Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
2017/07/16 15:19:55
Subject: The Infinity News and Rumors Thread - The 2017 Edition
ImAGeek wrote: Bostria said on Facebook in comments on the Kriza Borac silhouette pic 'Consider "Black Hand" inside Tunguska as "The Observancy" is inside Bakunin.'
So they will be like Observance and Bakunin? probably for the best.
@ -Loki-
What I mean is the sculpt could have been made before the Icestorm standardisation.
Of course they have assets and they share it in the studio and they manually adjust them for each model, it would be stupid to not have.
So What's the excuse for the non standard stuff done after the Ice storm standardization or should that have been picked up in the following standardization or was it done in advance to link up with the pre-post-pre standardization that followed.
[MOD EDIT - RULE #1 - Alpharius]
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/07/16 17:03:13
Your last point is especially laughable and comical, because not only the 7th ed Valkyrie shown dumber things (like being able to throw the troopers without parachutes out of its hatches, no harm done) - Irbis
2017/07/16 17:02:30
Subject: Re:The Infinity News and Rumors Thread - The 2017 Edition
Folding the Black Hand into Tunguska makes sense to me. I do recall Bostria mentioning something about not creating too much bloat to the factions.
I wonder if they will trim the number of sectorials for other factions too.
GenCon starts in 1 month, and I think CB's seminar will be 19 August. Should be interesting. Plus, we'll get to see/hear about the Aristeia! demos. Demoes? w/e.
2017/07/16 21:31:59
Subject: The Infinity News and Rumors Thread - The 2017 Edition
New models in the 'Beyond' packs are incredible. I had my reservations before the release due to including two factions in one rather than two separate expansion packs but great sculpts and good choice of models have put those to rest. Great to see such a positive response to them from the community too.
2017/07/16 22:15:59
Subject: The Infinity News and Rumors Thread - The 2017 Edition
Red Harvest wrote: Folding the Black Hand into Tunguska makes sense to me. I do recall Bostria mentioning something about not creating too much bloat to the factions.
I wonder if they will trim the number of sectorials for other factions too.
Messing with current sectorials would be playing with fire, I think. And too many people are clamouring for more like the Kazaks, Varuna and Svarlerheimaermamaermaheima for them to ignore it. I think we'll just have to put up with the bloat.
The galaxy is littered with the single-planet graveyards of civilisations which made the economically sensible decision not to explore space.
2017/07/16 23:19:57
Subject: The Infinity News and Rumors Thread - The 2017 Edition
Red Harvest wrote: GenCon starts in 1 month, and I think CB's seminar will be 19 August. Should be interesting. Plus, we'll get to see/hear about the Aristeia! demos. Demoes? w/e.
On July 28th, in Spain, CB will have its own event: The Interplanetario
The big seminar full of concept artwork will happen there, before Gencon this year.
So expect this thread to be swarmed with low res images of upcoming stuff in two weeks.
2017/07/17 00:03:52
Subject: The Infinity News and Rumors Thread - The 2017 Edition
Red Harvest wrote: Folding the Black Hand into Tunguska makes sense to me. I do recall Bostria mentioning something about not creating too much bloat to the factions.
I wonder if they will trim the number of sectorials for other factions too.
Messing with current sectorials would be playing with fire, I think. And too many people are clamouring for more like the Kazaks, Varuna and Svarlerheimaermamaermaheima for them to ignore it. I think we'll just have to put up with the bloat.
Thing is, some factions have enough units that justify a fourth sectorial, and some just don't. Black Hand is a cool idea, but it seems CB can't make enough unique units to fill it. They were talking about rolling them into Tunguska years ago the way they rolled the Observance into Bakunin. But then you've got, say Gabqar Khanate, where the stuff they have really doesn't fit elsewhere in the fluff or on the table, and there's a lot of scope to make new units that are rather unique for that sectorial.
I think we'll just end up with uneven amounts of sectorials. Some, like Nomads, might sit at three, some might sit at four or, like Pan Oceania, five. Either that or they will think of different fourth sectorials.
2017/07/17 02:24:30
Subject: The Infinity News and Rumors Thread - The 2017 Edition
Red Harvest wrote: Folding the Black Hand into Tunguska makes sense to me. I do recall Bostria mentioning something about not creating too much bloat to the factions.
