Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Isn't that incompatible with the idea that Liberals are having all that sex before marriage and having lots of kids on the damn liberal welfare?



Man, you are hilariously funny though.

I used to think like that, when I was 18 and it was easy to pretend that the world was morally black and white...

jamesk1973 wrote:
Thus fewer innocents will be exposed to liberal ideals.

Given a couple more generations the hippie liberals will be bred out.

You do realize that liberal ideas aren't genetic, right? And that people will be exposed to them as soon as they leave their sheltered lives with their conservative family and see the rest of the world?

 Peregrine wrote:

jamesk1973 wrote:
Thus fewer innocents will be exposed to liberal ideals.

Given a couple more generations the hippie liberals will be bred out.

You do realize that liberal ideas aren't genetic, right? And that people will be exposed to them as soon as they leave their sheltered lives with their conservative family and see the rest of the world?

I know. It's environmental. Like choosing to be gay.

jamesk1973 wrote:

I don't have the numbers but I am willing to make the sweeping generalization that more liberals than conservatives obtain abortions.

If that premise is followed fewer children will be born to liberal parents.

Thus fewer innocents will be exposed to liberal ideals.

Given a couple more generations the hippie liberals will be bred out.

ಠ_ಠ

There's gotta be a badge for being this dense.

 Kovnik Obama wrote:

jamesk1973 wrote:

I don't have the numbers but I am willing to make the sweeping generalization that more liberals than conservatives obtain abortions.

If that premise is followed fewer children will be born to liberal parents.

Thus fewer innocents will be exposed to liberal ideals.

Given a couple more generations the hippie liberals will be bred out.

ಠ_ಠ

There's gotta be a badge for being this dense.

There is, to the top right of his posts. It's yellow and has a little exclamation mark in it.

jamesk1973 wrote:

 Peregrine wrote:

jamesk1973 wrote:
Thus fewer innocents will be exposed to liberal ideals.

Given a couple more generations the hippie liberals will be bred out.

You do realize that liberal ideas aren't genetic, right? And that people will be exposed to them as soon as they leave their sheltered lives with their conservative family and see the rest of the world?

I know. It's environmental. Like choosing to be gay.

Hey! I found a Magical Artefact of +5 Poe's Law!

There is no intelligent debate to be had here.

I don't feel we should be killing potential human beings and most of you feel we should.

I thought the discussion concerning the rights of a male to absolve themselves of parental responsibility if the female decided to keep the baby against he male's wishes was interesting while it lasted.

Most of your pro-abortion types will get all up in arms over racism, bigotry, wealth inequality,mental illness, gun control, and death penalty.

But when it comes to abortions feth those kids. Vacuum their asses right out and cast them into the medical waste pail. It's not like they are a human being.

jamesk1973 wrote:
It's not like they are a human being

Yes, we're finally on the same page. A lump of cells the size of a tic-tac up to a rasberry is not a human being.

 Ouze wrote:

jamesk1973 wrote:
It's not like they are a human being

Yes, we're finally on the same page. A lump of cells the size of a tic-tac up to a rasberry is not a human being.

No. Only the potential to be one.

Go save a fething polar bear.

Last night I had a dream about saving a polar bear, and had to clean up 30 million potential people in the morning :/

 Ouze wrote:
Last night I had a dream about saving a polar bear, and had to clean up 30 million potential people in the morning :/

LoL. Exalted.

Hermaphrodite much?

jamesk1973 wrote:
There is no intelligent debate to be had here.

You sure killed whatever potential there was to be one.

I don't feel we should be killing potential human beings and most of you feel we should.

I don't. I still feel you don't get the difference between a troll pissing match and a debate.

I thought the discussion concerning the rights of a male to absolve themselves of parental responsibility if the female decided to keep the baby against he male's wishes was interesting while it lasted.

So, basically, the whole 0.2 seconds it took for everyone to realize how bad that idea is?

Most of your pro-abortion types will get all up in arms over racism, bigotry, wealth inequality,mental illness, gun control, and death penalty.

But when it comes to abortions feth those kids. Vacuum their asses right out and cast them into the medical waste pail. It's not like they are a human being.

Thereby equating ''having an intelligent debate'' with ''agreeing with my position''.

First of all I want to ask if taking away someone's free will (in regards with the law) isnt morally questionable either? Since it is choosing between the mother or the 'potential', as you call it. It is a difficult subject, but it should be a personal choice first and foremost. But is it the human life that you actually value or just the idea that it is objectionable? Concerned about its/his/her fate afterwards?

Our morals will shift further towards acceptance regarding abortion. The same applies to gay marriage, its a personal choice. Some people might not like it, but it does not concern their lives in the slightest. But we live in a democracy. Enough people believe that it should be a right, but at the same time it isnt forced on anyone.

jamesk1973 wrote:
There is no intelligent debate to be had here.

I don't feel we should be killing potential human beings and most of you feel we should.

You want to save it until its head crowns out of the vagina, until that point life is valuable.

Once the feet leave the vagina they become a drain on society and it is better to let them lazy babies die to reduce the welfare burden on our society instead of providing for them.

Like women like to say:

"It's my body, and no you can't have it."

Ughh...nothing good is going to come out of this save for another classic Gailbraithe-like moment.

 WarOne wrote:
Ughh...nothing good is going to come out of this save for another classic Gailbraithe-like moment.

My God... it would all be so worth it.

It lets us play a fun game of "guess the IQ" though...

 d-usa wrote:
It lets us play a fun game of "guess the IQ" though...

Ooooo....Oooooo

Yours is in the triple digits!



Tell me of this Gailbraithe....

jamesk1973 wrote:

 d-usa wrote:
It lets us play a fun game of "guess the IQ" though...

Ooooo....Oooooo

Yours is in the triple digits!

Mensa baby

 d-usa wrote:

jamesk1973 wrote:

 d-usa wrote:
It lets us play a fun game of "guess the IQ" though...

Ooooo....Oooooo

Yours is in the triple digits!

Mensa baby

I can't even spell Mensa!

Abortion is bad.

jamesk1973 wrote:
Abortion is bad.

This. Abortion interferes with our liberal plot to throw all of the excess babies into deathmatch arenas where they will fight to the death with an interesting mixture of chainsaws, flaming swords, and grenades. Murdering children before they're born is much less fun, so ban abortion!

jamesk1973 wrote:

Abortion is bad.

Abortion is bad. That's why the vast majority of people that are pro-choice are not actually pro-abortion.

Provide the incentives to actually have the child and raise it instead of passing unconstitutional law after unconstitutional law while also legislating away all benefits and programs to help these parents raise their child. Keep it pro-choice, and give these women all the help that they need so that they will choose life. Care as much about an actual living breathing human child once it is born as you pretend to care about while it is still a sack of cells.

Abortion: Keep it legal, keep it safe, provide all the resources they need to make it more rare.

I'm all for birthing licenses and forced depo implants.

Eugenics baby!


Automatically Appended Next Post:
As to abortion: I just want the law to be consistent. If you can kill it and not be charged thorough abortion, the drunk driver that hit you and aborted your fetus shouldn't able to be prosecuted for it either.

I don't think we have the collective maturity to discuss abortion and eugenics here. Many of you have broken rules attempting to do so.

So the thread is closed.