Switch Theme:

What stops conscripts from taking chem-inhalers?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Uhlan





So, looking at the viability of conscripts and I was re-reading the Chem-inhaler rule. Pg 57 IG codex

"Chem-inhalers: Some undisciplined units have altered the gasses in their rebreathers to include narcorits such as 'slaught and Kalma. The effect is to make them even more indifferent danger and loss. They will always test Morale, Leadership or Pinning with no negative modifiers. If they fail a Morale check for 25% casualties, they will be pinned rather than falling back. Costs +XX points per unit

May not be combined with Iron Discipline or Die-Hards."

This the equipment it self. I've combed over the other rules for Regimental Doctrines, and I found nothing else to counter the thought that conscripts can and must get chem-inhalers if the army has them. However, I've never seen it done, and I know shoring up there leadership issues is a priority for those looking to feild them.

So, my question is based on the premise that conscripts are not excluded from pruchasing Chem-inhalers by the above quote. I'm asking for one of the following.
1) prove the premise is wrong
2) find another place that denies conscripts this equipment
3) agree that conscripts can infact take chem-inhalers.

Thanks.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/01/19 02:37:05


I play +  
   
Made in us
Sword-Bearing Inquisitorial Crusader




Northern Virginia

Well while I think a quote isn't the best place to take your information from I do have a point that may help you out.

On page 55 of the imperial guard codex it has an entry called "GUARD INFANTRY"

Meaning that any entry with guard infantry rule (i.e. line hw and command squads and so on can ONLY take them.) There are two entries under the additional equipment section without the guard infantry rule in their description which leads me to believe that conscripts can then take those doctrines. Those doctrines are chem inhalers and warrior weapons.

Also according to the offical errata on IG chem inhalers are not changed at all so I think you are good to go. Could be wrong but I think you are in the clear

"Paranoia is a very reassuring state of mind. If you think they are after you, you think you matter" 
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut






SoCal, USA!

Based on a a literal reading of Special Equipment and Guard Infantry, there doesn't appear to be anything stopping you from taking Chem-Inhaler Conscripts.

Unlike Cameoline / Carapace / Cyber-Enhancement (or most Skills & Drills), the Chem-Inhaler (along with Warrior Weapons) doesn't have a "Guard Infantry" limitation.

Go for it.

Just be aware that you've got a whopping 3+ months to take advantage of Chem-Inhaler Conscripts.

Once the new Codex comes out, I'd be surprised if Conscripts had access to Chime inhalers. But who knows - maybe it'll stay after all...

   
Made in us
Lieutenant General





Florence, KY

This is from the pre-fifth edition FAQ which can still be found on the GW-Australia website:

Q. Is there any restriction on who can be given chem-inhalers?

A. Assume the normal Guard Infantry restriction applies.

http://oz.games-workshop.com/games/40k/chapter_approved/assets/qa/imperialguardqav4.pdf

'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents
cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable
defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'

- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty
Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim
 
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut






SoCal, USA!

@Ghaz: Heh, too bad that ain't what the Codex actually says...


   
Made in us
Furious Fire Dragon





Ghaz wrote:This is from the pre-fifth edition FAQ which can still be found on the GW-Australia website:

Q. Is there any restriction on who can be given chem-inhalers?

A. Assume the normal Guard Infantry restriction applies.

http://oz.games-workshop.com/games/40k/chapter_approved/assets/qa/imperialguardqav4.pdf

Isn't this superceded by the publishing of 5th edition? Otherwise, that leaves a lot of issues with other out of date FAQs.

Homer

The only "hobby" GW is interested in is lining their pockets with your money.
 
   
Made in us
Lieutenant General





Florence, KY

Except the 5th edition FAQ says nothing on the matter. Also I didn't say that it did take precedence, just that a ruling had existed at one time, therefore they have all of the facts to decide how they want to play it.

'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents
cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable
defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'

- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty
Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim
 
   
Made in us
Uhlan





What would you expect at a tournament? RAI inhalers on only GUARD INFANTRY, or RAW which is everything must take them, Ogryn, ratlings and conscripts.

Or rather is there a situation where you would call you opponent out regarding this issue?

I play +  
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut






SoCal, USA!

@Ghaz: If the 5E FAQ is silent, then RAW applies. Which means YES to Chem-Inhaler Conscripts.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/01/19 22:30:09


   
Made in us
On a Canoptek Spyder's Waiting List




Santa Clara, CA

Pwnt.

Necrons--17-2-5
iGuard--36-1-10 
   
Made in us
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut






Los Angeles, CA

JohnHwangDD wrote:@Ghaz: If the 5E FAQ is silent, then RAW applies. Which means YES to Chem-Inhaler Conscripts.


It also means that you have to give Chem-Inhalers to all of your units, including vehicles (that get no benefit from it).

I think it is safe to assume this an oversight.





I play (click on icons to see pics): DQ:70+S++G(FAQ)M++B-I++Pw40k92/f-D+++A+++/areWD104R+T(D)DM+++
yakface's 40K rule #1: Although the rules allow you to use modeling to your advantage, how badly do you need to win your toy soldier games?
yakface's 40K rule #2: Friends don't let friends start a MEQ army.
yakface's 40K rule #3: Codex does not ALWAYS trump the rulebook, so please don't say that!
Waaagh Dakka: click the banner to learn more! 
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut






SoCal, USA!

Exactly.

Which is why Doctrines need to go away in favor of discrete Platoon options.

   
Made in gb
Dispassionate Imperial Judge






HATE Club, East London

JohnHwangDD wrote:Exactly.

Which is why Doctrines need to go away in favor of discrete Platoon options.


Um, no it's not. It just means that the Doctrine rules needed to be written a bit better.

Of course, as far as we know Doctrines ARE going away, but this has nothing to do with the OP...

   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: