| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2006/06/21 09:10:47
Subject: RE: The Unassaultable Squad
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
can't ... stop myself... must ... throw ... monkey wrench in....
So transports, with embarked troops, are unassaultable (per RAW)? Just checking!
|
Manfred on Dwarfs: "it's like fighting a mountain, except the mountain stabs back."
For Hearth and Home! |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2006/06/21 10:07:36
Subject: RE: The Unassaultable Squad
|
 |
Infiltrating Broodlord
|
Hmmm...good point Antonin.
Since there's nothing in the rules that makes you remove models from the table when you embark them, then models in a transport will definitely be within 1" of the edge of the transport. I've seen an opponent stack his DE all over a Raider actually, and they are for sure within 1" of the sides. But an assaulting unit would be unable to charge the embarked squad. Therefore the transport cannot be assaulted.
Good catch!
|
-S
2000 2000 1200
600 190 in progress
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2006/06/21 10:26:04
Subject: RE: The Unassaultable Squad
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Legal or not, right or not....would any of us pull this stunt? No? Good. Then the debate is over. Would any of us really throw a fit about this if it came up (unlikely as it is)? No? Good. Then the debate is over. Capt K
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2006/06/21 16:42:12
Subject: RE: The Unassaultable Squad
|
 |
[DCM]
Sentient OverBear
|
Really, I think that all of us arguing the intent of the rules is just dumb.
The number of times that people will holler at you for saying that this isn't legal is miniscule and shouldn't be counted on.
The sooner that we hang up our hats on this and return to talking about actual rules errata, the better; after all, don't we have better things to discuss?
Think about it!!!
|
DQ:70S++G+++M+B++I+Pw40k94+ID+++A++/sWD178R+++T(I)DM+++
Trust me, no matter what damage they have the potential to do, single-shot weapons always flatter to deceive in 40k. Rule #1 - BBAP
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2006/06/21 19:09:59
Subject: RE: The Unassaultable Squad
|
 |
40kenthus
|
Are Sisters of Battle unassaultable because of their ceramite panties and bodices?
|
Only now do I realize how much I prefer Pete Haines' "misprints" to Gav Thorpe's "brainfarts." :Abadabadoobaddon |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|