Switch Theme:

Free Hobbit rules, I assume no one cares  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in in
[MOD]
Otiose in a Niche






Hyderabad, India

Looks even GW has given up hope of selling their Hobbit games.

Source:

http://www.lounge.belloflostsouls.net/showthread.php?51688-The-Hobbit-The-Battle-of-the-Five-Armies%99-Strategy-Battle-Game-%28PDF%29

Link:

http://www.games-workshop.com/en-GB/The-Hobbit-The-Battle-of-the-Five-Armies-Strategy-Battle-Game-PDF?_requestid=2745526

I can't see this hanging around too, too long. I doubt GW will renew the license.

 
   
Made in gb
Ancient Chaos Terminator






Surfing the Tervigon Wave...on a baby.

Isn't that the one that came out in last week's WD?


Now only a CSM player. 
   
Made in in
[MOD]
Otiose in a Niche






Hyderabad, India

Maybe. But knowing the answer would require caring.

 
   
Made in us
Lieutenant General





Florence, KY

http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/624219.page#7424820

Yes, they posted these rules over a week ago. Shame it was for a whole four models.

'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents
cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable
defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'

- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty
Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim
 
   
Made in gb
Boom! Leman Russ Commander





UK

At least they've been made available for free to those who may have been interested but don't have a retailer nearby that stocks the weekly WD.


   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





Myrtle Creek, OR

They also put some free rules up for Tyranid minis, I noticed, the other day.

Thread Slayer 
   
Made in au
Novice Knight Errant Pilot





Ipswich, Australia

I'd be interested in the Tyranid stuff...

But KK's right, couldn't give a feth for the Hobbit stuff.

"All GW will gain is my increased contempt for their business practices." - AesSedai
"Its terrible the way that conversion kit is causing him to buy 2 GW kits... " - Mad4Minis
"GW are hard to parody, as they are sometimes so stupid that the best in comedy couldn't beat them at their own game..." - Paradigm


 
   
Made in au
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests






Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.

 Padre wrote:
But KK's right, couldn't give a feth for the Hobbit stuff.


Don't worry, neither does GW.

Industrial Insanity - My Terrain Blog
"GW really needs to understand 'Less is more' when it comes to AoS." - Wha-Mu-077

 
   
Made in au
Novice Knight Errant Pilot





Ipswich, Australia

 H.B.M.C. wrote:
 Padre wrote:
But KK's right, couldn't give a feth for the Hobbit stuff.


Don't worry, neither does GW.



"All GW will gain is my increased contempt for their business practices." - AesSedai
"Its terrible the way that conversion kit is causing him to buy 2 GW kits... " - Mad4Minis
"GW are hard to parody, as they are sometimes so stupid that the best in comedy couldn't beat them at their own game..." - Paradigm


 
   
Made in us
Thinking of Joining a Davinite Loge




I guess this is proof that free rules don't sell models. Too bad it's not the full set of rules.

[/sarcasm] 
   
Made in us
Shas'o Commanding the Hunter Kadre




Missouri

boyd wrote:
I guess this is proof that free rules don't sell models.


Yeah, and I'm sure no one bought the toxicrene or the new zoanthropes, either.

Mishandling a license is not proof of anything other than GW no longer has any idea what the feth it's doing.

 Desubot wrote:
Why isnt Slut Wars: The Sexpocalypse a real game dammit.


"It's easier to change the rules than to get good at the game." 
   
Made in ca
Tough-as-Nails Ork Boy





Manitoba

Surprisingly not in a $65 book

 
   
Made in us
Honored Helliarch on Hypex





Back in GA

GW is probably happy this license is at its end. Initially when the first set came out (10 years ago?!?) it did pretty well. Even into the second movie. People were buying the models just to collect but our local area had a large but short lived group playing LOR. Problem was by the time the third movie came out it had tanked but GW locked in for ten years. Anyone who even mentions signing another license deal like that should be flogged hehe

I do what the voices in my wifes head say...
 
   
Made in in
[MOD]
Otiose in a Niche






Hyderabad, India

That and the films themselves were terribly mishandled.

One film from the short Hobbit book would have been awesome.

Two could have been good.

Three...

I fell asleep during Hobbit 2: The Padding, and have no plans to see Hobbit 3: the Last 30 Pages. And I'm not the only one. I think a bloom is well off this rose.

