Assaulting a vehicle's passengers

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**Dashofpepper**

I read in another thread that you can destroy a vehicle and then assault the passengers with the same unit. Is this in the rules somewhere? I've been poring over the rules about vehicles and shooting at vehicles and have come up with nothing. Can someone toss me a page number and an answer??

**Gwar!**

Page 67, The Paragraph just above the Dedicated Transport Rules

**Dashofpepper**

Gwar, you're freakin' awesome! I never knew that.

**Lordhat**

And here we were, thinking that you actually knew the answer and were just testing us.

**Gwar!**

Lordhat wrote:And here we were, thinking that you actually knew the answer and were just testing us.

A lesson in futility it seems. After all, see my signature

**SeattleDV8**

Hmmm lets see you have about 43 'I agree's" in your Sig.
The front page of the forum has 48 Questions.
there are 97 pages shown.
48 X 97 = 4656
43 divided by 4656 = .009
so Gwar is correct less than 1% of the time.....Heh

(Note : a not fair statistical sample. Gwar is closer to correct 10%....LOL JOKE!

**Gwar!**

SeattleDV8 wrote:Hmmm lets see you have about 43 'I agree's" in your Sig.
The front page of the forum has 48 Questions.
there are 97 pages shown.
48 X 97 = 4656
43 divided by 4656 = .009
so Gwar is correct less than 1% of the time.....Heh

(Note : a not fair statistical sample. Gwar is closer to correct 10%....LOL JOKE!

Did you remember to account for the fact I have been here since March? Did you account for the times People have agreed with me in a non-quoteable format?

No, you haven't.

**solkan**

Yes, the important thing to remember is that not even Gwar! has replied to every thread on the forums. Give the guy some time, okay?!?

**Flexen**

SeattleDV8 wrote:Hmmm lets see you have about 43 'I agree's" in your Sig.
The front page of the forum has 48 Questions.
there are 97 pages shown.
48 X 97 = 4656
43 divided by 4656 = .009
so Gwar is correct less than 1% of the time.....Heh

(Note : a not fair statistical sample. Gwar is closer to correct 10%....LOL JOKE!

Idk - from what I have seen, he is right most of the time and when he is wrong, he will admit it pretty quickly (although he blames booze too much). If I had to put money down, its on Gwar. Just my observation.

**Gwar!**

Flexen wrote:Idk - from what I have seen, he is right most of the time and when he is wrong, he will admit it pretty quickly (although he blames booze too much). If I had to put money down, its on Gwar. Just my observation.

I blame the Booze because it normally is the Booze, or lack of sleep, or because I was too lazy to double check before opening my big mouth.

**Hollismason**

I was reading the rules today about multiple engagements and its perfectly legit to assault vehicles and squads at the same time.

Never knew.

**Gwar!**

Hollismason wrote:I was reading the rules today about multiple engagements and its perfectly legit to assault vehicles and squads at the same time.

Never knew.

Yes, but you can only ever declare the assault (and thus move the first model into BTB with) against the unit you shot at, so just make damn sure your shooting doesn't wipe out the target or cause them to lose enough casualties that you are out of charge range.