Switch Theme:

How long is it before World War II becomes remembered as a war of American agression?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Junior Officer with Laspistol




Perth/Glasgow

They did start to mobilise and the BEF did land in France and advance towards the germans before getting beaten back but for the most part they were peace time armies in Europe apart from the Germans. The 6 years of Appeasement gave some time but they were still updating equipment and recruiting men which takes time and Poland was on the other side of Europe.

Currently debating whether to study for my exams or paint some Deathwing 
   
Made in ie
Jovial Junkatrukk Driver





Angloland

 Hlaine Larkin mk2 wrote:
They did start to mobilise and the BEF did land in France and advance towards the germans before getting beaten back but for the most part they were peace time armies in Europe apart from the Germans. The 6 years of Appeasement gave some time but they were still updating equipment and recruiting men which takes time and Poland was on the other side of Europe.


Neither England or France attack Germany before you were attacked by them.
Both England and France promised us that they would attack Germany if they attacked us.
Not only did you Betray us then, you even sold us (and a few other countries) to the USSR after the war.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/09/30 20:49:51


motyak wrote:[...] Yes, the mods are illuminati, and yakface, lego and dakka dakka itself are the 3 points of the triangle.
 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka




 Daemonhammer wrote:
 Hlaine Larkin mk2 wrote:
They did start to mobilise and the BEF did land in France and advance towards the germans before getting beaten back but for the most part they were peace time armies in Europe apart from the Germans. The 6 years of Appeasement gave some time but they were still updating equipment and recruiting men which takes time and Poland was on the other side of Europe.


Neither England or France attack Germany before you were attacked by them.
Both England and France promised us that they would attack Germany if they attacked us.
Not only did you Betray us then, you even sold us (and a few other countries) to the USSR after the war.


It was definitely not a glittering page in our history.
   
Made in de
Oberleutnant




Germany

 Daemonhammer wrote:
 Hlaine Larkin mk2 wrote:
They did start to mobilise and the BEF did land in France and advance towards the germans before getting beaten back but for the most part they were peace time armies in Europe apart from the Germans. The 6 years of Appeasement gave some time but they were still updating equipment and recruiting men which takes time and Poland was on the other side of Europe.


Neither England or France attack Germany before you were attacked by them.
Both England and France promised us that they would attack Germany if they attacked us.
Not only did you Betray us then, you even sold us (and a few other countries) to the USSR after the war.


Not quite. There were some minor French attacks on Germany during the polish campagin.

However you are mostly right, although you can expect someone to die for anothers freedom, it would be just heroic.


 
   
Made in gb
Junior Officer with Laspistol




Perth/Glasgow

Relapse wrote:
 Daemonhammer wrote:
 Hlaine Larkin mk2 wrote:
They did start to mobilise and the BEF did land in France and advance towards the germans before getting beaten back but for the most part they were peace time armies in Europe apart from the Germans. The 6 years of Appeasement gave some time but they were still updating equipment and recruiting men which takes time and Poland was on the other side of Europe.


Neither England or France attack Germany before you were attacked by them.
Both England and France promised us that they would attack Germany if they attacked us.
Not only did you Betray us then, you even sold us (and a few other countries) to the USSR after the war.


It was definitely not a glittering page in our history.


Yet Britain and France weren't able to launch an effective strike at any of the German forces
- The Maginot Line was directly opposite the Rhineland, the only French-German border,
-The rest was neutral or opposing countries (Netherlands/Belgium to the north, Italy and Switzerland to the south)

Without either exposing and overextending themselves by trying to fight the Dutch before the Germans as the forces available at the time were still deploying with antiquated technology.

And after the war the USSR would of had a war if we and tried to get more than what we ended up and all that would of succeeded in doing was to have the cold war between Europe and the US instead fo the USSR and Nato

Currently debating whether to study for my exams or paint some Deathwing 
   
Made in de
Oberleutnant




Germany

Not quite. An allied invasion would have been successful in the oppinion of the most historians:

The most german forces were in Poland (to fasten the campaign to rush back to the French broder) (only 23 divisions remained, facing 110 allied divisions).

The Wehrmacht was weaker in `39 than `40 and most ,,Blitz" lessons not learned.

