In what the State Department is calling an “historic step” the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva Friday passed a resolution supporting equal rights for all, regardless of sexual orientation.

The resolution, introduced by South Africa, is the first-ever U.N. resolution on the human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered persons.

It passed with 23 votes in favor, 19 opposed and three abstentions, amidst strong criticism of South Africa by some African nations.

Suzanne Nossel, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for International Organizations, tells CNN

“It really is a key part in setting a new norm that gay rights are human rights and that that has to be accepted globally.”

“It talks about the violence and discrimination that people of LGBT persuasion experience around the world,” she says, “and that those issues...need to be taken seriously. It calls for reporting on what’s going on, where people are being discriminated against, the violence that is taking place and it really puts the issue squarely on the U.N.'s agenda going forward.”

Divided opinion continues among some countries about whether the time has come to take up gay rights in the U.N. forum, Nossel says, “so this resolution is really significant as far as gaining widespread support for doing just that.”

The State Department lobbied intensively for the resolution and Nossel says the U.S. was pleased to see African leadership, from South Africa in particular, as well as strong support from South America, Colombia and Brazil.

The resolution also will commission the first-ever U.N. report on the challenges that LGBT persons face around the globe and Nossel says the Obama administration hopes it will “open a broader international discussion on how to best promote and protect the human rights of LGBT persons,” Nossel says.

In March the U.N. Human Rights Council adopted a statement, supported by 85 countries, on gay rights called on “Ending Violence Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity.”

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has made gay rights a key focus of the State Department’s human rights agenda, expressing her view that “gay rights are human rights and human rights are gay rights.”

In June, at a Gay Pride event at the State Department, Clinton said “Men and women are harassed, beaten, subjected to sexual violence, even killed, because of who they are and whom they love. Some are driven from their homes or countries, and many who become refugees confront new threats in their countries of asylum. In some places, violence against the LGBT community is permitted by law and inflamed by public calls to violence; in others, it persists insidiously behind closed doors.”

The State Department’s Suzanne Nossel tells CNN “its not like discrimination or violence are going to end over night” because of the new U.N. resolution “but now….when there are proposals in parliaments or legislatures around the world to illegalize gay activity or repress people because of their sexual orientation, opponents can point to this and say 'hey the U.N. has spoken out, there is a resolution that rejects this squarely.'"

"That is the way these international norms are built," she says. "Its not from scratch – on women's rights, on minority rights – it builds up over time so this is really a critical beginning of a universal recognition of a new set of rights that forms part of the international system.”

Ribon Fox wrote:About time, I for one am glad that this is about.
No one should be discriminated due to whom they love or which gender they are or wish to be. We are all human (...well most of us are ) about time we actted like it to.

Ahtman wrote:Indeed, we should set all policy based around what Iran will or won't do.

You don't wait for people to change and then ensure their equal rights. If we did that then Jim Crowe would still be in effect.

Frazzled wrote:

Ahtman wrote:Indeed, we should set all policy based around what Iran will or won't do.

You don't wait for people to change and then ensure their equal rights. If we did that then Jim Crowe would still be in effect.

You act like this changes anything or ensures anything. But it makes the kombayah types happy in thinking they've actually done something so all's fair.

Does this go to the General Assembly? If so, it will be interesting to see what happens.

Ahtman wrote:

Frazzled wrote:

Ahtman wrote:Indeed, we should set all policy based around what Iran will or won't do.

You don't wait for people to change and then ensure their equal rights. If we did that then Jim Crowe would still be in effect.

You act like this changes anything or ensures anything. But it makes the kombayah types happy in thinking they've actually done something so all's fair.

Does this go to the General Assembly? If so, it will be interesting to see what happens.

You act like doing nothing makes more of a difference than doing something. Only fools believe this will immediately change anything or that that is it's intent. Again, you could say (and considering your extreme old age, you probably did) the same thing about the Civil Rights. "no discrimination based on color? Like that will change anything in Mississippi. All this does is make the hippies happy."

Frazzled wrote:

Ahtman wrote:

Frazzled wrote:

Ahtman wrote:Indeed, we should set all policy based around what Iran will or won't do.

You don't wait for people to change and then ensure their equal rights. If we did that then Jim Crowe would still be in effect.

You act like this changes anything or ensures anything. But it makes the kombayah types happy in thinking they've actually done something so all's fair.

Does this go to the General Assembly? If so, it will be interesting to see what happens.

You act like doing nothing makes more of a difference than doing something. Only fools believe this will immediately change anything or that that is it's intent. Again, you could say (and considering your extreme old age, you probably did) the same thing about the Civil Rights. "no discrimination based on color? Like that will change anything in Mississippi. All this does is make the hippies happy."

Your something is worse than nothing. Its rank hypocrisy and we will, again be held to higher standard, while the enlightened dictatorships of the world go on merrily killing.
Plus I pay money for the jackanapes to do this.

Frazzled wrote:1. It cost me a lot of money to suport these idiots
2. We're held to a different standard and raked over the coals. Meanwhile nothing happens to the BGs. They can now say "oh look we did something see" instead of real change.

nectarprime wrote:

Frazzled wrote:1. It cost me a lot of money to suport these idiots
2. We're held to a different standard and raked over the coals. Meanwhile nothing happens to the BGs. They can now say "oh look we did something see" instead of real change.

Wanting equal rights for all people makes you an idiot? Wow!

Kilkrazy wrote:It got Saddam out of Iraq.

Frazzled wrote:Age of Aquarius.

Toastedandy wrote:

Frazzled wrote:Age of Aquarius.

I love that song


Automatically Appended Next Post:

Toastedandy wrote:

Frazzled wrote:Age of Aquarius.

I like that song

kronk wrote:

Toastedandy wrote:

Frazzled wrote:Age of Aquarius.

I love that song


Automatically Appended Next Post:

Toastedandy wrote:

Frazzled wrote:Age of Aquarius.

I like that song

Toastedandy has multiple personalities...

Frazzled wrote:

Kilkrazy wrote:It got Saddam out of Iraq.

Mmm...no George Bush, the US and British military did that. Did the UN even support it? I think it was the first reported instance of HBMs (Haggis Ballistic Missiles) being used.

Kilkrazy wrote:

Frazzled wrote:

Kilkrazy wrote:It got Saddam out of Iraq.

Mmm...no George Bush, the US and British military did that. Did the UN even support it? I think it was the first reported instance of HBMs (Haggis Ballistic Missiles) being used.

If you check history you'll find that George Bush, the US and British Military' governments made very sure to base the invasion on a UN resolution.

To say it wasn't necessary is like saying the police can kick their way into someone's house without a warrant.

Kilkrazy wrote:So stamp out homophobia already.

Melissia wrote:Well, what are you waiting for?