Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/25 23:19:59
Subject: Whirlwinds vs. LR Prometheus
|
 |
Foul Dwimmerlaik
|
I am trying to weigh some pros and cons listed below (and anything I may have forgotten to include) regarding which is ultimately more effective points for points in a 2000+ pt format.
Would it be a Whirlwind, or a Land Raider Prometheus?
Both weapons on the vehicles possess the same Str and AP values
Whirlwind Pros:
It is pretty cheap (more than 3x's cheaper than a Prometheus)
Has indirect fire capability
Great GEQ killer
Has multiple missile options
Causes pinning in 5th ed
Can ignore cover if certain missile is used
Maximum 48" range
Whirlwind Cons:
Fairly low armor value
Once its whirlwind launcher is destroyed, its out of weapons
Cannot be used as a transport
Takes up a Heavy Support slot
Cannot fire if it moves
Minimum 12" range
Prometheus Pros:
Has an extraordinary armor value
Great GEQ killer
High rate of twin linked fire
Takes two weapon destroyed results to make it impotent in ranged capacity
Can be used as a transport
Doesn't take up a slot on the FOC as it is taken as a command squad transport
Can fire if it moves 6" or less
Allows reroll of a reserve roll once per turn
Is an assault vehicle
Prometheus Cons:
Its expensive (points wise and monetarily)
No indirect fire
Doesn't cause pinning
Doesn't ignore cover
Maximum 36" range (42" if moving)
Opinions?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/26 05:01:17
Subject: Whirlwinds vs. LR Prometheus
|
 |
Thunderhawk Pilot Dropping From Orbit
wait wait wait wait... huh..?
|
Well as with every part of your army the vehicle you take has to mix well with the rest of your army, and the types of opponents and terrain you expect to deal with. The land raider is smexy cause it soaks up fire for 1-3 turns based on what your opponents anti-armor is like. Also, like you said its twin linked weapons make big weak squads run like hell... which is fun to watch. The whirlwind can lay down a mean field of fire and leave your opponents cowering while you obligingly shoot them of of their misery. Also. If you place it amazingly well. You can use it as bait to lure your opponents into a trap. this is hard to do, as it requires perfect deployment, but i t can be done to devastating effect.
But it really comes down to whether you do assault or shooting more in your army. if your close combat, both are viable options, as the whirlwind can take the place of a anti-infantry devastator squad and using fewer points. While the Land raider can get your troops into action. In shooty armies, the whirlwind is the only way to go. And in all around armies... well i really don't know
|
I play (homegrown chapter)
Win 8
Draw1
Loss1
Follow the word of the Turtle Pie. Bathe your soul in its holy warmth and partake in its delicious redemption. Let not the temptation of Lesser desserts divert you, for All is Pie, and Turtle is All
97% of people have useless and blatantly false statistics in their sigs, if you are one of the 8% who doesn't, paste this in your sig to show just what a rebel you are |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/26 05:02:06
Subject: Whirlwinds vs. LR Prometheus
|
 |
Thunderhawk Pilot Dropping From Orbit
wait wait wait wait... huh..?
|
Also, the thingy next to your name is really distracting =)
|
I play (homegrown chapter)
Win 8
Draw1
Loss1
Follow the word of the Turtle Pie. Bathe your soul in its holy warmth and partake in its delicious redemption. Let not the temptation of Lesser desserts divert you, for All is Pie, and Turtle is All
97% of people have useless and blatantly false statistics in their sigs, if you are one of the 8% who doesn't, paste this in your sig to show just what a rebel you are |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/26 05:46:33
Subject: Whirlwinds vs. LR Prometheus
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
The Hammer
|
#1 Prometheus pro (as long as we're gonna turn this place into a lil theoryhammer forge) is that it'll give up that kill point a lot harder in those 33% of missions it'll show up in. Kinda like those yo-yo hawks that way: no tasty little morsel to be nibbled up.
However, if you build an army designed strictly around killing power this ought to factor in far less than anything that has all ready been mentioned. IMHO this will remain somewhat of a gamblers strategy by the logic that a good player *ought* to be able to outdo an equally good player with a list better suited to the scenario and similar luck on enough of the important dice.
I'll accept any correction to this if this just too plainly demonstrates I'm on outer space as far as the game is concerned. I've been a bit of a male appendage (hopefully that's colourful enough for the grownups, obscure enough to foil the little kids and just profane enough to inspire revulsion in the pull-ups crowd*) lately, owing to a change of employment status and the fact that I've got about a thousand times more adrenaline in the past few days than in the previous few months or maybe years.