I wonder if they will trim the number of sectorials for other factions too.
Messing with current sectorials would be playing with fire, I think. And too many people are clamouring for more like the Kazaks, Varuna and Svarlerheimaermamaermaheima for them to ignore it. I think we'll just have to put up with the bloat.
Thing is, some factions have enough units that justify a fourth sectorial, and some just don't. Black Hand is a cool idea, but it seems CB can't make enough unique units to fill it. They were talking about rolling them into Tunguska years ago the way they rolled the Observance into Bakunin. But then you've got, say Gabqar Khanate, where the stuff they have really doesn't fit elsewhere in the fluff or on the table, and there's a lot of scope to make new units that are rather unique for that sectorial.
I think we'll just end up with uneven amounts of sectorials. Some, like Nomads, might sit at three, some might sit at four or, like Pan Oceania, five. Either that or they will think of different fourth sectorials.
Nothing wrong with Nomads only having 3 sectorials. Ariadna will really only be getting 1 new sectorial as well.
Do we have a profile yet for the Kriza Boracs, Tunguska Crisis Special Unit?
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/07/17 02:31:24
Is that a natural 21?
Nomads & Yu Jing
2017/07/17 02:39:34
Subject: The Infinity News and Rumors Thread - The 2017 Edition
I think we'll just end up with uneven amounts of sectorials. Some, like Nomads, might sit at three, some might sit at four or, like Pan Oceania, five. Either that or they will think of different fourth sectorials.
I'm OK with that. I'm against the approaches in gaming that says one faction needs a mirror because the other factions have X already.
Also, it would be interesting to see if if the Svarlaheimamhneminnaheima sectorial ends up being cross some kind fof cross PanO/YuJing force. I don't see it happening, but it would be fun.
The galaxy is littered with the single-planet graveyards of civilisations which made the economically sensible decision not to explore space.
2017/07/17 02:40:53
Subject: The Infinity News and Rumors Thread - The 2017 Edition
I think we'll just end up with uneven amounts of sectorials. Some, like Nomads, might sit at three, some might sit at four or, like Pan Oceania, five. Either that or they will think of different fourth sectorials.
I'm OK with that. I'm against the approaches in gaming that says one faction needs a mirror because the other factions have X already.
Also, it would be interesting to see if if the Svarlaheimamhneminnaheima sectorial ends up being cross some kind fof cross PanO/YuJing force. I don't see it happening, but it would be fun.
Yeah that won't happen. White Banner is the Yu Jing opposing force on Svalarheima and is already in progress. IIRC they're in the next book.
2017/07/17 14:13:21
Subject: Re:The Infinity News and Rumors Thread - The 2017 Edition
I'm a native Turkish speaker, and I assure you many of the Haqqi models also have infuriating pluralization. I guess it's similar to how Italians hate it when English speakers day "paninis"
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/07/17 17:45:34
2017/07/17 19:26:17
Subject: Re:The Infinity News and Rumors Thread - The 2017 Edition
We English speakers sometimes double pluralize words, even pronouns. Youse is a plural of the 2nd person plural for example. Why should borrowed words be immune?
That Spec Op is nice. I would ditch that tactical rock, and mount his front foot on a clear latex rod -- perhaps obscured by a bit of foliage-- so it looks like he is leaping forward.
I already have a Chibi, from SDE. At some point I'll paint it. So, no want/need/interest in this. It is a nice mini for an exclusive. It has no use in game, so nobody ought to feel left out if they don't get it. Although I suppose that it could be used in-game for the Lulz.
That grunt, along with my other spec ops model, will finally replace Chasseurs in my army, except for Moblot resculpts, I will finally be able to play a decent FRRM army.
The screencaps are from the WGC Infinity FB group, taken from the BoW video BobbaFett posted.
Yu Jing
USARF General Release
GenCon
PanOceania
Nomads
Automatically Appended Next Post: The Haqqislam designs are so similar to the current stuff I couldn't justify bringing them over, and the Hellcat dossier is the one from the line revamp just with some new guns.
ABH and CSU ones also aren't that exciting.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/07/18 15:59:37
2017/07/18 16:27:10
Subject: Re:The Infinity News and Rumors Thread - The 2017 Edition
Impressive how a palette change and a head swap make the USARF spec op look so different. Damn, I think I might have to get that GenCon version after all..