However it was a matter a critical timing. It was smart to put the best troops into Poland to end the campain fast, because decisions need time.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/09/30 21:21:48



 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka




 Hlaine Larkin mk2 wrote:
Relapse wrote:
 Daemonhammer wrote:
 Hlaine Larkin mk2 wrote:
They did start to mobilise and the BEF did land in France and advance towards the germans before getting beaten back but for the most part they were peace time armies in Europe apart from the Germans. The 6 years of Appeasement gave some time but they were still updating equipment and recruiting men which takes time and Poland was on the other side of Europe.


Neither England or France attack Germany before you were attacked by them.
Both England and France promised us that they would attack Germany if they attacked us.
Not only did you Betray us then, you even sold us (and a few other countries) to the USSR after the war.


It was definitely not a glittering page in our history.


Yet Britain and France weren't able to launch an effective strike at any of the German forces
- The Maginot Line was directly opposite the Rhineland, the only French-German border,
-The rest was neutral or opposing countries (Netherlands/Belgium to the north, Italy and Switzerland to the south)

Without either exposing and overextending themselves by trying to fight the Dutch before the Germans as the forces available at the time were still deploying with antiquated technology.

And after the war the USSR would of had a war if we and tried to get more than what we ended up and all that would of succeeded in doing was to have the cold war between Europe and the US instead fo the USSR and Nato


One of the truly severe mistakes was letting the Germans get their hooks into Czechoslavakia without a fight and in fact, forcing the Czechs to give up extremely defensible areas.

http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005688
   
Made in ca
Trustworthy Shas'vre




Yeah, the Czechs probably could have blocked a German advance had they been allowed to fight.

There were also plans in motion within Germany to take Hitler down at the time, all they wanted was British support . . .

Tau and Space Wolves since 5th Edition. 
   
Made in gb
Junior Officer with Laspistol




Perth/Glasgow

Spoiler:
Relapse wrote:
 Hlaine Larkin mk2 wrote:
Relapse wrote:
 Daemonhammer wrote:
 Hlaine Larkin mk2 wrote:
They did start to mobilise and the BEF did land in France and advance towards the germans before getting beaten back but for the most part they were peace time armies in Europe apart from the Germans. The 6 years of Appeasement gave some time but they were still updating equipment and recruiting men which takes time and Poland was on the other side of Europe.


Neither England or France attack Germany before you were attacked by them.
Both England and France promised us that they would attack Germany if they attacked us.
Not only did you Betray us then, you even sold us (and a few other countries) to the USSR after the war.


It was definitely not a glittering page in our history.


Yet Britain and France weren't able to launch an effective strike at any of the German forces
- The Maginot Line was directly opposite the Rhineland, the only French-German border,
-The rest was neutral or opposing countries (Netherlands/Belgium to the north, Italy and Switzerland to the south)

Without either exposing and overextending themselves by trying to fight the Dutch before the Germans as the forces available at the time were still deploying with antiquated technology.

And after the war the USSR would of had a war if we and tried to get more than what we ended up and all that would of succeeded in doing was to have the cold war between Europe and the US instead fo the USSR and Nato


One of the truly severe mistakes was letting the Germans get their hooks into Czechoslavakia without a fight and in fact, forcing the Czechs to give up extremely defensible areas.

http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005688


The Sudetenland incident was probably one of the lowest points in British history in the past 100 years, it was an absolute disgrace but at the time Britain had a peacetime army with no real technology to speak of, the years of appeasement bought Britain enough time to update thei technology and start training new soldiers so that when war came we weren't destroyed and invaded by the Germans

Currently debating whether to study for my exams or paint some Deathwing 
   
Made in ie
Jovial Junkatrukk Driver





Angloland

Hlaine Larkin mk2 wrote:Yet Britain and France weren't able to launch an effective strike at any of the German forces
- The Maginot Line was directly opposite the Rhineland, the only French-German border,
-The rest was neutral or opposing countries (Netherlands/Belgium to the north, Italy and Switzerland to the south)

Dont give me that , both Chamberlain and Lebrun were too afraid to do anything, the Appeasement proves that.

Hlaine Larkin mk2 wrote:
Without either exposing and overextending themselves by trying to fight the Dutch before the Germans as the forces available at the time were still deploying with antiquated technology.

Um, go trough the Maginot line straight into germany?
The french tanks were actually more advanced than the german! and you Brits did fine when it came to defending your own country. Maybe thats what its about, you probably tought "Oh its not our country, so it dosent matter as much."