 
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut




United States of England

 Kid_Kyoto wrote:
That and the films themselves were terribly mishandled.

One film from the short Hobbit book would have been awesome.

Two could have been good.

Three...

I fell asleep during Hobbit 2: The Padding, and have no plans to see Hobbit 3: the Last 30 Pages. And I'm not the only one. I think a bloom is well off this rose.


Awesome, I totally agree! The second film was absolute bum cloth, and I never watched the first, as my wife informed me it was trash. I have no plans to watch the third.

Man down, Man down.... 
   
Made in au
[DCM]
.. .-.. .-.. ..- -- .. -. .- - ..






Toowoomba, Australia

 Kid_Kyoto wrote:

I fell asleep during Hobbit 2: The Padding, and have no plans to see Hobbit 3: the Last 30 Pages. And I'm not the only one. I think a bloom is well off this rose.


You and me both.
Benedict Cumberbatch as a dragon going on, and on and on with the occasional treasureslide, then I wake to find dwarfs running all over the place with smaug going bananas trying to catch them.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/12/24 14:45:06


2025: Games Played:8/Models Bought:162/Sold:169/Painted:127
2024: Games Played:6/Models Bought:393/Sold:519/Painted: 207
2023: Games Played:0/Models Bought:287/Sold:0/Painted: 203
2020-2022: Games Played:42/Models Bought:1271/Sold:631/Painted:442
2016-19: Games Played:369/Models Bought:772/Sold:378/ Painted:268
2012-15: Games Played:412/Models Bought: 1163/Sold:730/Painted:436 
   
Made in in
[MOD]
Otiose in a Niche






Hyderabad, India

Was there something about a dropping a whole statue of molten gold on Benedict? Or was I just dreaming?

I remember a hawt redhead. That I do remember.

 
   
Made in us
Shas'o Commanding the Hunter Kadre




Missouri

I wouldn't call them trash...jeez, that's pretty harsh. It really should have been kept to two movies, though...they have way too much padding. They even went as far as making up new gak just to keep the movie running even longer and at that point I have to say "Okay, come on, really?"

I mean I love Smaug, and I like that he has a lot of screen time, but it just seems wrong to invent so much new dialogue and scenes for him, just to try and keep him in the movie as long as possible. The funniest thing to me is that the movies are long as gak, and they have so much stuff crammed into them, but they still cut out enough to make "extended editions". The Hobbit is going to have a longer combined running time than the entire Lord of the Rings trilogy, I bet, and that's just insane for a story that fit pretty nicely in a single book.

But yeah, I'm still a super nerd for the movies personally, but it does feel like too much and I suppose I can't blame people for not liking it. I don't agree that they're "trash", though.

Anyway, speaking solely about the models and the game, though, I think GW killed it from the onset with their ludicrous prices. They are so far beyond what the LotR models cost it's just...even "ludicrous" doesn't seem an apt description of them. The core rulebook costs at least twice what the originals did, if not more, and when people are staring at a massive $80 investment just for the core rulebook it's no wonder the vast majority turn and run out the door. The starter set is well into triple digits and I'm pretty sure the original Mines of Moria box was at least half that, as well. A box of troops used to be something like $20 for 20 models if I'm not mistaken, may be a little off here or there, but not a bad value as far as GW products are concerned. Boxes of plastic troops for The Hobbit game are twice as much for half as many models. There's also the fact that the LotR game was actually advertised and marketed to people, whereas you likely wouldn't even know there was a Hobbit game unless you just happened to wander into a GW store and see the crap on a shelf...at which point you would laugh and walk back out the door again because they're asking you to pay $85 for three ugly Finecast trolls, and trying really, really hard to pretend that they're not just going to dump all support for the game and pretend it never existed as soon as Battle of Five Armies leaves the theater, leaving you with a dead game and a hell of a lot of money wasted.

 Kid_Kyoto wrote:
I remember a hawt redhead. That I do remember.


Do you think she could ever love me?

lol, but yeah...completely made up character, too. And while I did like Tauriel it was kinda lame how she and Legolas kinda stole Bilbo's thunder in the MIrkwood fight with the spiders.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/12/24 15:00:43


 Desubot wrote:
Why isnt Slut Wars: The Sexpocalypse a real game dammit.


"It's easier to change the rules than to get good at the game." 
   
Made in gb
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain





The Rock

You still need the Desolation of Smaug rules to play Battle of Five Armies though..

