| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2007/01/29 17:15:55
Subject: Tank Charging
|
|
Been Around the Block
|
Imagine you have a unit do a split charge, charging a squad of infantry and a tank. After the fight, you defeat the infantry squad and they break. How do you move the models?
1) Follow the tank fighting rules - sit tight and do nothing.
2) Follow the infantry fighting rules - consolidate or massacre
Thanks!
|
|
|
 |
|
2007/01/29 17:19:53
Subject: RE: Tank Charging
|
|
Incorporating Wet-Blending
|
2.
|
Mannahnin wrote:A lot of folks online (and in emails in other parts of life) use pretty mangled English. The idea is that it takes extra effort and time to write properly, and they’d rather save the time. If you can still be understood, what’s the harm? While most of the time a sloppy post CAN be understood, the use of proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling is generally seen as respectable and desirable on most forums. It demonstrates an effort made to be understood, and to make your post an easy and pleasant read. By making this effort, you can often elicit more positive responses from the community, and instantly mark yourself as someone worth talking to.
insaniak wrote: Every time someone threatens violence over the internet as a result of someone's hypothetical actions at the gaming table, the earth shakes infinitisemally in its orbit as millions of eyeballs behind millions of monitors all roll simultaneously.
|
|
|
|
|
2007/01/30 11:23:08
Subject: RE: Tank Charging
|
|
Been Around the Block
|
any specific reason why 2 lordhat?
|
|
|
|
|
2007/01/30 11:59:12
Subject: RE: Tank Charging
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
I believe that would be because you are never actually "locked" into combat with a vehicle unless it has a WS.....but I could be wrong.
|
Courage Honor Wisdom.
|
|
|
|
|
2007/01/30 12:52:23
Subject: RE: Tank Charging
|
|
Incorporating Wet-Blending
|
Posted By Vult on 01/30/2007 4:59 PM
I believe that would be because you are never actually "locked" into combat with a vehicle unless it has a WS.....but I could be wrong.
That would be my reasoning.
|
Mannahnin wrote:A lot of folks online (and in emails in other parts of life) use pretty mangled English. The idea is that it takes extra effort and time to write properly, and they’d rather save the time. If you can still be understood, what’s the harm? While most of the time a sloppy post CAN be understood, the use of proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling is generally seen as respectable and desirable on most forums. It demonstrates an effort made to be understood, and to make your post an easy and pleasant read. By making this effort, you can often elicit more positive responses from the community, and instantly mark yourself as someone worth talking to.
insaniak wrote: Every time someone threatens violence over the internet as a result of someone's hypothetical actions at the gaming table, the earth shakes infinitisemally in its orbit as millions of eyeballs behind millions of monitors all roll simultaneously.
|
|
|
|
|
2007/01/31 05:08:38
Subject: RE: Tank Charging
|
|
[DCM]
Tilter at Windmills
|
2. You are not locked with the vehicle, but you are locked with the infantry. If you failed to break or destroy the infantry, you'd be forced to Pile In away from the tank, as well.
|
Adepticon 2015: Team Tourney Best Imperial Team- Team Ironguts, Adepticon 2014: Team Tourney 6th/120, Best Imperial Team- Cold Steel Mercs 2, 40k Championship Qualifier ~25/226
More 2010-2014 GT/Major RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 78-20-9 // SW: 8-1-2 (Golden Ticket with SW), BA: 29-9-4 6th Ed GT & RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 36-12-2 // BA: 11-4-1 // SW: 1-1-1
DT:70S++++G(FAQ)M++B++I+Pw40k99#+D+++A+++/sWD105R+++T(T)DM+++++
A better way to score Sportsmanship in tournaments
The 40K Rulebook & Codex FAQs. You should have these bookmarked if you play this game.
The Dakka Dakka Forum Rules You agreed to abide by these when you signed up.
Maelstrom's Edge! |
|
|
|
|
2007/01/31 05:41:36
Subject: RE: Tank Charging
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
New Mexico
|
2 is correct. You can only be engaged with a tank if you charge it on your turn, and after the combat is done, you cease to be engaged with it because you're not locked with it. So you'd follow up on the infantry side of the combat.
|
I think I like it RAW. |
|
|
|
|
2007/01/31 06:07:55
Subject: RE: Tank Charging
|
|
Tough Tyrant Guard
|
yes but there are a few vehicles in game that have WS and im not talking about Dreads and Defliers, One that comes into mind is the DE. Asdrubael Vect, hes a skimmer and vehicle and a Independ character.
|
|
|
|
|
2007/01/31 07:18:42
Subject: RE: Tank Charging
|
|
Incorporating Wet-Blending
|
And this affects our answer how?
|
Mannahnin wrote:A lot of folks online (and in emails in other parts of life) use pretty mangled English. The idea is that it takes extra effort and time to write properly, and they’d rather save the time. If you can still be understood, what’s the harm? While most of the time a sloppy post CAN be understood, the use of proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling is generally seen as respectable and desirable on most forums. It demonstrates an effort made to be understood, and to make your post an easy and pleasant read. By making this effort, you can often elicit more positive responses from the community, and instantly mark yourself as someone worth talking to.
insaniak wrote: Every time someone threatens violence over the internet as a result of someone's hypothetical actions at the gaming table, the earth shakes infinitisemally in its orbit as millions of eyeballs behind millions of monitors all roll simultaneously.
|
|
|
|
|
2007/02/01 17:58:10
Subject: RE: Tank Charging
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Provided you can't be locked with the vehicle, 2. is the answer.
To be locked with a vehicle, the vehicle must have a WS. In the event that you fight a vehicle with WS, then the normal rules of close combat apply.
|
|
|
|
|
2007/02/01 22:52:23
Subject: RE: Tank Charging
|
|
Stern Iron Priest with Thrall Bodyguard
The drinking halls of Fenris or South London as its sometimes called
|
I saw this happen to a eldar player at a tournie, his eldar squad assualted a leman russ tank and some gaurdsmen. He broke the gaurd and went to try wipe out/consolidate etc but the IG player was like NO your still engaged with the tank. The Judges did not help, and the eldar guy got ripped off especially since it was the deciding turn and that would have made a big difference to the outcome.
|
R.I.P Amy Winehouse
|
|
|
|
|
2007/02/02 00:48:33
Subject: RE: Tank Charging
|
|
Dakka Veteran
Troll country
|
That was just not right, but then again he was playing eldar.
- Greenie
|
- I am the troll... feed me!
- 5th place w. 13th Company at Adepticon 2007 Championship Tourney
- I love Angela Imrie!!!
http://40kwreckingcrew.com/phpBB2/index.php
97% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
