Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/14 04:45:46
Subject: Comparisons Between X-Wing & Attack Wing
|
 |
[MOD]
Solahma
|
So with Origins already past and GenCon coming up, there's more information rolling in about Star Trek: Attack Wing. Although Attack Wing is based on the FlightPath system under license from FFG, the same system that X-Wing uses, there are some interesting differences. We haven't decided whether talk about Attack Wing should go in this subforum just yet but as this will still somewhat be about X-Wing we'll discuss it here for the time being.
Based on coverage at Origins, here are some things I've noticed so far:
- there aren't as many koiogran/Immelman turns; instead ships can move directly backwards
- otherwise movement seems the same except there's also a size 6 straight movement template
- like X-Wing, lower pilot (in this case, captain) scores maneuver first and higher scores attack first
- there's the "scanning action" which allows you to remove one of the defender's dice
- focus is called targetting (not sure if true)
- target lock and evasion seem to be the same
- stress seems to work the same way
- still get a bonus defense die at range 3 and bonus attack die at range 1
- pilot/ship are the same card in X-Wing; ship and captain are different cards in Attack Wing
- generic captains are free
- some captains can be upgraded themselves (e.g., Picard)
- like in X-Wing, it looks like different weapons on the same ship use different arcs
- the Constellation-class, Miranda-class, and Galor-class (or at least some version of each) seem to have 180 degree forward arcs
- you can raise and lower your shields
- there are still regular and critical hits
- just like X-Wing, you remove regular hits before critical hits
- you can cloak but it doesn't take full effect until the next turn;
- cloaking and cloaked ships get four bonus defense dice (but can't have your shields up)
- cloaked ships can't be target locked; cloaking ships can
- a ship can't cloak to shake a target lock
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/08/14 05:02:09
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/14 15:43:36
Subject: Comparisons Between X-Wing & Attack Wing
|
 |
Veteran Inquisitor with Xenos Alliances
|
Well it sounds like they're tweaking the rules in a good way... I hope they do something with the minis.
I hope Warp core breaches and coolant links are common place... With some nice run/fly for your life explosions.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/08/14 15:47:49
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/14 15:48:35
Subject: Comparisons Between X-Wing & Attack Wing
|
 |
[MOD]
Solahma
|
As you probably know, the minis are just the clix ones -- which is why they can offer 11 ships off the bat while X-Wing still only has 8 (not including Wave 3) ... and the seeming plan with Attack Wing is to continue releasing the clix models. The Attack Wing rule book apparently mentions Borg, Species 8472, Kazon, Bajoran, Ferengi, Independents, and even Mirror Universe.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/14 20:44:48
Subject: Comparisons Between X-Wing & Attack Wing
|
 |
[SWAP SHOP MOD]
Barpharanges
|
Will "Eject Red Shirts/Warp Core" be an action that can be performed?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/14 20:52:09
Subject: Comparisons Between X-Wing & Attack Wing
|
 |
[MOD]
Solahma
|
There is definitely going to be a Red Shirts promo card. It's a Participation Prize for the October Dominion War campaign. http://wizkidsgames.com/dominionwar/
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/08/14 20:52:23
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/14 22:40:18
Subject: Comparisons Between X-Wing & Attack Wing
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
IRCC, they showed off a couple 8472 Clix ships last week if people wanna see the sculpt. http://heroclix.com/heroclix/preview/star-trek-heroclix-tactics-iii-species-8472s-bioship-alpha-and-bioship-beta/#axzz2bzBvLOPL And a couple Borg: http://heroclix.com/heroclix/preview/star-trek-heroclix-tactics-series-iii-borg-scout-608-queen-vessel-prime/#axzz2bzBvLOPL I'm liking what I'm seeing of Attack Wing so far, and will probably try to rebase my Trek Clix when it comes out. It's being packaged similar to X-wing, right? Not blind packs?
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2013/08/14 22:46:25
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/14 23:17:52
Subject: Comparisons Between X-Wing & Attack Wing
|
 |
[MOD]
Solahma
|
Right, it's not "collectible."
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/15 00:39:15
Subject: Comparisons Between X-Wing & Attack Wing
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Was pretty sure I'd heard that, but wouldn't put it past Wizkids.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/15 02:50:34
Subject: Comparisons Between X-Wing & Attack Wing
|
 |
Crazed Troll Slayer
|
What is kind of bothering me about Attack Wing is that some things being released are exclusive to conventions and/or tournaments. I know this is common with Heroclix but for someone who wants to collect stuff and have friendly games, I really don't want to bother with tournaments or buy it for a vastly inflated price over eBay.
For example, I think that's the only way to get a Deep Space 9 miniature.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/15 18:12:17
Subject: Comparisons Between X-Wing & Attack Wing
|
 |
[MOD]
Solahma
|
Nice review here: http://www.figures.com/forums/news/37052-advance-review-wizkids-star-trek-attack-wing-miniatures-game.html Or rather, nice pictures. Can't say I agree Attack Wing is an "upgrade" of X-Wing or that Attack Wing has "great art." Unfortunately the review doesn't add much to what we know. Well -- I haven't scrutinized the pics yet. - Starter Set comes with two Missions: "A New Source of Dilithum" and "The Chase" (both three-player) - Each expansion comes with 2-3 Captains and 4-9 Upgrades - Expansions also come with new Missions! (inlcuding "The Mutara Nebula") I do like that, unlike X-Wing, Attack Wing contemplates games between more than three players from the start. I do worry about balance issues, however ...