Hlaine Larkin mk2 wrote:And after the war the USSR would of had a war if we and tried to get more than what we ended up and all that would of succeeded in doing was to have the cold war between Europe and the US instead fo the USSR and Nato

You AGREED to let the USSR take over the countries! And none of us had any say in it!

motyak wrote:[...] Yes, the mods are illuminati, and yakface, lego and dakka dakka itself are the 3 points of the triangle.
 
   
Made in us
The Conquerer






Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios

The allies only advantage in military hardware was in tanks. In other areas the Germans were equal if not superior. Especially in tactics.

German Tanks may have been small, but they used them to the greatest effect. Unlike the allied "land battleship" techniques that tried to apply navel tactics onto armored vehicles.

The only real disadvantage the Germans had was that they didn't have the manpower or resources to do what they did. Hitler also was not a great tactician, his general were. When he took over direct command is when things went south.

Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines

Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.

MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! 
   
Made in gb
Junior Officer with Laspistol




Perth/Glasgow

 Daemonhammer wrote:
Hlaine Larkin mk2 wrote:Yet Britain and France weren't able to launch an effective strike at any of the German forces
- The Maginot Line was directly opposite the Rhineland, the only French-German border,
-The rest was neutral or opposing countries (Netherlands/Belgium to the north, Italy and Switzerland to the south)

Dont give me that , both Chamberlain and Lebrun were too afraid to do anything, the Appeasement proves that.


Appeasement although dispicable for what happened under it bought enough time for Britain to mobilise and update their armed forces
 Daemonhammer wrote:

Hlaine Larkin mk2 wrote:
Without either exposing and overextending themselves by trying to fight the Dutch before the Germans as the forces available at the time were still deploying with antiquated technology.

Um, go trough the Maginot line straight into germany?
The french tanks were actually more advanced than the german! and you Brits did fine when it came to defending your own country. Maybe thats what its about, you probably tought "Oh its not our country, so it dosent matter as much."


The French generals relied on the Defensive strength of the Maginot line and most of the military tactician outside of Nazi Germany hadn't advanced beyond trench warfare and as a result they were never going to attack the Rhineland as the Rhine's bridges could of been rendered useless by the defending Germans stalling the advance until they could re-deploy their superior airforce to neutralise the armour

 Daemonhammer wrote:

Hlaine Larkin mk2 wrote:And after the war the USSR would of had a war if we and tried to get more than what we ended up and all that would of succeeded in doing was to have the cold war between Europe and the US instead fo the USSR and Nato

You AGREED to let the USSR take over the countries! And none of us had any say in it!


Because anything else would of resulted in another war

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/09/30 21:30:27


Currently debating whether to study for my exams or paint some Deathwing 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka




The sad thing about Czechoslavakia was that Hitler's generals were scared of the Czech army and Hitler's bluff would have been shown for what it was if he were told to go take a flying
It would be interesting to see what would have happened if it were Churchill in charge during this time instead of Chamberlain.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/09/30 21:32:13


 
   
Made in gb
Junior Officer with Laspistol




Perth/Glasgow

but at the time the desicion to give the Sudetenland to Germany was hailed by most of western Europe who praised Chamberlain because he got the promise from Hitler that there would be no war

Currently debating whether to study for my exams or paint some Deathwing 
   
Made in ie
Jovial Junkatrukk Driver





Angloland

 Grey Templar wrote:
The allies only advantage in military hardware was in tanks. In other areas the Germans were equal if not superior. Especially in tactics.
German Tanks may have been small, but they used them to the greatest effect. Unlike the allied "land battleship" techniques that tried to apply navel tactics onto armored vehicles.
The only real disadvantage the Germans had was that they didn't have the manpower or resources to do what they did. Hitler also was not a great tactician, his general were. When he took over direct command is when things went south.


Like i stated, Nearly 80% of German forces were present in the east at the start of WWII. Hitler anticipated that the French And English would be too afraid to attack them. He took a gambit (again) and he succeeded.

If they attacked Germany instead of acting like cowards, they would have won before Christmas and WWII would not escalate into what it did. (Remember that in 1939 WWII was still confined to Europe.)

motyak wrote:[...] Yes, the mods are illuminati, and yakface, lego and dakka dakka itself are the 3 points of the triangle.
 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka




 Hlaine Larkin mk2 wrote:
but at the time the desicion to give the Sudetenland to Germany was hailed by most of western Europe who praised Chamberlain because he got the promise from Hitler that there would be no war


This is true. Historical hindsight is almost always 20/20, but Churchil pretty well had the bastard pegged.
   