AoV's Hobby Blog 29/04/18 The Tomb World stirs p44
How to take decent photos of your models
There's a beast in every man, and it stirs when you put a sword in his hand
Most importantly, Win or Lose, always try to have fun.
Armies Legion: Dark Angels 
   
Made in gb
Is 'Eavy Metal Calling?





UK

 Sidstyler wrote:
I wouldn't call them trash...jeez, that's pretty harsh. It really should have been kept to two movies, though...they have way too much padding. They even went as far as making up new gak just to keep the movie running even longer and at that point I have to say "Okay, come on, really?"

I mean I love Smaug, and I like that he has a lot of screen time, but it just seems wrong to invent so much new dialogue and scenes for him, just to try and keep him in the movie as long as possible. The funniest thing to me is that the movies are long as gak, and they have so much stuff crammed into them, but they still cut out enough to make "extended editions". The Hobbit is going to have a longer combined running time than the entire Lord of the Rings trilogy, I bet, and that's just insane for a story that fit pretty nicely in a single book.

But yeah, I'm still a super nerd for the movies personally, but it does feel like too much and I suppose I can't blame people for not liking it. I don't agree that they're "trash", though.


Having not seen the third one, I give both Hobbits so far a 10/10 score (especially factoring in the DoS Extended Edition which does wonders for the pacing) and would rank them easily alongside LotR as the best films ever made. I honestly don't see how they could have fit so much into just 2 films, even if they added another half an hour to each to bring them up to LotR non-extended length (and for the record, Extended LotR has a much longer run-time than Extended Hobbit, I think, unless BOFA EE adds in over an hour, which I doubt), so I am very glad them made the transition to three.

As for the added stuff, almost all of it is taken and adapted from the appendices, and I'm greatful for all of it; had they stuck to the book itself, the whole thing would fall so far short of the magnificence of LotR it would be laughable.


Anyway, speaking solely about the models and the game, though, I think GW killed it from the onset with their ludicrous prices. They are so far beyond what the LotR models cost it's just...even "ludicrous" doesn't seem an apt description of them. The core rulebook costs at least twice what the originals did, if not more, and when people are staring at a massive $80 investment just for the core rulebook it's no wonder the vast majority turn and run out the door. The starter set is well into triple digits and I'm pretty sure the original Mines of Moria box was at least half that, as well. A box of troops used to be something like $20 for 20 models if I'm not mistaken, may be a little off here or there, but not a bad value as far as GW products are concerned. Boxes of plastic troops for The Hobbit game are twice as much for half as many models. There's also the fact that the LotR game was actually advertised and marketed to people, whereas you likely wouldn't even know there was a Hobbit game unless you just happened to wander into a GW store and see the crap on a shelf...at which point you would laugh and walk back out the door again because they're asking you to pay $85 for three ugly Finecast trolls, and trying really, really hard to pretend that they're not just going to dump all support for the game and pretend it never existed as soon as Battle of Five Armies leaves the theater, leaving you with a dead game and a hell of a lot of money wasted.


This, on the other hand, I agree with entirely. GW's greed is what has killed the game. They saw how fast the LotR stuff sold when the films were out, and the game was easy/cheap to get into, so assumed we'd happily pay double for the same stuff. The first strike was the halving of the box sizes, to see if we could take it, and I'd guess the reaction to that was poor enough they decided to approach the Hobbit stuff with minimal effort, hence the Finecast troops, a whole set of Thorin's Company sculpts that have never been released, and overpriced-then-free rules.

 
   
Made in in
[MOD]
Otiose in a Niche






Hyderabad, India

I'd rank Hobbit 1-Nothing Happens, Hobbit 2-the Padding, and Hobbit 3-the Last 30 Pages collectively as the second best Hobbit adaptation after this one:


 
   
Made in us
Brigadier General






Chicago

Thanks for posting these. It really does show how GW's interest in making the series accessible to gamers has waned. As well as pricing it almost entirely solely into the collectors market, the progression from hard back rulebook, to smaller softcover to 30 page PEF is pretty telling.