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/08/15 18:16:45
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/15 18:34:57
Subject: Comparisons Between X-Wing & Attack Wing
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Kinda disappointing that the ships are named and not generic classes.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/15 18:35:41
Subject: Comparisons Between X-Wing & Attack Wing
|
 |
[MOD]
Solahma
|
The ships come with generic class cards as well as named versions.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/15 18:42:54
Subject: Comparisons Between X-Wing & Attack Wing
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
i see a breen ship
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Also in looking it over, is FFG in bed with wiz kids? Cause this game looks like X-wing with star trek. I expected it to atleast look a little different
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2013/08/15 18:44:32
DT:80S+++G+++M+B++I+Pw40k00+D++A(WTF)/areWD100R+++++T(T)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/15 18:45:45
Subject: Comparisons Between X-Wing & Attack Wing
|
 |
[MOD]
Solahma
|
Speaking of which ... How thread-appropriate. Even so -- Attack Wing and X-Wing are, according to Tom Vasel, not compatible (thank goodness). It's a pity there isn't a Jem'Hadar ship ( or the Defiant for that matter!) in Wave 1 considering the first campaign is called "Dominion War." http://www.beastsofwar.com/wp-content/uploads/forumfiles/picture-466.jpg Automatically Appended Next Post: ironicsilence wrote:
Also in looking it over, is FFG in bed with wiz kids? Cause this game looks like X-wing with star trek. I expected it to atleast look a little different
Hey -- take a look at the OP, grumpy cat.
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2013/08/15 18:51:55
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/15 18:54:18
Subject: Comparisons Between X-Wing & Attack Wing
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I read an OP once, it was awful
Automatically Appended Next Post:
I'm guessing that its really just all the unique abilities you get from the captain and crew that makes in non compatible
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2013/08/15 18:57:11
DT:80S+++G+++M+B++I+Pw40k00+D++A(WTF)/areWD100R+++++T(T)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/15 19:03:21
Subject: Comparisons Between X-Wing & Attack Wing
|
 |
[MOD]
Solahma
|
Well, consider that the games aren't balanced against each other at all ...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/15 19:07:18
Subject: Comparisons Between X-Wing & Attack Wing
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I'd echo the disappointment on the lack of "Dominion" ships. Would have loved to see some Jem Hadar ships, the defiant, and even the voyager model as that was the admirals flag ship. Lots of options for future releases but seems like atleast a single Jem ship would have been nice. Unless Wave 2 will come quick
|
DT:80S+++G+++M+B++I+Pw40k00+D++A(WTF)/areWD100R+++++T(T)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/15 19:09:12
Subject: Comparisons Between X-Wing & Attack Wing
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
I have a feeling waves will come faster for this than for X-wing being that the ships are already done. Probably not putting out too much at once to spread out their intake of money.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/15 19:12:44
Subject: Comparisons Between X-Wing & Attack Wing
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I'll likely take a good look at the ships before deciding if I want to actually buy the game. Not sure I'd actually want to play it but if the ships are nice I wouldnt mind picking up a bunch just to throw on the gaming self. Really comes down to the quality of the ships. I've never paid much attention to the clix stuff, but if the quality is more closer to what I remember hero clix being I'm not sure I'd be all that interested, but if the quality is similar to x-wing then i'd likely pick some up
|
DT:80S+++G+++M+B++I+Pw40k00+D++A(WTF)/areWD100R+++++T(T)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/15 19:16:28
Subject: Comparisons Between X-Wing & Attack Wing
|
 |
Androgynous Daemon Prince of Slaanesh
|
ironicsilence wrote:I'll likely take a good look at the ships before deciding if I want to actually buy the game. Not sure I'd actually want to play it but if the ships are nice I wouldnt mind picking up a bunch just to throw on the gaming self. Really comes down to the quality of the ships. I've never paid much attention to the clix stuff, but if the quality is more closer to what I remember hero clix being I'm not sure I'd be all that interested, but if the quality is similar to x-wing then i'd likely pick some up
It sounds like Heroclix level detail. My friend prefers Star Trek over Star Wars, and he's getting a bit worried/leery.
|
Reality is a nice place to visit, but I'd hate to live there.
Manchu wrote:I'm a Catholic. We eat our God.
Due to work, I can usually only ship any sales or trades out on Saturday morning. Please trade/purchase with this in mind. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/15 19:28:30
Subject: Comparisons Between X-Wing & Attack Wing
|
 |
[MOD]
Solahma
|
I dunno, that's what I was thinking until I saw the clix ships in person. They look alright. I don't think they're as nice as X-Wing, however. A lot about Attack Wing strikes me as sloppier than X-Wing.
