normal porn out there for you to enjoy - it DOES mostly feature women over 18 years of age though. Hope you're OK with that.
Chin up, old chap.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/05/06 00:09:13
This doesn't actually matter. Anyone who knows what they are doing uses Truecrypt, then claims they were beaten by police and so suffered amnesia so cannot remember the password.
*Diclaimer: I am not one of those people, I just happen to use Truecrypt and all that jazz because I am a paranoid Bastard!
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/05/06 00:07:33
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail. Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!)
Gwar! wrote:This doesn't actually matter. Anyone who knows what they are doing uses Truecrypt, then claims they were beaten by police and so suffered amnesia so cannot remember the password.
*Diclaimer: I am not one of those people, I just happen to use Truecrypt and all that jazz because I am a paranoid Bastard!
ShumaGorath wrote:I thought the england lolicon ban went through last year? It's just a silly reactionary banning to something with no real criminality because it "feels" good to ban. Go england.
Well it doesn't affect me, so I'm not arsed. I can see why you would be upset if you're into that sort of thing though.
Don't worry Shuma, there's still plenty of normal porn out there for you to enjoy - it DOES mostly feature women over 18 years of age though. Hope you're OK with that.
Chin up, old chap.
I find this pretty funny, mainly because none of this stuff remotely resembles reality. I have definitely seen some pretty sickening anime, that is clearly perverted, but a lot of it just goes over my head. I also know plenty of petite chicks that could pass for younger than 18, even well into their 20's.
Reality of Anime... like I said, over my head.
This one seems to work in reverse, where the reality looks younger than the comic. In general, it seems like a pretty blatant invasion of artistic depiction, that could open up some obvious loopholes for people with really loud opinions.
"Looks perverted to me... CENSOR IT!"
YMMV, but it is not a clear issue at all.
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2010/05/06 02:39:55
Shadowbrand wrote:So basically you can get arrested for looking at Hentai?
lol
The 'underage' impression of Hentai comes from a long standing quirk in Japanese law which prohibits animators from depicting images of pubic hair. This law was intended to promote decency in mainstream animation long before Hentai was part of the culture.
n'oublie jamais - It appears I now have to highlight this again.
It is by tea alone I set my mind in motion. By the juice of the brew my thoughts aquire speed, my mind becomes strained, the strain becomes a warning. It is by tea alone I set my mind in motion.
I thought the whole point of banning CP was to protect the children. So who are they protecting with this law, the imaginary, drawn children? Seriously, as long as perverts aren't harming anyone, let them do whatever they want. Seems so pointless compared to real issues going on in the world. Can someone tell me exactly what this law accomplishes?
riman1212 wrote:i am 1-0-1 in a doubles tourny and the loss was beacause the 2 people we where vsing where IG who both took 50 conscipts yarak in one a comistare in the other
lukie117 wrote:necrons are so cheesy it should be easy but space marines are cheesy too so use lots of warriors with a chessy res orb
2.) Moral standards for England, all stem from one perspective. (noting again, that there are plenty of women that LOOK underage, and people are creeped out by it)
3.) Action must be taken, simply because there may be a connection that does harm children, namely referring to point 1.), wherein thoughts equate to action.
All incomplete logic if you ask me, mainly because the problems that this new law could cause, would seem to overwhelm any good a law may produce. There appear to be several (rather zealous IMHO) interest groups behind this, and they seem to have psychic powers, which can render animation into reality.
I blame the interest groups, they are obviously the cause of all this. Without them, there would be no problem in this area...
The amount of psychology at work here is absolutely mind-blowing.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/05/06 07:27:08
ShumaGorath wrote:I thought the england lolicon ban went through last year? It's just a silly reactionary banning to something with no real criminality because it "feels" good to ban. Go england.
Well it doesn't affect me, so I'm not arsed. I can see why you would be upset if you're into that sort of thing though.
Don't worry Shuma, there's still plenty of normal porn out there for you to enjoy - it DOES mostly feature women over 18 years of age though. Hope you're OK with that.
Chin up, old chap.
I just dislike arcane and pointless social laws. I live in america, this isn't cutting off my flow of giant baloon porn.
----------------
Do you remember that time that thing happened?
This is a bad thread and you should all feel bad
2.) Moral standards for England, all stem from one perspective. (noting again, that there are plenty of women that LOOK underage, and people are creeped out by it)
3.) Action must be taken, simply because there may be a connection that does harm children, namely referring to point 1.), wherein thoughts equate to action.
All incomplete logic if you ask me, mainly because the problems that this new law could cause, would seem to overwhelm any good a law may produce. There appear to be several (rather zealous IMHO) interest groups behind this, and they seem to have psychic powers, which can render animation into reality.
I blame the interest groups, they are obviously the cause of all this. Without them, there would be no problem in this area...
The amount of psychology at work here is absolutely mind-blowing.
ShumaGorath wrote:I thought the england lolicon ban went through last year? It's just a silly reactionary banning to something with no real criminality because it "feels" good to ban. Go england.
Well it doesn't affect me, so I'm not arsed. I can see why you would be upset if you're into that sort of thing though.
Don't worry Shuma, there's still plenty of normal porn out there for you to enjoy - it DOES mostly feature women over 18 years of age though. Hope you're OK with that.
Chin up, old chap.
I just dislike arcane and pointless social laws. I live in america, this isn't cutting off my flow of giant baloon porn.
Exactly, you live in America. What the feth do you care? You're free to view cartoon child porn to your heart's content - fill your boots.
ShumaGorath wrote:
I just dislike arcane and pointless social laws. I live in america, this isn't cutting off my flow of giant baloon porn.
Scared to ask, but... what is giant balloon porn?
It's kinda like this, but with less in the way of clothing.
Please note that i would file this under 'what were you thinking?!' rather than 'ooh hey! I'm hard'.
1500pts
Gwar! wrote:Debate it all you want, I just report what the rules actually say. It's up to others to tie their panties in a Knot. I stopped caring long ago.
Lolicon is filed in the same category as gay porn for me. Not something I'd personally like to look at, but if people want to look at it in their spare time, in their own home, they should feel free.
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
1500pts
