| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/10/01 01:30:34
Subject: Army Ratings: Help with a project.
|
 |
Sybarite Swinging an Agonizer
Pleasant Hill CA 94523
|
Folks
So over at my blog I am trying to help out another blog with an 40k Army rating system. Basically assigning numbers to certain aspects of a codex. I would love to get some feedback from the Dakka community. Post here or on my site!
thanks, Tasty
http://bloodofkittens.com/?p=1398
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/10/01 01:58:33
Subject: Army Ratings: Help with a project.
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
A 20-point scale? Utter nonsense.
And even a 10-point scale is too much.
If you're doing multiple factors for each army, stop with a 5-point scale for each factor.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/10/01 04:18:03
Subject: Army Ratings: Help with a project.
|
 |
Sybarite Swinging an Agonizer
Pleasant Hill CA 94523
|
yeah my suggestion was 1-10 scale. With the amount of armies I think 1-10 scale is just fine.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/10/01 23:49:19
Subject: Re:Army Ratings: Help with a project.
|
 |
Willing Inquisitorial Excruciator
Ephrata, PA
|
I'd go with the 1-10, but theres also isses with a few of the numbers. theres no way IG are more mobile that Tau, and Tau have better saves, making then more likely to survive. And they now cost about the same amount of points. Im thinking theres a bias going on here, cause the IG scored the highest in everything except assault and veratility, which went to Space Marines.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/10/01 23:55:45
Subject: Army Ratings: Help with a project.
|
 |
Swift Swooping Hawk
|
Yeah, I think there's some serious IG love going on in that blog. Of course, I'm not a big fan of jawaballs at all, so maybe I'm the biased one. hmmm.
|
The Battle Report Master wrote:i had a freind come round a few weeks ago to have a 40k apocalpocalpse game i was guards men he was space maines.... my first turn was 4 bonbaonbardlements... jacobs turn to he didnt have one i phased out. This space for rent, contact Gwar! for rights to this space.
Tantras wrote: Logically speaking, that makes perfect sense and I understand and agree entirely... but is it RAW? |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/10/02 00:17:28
Subject: Re:Army Ratings: Help with a project.
|
 |
Willing Inquisitorial Excruciator
Ephrata, PA
|
No, no your not. IG is the flavor of the week, once a new army codex (Space Wolves does not count) then the ratings will favor that army. Id love to see them rate Dark Eldar
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|