Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I think anything should go. I don't really care. draw super nipples on your female figs and giant wangs on your SM for all I care. They're your figs do what you want with them. The problem is that the TO may not agree with that.

As long as it's tasteful I don't have a problem with it.

I'd say chests are fine, but anything beyond that is a bit off, for me at least. If I want more than that, I'll go talk to my wife.

Nudity is fine, but don't have them doing anything sexually explicit. I understand it is art, but great artists knew how to do it tastefuly.

Well i dont care and would be pleased if there were more nude models (WERE DO ORKS GET ALL THEIR PANTS FROM!!)

And GW doesnt care to a certain extent as a naked demmonette won a golden demon

Unfortunately the number of miniature models I would LIKE to see without clothes are, shall we say, minimal? Also, what the hell?

One of the most hillarious Conversions i have ever seen is a butt nekkid orc shaman showing his jibblies to the world.

Spent a while laughing at that mini.

I think nudity is fine in the wargaming world. Harpies for example, they are feral flying beast women.... I also doubt anyone will get stiff from those....

It needs to be realistic tho, a topless model with a 2+ armor save.... just no.

REPENTIAAAAAAA WWOOOOOOHHHH 1 in five models is half topless and they always turn the model around in the codex so you cant see it.

warpcrafter wrote:If people don't like the bewbs, they have the option of not buying the minis. It is not everybody else's job to raise your children.

QFT!!!! completely agree with you!! the same can be said about tv, you dont want things on the air dont remove them change the channel raise your kids dont let other things be the babysitter. QFT brother QFT

Yes so true

Also with games

Dose anyone really have issues with nudity in minis at all?

ChaosxVoid wrote:

warpcrafter wrote:If people don't like the bewbs, they have the option of not buying the minis. It is not everybody else's job to raise your children.

QFT!!!! completely agree with you!! the same can be said about tv, you dont want things on the air dont remove them change the channel raise your kids dont let other things be the babysitter. QFT brother QFT

Of course, if you like the game, enjoy the hobby, and you like doing it with your kids.... especially if you've invested money in a product that's already been marketed in a 'clean' way, you're not exactly hoping for your kid to show up at a tourney and face 'Slaanesh's Boobies Brigade.'

As the poll describes, there is a time and place for boobies. And this is not it. :p They're preferred, however, at the afterparty.

Other (Write in):

Look at the average demographic.

Its not art, its marketing, plain and simple.

I never understood why parents flip out about this kind of stuff, it isn't graphic, it's not a strip club it's just plastic, metal and or putty. I for one would be more upset at my kid if they acted in an inappropriate manner at the site of something like a "fleshy" toy model.

As long as noone is having sex in a model i don't have a problem with it

Go NZ in rugby world cup 2011!

Mr. SD likes but does not own any Daemonettes...
I don't think it's that out of line, we have armies that slaughter to feed their hedonistic gods and urges (DE) or to murder and massacre just for giggles (orks) and just because they're mad (Khorne) so I think showing some skin is not that...bad..really.

think of, in italy you have statues of naked men everywhere, so why not have it on miniatures if they are posed in a, lets say, non obscene way.

Mr. Self Destruct wrote:Mr. SD likes but does not own any Daemonettes...
I don't think it's that out of line, we have armies that slaughter to feed their hedonistic gods and urges (DE) or to murder and massacre just for giggles (orks) and just because they're mad (Khorne) so I think showing some skin is not that...bad..really.

I do have to agree with Mr. SD...most people do paint their models sensibly a few go to the extreme but it is few and far between. I mean if you think about it is a gorefest army of berserkers covered in blood and having entrails dangling from there chain swords any better then a tit hanging out?

I've been playing since I was very young and even owned some of the Deamonettes. Seriously if a kid is mature enough to handle this game he's mature enough to handle some nudity here and there.

It's ok; it's the game makers responsibility to put out a tasteful product, but it's also the parents responsibility to be involved with their kids and help them make good decisions.

If people dont like the bewbs, then cut/file off the nipple then paint it like its a piece of clothing, problem solved. lol

It adds a bit of spice to life.

I've nothing wrong with nudity itself. That said, I'm not exactly confident in the average game or gamer to be doing for reasons other than tacky fanservice. At least human nudity anyway.

So long as the model(s) in question do not have anything else wrong...the degree to which a model is naked is okay by me.

I dont really care. GW would only include nudity if the fluff and feel of the model felt right. slaanesh: sure, i dont care. space marines: oh god, no!

WHY ARE YOU LETTING CHILDREN PLAY 40K?!?!?!

well more children have begun playing 40k than in the past, and gw know this, hence why the recent daemonettes had their multiple breasts covered up. on the old models there was virtually nothing there.

Couldn't care less if there was nudity. I think there should be more nudity. The world needs more nudity. Nudity for President!

Art is Art

Element206 wrote:Art is Art

Couldn't resist!

I just dont want my squats being beaten to death by greater demon dongs lol, but in all seriousness, nipples are fine but everything else is a little much