*"Mommy wow...I'm a big kid now!" (and if you're old enough to remember the commercial the point remains proven even more politely IMHO)
|
When soldiers think, it's called routing. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/26 05:47:49
Subject: Whirlwinds vs. LR Prometheus
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
The Hammer
|
...and yes I'm painfully aware of the irony of that reference coming from a grown man.
|
When soldiers think, it's called routing. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/26 05:55:45
Subject: Whirlwinds vs. LR Prometheus
|
 |
Morally-Flexible Malleus Hearing Whispers
Well I kind of moved near Toronto, actually.
|
Whirlwind if you can hide it. As in, behind a building.
Prometheus if you are awesome.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/26 09:46:54
Subject: Whirlwinds vs. LR Prometheus
|
 |
Homicidal Veteran Blood Angel Assault Marine
|
Just an FYI, Whirlwinds can move and fire directly.
|
I play
I will magnetize (now doing LED as well) your models for you, send me a DM!
My gallery images show some of my work
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/26 10:31:31
Subject: Whirlwinds vs. LR Prometheus
|
 |
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
One thing about the new codex in case you're not aware:
Whirlwinds don't have to choose which ammo to use each game, instead they can choose everytime they fire.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2008/08/26 10:33:22
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/26 11:13:59
Subject: Whirlwinds vs. LR Prometheus
|
 |
Highlord with a Blackstone Fortress
Adrift within the vortex of my imagination.
|
The Prometheus Land Raider must be an orks second worst nightmare*, lots of useful firepower on a near invulnerable target.
I would still go with the Whirlwind. If both rumours are true - incendiary ammo for all, and ammo switching; its a no brainer.
*After a monolith.
|
n'oublie jamais - It appears I now have to highlight this again.
It is by tea alone I set my mind in motion. By the juice of the brew my thoughts aquire speed, my mind becomes strained, the strain becomes a warning. It is by tea alone I set my mind in motion. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/26 20:28:43
Subject: Whirlwinds vs. LR Prometheus
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
To eliminate a Con of the Whirlwind:
Vehicles carrying ordnance barrage weapons can choose to fire them either directly or as a barrage. So if it moves, it can still fire.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/26 20:34:35
Subject: Whirlwinds vs. LR Prometheus
|
 |
Ruthless Rafkin
|
I thought the LRP had s6 ap3 flamers on it's sponsons. Too bad I can't get it. (BA player)
|
-Loki- wrote:
40k is about slamming two slegdehammers together and hoping the other breaks first. Malifaux is about fighting with scalpels trying to hit select areas and hoping you connect more. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/26 21:04:08
Subject: Whirlwinds vs. LR Prometheus
|
 |
Foul Dwimmerlaik
|
Valhallan42nd wrote:I thought the LRP had s6 ap3 flamers on it's sponsons. Too bad I can't get it. (BA player)
Thats a redeemer. I am talking about the 4 twin linked heavy bolter LR from forgeworld.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/26 21:08:10
Subject: Whirlwinds vs. LR Prometheus
|
 |
Ruthless Rafkin
|
Oh, then that's a no brainer. Whirlwinds all the way.
|
-Loki- wrote:
40k is about slamming two slegdehammers together and hoping the other breaks first. Malifaux is about fighting with scalpels trying to hit select areas and hoping you connect more. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/26 21:17:07
Subject: Re:Whirlwinds vs. LR Prometheus
|
 |
Bounding Ultramarine Assault Trooper
|
The Prometheus is a Forge World landraider variant. It's got 4 sets of twin linked heavy bolters (2 per sponson) and gives a bonus to reserve rolls.
I had one and I would have fielded it a whole lot more often if I could have. I also have a battery of 3 Whirlwinds. They are really for different purposes and army styles. If the Crusader is a lawnmower for infantry than the Prometheus is a lawnmower without the protective cover and helicopter rotor blades. It's wonderful! It's a Landraider that finally has the firepower to make it deadly to troops and at a useful range.
|
You can't fix stupid. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/26 21:22:33
Subject: Re:Whirlwinds vs. LR Prometheus
|
 |
Morally-Flexible Malleus Hearing Whispers
Well I kind of moved near Toronto, actually.
|
Swordbreaker wrote:If the Crusader is a lawnmower for infantry than the Prometheus is a lawnmower without the protective cover and helicopter rotor blades.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/26 21:32:02
Subject: Whirlwinds vs. LR Prometheus
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Hellfury, have you considered the Helios at all? It combines many of the Whirlwind pros(ID fire, Whirlwind firing capabilities) with the Land Raider(AV14, Assault Ramp, Troop carrier). It only has the carrying possibility of a Razorback, but has the ability to change from long range fire support(ether with Lascannons or Whirlwind missile launcher) to loading a small squad to capture/contest an objective mid to late game.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/26 22:19:36
Subject: Whirlwinds vs. LR Prometheus
|
 |
Thunderhawk Pilot Dropping From Orbit
wait wait wait wait... huh..?