OTOH they at least have +1 defense at range 3 and +1 attack at range 1 on their range template.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/16 04:05:51
Subject: Comparisons Between X-Wing & Attack Wing
|
 |
Old Sourpuss
|
I'm very saddened by the quality of the ships :-\ they just seem to be lacking in detail... oh well..
|
DR:80+S++G+M+B+I+Pwmhd11#++D++A++++/sWD-R++++T(S)DM+

Ask me about Brushfire or Endless: Fantasy Tactics |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/16 12:10:36
Subject: Comparisons Between X-Wing & Attack Wing
|
 |
Battlefield Tourist
MN (Currently in WY)
|
The ships look like the old Micro Machines molds still seeign service.
Also, is it just me, or should capital ships not perform like fighters? I'm not sure the X-wing base of the game is a good idea.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/08/16 12:11:00
Support Blood and Spectacles Publishing:
https://www.patreon.com/Bloodandspectaclespublishing |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/16 13:00:18
Subject: Comparisons Between X-Wing & Attack Wing
|
 |
Screaming Shining Spear
|
I'll hold off until I see an Akira. Then I'll probably tumble all in with my fascination for that ship.
|
Farseer Faenyin
7,100 pts Yme-Loc Eldar(Apoc Included) / 5,700 pts (Non-Apoc)
Record for 6th Edition- Eldar: 25-4-2
Record for 7th Edition -
Eldar: 0-0-0 (Yes, I feel it is that bad)
Battlefleet Gothic: 2,750 pts of Craftworld Eldar
X-wing(Focusing on Imperials): CR90, 6 TIE Fighters, 4 TIE Interceptors, TIE Bomber, TIE Advanced, 4 X-wings, 3 A-wings, 3 B-wings, Y-wing, Z-95
Battletech: Battlion and Command Lance of 3025 Mechs(painted as 21st Rim Worlds) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/16 14:35:33
Subject: Comparisons Between X-Wing & Attack Wing
|
 |
[MOD]
Solahma
|
Yeah, it's no X-Wing ... just judging based on seeing the clix in person. But it's serviceable. Easy E wrote:Also, is it just me, or should capital ships not perform like fighters?
I suspect it won't feel that way given scale is abstracted in Attack Wing. I don't think an Akira was ever made for clix. Will be interesting to see if WizKids does more than just clix models for this line. I doubt it.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/16 16:36:17
Subject: Comparisons Between X-Wing & Attack Wing
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
ironicsilence wrote:I'll likely take a good look at the ships before deciding if I want to actually buy the game. Not sure I'd actually want to play it but if the ships are nice I wouldnt mind picking up a bunch just to throw on the gaming self. Really comes down to the quality of the ships. I've never paid much attention to the clix stuff, but if the quality is more closer to what I remember hero clix being I'm not sure I'd be all that interested, but if the quality is similar to x-wing then i'd likely pick some up If you're just looking to grab some for your shelf rather than to play, go ahead and buy the Clix. It's the same exact model and paint job, but they'll be cheaper. No Akira class yet, but considering some of the other classes they've done, I wouldn't bee surprised if it comes out eventually.
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2013/08/16 16:39:11
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/18 03:22:58
Subject: Comparisons Between X-Wing & Attack Wing
|
 |
The New Miss Macross!
|
Another important for some difference is that the competitive tourney/league kits come with complete ship sculpts and variants that are not otherwise available for normal purchase.
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/545704.page
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/18 20:21:20
Subject: Re:Comparisons Between X-Wing & Attack Wing
|
 |
Stubborn Prosecutor
|
I am stoked I am a big fan of wars but even bigger fan of trek. I was about to invest in x wing and then found out attack wing and have been selling warhammer stuff on ebay for the past 2 weeks to fund my fleets. Can't wait it is just going to pull in a whole new fan base in the fantasy flight system. Automatically Appended Next Post: The two games are really differant in that x wing is more about dog fights where attack is more about big capital ships. There are many basic ships in attack wing that are going to start with 4-5 attack dice. I believe most x wing ships have less than that.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/08/18 20:35:40
It's time to go full Skeletor |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 0004/08/18 20:45:51
Subject: Comparisons Between X-Wing & Attack Wing
|
 |
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
I had a good look at this today and have to say the quality of the ships was a complete turn off. They dont even come close to the FF X-wing ships and I didnt buy it (despite having an interest) as a result.
|
Check out our new, fully plastic tabletop wargame - Maelstrom's Edge, made by Dakka!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/08/18 21:05:41
Subject: Comparisons Between X-Wing & Attack Wing
|
 |
Stubborn Prosecutor
|
legoburner wrote:I had a good look at this today and have to say the quality of the ships was a complete turn off. They dont even come close to the FF X-wing ships and I didnt buy it (despite having an interest) as a result.
The attack wing ships are not bad, they are they same sculps as heroclix but the paint job is more detailed. Not as detailed as x wing but it is a fair trade. Attack wing ships are cheaper $$. They all retail from 10-14 $ a ship x wing is 12-15 for fighters and 19-39 for the bigger. So I think it works out.
|
It's time to go full Skeletor |
|
 |
 |
|