Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/19 04:47:29
Subject: Re:Movies you love that contain "little" inaccuracies that bother you
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
Anime High School
|
Experiment 626 wrote:The Harry Potter films got horrendous as they moved forwards. I found the 2-parter 7th film was barely watchable as a number of important details had deviated so far from the book!
Worst of all, they left out Peeves!!! 
I speed-read through the 7th book, and finished it four days after it was released, which is fairly quick for a huge book like that, although I'm sure plenty of people finished it same-day. I don't really remember too much about it, besides the part where they find the sword under the ice. That is literally the only thing I remembered while watching the movie(s). Don't Speed-Read!
Anyway! My point... ah. The movies totally wipe your memory of the books, and if you're one of the unfortunate souls who reads the book after seeing the movie, then you're probably wasting your time, because the movie is burned into your mind!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/19 06:03:40
Subject: Movies you love that contain "little" inaccuracies that bother you
|
 |
The Dread Evil Lord Varlak
|
KalashnikovMarine wrote:My thoughts exactly, the key thing to remember with Mel Gibson is that he NEVER lets reality get in the way of a good story. His treatment of the American Revolution and Brigadier General Francis Marion "The Swamp Fox" (who my Infinity unit is named after as it happens) got a similar do over. The difference being that The Patriot had terrible history and was a terrible movie in general. Not though, that Gibson only starred in The Patriot, he didn't produce, direct, or contribute to the screenplay (and he only agreed to act in it after they dumped a gak ton of money on his doorstep). Gibson is a crazy ass son of a bitch, and his only interest in history is in selling his particular brand of crazy world view, but the guy actually understands how to make a decent film. Which can't be said for Roland Emmerich and the team behind The Patriot.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/11/19 06:04:25
“We may observe that the government in a civilized country is much more expensive than in a barbarous one; and when we say that one government is more expensive than another, it is the same as if we said that that one country is farther advanced in improvement than another. To say that the government is expensive and the people not oppressed is to say that the people are rich.”
Adam Smith, who must have been some kind of leftie or something. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/19 06:34:43
Subject: Movies you love that contain "little" inaccuracies that bother you
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
KalashnikovMarine wrote: Captain Fantastic wrote:In Dr.No, M (or was it Q?) gives Bond a Walther PPK in .32 colt, because he thinks his Beretta (in 9mm) is rubbish, and that the PPK is superior. Opinions aside, in Skyfall, he's given a PPK-S in 9mm.
I thought this was a bit of a betrayal of character. Bond almost exclusively uses a .32 PPK. I can't complain too much. At least it's a PPK, not that P99 monstrosity.
The PPK Bond got in Skyfall was 9mm Short, which is to say .380 ACP. Walther PPKs are not produced in 9mm Parabellum. This is the more modern ammunition selection for the weapon and isn't really a betrayal any more then when Bond ditched his original Beretta 418 in the books. It's just an update for the modern era while keeping fairly true to the original weapons.
What Cpt Fantastic is referring to is really an error in props. The scene in Dr. No corresponds with the scene in the book where Bond's Modelo 418 is replaced by the PPK in 7.65mm. replacing a 25 ACP with a 32 ACP isn't exactly a monumental change in firepower. The J frame he is also given in the book on the other hand is, the movies never reflected both guns, but those who read the Fleming novels would have noticed: Bond carried a revolver in *nearly* every book, if not all of them.
|
Avatar 720 wrote:You see, to Auston, everyone is a Death Star; there's only one way you can take it and that's through a small gap at the back.
Come check out my Blood Angels,Crimson Fists, and coming soon Eldar
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/391013.page
I have conceded that the Eldar page I started in P&M is their legitimate home. Free Candy! Updated 10/19.
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/391553.page
Powder Burns wrote:what they need to make is a fullsize leatherman, like 14" long folded, with a bone saw, notches for bowstring, signaling flare, electrical hand crank generator, bolt cutters.. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/19 07:04:19
Subject: Movies you love that contain "little" inaccuracies that bother you
|
 |
Hallowed Canoness
|
sebster wrote: KalashnikovMarine wrote:My thoughts exactly, the key thing to remember with Mel Gibson is that he NEVER lets reality get in the way of a good story. His treatment of the American Revolution and Brigadier General Francis Marion "The Swamp Fox" (who my Infinity unit is named after as it happens) got a similar do over.