Made in us
The Conquerer






Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios

 Daemonhammer wrote:
 Grey Templar wrote:
The allies only advantage in military hardware was in tanks. In other areas the Germans were equal if not superior. Especially in tactics.
German Tanks may have been small, but they used them to the greatest effect. Unlike the allied "land battleship" techniques that tried to apply navel tactics onto armored vehicles.
The only real disadvantage the Germans had was that they didn't have the manpower or resources to do what they did. Hitler also was not a great tactician, his general were. When he took over direct command is when things went south.


Like i stated, Nearly 80% of German forces were present in the east at the start of WWII. Hitler anticipated that the French And English would be too afraid to attack them. He took a gambit (again) and he succeeded.

If they attacked Germany instead of acting like cowards, they would have won before Christmas and WWII would not escalate into what it did. (Remember that in 1939 WWII was still confined to Europe.)


True, I mearly was giving some reasons the Allies didn't attack.

And its not like they could have done this in secret. if they had made a move the Germans would have immediatly pulled their forces back to face the threat, and the stalemate would likely have continued.

Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines

Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.

MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! 
   
Made in gb
Junior Officer with Laspistol




Perth/Glasgow

 Daemonhammer wrote:
 Grey Templar wrote:
The allies only advantage in military hardware was in tanks. In other areas the Germans were equal if not superior. Especially in tactics.
German Tanks may have been small, but they used them to the greatest effect. Unlike the allied "land battleship" techniques that tried to apply navel tactics onto armored vehicles.
The only real disadvantage the Germans had was that they didn't have the manpower or resources to do what they did. Hitler also was not a great tactician, his general were. When he took over direct command is when things went south.


Like i stated, Nearly 80% of German forces were present in the east at the start of WWII. Hitler anticipated that the French And English would be too afraid to attack them. He took a gambit (again) and he succeeded.

If they attacked Germany instead of acting like cowards, they would have won before Christmas and WWII would not escalate into what it did. (Remember that in 1939 WWII was still confined to Europe.)


Once again he French's prefered tactic was to sit back and block Germany's advances by way of the Maginot Line,

You also forget that they didn't have the internet back then and as a result didn't know the German distribution of forces or a perfectly accurate vision of all the options final results

Currently debating whether to study for my exams or paint some Deathwing 
   
Made in ie
Jovial Junkatrukk Driver





Angloland

 Hlaine Larkin mk2 wrote:
 Daemonhammer wrote:
Hlaine Larkin mk2 wrote:Yet Britain and France weren't able to launch an effective strike at any of the German forces
- The Maginot Line was directly opposite the Rhineland, the only French-German border,
-The rest was neutral or opposing countries (Netherlands/Belgium to the north, Italy and Switzerland to the south)

Dont give me that , both Chamberlain and Lebrun were too afraid to do anything, the Appeasement proves that.


Appeasement although dispicable for what happened under it bought enough time for Britain to mobilise and update their armed forces

And still all you managed to do in the early stage of the war was to defend your own country.


 Daemonhammer wrote:

Hlaine Larkin mk2 wrote:
Without either exposing and overextending themselves by trying to fight the Dutch before the Germans as the forces available at the time were still deploying with antiquated technology.

Um, go trough the Maginot line straight into germany?
The french tanks were actually more advanced than the german! and you Brits did fine when it came to defending your own country. Maybe thats what its about, you probably tought "Oh its not our country, so it dosent matter as much."


The French generals relied on the Defensive strength of the Maginot line and most of the military tactician outside of Nazi Germany hadn't advanced beyond trench warfare and as a result they were never going to attack the Rhineland as the Rhine's bridges could of been rendered useless by the defending Germans stalling the advance until they could re-deploy their superior airforce to neutralise the armour

So you sat and waited for the germans to come.


 Daemonhammer wrote:

Hlaine Larkin mk2 wrote:And after the war the USSR would of had a war if we and tried to get more than what we ended up and all that would of succeeded in doing was to have the cold war between Europe and the US instead fo the USSR and Nato

You AGREED to let the USSR take over the countries! And none of us had any say in it!


