Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/04/18 15:36:29
Subject: Flaming attacks: Hand to hand, shooting, or magical?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
If a unit has Flaming Attacks, do they apply only to their close combat attacks? The new Flamers and Horrors, for example, have Flaming Attacks.
Does the Flames of Tzeentch shooting attack count as a Flaming Attack too?
Do the spells cast by Tzeentch wizards count as Flaming?
The main rulebook doesn't make a distinction between which kind of attacks count as Flaming.
Zoned
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/04/18 17:57:11
Subject: Flaming attacks: Hand to hand, shooting, or magical?
|
 |
Deadly Tomb Guard
Payson Utah, USA
|
the attcks should say wether they are flaming, magical, or both
|
I am a Utah man sir, I live across the green, our gang is the jolliest that you have ever seen, Our co-eds are the fairest, ans each one's a shining star, our yell you'l hear it ringing through the mountains near and far.
Who am I sir? a UTAH MAN am I. A UTAH MAN sir, I will be till I die.
KI-YI
Were up to snuff, we never bluff were game for any fuss, no other gang of college men dare meet us in the MUSS. So fill your lungs and sing it out and shout it to the sky, we'll fight for dear old Crimson for a UTAH MAN AM I!!
GO UTES!!!! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/04/18 18:40:37
Subject: Flaming attacks: Hand to hand, shooting, or magical?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
Cherry Hill, NJ
|
All of the Flamer's Close combat attacks and ranged attacks are flaming.
Also note that the spells do not constitute attacks so unless the spell description states they are flaming then they are not flaming.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/04/19 06:06:22
Subject: Flaming attacks: Hand to hand, shooting, or magical?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
To Arion: It simply says in their profile "Flaming Attacks," just as Shadow Warriors will say "skirmishers." It doesn't specify which kind (hand to hand, shooting, or magical.) The main rulebook doesn't specify either.
To Negative Monkey: Spells don't constitute as attacks? So when I cast a spell and zzap a unit with a magic missile I haven't attacked you?
Is there something I'm missing in the rulebook that says magic spells don't count as attacks?
Zoned
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/04/19 11:51:57
Subject: Flaming attacks: Hand to hand, shooting, or magical?
|
 |
Sneaky Kommando
|
Zoned wrote:
To Negative Monkey: Spells don't constitute as attacks? So when I cast a spell and zzap a unit with a magic missile I haven't attacked you?
Is there something I'm missing in the rulebook that says magic spells don't count as attacks?
Zoned
What you're missing is the fact that the magic missile you're casting has completely separate rules than the unit who casts it. Take fireball for example. The spell says it inflicts D6 S4 flaming hits. Notice that the spell specifies that it is flaming (or in this case the lore specifies that all spells are flaming). So, to determine if your spell is a flaming attack, simply look at the spell you're casting and it will tell you. The rule for the unit applies only to ranged or melee attacks it makes.
|
Epic Fail |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/04/21 03:44:22
Subject: Flaming attacks: Hand to hand, shooting, or magical?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
To Dakkalad:
The Flames of Tzeentch shooting power doesn't describe the power as being a Flaming Attack. By your logic, even though the Flamers of Tzeentch have Flaming Attacks, their Flames of Tzeentch shooting attacks wouldn't count as Flaming because the power doesn't specifically say so.
That is fine with me too, by the way, so long as everything is consistent. Either Flaming Attacks only count for Hand to Hand, or they counts as Flaming for Shooting and Magical Attacks as well.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/04/22 01:21:31
Subject: Flaming attacks: Hand to hand, shooting, or magical?
|
 |
Sneaky Kommando
|
Flames of tzeentch is a shooting attack. Flamers have magical attacks. Thus, flames of tzeentch are flaming attacks. Shooting and combat attacks made by flamers are flaming. Magic attacks are NOT necessarily flaming unless the specific spell being cast says they are. Again, FoT is a shooting and not magical attack.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2008/04/22 01:22:59
Epic Fail |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/04/22 03:38:07
Subject: Flaming attacks: Hand to hand, shooting, or magical?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
What? How come in one case the description doesn't need to be specific about being a Flaming Attack, but the unit's rules apply (such as the Flames of Tzeentch shooting attacks) and in another the lack of Flaming in the description (Tzeentch spells) overides the unit's special rules? How is that consistent?
Your argument for the Flames of Tzeentch power is essentially this:
P1 Flamers have Flaming Attacks
P2 The Flames of Tzeentch shooting ability is an attack
C The Flames of Tzeentch shooting ability used by a Flamer is a Flaming Attack
So my argument following your template is this:
P1 Horrors have Flaming Attacks
P2 Spells that cause damage are attacks
C Spells cast by Horrors that cause damage are Flaming Attacks
How can you have it one way but not the other?
Zoned
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/04/22 04:56:47
Subject: Flaming attacks: Hand to hand, shooting, or magical?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
'Cause your P2 is false.
|
Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/04/22 05:20:59
Subject: Flaming attacks: Hand to hand, shooting, or magical?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Care to explain why?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/04/22 17:20:08
Subject: Flaming attacks: Hand to hand, shooting, or magical?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Magic missiles aren't a model's attacks, they're spells.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2008/04/22 17:21:05
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/04/22 17:46:41
Subject: Flaming attacks: Hand to hand, shooting, or magical?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
I guess the problem is that an "attack" isn't clearly defined in the rules.
I don't think it's a stretch to say that a magic missile is an attack.
Why is the Flames of Tzeentch shooting ability an attack? The description doesn't use the work attack.
Zoned
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/04/22 18:39:30
Subject: Flaming attacks: Hand to hand, shooting, or magical?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
Cherry Hill, NJ
|
The only attacks that are defined in the BRB are shooting and close combat. Magic is Magic and under its own rules. Unless the spell's description states that it is Flaming than it does not count as flaming.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/04/23 07:44:05
Subject: Flaming attacks: Hand to hand, shooting, or magical?
|
 |
Sneaky Kommando
|
Negativemoney wrote:The only attacks that are defined in the BRB are shooting and close combat. Magic is Magic and under its own rules. Unless the spell's description states that it is Flaming than it does not count as flaming.
Thank you.
|
Epic Fail |
|
 |
 |
|