The difference being that The Patriot had terrible history and was a terrible movie in general.
.
That's why I was comparing it to Braveheart, not as a terrible movie, Braveheart is a personal favorite, but the history is a similar level of rubbish.
AustonT wrote: KalashnikovMarine wrote: Captain Fantastic wrote:In Dr.No, M (or was it Q?) gives Bond a Walther PPK in .32 colt, because he thinks his Beretta (in 9mm) is rubbish, and that the PPK is superior. Opinions aside, in Skyfall, he's given a PPK-S in 9mm.
I thought this was a bit of a betrayal of character. Bond almost exclusively uses a .32 PPK. I can't complain too much. At least it's a PPK, not that P99 monstrosity.
The PPK Bond got in Skyfall was 9mm Short, which is to say .380 ACP. Walther PPKs are not produced in 9mm Parabellum. This is the more modern ammunition selection for the weapon and isn't really a betrayal any more then when Bond ditched his original Beretta 418 in the books. It's just an update for the modern era while keeping fairly true to the original weapons.
What Cpt Fantastic is referring to is really an error in props. The scene in Dr. No corresponds with the scene in the book where Bond's Modelo 418 is replaced by the PPK in 7.65mm. replacing a 25 ACP with a 32 ACP isn't exactly a monumental change in firepower. The J frame he is also given in the book on the other hand is, the movies never reflected both guns, but those who read the Fleming novels would have noticed: Bond carried a revolver in *nearly* every book, if not all of them.
So what's the real issue then? The lack of Bond's .38 revolver at all? or what?
|
I beg of you sarge let me lead the charge when the battle lines are drawn
Lemme at least leave a good hoof beat they'll remember loud and long
SoB, IG, SM, SW, Nec, Cus, Tau, FoW Germans, Team Yankee Marines, Battletech Clan Wolf, Mercs
DR:90-SG+M+B+I+Pw40k12+ID+++A+++/are/WD-R+++T(S)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/19 07:45:15
Subject: Movies you love that contain "little" inaccuracies that bother you
|
 |
Lord Commander in a Plush Chair
|
I know Bond drives some gadget-filled cars in the films but there's no way on earth his DB5 could outpace a Ferrari 355 in Goldeneye.
Thinking about innacuracies involving cars is the way gear changes work in Hollywood. Maybe it's because most films are american made and the American public largely drive automatics? But even films made for car buffs break the laws of physics. How often do you see two cars going flat out side by side in a film only for the hero to drop a gear an roar ahead? That just isn't how cars work, you drop a gear while going in top at a higher gear and at best you'll slow the car down, at worst the engine will scream in agony as the cylinders all break free in an attemp to search for life outside the bonnet.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/11/19 07:53:50
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/19 07:58:16
Subject: Movies you love that contain "little" inaccuracies that bother you
|
 |
The Dread Evil Lord Varlak
|
KalashnikovMarine wrote:That's why I was comparing it to Braveheart, not as a terrible movie, Braveheart is a personal favorite, but the history is a similar level of rubbish.
Cool. Me too, by the way.
|
“We may observe that the government in a civilized country is much more expensive than in a barbarous one; and when we say that one government is more expensive than another, it is the same as if we said that that one country is farther advanced in improvement than another. To say that the government is expensive and the people not oppressed is to say that the people are rich.”
Adam Smith, who must have been some kind of leftie or something. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/19 16:41:58
Subject: Movies you love that contain "little" inaccuracies that bother you
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
Dundee, Scotland/Dharahn, Saudi Arabia
|
sebster wrote:
the sheer nonsense of a Scottish noble running talking about American style freedom in the middle of the 13th century.