Because anything else would of resulted in another war

Not if you tried negotiation instead of selling countries to stalin.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
 Hlaine Larkin mk2 wrote:
 Daemonhammer wrote:
 Grey Templar wrote:
The allies only advantage in military hardware was in tanks. In other areas the Germans were equal if not superior. Especially in tactics.
German Tanks may have been small, but they used them to the greatest effect. Unlike the allied "land battleship" techniques that tried to apply navel tactics onto armored vehicles.
The only real disadvantage the Germans had was that they didn't have the manpower or resources to do what they did. Hitler also was not a great tactician, his general were. When he took over direct command is when things went south.


Like i stated, Nearly 80% of German forces were present in the east at the start of WWII. Hitler anticipated that the French And English would be too afraid to attack them. He took a gambit (again) and he succeeded.

If they attacked Germany instead of acting like cowards, they would have won before Christmas and WWII would not escalate into what it did. (Remember that in 1939 WWII was still confined to Europe.)


Once again he French's prefered tactic was to sit back and block Germany's advances by way of the Maginot Line,

You also forget that they didn't have the internet back then and as a result didn't know the German distribution of forces or a perfectly accurate vision of all the options final results


But my point that if they attacked the war would have been won before Christmas.
Even if the german forces were split evenly you would have still won! our army was the 3 third largest allied army in the early stages. You have helped, it would take the pressure off us and we would have pushed them back eventually.
Instead you betrayed us.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/09/30 21:47:21


motyak wrote:[...] Yes, the mods are illuminati, and yakface, lego and dakka dakka itself are the 3 points of the triangle.
 
   
Made in us
[DCM]
Tilter at Windmills






Manchester, NH

Your phrasing seems to hold Dakka members responsible for decisions made in WW2.

I'm pretty sure no one posting here was in charge of any of these nations' militaries or foreign policy seventy years ago, so do you think you might cool it with the accusatory-sounding use of "you"?

Adepticon 2015: Team Tourney Best Imperial Team- Team Ironguts, Adepticon 2014: Team Tourney 6th/120, Best Imperial Team- Cold Steel Mercs 2, 40k Championship Qualifier ~25/226
More 2010-2014 GT/Major RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 78-20-9 // SW: 8-1-2 (Golden Ticket with SW), BA: 29-9-4 6th Ed GT & RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 36-12-2 // BA: 11-4-1 // SW: 1-1-1
DT:70S++++G(FAQ)M++B++I+Pw40k99#+D+++A+++/sWD105R+++T(T)DM+++++
A better way to score Sportsmanship in tournaments
The 40K Rulebook & Codex FAQs. You should have these bookmarked if you play this game.
The Dakka Dakka Forum Rules You agreed to abide by these when you signed up.

Maelstrom's Edge! 
   
Made in gb
Junior Officer with Laspistol




Perth/Glasgow

 Daemonhammer wrote:
 Hlaine Larkin mk2 wrote:
 Daemonhammer wrote:
Hlaine Larkin mk2 wrote:Yet Britain and France weren't able to launch an effective strike at any of the German forces
- The Maginot Line was directly opposite the Rhineland, the only French-German border,
-The rest was neutral or opposing countries (Netherlands/Belgium to the north, Italy and Switzerland to the south)

Dont give me that , both Chamberlain and Lebrun were too afraid to do anything, the Appeasement proves that.


Appeasement although dispicable for what happened under it bought enough time for Britain to mobilise and update their armed forces

And still all you managed to do in the early stage of the war was to defend your own country.


we were very nearly defeated, we were saved by Hitler demanding that the Luftewaffe target cities instead of airfields, if that didn't happen Britain would of been invaded and conquered


 Daemonhammer wrote:

Hlaine Larkin mk2 wrote:
Without either exposing and overextending themselves by trying to fight the Dutch before the Germans as the forces available at the time were still deploying with antiquated technology.

Um, go trough the Maginot line straight into germany?
The french tanks were actually more advanced than the german! and you Brits did fine when it came to defending your own country. Maybe thats what its about, you probably tought "Oh its not our country, so it dosent matter as much."


The French generals relied on the Defensive strength of the Maginot line and most of the military tactician outside of Nazi Germany hadn't advanced beyond trench warfare and as a result they were never going to attack the Rhineland as the Rhine's bridges could of been rendered useless by the defending Germans stalling the advance until they could re-deploy their superior airforce to neutralise the armour

So you sat and waited for the germans to come.


It was the accepted tactic of the time, they still were locked in WW1 thinking


 Daemonhammer wrote:

Hlaine Larkin mk2 wrote:And after the war the USSR would of had a war if we and tried to get more than what we ended up and all that would of succeeded in doing was to have the cold war between Europe and the US instead fo the USSR and Nato

You AGREED to let the USSR take over the countries! And none of us had any say in it!