As for the Hobbit films, I'm with the naysayers. I love the LoTR movies. I loved the extended versions and watch them often. I've even re-watched each of the 4 commentaries and the special features. The Hobbit films, unfortunately are a poor imitation. LoTR was a great example of taking a massive tome, and distilling the best (and most useful for the chosen narrative) parts into an excellent series of movies. The Hobbit is an example of taking a small (read "one movie") book and blowing it into three movies by cramming in more chase scenes and new-trilogy-SW-style-overblown-action sequences than one can count. It's a real shame Peter Jackson couldn't trust the Hobbit material the way he trusted the LoTR books.

My wife feels the same way as I do about the LoTR movies. Not only was she unimpressed with the first two Hobbit movies, she fell asleep while we were watching the last movie this weekend. LoTR instills in the viewer a sense of wonder. Tolkien's world is allowed to unfold in all it's beauty and the viewer is treated to a great movie experience. The Hobbit on the other hand numb the senses with meaningless and improbable action sequences and additional Jackson-created material.

Sum up, despite how much I love the LoTR movies, I'm probably going to not purchase the Hobbit. Rather, I think I'll keep LoTR in my mind and let Hobbit films fade from memory.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2014/12/24 15:51:42


Chicago Skirmish Wargames club. Join us for some friendly, casual gaming in the Windy City.
http://chicagoskirmishwargames.com/blog/


My Project Log, mostly revolving around custom "Toybashed" terrain.
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/651712.page

Visit the Chicago Valley Railroad!
https://chicagovalleyrailroad.blogspot.com 
   
Made in us
Shas'o Commanding the Hunter Kadre




Missouri

 Paradigm wrote:
I honestly don't see how they could have fit so much into just 2 films, even if they added another half an hour to each to bring them up to LotR non-extended length (and for the record, Extended LotR has a much longer run-time than Extended Hobbit, I think, unless BOFA EE adds in over an hour, which I doubt), so I am very glad them made the transition to three.


Well it's entirely possible I was talking out of my ass, then. Maybe they just felt really freaking long to me, I dunno.

 Kid_Kyoto wrote:
I'd rank Hobbit 1-Nothing Happens, Hobbit 2-the Padding, and Hobbit 3-the Last 30 Pages collectively as the second best Hobbit adaptation after this one:


But I don't think there are any other Hobbit adaptati-oh...

 Eilif wrote:
As for the Hobbit films, I'm with the naysayers. I love the LoTR movies. I loved the extended versions and watch them often. I've even re-watched each of the 4 commentaries and the special features. The Hobbit films, unfortunately are a poor imitation. LoTR was a great example of taking a massive tome, and distilling the best (and most useful for the chosen narrative) parts into an excellent series of movies. The Hobbit is an example of taking a small (read "one movie") book and blowing it into three movies by cramming in more chase scenes and new-trilogy-SW-style-overblown-action sequences than one can count. It's a real shame Peter Jackson couldn't trust the Hobbit material the way he trusted the LoTR books.


Yeah. In some ways it feels like the approach with The Hobbit was almost exactly opposite to the one they took with LotR. If I remember right Jackson did face some criticism from fanboys for cutting too much out, so maybe that's part of it. In reality though it's probably just the studio wanting to milk every penny out of it that they possibly could, or wanting to make it a trilogy just because LotR was a trilogy and made tons of money.

Could've been worse, though. They could have made The Hobbit a saga.

 Desubot wrote:
Why isnt Slut Wars: The Sexpocalypse a real game dammit.


"It's easier to change the rules than to get good at the game." 
   
Made in us
Fresh-Faced New User




Not impossible of course -- may well be something that we just haven't heard about.







 
   
Made in gb
Land Raider Pilot on Cruise Control





Twickenham, London

I hope GW gets as far away from this Hobbit rubbish as it can as soon as it can. The films were garbage and were always going to be since Hollywood saw the possibility for a new LotR trilogy.

They should pick up a license for something like Star Wars and get ready for the massive pile of steaming fan service that JJ is brewing up. Money to be made right there.

"If you don't have Funzo, you're nothin'!"
"I'm cancelling you out of shame, like my subscription to white dwarf"
Never use a long word where a short one will do. 
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut






New Orleans, LA

LotR movies = good, Hobbit movies = bad, Hobbit game = no thanks!

DA:70S+G+M+B++I++Pw40k08+D++A++/fWD-R+T(M)DM+
 
   
Made in us
Brigadier General






Chicago

 Sidstyler wrote:
 Paradigm wrote:
I honestly don't see how they could have fit so much into just 2 films, even if they added another half an hour to each to bring them up to LotR non-extended length (and for the record, Extended LotR has a much longer run-time than Extended Hobbit, I think, unless BOFA EE adds in over an hour, which I doubt), so I am very glad them made the transition to three.