While I agree that Braveheart is a historical travesty, the idea of "American style freedom" is far from nonsense,
American style freedom has its roots in Scotland.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Arbroath
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2012/11/19 16:43:41
If the thought of something makes me giggle for longer than 15 seconds, I am to assume that I am not allowed to do it. item 87, skippys list
DC:70S+++G+++M+++B+++I++Pw40k86/f#-D+++++A++++/cWD86R+++++T(D)DM++ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/19 17:14:22
Subject: Movies you love that contain "little" inaccuracies that bother you
|
 |
Alessio Cavatore
|
I recently saw a historical film I enjoyed a great deal. It was called "Brave" the really irritating historical inaccuracy surrounds bears. Everything else about the film was masterful.
Everyone knows that Scottish women turn into bears with age not magic. Or like Magnus the Red says, "There are no bears in the Highlands."
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/19 17:23:44
Subject: Movies you love that contain "little" inaccuracies that bother you
|
 |
Lord Commander in a Plush Chair
|
Gladiator is largely fiction, Commodus was bad but not really in the way shown. Also the gladiators equipment store appears to include both Sutton Hoo and Greek Hoplite helmets.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/19 17:42:33
Subject: Movies you love that contain "little" inaccuracies that bother you
|
 |
Battlefield Tourist
MN (Currently in WY)
|
Yeah, the Gladiator type sin the movie Gladiator were all over the place and didn;t conform to any known standards.
However, it is Ridley Scott, and he does make cool movies so I forgive him. I will even forgive him for Kingdom of Heaven.
|
Support Blood and Spectacles Publishing:
https://www.patreon.com/Bloodandspectaclespublishing |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/19 17:46:38
Subject: Movies you love that contain "little" inaccuracies that bother you
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Easy E wrote:Yeah, the Gladiator type sin the movie Gladiator were all over the place and didn;t conform to any known standards.
However, it is Ridley Scott, and he does make cool movies so I forgive him. I will even forgive him for Kingdom of Heaven.
There is nothing wrong with Kingdom of Heaven.
YOU TAKE THAT BACK!
|
Avatar 720 wrote:You see, to Auston, everyone is a Death Star; there's only one way you can take it and that's through a small gap at the back.
Come check out my Blood Angels,Crimson Fists, and coming soon Eldar
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/391013.page
I have conceded that the Eldar page I started in P&M is their legitimate home. Free Candy! Updated 10/19.
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/391553.page
Powder Burns wrote:what they need to make is a fullsize leatherman, like 14" long folded, with a bone saw, notches for bowstring, signaling flare, electrical hand crank generator, bolt cutters.. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/19 23:00:49
Subject: Movies you love that contain "little" inaccuracies that bother you
|
 |
Evasive Pleasureseeker
Lost in a blizzard, somewhere near Toronto
|
AustonT wrote: Easy E wrote:Yeah, the Gladiator type sin the movie Gladiator were all over the place and didn;t conform to any known standards.
However, it is Ridley Scott, and he does make cool movies so I forgive him. I will even forgive him for Kingdom of Heaven.
There is nothing wrong with Kingdom of Heaven.
YOU TAKE THAT BACK!
Well, Mr.Scott admitted that the opening of Balion's story is pure fiction... His father actually found him already in Italy - never in France as a Blacksmith. Plus, Balion also had IIRC at least two younger brothers who played a big role in helping him defend Jerusalem.
Balion himself was also captured during the Christian massacre at the Battle of Hatim and actually negotiated his release with Saladin to return and lead the defense of the Holy City.
It's completely unknown if Sibilla did kill her son. All that is known is that her son was a sickly child and died within about 8 months of assuming the throne. Scott went with the idea of Sibilla poisoning her son as a mercey to spare him the pain and suffering of living as her brother had.
He simply found it too distasteful that she would have maybe killed him as a means to gain power herself, because she was already the Queen Regeant, (and thus already effectively had the run of the city), and that it would be far too cold and sinister.