Because anything else would of resulted in another war

Not if you tried negotiation instead of selling countries to stalin.

Chances are Stalin would not of agreed to the negotiations, Churchill also had more of a hate for communism and the USSR than fascism and Nazi Germany. The Soviets were merely allies of convenience and situation. The USSR still had the available man-power and lack of morals to continue the war against the other allies

Currently debating whether to study for my exams or paint some Deathwing 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka




I think now the best thing we can do is figure out how to help each other up.
We can't replay history, but we can learn enough from it hopefully to make a better future.
   
Made in ie
Jovial Junkatrukk Driver





Angloland

 Mannahnin wrote:
Your phrasing seems to hold Dakka members responsible for decisions made in WW2.

I'm pretty sure no one posting here was in charge of any of these nations' militaries or foreign policy seventy years ago, so do you think you might cool it with the accusatory-sounding use of "you"?


Since he was defending his country from the decisions they made, i meant "you" as in his country.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Relapse wrote:
I think now the best thing we can do is figure out how to help each other up.
We can't replay history, but we can learn enough from it hopefully to make a better future.


The thing is the allies betrayed us twice before, sold us to the USSR and because of that our economy is still in a "meh" state.
If Russia invaded Europe (Somewhat unlikely, but the current placement behavior of their armies is "questionable") How would we know if we can trust the Allies?
Of course i dont speak for my entire country, im just pointing out some facts.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2012/09/30 22:06:01


motyak wrote:[...] Yes, the mods are illuminati, and yakface, lego and dakka dakka itself are the 3 points of the triangle.
 
   
Made in ca
Aspirant Tech-Adept






Aschknas, Sturmkrieg Sektor

 Daemonhammer wrote:
In theory you could blame the British and French for causing WWII.
If they kept their promises, and attacked Germany from behind when they invaded Poland the war would have been over before Christmas and wouldnt have evolved into a world wide conflict.
But no, they were too afraid of Hitler and just waited, and look what happened, Germans defeated the combined British-French forces faster than the Polish army.



The responsibility still lays with the Germans.

As a discussion grows in length, the probability of a comparison to Matt Ward or Gray Knights approaches one.

Search engine for Warhammer 40,000 websites
Note: Ads are placed by Google since it uses their service. Sturmkrieg does not make any money from the use of this service.

The Vault - Fallout Wiki Wikia still maintains their plagiarized copy 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka




 Daemonhammer wrote:
 Mannahnin wrote:
Your phrasing seems to hold Dakka members responsible for decisions made in WW2.

I'm pretty sure no one posting here was in charge of any of these nations' militaries or foreign policy seventy years ago, so do you think you might cool it with the accusatory-sounding use of "you"?


Since he was defending his country from the decisions they made, i meant "you" as in his country.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Relapse wrote:
I think now the best thing we can do is figure out how to help each other up.
We can't replay history, but we can learn enough from it hopefully to make a better future.


The thing is the allies betrayed us twice before, sold us to the USSR and because of that our economy is still in a "meh" state.
If Russia invaded Europe (Somewhat unlikely, but the current placement behavior of their armies is "questionable") How would we know if we can trust the Allies?
Of course i dont speak for my entire country, im just pointing out some facts.


You're in a historically bad location, being a crossroads and all and I wish there were better options for you than having your country be a potential battlefield.
I really can't answer your question with certainty, but I don't think we would stand back and let you go under the bus based on the history behind just this very conversation.
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut






Leerstetten, Germany

Wasn't the German plan to go around the border into France pretty much the same plan as in World War 1?
   
Made in us
The Conquerer






Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios

Well, no. The Maginot line was built after WW1 as a precaution against further German invasion.

Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines

Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.

MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! 
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut






Leerstetten, Germany

But what route did Germany take into France during World War 1?
   
Made in gb
Junior Officer with Laspistol




Perth/Glasgow

It was slightly further to the north IIRC

Currently debating whether to study for my exams or paint some Deathwing 
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut






Leerstetten, Germany

Found it:



I just always thought it was a weird response. Germany invades France during WW1 by largely ignoring their shared border, so to prevent another attack France reinforces the border only for Germany to ignore it again during WW2.
   
 
Forum Index » Off-Topic Forum
Go to: