Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

1hadhq wrote:

Gwar! wrote:So if an FAQ came out and said "Ultramarines actually use BS 10 instead of BS 4" but it was not an Errata, you would use it?

Every smurf would use it.....

And no, there is no change for statlines higher than +1 or -1 and commonly this would be a errata.

Ah but it is "Official", if you don't let me use it, you are a Cheater, and TFG and whatever other mean words I can call "people who play by the rules"!

What about if an FAQ stated "You may douse your opponents models in gasoline and set them alight whenever you cause a wound". Are you "FAQ are Official" people gonna let me do it?

The fact of the matter is, GW say the FAQs are house rules. House rules are not official by Definition. End of Discussion. This whole thread has just been one huge flamebait, and I feel like an idiot for falling for it (again).

A blizzard of more reports.
This thread is closed. Jeez.