Well it's entirely possible I was talking out of my ass, then. Maybe they just felt really freaking long to me, I dunno. ...

…heah. In some ways it feels like the approach with The Hobbit was almost exactly opposite to the one they took with LotR. If I remember right Jackson did face some criticism from fanboys for cutting too much out, so maybe that's part of it. In reality though it's probably just the studio wanting to milk every penny out of it that they possibly could, or wanting to make it a trilogy just because LotR was a trilogy and made tons of money.


Don't sell yourself short. Your observations regarding length were spot-on.

The Hobbit could have easily have been cut down to one film and if done properly it would have been a better film than all/any of the 3 films Jackson delivered. The fanboys who demand that a book adapted for screen be detailed in it's entirety have no concept of how the medium of film works. The point of a film is NEVER to put every bit of a book on screen. The film exists to play out a set story visually in a set amount of time. When as a screenwriter or director bows to the fanboys the quality of the film almost invariably suffers.

Interestingly, listening to the writers commentary on LoTR is a how-to for successful adaptation of books for cinema. The writers are constantly talking about how they removed/skipped/rearranged sections to fit the narrative of the film. They are entirely aware that the film cannot be successful if it tries to cover every plotline in the books. They rarely add elements not present in the books and are absolutely ruthless with the cutting, even chopping parts that are known fan favorites in service to the films narrative structure. The end result is a spectacular trilogy of films and I just wish the Hobbit had been approached in the same way.

I'd much rather have one excellent Hobbit picture than 3 exercises in fantasy-action-mediocrity.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2014/12/24 17:32:41


Chicago Skirmish Wargames club. Join us for some friendly, casual gaming in the Windy City.
http://chicagoskirmishwargames.com/blog/


My Project Log, mostly revolving around custom "Toybashed" terrain.
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/651712.page

Visit the Chicago Valley Railroad!
https://chicagovalleyrailroad.blogspot.com 
   
Made in ie
Joined the Military for Authentic Experience






Nuremberg

The Hobbit films have been a disappointment except in one way- the designs and costumes have been as good (for the most part) as the excellent designs and look of the LOTR trilogy. This makes it ideal for translation into miniature form. I would be all over the Hobbit plastic kits if they were priced in any way reasonably. Hell, even at current prices I've still picked up the orcs on the new wargs and the giant eagles. There is some lovely stuff there.

But the price is too high, and I think we can see that from the Escape from Goblin Town limited editions still being on sale now, three years after release. Not enough bang for your buck. Which is a shame because it used to be one of the best value for money offerings GW had.

These rules are little more than stat blocks. I read the scenarios and they are not as good as the ones presented in the old Journey books at all- a pale reflection. For one, it's movie scenarios only, whereas the older books used to provide movie or book versions to appeal to a wide variety of fans. Add to that all the Trademarking symbols everywhere and it unfortunately makes the whole thing look very tacky.

A massive disappointment, but hopefully fans will make their own scenarios and share them around. The game system is still among GW's best.

   
Made in gb
Posts with Authority






Norn Iron

Davy: but then that would mean they couldn't have a stranglehold control of it ("The more you tighten your grip...") and they'd have to share the pie with every other single piece of SW merch put on a shop shelf or store page.

It's a real shame Peter Jackson couldn't trust the Hobbit material the way he trusted the LoTR books.


That's funny, because from what I hear about the Hobbit movies, Pyjamas treated the book with just the same amount of respect as LotR.

I'm sooo, sooo sorry.

Plog - Random sculpts and OW Helves 9/3/23 
   
Made in gb
Fixture of Dakka





Southampton

 Da Boss wrote:
I think we can see that from the Escape from Goblin Town limited editions still being on sale now, three years after release.


Indeed - complete with that 'resplendent' Radagast the Brown mini to sweeten the deal.

Spoiler:


http://www.games-workshop.com/en-GB/The-Hobbit-Escape-from-Goblin-Town-Limited-Edition-ENG

GW really should have thought this one through. They renewed a license to sell war games off the back of a franchise with very little war in it. I believe we all said as such at the time.

The fact that The Hobbit wasn't very good probably didn't help matters.

   
 
Forum Index » News & Rumors
Go to: