| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/11/14 07:44:59
Subject: new geek laws and axioms
|
 |
Battlewagon Driver with Charged Engine
|
10 Geeky Laws That Should Exist, But Don’t
* By Matt Blum Email Author
* November 10, 2009 |
* 8:00 am |
* Categories: Everything Else
*
There are many, many laws having nothing to do with government that are useful to know because they tell you something about how the universe works. There are Newton’s laws of motion, the laws of thermodynamics, Boyle’s Law, Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle, among many. Most of these laws have been known for a long time, but it wasn’t until a mere 19 years ago that Godwin’s Law was written.
If you’ve ever been involved in a discussion on Usenet, or have been following politics in the past decade or so, you’ve probably encountered Godwin’s Law. While Godwin’s Law is, alas, as true today as it was then, it seems unfortunate that there aren’t more widely accepted axioms to help us geeks define the characteristics of our world.
To that end, then, here are 10 geeky laws (axioms) that should exist, but don’t … at least, they didn’t until now:
1. Munroe’s Law: A person in a geeky argument who can quote xkcd to support his position automatically wins the argument. This law supersedes Godwin, so that even if the quote is about Hitler, the quoter still wins.
2. Lucas’s Law: There is no movie so beloved that a “special edition,” prequel or sequel cannot trample and forever stain its memory.
3. Tolkien and Rowling’s Law: No reasonably faithful movie adaptation of a book will ever be quite as good as the book it adapts. Thus great movie adaptations can only be made out of truly amazing books.
4. Somers and McCarthy’s Law: There is no dangerous unscientific theory so preposterous that no celebrity will espouse and advocate it.
5. Jobs’s Law: No matter how well last year’s cool tech gadget still works, it will seem utterly inadequate the moment the new version comes out.
6. Savage and Hyneman’s Law: Blowing stuff up is fun. Blowing stuff up in the name of science is AWESOME.
7. Starbucks’ and Peet’s Law: C8H10N4O2, better known as caffeine, is the most wonderful chemical compound known to humankind. If the field of chemistry had never identified or produced a single other useful compound, caffeine alone would be justification enough for its existence.
8. Wilbur’s Law: Bacon makes everything better.
9. Comic Book Guy’s Law: There is no detail of a movie too brief or inconsequential to become the subject of an hours-long diatribe.
10. The Unified Geek Theory: At present, the President of the United States, the wealthiest person in the United States, and the most trusted newscaster in the United States are all geeks. At the same time, movies based on comic book characters are routinely taking in hundreds of millions of dollars. The only reasonable conclusion is: We’ve won
I invoke wilburs law and demand more bacon
|
H.B.M.C. wrote:
"Balance, playtesting - a casual gamer craves not these things!" - Yoda, a casual gamer.
Three things matter in marksmanship -
location, location, locationMagickalMemories wrote:How about making another fist?
One can be, "Da Fist uv Mork" and the second can be, "Da Uvver Fist uv Mork."
Make a third, and it can be, "Da Uvver Uvver Fist uv Mork"
Eric |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/11/14 08:51:12
Subject: new geek laws and axioms
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I like 6. I'd like to legally blow stuff up.
|
--The whole concept of government granted and government regulated 'permits' and the accompanying government mandate for government approved firearms 'training' prior to being blessed by government with the privilege to carry arms in a government approved and regulated manner, flies directly in the face of the fundamental right to keep and bear arms.
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government.”
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/11/14 10:35:03
Subject: Re:new geek laws and axioms
|
 |
Cosmic Joe
|
Geeks shall inherite the eart
|
Nosebiter wrote:Codex Space Marine is renamed as Codex Counts As Because I Dont Like To Loose And Gw Hates My Army. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/11/14 14:58:28
Subject: new geek laws and axioms
|
 |
Anti-Armour Swiss Guard
|
Fateweaver wrote:I like 6. I'd like to legally blow stuff up.
I already get to do this. My brother is a legal and qualified demo engineer.
Next week I'll be using detcord to remove some trees.
|
I'm OVER 50 (and so far over everyone's BS, too).
Old enough to know better, young enough to not give a ****.
That is not dead which can eternal lie ...
... and yet, with strange aeons, even death may die.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/11/14 22:19:47
Subject: Re:new geek laws and axioms
|
 |
Crafty Bray Shaman
|
This list is null and void due to Apple products being one of the qualifying Laws. This. Is. bs.
|
Jean-luke Pee-card, of thee YOU ES ES Enter-prize
Make it so!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/11/14 22:26:14
Subject: Re:new geek laws and axioms
|
 |
Boom! Leman Russ Commander
|
Like the orks I like the explosions,speed and sound.Moar dakka.
|
Hail to the creeeeeeeeeeeeeeed!baby Ask not the moot a question,for he will give you three answers,all of which will result in a public humiliation.
My DIY chapter Fire Wraiths http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/264338.page
3 things that Ivan likes:
Food Sex Machines
Tactical Genius of DakkaDakka
Colonel Miles Quaritch is my hero
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/11/14 22:27:54
Subject: new geek laws and axioms
|
 |
Da Head Honcho Boss Grot
|
A person in a geeky argument who can quote xkcd to support his position automatically wins the argument.
|
Anuvver fing - when they do sumfing, they try to make it look like somfink else to confuse everybody. When one of them wants to lord it over the uvvers, 'e says "I'm very speshul so'z you gotta worship me", or "I know summink wot you lot don't know, so yer better lissen good". Da funny fing is, arf of 'em believe it and da over arf don't, so 'e 'as to hit 'em all anyway or run fer it. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/11/15 02:17:06
Subject: Re:new geek laws and axioms
|
 |
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
VermGho5t wrote:This list is null and void due to Apple products being one of the qualifying Laws. This. Is. bs.  Just to continue the Geek theme
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/11/15 02:17:20
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/11/15 02:42:33
Subject: new geek laws and axioms
|
 |
Bane Knight
Washington DC metro area.
|
1 Points maybe, not a win, and not trumping Godwin.
3 presumes Rowling is truly amazing. QED.
10 is inconsistent as correlation is not causation.
|
Special unique snowflake of unique specialness (+1/+3versus werewolves)
Alternatively I'm a magical internet fairy.
Pho indignation *IS* the tastiest form of angry!
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|