Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Polonius wrote:The fact that you think his exit is "the worst" is a little hyperbolic. I mean, if nothing else, you can always be clearer in displaying contempt. Say something like, "I don't get why you losers have your panties in a twist over creative armies." I think that's worse right there.

1. I said "like". Not hyperbolic.
2. Your proposed response would fit the description of "saying that everyone else is mad" that I said. So thanks for supporting my argument?

I'm okay with it, as long as everything is rather easily identifiable. My daemon army is sort of counts-as, but more along the lines of "conversion." Everything has right wargear, right size, etc. Nobody complains, and I get quite a few compliments on the idea, painting, etc. However, I think something like "okay, these necrons with space marines shoulderpads are scouts" is not acceptable. I am exaggerating here, however you get the idea, correct?

I voted B.), in case you were wondering.

ph34r wrote:

Polonius wrote:The fact that you think his exit is "the worst" is a little hyperbolic. I mean, if nothing else, you can always be clearer in displaying contempt. Say something like, "I don't get why you losers have your panties in a twist over creative armies." I think that's worse right there.

1. I said "like". Not hyperbolic.
2. Your proposed response would fit the description of "saying that everyone else is mad" that I said. So thanks for supporting my argument?

I was just giving an example of a worse response.

Polonius wrote:I was just giving an example of a worse response.

Worse response, yep. Still the same type of response: the worst type.

I'm not sure what you're point is, but I think some people here have posted in a way that could reasonably be called "upset."

I think that if you look at reece's comments from the perspective of somebody who wouldn't even think that there would be a problem, seeing the sort of emotion in some of these posts is a bit noteworthy.

I mean, if you did something and found out that other people though it was rude, insensitive, borderline cheating, etc., how is it inappropriate to say, "man, I'm surprised how upset you are over this?"

Thaylen wrote:

Wehrkind wrote:

Thaylen wrote:I have one guy I play with that has converted the Dwarven Steam Behemoth from Mage-Knight for a battlewagon. He removed the base, painted it red, and glued some orky bits and weaponry on it.

What would you guys think of this?

I think it is freaking awesome, and wish to know where I can get my hands on 2-3!

Ebay, they are like $15-20 a pop.

Nice, thanks! I might have to look into those. I guess they don't make them new anymore (I guess not, since I don't remember seeing the name Mage Knight on anything for about 10 years)?

Polonius wrote:I'm not sure what you're point is, but I think some people here have posted in a way that could reasonably be called "upset."

I think that if you look at reece's comments from the perspective of somebody who wouldn't even think that there would be a problem, seeing the sort of emotion in some of these posts is a bit noteworthy.

I mean, if you did something and found out that other people though it was rude, insensitive, borderline cheating, etc., how is it inappropriate to say, "man, I'm surprised how upset you are over this?"

Alright then, I guess I'm just surprised you that all the "land speeder counts as chariot" proponents are upset that they are not universally accepted. Agreed?

That's fair. I don't think people weren't aware that some people might not accept the counts as gladly. I think that the level of hostility expressed was suprising.

"I just see the same people with an agenda making excuses. Total conversion armies can be fun but many times are poorly executed and unclear and make it hard for gameplay. In true competitive play it is rude to burden opponents with that. "

"I feel sorry for anyone forced to play against this in a real tourney as it is selfish and burdonsome to expect someone to translate what these proxies are supposed to be. It is the poster child for all that is wrong with total conversion armies. "

"Actually now that I think about it, yeah, you do sound like a jerk, the reason being that you think the problem is with them remembering what army you are. "

"you're nuts. Sorry bud, the world doesn't revolve around you. "

"Are you trying to troll? "

I think there is evidence to support a finding of negative emotions being expressed in this thread.

Polonius wrote:
I think there is evidence to support a finding of negative emotions being expressed in this thread.

*LOL*

Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play? While hyperbole is the best, understatement is often pretty good. Well played sir.

[whistle] Point! Polonius! [hand signal]

Let's move on.