Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

http://www.metro.co.uk/news/article.html?Cross_dressing_cage_fighters_beat_up_attackers&in_article_id=748957&in_page_id=34

HAHAHA!

They were cage fighters

LMAO!!! Karma FTW! This is why you shouldn't feth with cross dressers, they get this crap all the time, of course they learn how to fight along the way. Every one of em I've met was hard as nails. They have to be sometimes.

If they had just followed the number one rule of picking fights, don't fight the guy with the fethed up ears.

Excelsior!

Shim dropped both of them! Now that's impressive. 2-0 with 2 shots taken.

Another one reported today.

Chav decided to do a Doorstep Mugging whilst his mate filmed it on his Cameraphone. Rings doorbell, throws a punch, then next thing he knows he's flat on his arse, with a Martial Arts Instructor towering above him in a fighting stance....

FAIL!

Beats
Rings doorbell, throws a punch,
gets shot 14 times.

Frazzled wrote:Beats
Rings doorbell, throws a punch,
gets shot 14 times.

19+1 if its me on the other side.

Frazzled wrote:Beats
Rings doorbell, throws a punch,
gets shot 14 times.

And of course, had they used Fraz's path, and not walked straight over the Lawn, he'd have shot them just twice each (in the kneecaps). He might even have phoned the Amublance, but Fraz finds idiot blood to be a high quality Lawn Fertiliser.

jp400 wrote:

Frazzled wrote:Beats
Rings doorbell, throws a punch,
gets shot 14 times.

19+1 if its me on the other side.

Yea but guys with glocks need that many to hit something


Automatically Appended Next Post:

Mad Doc Grotsnik wrote:

Frazzled wrote:Beats
Rings doorbell, throws a punch,
gets shot 14 times.

And of course, had they used Fraz's path, and not walked straight over the Lawn, he'd have shot them just twice each (in the kneecaps). He might even have phoned the Amublance, but Fraz finds idiot blood to be a high quality Lawn Fertiliser.

GOod base for stew too, er you didn't hear that.

Nothing against Long Pig here matey!

Frazzled wrote:

jp400 wrote:

Frazzled wrote:Beats
Rings doorbell, throws a punch,
gets shot 14 times.

19+1 if its me on the other side.

Yea but guys with glocks need that many to hit something

Pfftt.... Fraz, dont insult me by calling me a BLock owner.

Springfield Armory XDM in 9mm.

20 rounds... one for each finger and toe. And if you still want to fight after that... then ill stop playing and actually do something about it.

Cricket Bat, overarm, single handed swing beats your pansy guns any day. Especially if I've snuck up behind! Guns just don't make that satisying 'thwack' sound!

Mad Doc Grotsnik wrote:Cricket Bat, overarm, single handed swing beats your pansy guns any day. Especially if I've snuck up behind! Guns just don't make that satisying 'thwack' sound!

They do make that satifying "dakka dakka dakka" sound though!

Guns for show, knives for a pro.

They don't like it up 'em!

jp400 wrote:

Frazzled wrote:

jp400 wrote:

Frazzled wrote:Beats
Rings doorbell, throws a punch,
gets shot 14 times.

19+1 if its me on the other side.

Yea but guys with glocks need that many to hit something

Pfftt.... Fraz, dont insult me by calling me a BLock owner.

Springfield Armory XDM in 9mm.

My apologies. Respect.


Automatically Appended Next Post:

Mad Doc Grotsnik wrote:Cricket Bat, overarm, single handed swing beats your pansy guns any day. Especially if I've snuck up behind! Guns just don't make that satisying 'thwack' sound!

True that, the only things equal to a cricket bat are a nice five iron or a beseball bat (or bike chain of course, but then you have to wear a t shirt with a rolled up box of cigs and decide if you want to be a Shark or a Jet).

More seriously though, this clip got me thinking about corporal punishment.