The Second Crusade is actually pretty well documented and both the Christian & Muslim accounts are pretty similar.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/20 02:16:00
Subject: Movies you love that contain "little" inaccuracies that bother you
|
 |
Hallowed Canoness
|
ALL the Crusades are actually pretty well documented. It's not quite the modern era where we have thousands of personal accounts of various battles and conflicts, but educated men on both sides put pen to paper quite a lot from the first conflict on.
|
I beg of you sarge let me lead the charge when the battle lines are drawn
Lemme at least leave a good hoof beat they'll remember loud and long
SoB, IG, SM, SW, Nec, Cus, Tau, FoW Germans, Team Yankee Marines, Battletech Clan Wolf, Mercs
DR:90-SG+M+B+I+Pw40k12+ID+++A+++/are/WD-R+++T(S)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/20 02:30:33
Subject: Movies you love that contain "little" inaccuracies that bother you
|
 |
The Dread Evil Lord Varlak
|
No. The treaty possibly makes a claim for popular sovereignty (though as your link points out, it is debatable whether people at that time had such a concept), but that's all. This means there existed a notion that Scotland should have a Scottish king, and it might possibly have meant that king should be popular among the Scottish people and barons, but it certainly doesn't in any way make an argument for the rights of common people to be left alone by their lords and barons, as the movie pretended.
|
“We may observe that the government in a civilized country is much more expensive than in a barbarous one; and when we say that one government is more expensive than another, it is the same as if we said that that one country is farther advanced in improvement than another. To say that the government is expensive and the people not oppressed is to say that the people are rich.”
Adam Smith, who must have been some kind of leftie or something. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/20 04:54:50
Subject: Re:Movies you love that contain "little" inaccuracies that bother you
|
 |
Ultramarine Librarian with Freaky Familiar
|
If Star Wars was scientifically accurate, half of the movies would be dead silent. Same goes for many Sci-fi movies.... but I think that argument has been done to death.
|
Thought for the day: Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment.
30k Ultramarines: 2000 pts
Bolt Action Germans: ~1200 pts
AOS Stormcast: Just starting.
The Empire : ~60-70 models.
1500 pts
: My Salamanders painting blog 16 Infantry and 2 Vehicles done so far! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/21 19:38:58
Subject: Re:Movies you love that contain "little" inaccuracies that bother you
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
Kamloops, BC
|
TheCustomLime wrote:If Star Wars was scientifically accurate, half of the movies would be dead silent. Same goes for many Sci-fi movies.... but I think that argument has been done to death.
Star Wars isn't sci-fi it's science fantasy it's not meant to be scientific because that's not what's important about the movie.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/21 19:45:54
Subject: Movies you love that contain "little" inaccuracies that bother you
|
 |
Androgynous Daemon Prince of Slaanesh
|
Another to add to my list: I watched 8 Crazy Nights last night, and the scene where Davey (Sandler) freezes Whitey into a poopsicle...how does Whitey breath? I enjoy the movie around the holidays, don't love it, but it's cute and yes, te breathing thing is the part I have issue with.  I think I need to donate my brain to science...
|
Reality is a nice place to visit, but I'd hate to live there.
Manchu wrote:I'm a Catholic. We eat our God.
Due to work, I can usually only ship any sales or trades out on Saturday morning. Please trade/purchase with this in mind. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/22 02:59:38
Subject: Movies you love that contain "little" inaccuracies that bother you
|
 |
Lone Wolf Sentinel Pilot
|
In Prometheus the alien hologram of Earth should have Pangaea as the continents instead of Earth's current continents. Annoyed the crap out of me and totally took me out of that scene for a few seconds. And it would have been an easy thing to correct.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/22 03:16:48
Subject: Movies you love that contain "little" inaccuracies that bother you
|
 |
The Dread Evil Lord Varlak
|
GalacticDefender wrote:In Prometheus the alien hologram of Earth should have Pangaea as the continents instead of Earth's current continents. Annoyed the crap out of me and totally took me out of that scene for a few seconds. And it would have been an easy thing to correct.
You're assuming that aliens arrived on Earth 200 million years ago, and didn't update their maps since then. Given the film states that aliens returned only 2,000 years ago, your claimed error makes no sense.
And, in a movie that was basically non-sensical, that's a very strange thing to complain about.
|
“We may observe that the government in a civilized country is much more expensive than in a barbarous one; and when we say that one government is more expensive than another, it is the same as if we said that that one country is farther advanced in improvement than another. To say that the government is expensive and the people not oppressed is to say that the people are rich.”