|
As far as the helios I bet it costs way the hell more points, ( i had never heard of it before just now... Im so out of the loop *sob*  ) and it forces you to make tough choices in order to make up the points you spent, which can really mess you up. having a tank that can do everything isn't always a good thing
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2008/08/26 23:40:29
I play (homegrown chapter)
Win 8
Draw1
Loss1
Follow the word of the Turtle Pie. Bathe your soul in its holy warmth and partake in its delicious redemption. Let not the temptation of Lesser desserts divert you, for All is Pie, and Turtle is All
97% of people have useless and blatantly false statistics in their sigs, if you are one of the 8% who doesn't, paste this in your sig to show just what a rebel you are |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/26 23:24:39
Subject: Whirlwinds vs. LR Prometheus
|
 |
Foul Dwimmerlaik
|
Platuan4th wrote:Hellfury, have you considered the Helios at all? It combines many of the Whirlwind pros(ID fire, Whirlwind firing capabilities) with the Land Raider(AV14, Assault Ramp, Troop carrier). It only has the carrying possibility of a Razorback, but has the ability to change from long range fire support(ether with Lascannons or Whirlwind missile launcher) to loading a small squad to capture/contest an objective mid to late game.
I have. While I like the addition of the twin linked lascannons along with a whirlwind launcher, I am trying to get a vehicle that has a lot of adaptability, and that means transport capacity means a lot. I have yet to use one in a game though.
Shrike78 wrote:As far as the helios I bet it costs way the hell more points, ( i had never heard of it before just now... Im so out of the loop *sob*) and it forces you to make tough choices in order to make up the points you spent, which can really mess you up.
Actually the helios is 10 points cheaper than a Prometheus. It is a normal landraider except that it can only carry 6 PA or 3 TDA, and and it has a whirlwind effectively replacing the twin HBs.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/26 23:41:40
Subject: Whirlwinds vs. LR Prometheus
|
 |
Thunderhawk Pilot Dropping From Orbit
wait wait wait wait... huh..?
|
actually i was comparing the whirlwind and the helios
|
I play (homegrown chapter)
Win 8
Draw1
Loss1
Follow the word of the Turtle Pie. Bathe your soul in its holy warmth and partake in its delicious redemption. Let not the temptation of Lesser desserts divert you, for All is Pie, and Turtle is All
97% of people have useless and blatantly false statistics in their sigs, if you are one of the 8% who doesn't, paste this in your sig to show just what a rebel you are |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/27 00:44:05
Subject: Whirlwinds vs. LR Prometheus
|
 |
Highlord with a Blackstone Fortress
Adrift within the vortex of my imagination.
|
You dont need a Helios, you just hide the Whirlwind.
Prometheus is a good tank though, while the most expensive (so far and excepting Terminus) it covers the weakness of the stock Land Raider about its confused role.
There is another advantange to the Prometheus, it is not a HS unit, but a transport for an H.Q. unit. Also the wording allows it to be used with any Command Squad, not just a Termie command squad. If you are comparing for a competing HS slot you dont need to you can take both even if you have two other HS. If its a matter of points well, any Land Raider is almost always a questionable use of points.
|
n'oublie jamais - It appears I now have to highlight this again.
It is by tea alone I set my mind in motion. By the juice of the brew my thoughts aquire speed, my mind becomes strained, the strain becomes a warning. It is by tea alone I set my mind in motion. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/27 02:41:10
Subject: Whirlwinds vs. LR Prometheus
|
 |
Thunderhawk Pilot Dropping From Orbit
wait wait wait wait... huh..?
|
It still all depends on what kind of army he's fielding HEY HELLFURY! WHAT KIND OF ARMY ARE YOU USING?
|
I play (homegrown chapter)
Win 8
Draw1
Loss1
Follow the word of the Turtle Pie. Bathe your soul in its holy warmth and partake in its delicious redemption. Let not the temptation of Lesser desserts divert you, for All is Pie, and Turtle is All
97% of people have useless and blatantly false statistics in their sigs, if you are one of the 8% who doesn't, paste this in your sig to show just what a rebel you are |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/27 02:47:16
Subject: Whirlwinds vs. LR Prometheus
|
 |
Rampaging Furioso Blood Angel Dreadnought
|
My Prometheus was a dream for my BA army (yeah, been that long ago). That freakin thing never once hit less than 11 shots out of 12. I loved it.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/08/27 13:51:58
Subject: Whirlwinds vs. LR Prometheus
|
 |
Foul Dwimmerlaik
|
Shrike78 wrote:It still all depends on what kind of army he's fielding HEY HELLFURY! WHAT KIND OF ARMY ARE YOU USING?
Mostly Lysanderwing, but that is going to change over to DW soon enough I think. While my army is indeed termie heavy, it is by no means exclusive to termies, which is why I left out what type of army it was to be used for.
I was trying to ascertain the comparisons in generic terms, for any SM army that could take either vehicle, and not just my flavor of army. The army is big enough to be DW and very vanilla at the same time, so my specific use of it is not relevant I don't believe.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|