The case in point shows that CCTV plastered all over Swansea city centre did nothing to deter and prevent crime, it merely helped catch the perpetrators, whose punishment (following a beat-down) was 4 months community service and electronic tagging.

Today the UK Prison Governors' Association said prisons are overcrowded, a high proportion of the prisoners in there have got under 12 month sentences, and sentences under 6 months don't work.

These yobs are exactly the kind of people who are going to get pissed up again in 4 months and maybe get a custodial sentence, then they'll most likely repeat their crime again.

We can't afford to keep them in prison, particularly as they are likely to re-offend as soon as they are let out.

So, why not corporal punishment? In a case like this there can harly be any chance of a miscarriage of justice. Start with 12 lashes, then double the sentence for every repetition of the crime. I don't normally approve of corporal punishment but I think it may be useful in some circumstances.

I like a nice heavy stapler myself.

Kilkrazy wrote:More seriously though, this clip got me thinking about corporal punishment.

The case in point shows that CCTV plastered all over Swansea city centre did nothing to deter and prevent crime, it merely helped catch the perpetrators, whose punishment (following a beat-down) was 4 months community service and electronic tagging.

Today the UK Prison Governors' Association said prisons are overcrowded, a high proportion of the prisoners in there have got under 12 month sentences, and sentences under 6 months don't work.

These yobs are exactly the kind of people who are going to get pissed up again in 4 months and maybe get a custodial sentence, then they'll most likely repeat their crime again.

We can't afford to keep them in prison, particularly as they are likely to re-offend as soon as they are let out.

So, why not corporal punishment? In a case like this there can harly be any chance of a miscarriage of justice. Start with 12 lashes, then double the sentence for every repetition of the crime. I don't normally approve of corporal punishment but I think it may be useful in some circumstances.

KK thats just not nurturing.

These guys had their nurturing and it didn't work. I'm not interested in nurturing them anymore, I'm interested in stopping their foetid anti-social behaviour.

We can't deport them to America or Australia anymore.

Kilkrazy wrote:These guys had their nurturing and it didn't work. I'm not interested in nurturing them anymore, I'm interested in stopping their foetid anti-social behaviour.

We can't deport them to America or Australia anymore.

Which is why need need to make some kind of superjail under the ocean or on the moon. We could use prison labor to build it. That or bring back canings, (at least over here).

Bah we're missing out on the capitalist opportunities here. As stated, drop them in the middle of Compton and televise it.

Survivor-Compton would be a live action, pay per view event.


Inversely they could be used as the stand in dummies for guard dog training.

Simple.

If you are convicted of a violent crime, you are sterilised and your children taken into State care, thus preventing you turning innocent young minds into even more drooling, lawless scum.

Keep the sterilisation reversible just in case of a miscarriage of justice and BAM. Problem solved in a couple of generations.

Mad Doc Grotsnik wrote:Simple.

If you are convicted of a violent crime, you are sterilised and your children taken into State care, thus preventing you turning innocent young minds into even more drooling, lawless scum.

Keep the sterilisation reversible just in case of a miscarriage of justice and BAM. Problem solved in a couple of generations.

Yeah but sticking kids in state care is usually worse than leaving em with a realitive. I've heard some horror stories about foster care, that could be only in my neck of the woods though.

I smell Godwin's law . . .

Mad Doc Grotsnik wrote:Simple.

If you are convicted of a violent crime, you are sterilised and your children taken into State care, thus preventing you turning innocent young minds into even more drooling, lawless scum.

Keep the sterilisation reversible just in case of a miscarriage of justice and BAM. Problem solved in a couple of generations.

That's still a lot more expensive than the lash.

Not necessarily. And it's a lot more probable in a free and democratic society than you may have expected. Just ask Justice Holmes. He'll tell you the three generations of imbeciles is enough.

Norwulf wrote:Which is why need need to make some kind of superjail under the ocean or on the moon.

Or inside a volcano?

New avatar for KK?