Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
It's happened before. When people couldn't share the biome, Mel included, Me and Bloodhorror threatened to wreck the biome if people didn't settle down. They did eventually.
Anyway "A user-made project she thought up" isn't the point. It's that she took power from me and then gave herself the position later. I only became mayor to stop the inevitable building regulations and such that would build up otherwise, and to resolve any issues that might occur.
Less than a week later, at least three people were trying to kill each other.
I'd appreciate it not being called "bitching" too, Corpses.I thought of the point, I raised it, and as soon as I've defended it, I'll leave it alone. Has it occurred to you that my ban is not my fault? I really want back on to the server. Like, really really. So I want to keep an eye on it.
You were banned so you're now posting here trying to make excuses for your ban in the form of blaming other people to get back onto the server. I don't give a feth about what you'd appreciate, the above is bitching plain and simple.
Wait i am destroying a Biome but it is on my property and no one cares because it is plains biome... Which has no animals in it. So thats were i put in all my nettherrack a new biome The fiery plains instead
From whom are unforgiven we bring the mercy of war.
4oursword got banned, IIRC, because one of his IRL friends that he vouched for engaged in blatant cheating. Of course this is against the rules and warrants a ban of 4oursword as well, but that doesn't say anything against his character.
4oursword wrote:Me and Bloodhorror threatened to wreck the biome
4oursword wrote:I really want back on to the server.
Less of the sarcasm. It was a threat in order to stop three of your server members from effectively killing each other and griefing their property. Granted, I could have worded it better.
Also, thanks to Abso for seeing my side of things.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/07/03 20:52:43
Veteran Sergeant wrote:If 40K has Future Rifles, and Future Tanks, and Future Artillery, and Future Airplanes and Future Grenades and Future Bombs, then contextually Future Swords seem somewhat questionable to use, since it means crossing Future Open Space to get Future Shot At.
Polonius wrote:I categorically reject any statement that there is such a thing as too much boob.
Coolyo294 wrote:Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
Corpsesarefun wrote:
You were banned so you're now posting here trying to make excuses for your ban in the form of blaming other people to get back onto the server. I don't give a feth about what you'd appreciate, the above is bitching plain and simple.
I am not blaming other people. I raised a point regarding another member.
I'm not trying to get back on the server. Nor am I making excuses for my ban, where did I say that?
Rule #1 of this forum is Be Polite. You are not doing that.
Veteran Sergeant wrote:If 40K has Future Rifles, and Future Tanks, and Future Artillery, and Future Airplanes and Future Grenades and Future Bombs, then contextually Future Swords seem somewhat questionable to use, since it means crossing Future Open Space to get Future Shot At.
Polonius wrote:I categorically reject any statement that there is such a thing as too much boob.
Coolyo294 wrote:Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
I had intended for those two posts running into each other, that would have answered your point about giving the Mod orders. I know full well that a ban is permanent.
I do not feel I am being impolite, feel free to point out specific places where I am.
Veteran Sergeant wrote:If 40K has Future Rifles, and Future Tanks, and Future Artillery, and Future Airplanes and Future Grenades and Future Bombs, then contextually Future Swords seem somewhat questionable to use, since it means crossing Future Open Space to get Future Shot At.
Polonius wrote:I categorically reject any statement that there is such a thing as too much boob.
Coolyo294 wrote:Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
corpses, I'd have to agree you are starting to act like a dick.
Saying bloodhorror is bitching about being banned when all he said was he couldn't connect to any server
As well as that, Doca DID get blood confused with someone else.
And 4, wasn't even speaking about his ban when he was talking about the fight over a mushroom biome, he got banned because someone he vouched for broke dem server rules
4oursword wrote:Also, thanks to Abso for seeing my side of things.
Just because you made a poor judgment of someone else's character doesn't mean you, yourself have poor character. If anything, your community Titan project and your general activity was a boon to the community IMHO; I can only have a positive opinion of you Regardless, rules are rules.
Yeah, I would have thought a temporary ban and the inability to vouch for anyone else would have been a better punishment if the person you vouched for got banned for their own shenanigans.
What is this talk of me for? I have been away for three weeks, so I have read the last few pages but I can't figure out what is going on, someone care to explain?
Just me justifying a point I made and referencing that Mushroom Biome nonsense which you actually found in the world.
Veteran Sergeant wrote:If 40K has Future Rifles, and Future Tanks, and Future Artillery, and Future Airplanes and Future Grenades and Future Bombs, then contextually Future Swords seem somewhat questionable to use, since it means crossing Future Open Space to get Future Shot At.
Polonius wrote:I categorically reject any statement that there is such a thing as too much boob.
Coolyo294 wrote:Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
When the rich rage war it's the poor who die 