Adam Smith, who must have been some kind of leftie or something. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/22 05:44:39
Subject: Movies you love that contain "little" inaccuracies that bother you
|
 |
Pyro Pilot of a Triach Stalker
|
GalacticDefender wrote:In Prometheus the alien hologram of Earth should have Pangaea as the continents instead of Earth's current continents. Annoyed the crap out of me and totally took me out of that scene for a few seconds. And it would have been an easy thing to correct.
There is an unreleased deleted sceen which explains this.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/29 18:35:36
Subject: Movies you love that contain "little" inaccuracies that bother you
|
 |
Furious Raptor
Fort Worth, TX
|
A lot of these nitpicks have little to do with inaccuracies...
|
I out with in both 40k and WHFB.
Co-host of the HittingOn3s Podcast
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/29 18:43:29
Subject: Movies you love that contain "little" inaccuracies that bother you
|
 |
5th God of Chaos! (Yea'rly!)
The Great State of Texas
|
sebster wrote: GalacticDefender wrote:In Prometheus the alien hologram of Earth should have Pangaea as the continents instead of Earth's current continents. Annoyed the crap out of me and totally took me out of that scene for a few seconds. And it would have been an easy thing to correct.
You're assuming that aliens arrived on Earth 200 million years ago, and didn't update their maps since then. Given the film states that aliens returned only 2,000 years ago, your claimed error makes no sense.
And, in a movie that was basically non-sensical, that's a very strange thing to complain about.
You must admit, its a very detailed complaint.
|
-"Wait a minute.....who is that Frazz is talking to in the gallery? Hmmm something is going on here.....Oh.... it seems there is some dispute over video taping of some sort......Frazz is really upset now..........wait a minute......whats he go there.......is it? Can it be?....Frazz has just unleashed his hidden weiner dog from his mini bag, while quoting shakespeares "Let slip the dogs the war!!" GG
-"Don't mind Frazzled. He's just Dakka's crazy old dude locked in the attic. He's harmless. Mostly."
-TBone the Magnificent 1999-2014, Long Live the King!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/29 22:49:51
Subject: Re:Movies you love that contain "little" inaccuracies that bother you
|
 |
Dwarf Runelord Banging an Anvil
Way on back in the deep caves
|
Old film called Battle of the Bulge. I can get past the repainted modern vehicles but while some scenes are shot in winter/snow, other parts are shot in what looks like california desert with no snow in sight.
|
Trust in Iron and Stone |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/29 22:53:13
Subject: Re:Movies you love that contain "little" inaccuracies that bother you
|
 |
The Conquerer
Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios
|
Some of the old Hogan's Heroes episodes had the Germans armed with Tompsons
Then there was the episode with a captured German tank that was just a repainted 105mm Priest.
|
Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines
Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.
MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/11/30 16:16:51
Subject: Movies you love that contain "little" inaccuracies that bother you
|
 |
Boosting Ultramarine Biker
|
In Valkaryie, when the reservists line up NONE of their K98k rifles have cleaning rods.
|
5th Company 2000 pts
615 pts
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/12/01 05:05:34
Subject: Re:Movies you love that contain "little" inaccuracies that bother you
|
 |
[MOD]
Otiose in a Niche
|
yeri wrote:when I went to see Argo I couldn't help but notice that the sets were wrong in some places. for example in the shot of the dog barking Roman architecture can be seen behind the dog. there is no Roman architecture in Iran, but there is in Istanbul where they filmed. also there were too many stars on the CIA memorial wall for the time period, but I can understand the CIA not wanting to remove the stars for a simple movie. the last thing I noticed was that when the student's stormed the embassy at the beginning the weather and tress are wrong for Iran, but not for Toronto. kind of ruined my willing suspension of disbelief, but I still enjoyed it.
And those story boards looked nothing like Jack Kirby's art!
And then there was the ending... which was ultra cheesy and ruined an otherwise good film for me.
But wow, the embassy, the period appliances, the avacoado colored phone, that was some great attention to detail.
And I squeed at the lingering shot of the kid's toys at the end.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|