Eight Ball wrote:I don't think there is much way of getting the point across to people (like Sourclams, no offense) about this issue...
Seems like there's a lot of that going around. Still yet to see anyone who thinks the Deffrolla doesn't work answer any of the questions that undermine their position.... like 'how do I declare a Ram?'.
But seriously, Sourclams, you had said before to explain why the dogs and poodles example doesn't work, HERE'S WHY: If dogs are tank shock and poodles are ramming, what are dogs? You can't say "I have a dog" a dog is a huge species of many different kinds, so it's a BIT more correct to say "Collies are Tank Shock, and Border Collies are Ramming", because that is a (very similar) class to the main one. BETTER than the damn poodle thing!!
Using my (collies to border collies) example, if the rule says a (collie) tank shock, that doesn't mean you can use (border collie) ramming, because while they are similar, they are NOT the same..
You are so confused by the flaws in your argument you can't take a trick, poor fella. Do you realise you are making Sourclams' argument for him in this paragraph? If you try and get your dog into a club, you'll be able to get your border collie into the collie-fanciers' association. AKA things that affect tank shocking (all collies) also affect ramming (border collies) unless specifically otherwise stated.
Centurian99 wrote:Then you're going to love it when version 2.1 comes out...by Wednesday...
I hope this entry doesn't change as it was a good call in the version 2.0
INAT FAQ.