razorlead wrote:I was asked recently by my flgs owner to try to make the bi-annual tournament a little more exciting/different from the past years. I live in a college town and he wants to even up the playing field between rich suburbanites from out of town and poor college kids trying to have a good time.
I have been bouncing around an idea for a scenario based tournament with fixed armies for each scenario.
1: Should everyone play the same scenario each round or should could I have players play different scenarios.
2: What points level given a single day tournament starting at 9 or 10 and finishing by 7.
If you want to flatten the playing field, keep the points down and tighten the
FOC to have less flashy stuff (Heavy / Fast). Make all scenarios objective / goal / mission based, rather than
KP /
VP based.
Everybody should play the same scenarios, but with different roles depending on the winner. For example:
Round 1, neutral KotH scenario to grab one objective. Most Scoring units on Objective wins.
Round 2, winners place & Defend 3 widely-dispersed Objectives with 1 Elite, 2 Troops against attacking Losers; remaining Defenders in Reserves. Most Scoring units / non-contested Objectives wins.
Round 3, losers place & Defend 5 Objectives with full army in Dawn of War against Attackers coming in from Reserve.
The scenarios are designed to keep winners on their toes with asymmetrical missions, and you can dress them up how you like with extra special rules. Winning all 3 rounds is designed to be difficult, and you should go with a points system rather than a pure Swiss system because the structure is different.
In general, I like smaller points because there's need and room to maneuver. I'd suggest 1500 pts maximum for the regular
FOC, but consider 1000 pts with a special
FOC (1
HQ, 1-3 Elite, 2-4 Troops, 0-2 Fast, 0-2 Heavy). The smaller armies will struggle more to capture / control objectives on a full-sized board.