Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/12 11:30:38
Subject: is this cheating? - tactical squads, plasma guns and checking range.
|
 |
Courageous Questing Knight
|
As far as I know, you have to declare before you fire (yes?)
As in, with a squad of say,
8 sergeant/troop with a bolter
1 with a plasma rifle
1 with heavy bolter.
He doesn't say anything before he fires and fires with his bolters, finding them out of range, he moves onto the heavy bolter.
I asked him to roll for 'gets hot' and he says he decided not to fire it.
I think thats premeasuring, isn't it?
Whats your thought.
|
DR:90S+++G++MB+I+Pw40k096D++A+/areWD360R+++T(P)DM+
3000 pt space marine 72% painted!
W/L/D 24/6/22
2500 pt Bretons 10% painted
W/L/D 1/0/0
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/337109.page lekkar diorama, aye? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/12 11:46:56
Subject: Re:is this cheating? - tactical squads, plasma guns and checking range.
|
 |
Major
far away from Battle Creek, Michigan
|
It is not required to fire all of the weapons in a squad but you should state which weapons you are firing before you measure or roll for any of them. So before he rolled for the bolters he should have state whether or not he was also firing the plasma.
|
PROSECUTOR: By now, there have been 34 casualties.
Elena Ceausescu says: Look, and that they are calling genocide.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/12 12:50:42
Subject: is this cheating? - tactical squads, plasma guns and checking range.
|
 |
Courageous Questing Knight
|
but the fact is he didn't say anything, so I assumed he chose to fire aeverything.
Isn't that a fair assumption, I'm sure if my models were .5" closer he would have fired the plasme.
|
DR:90S+++G++MB+I+Pw40k096D++A+/areWD360R+++T(P)DM+
3000 pt space marine 72% painted!
W/L/D 24/6/22
2500 pt Bretons 10% painted
W/L/D 1/0/0
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/337109.page lekkar diorama, aye? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/12 12:52:14
Subject: Re:is this cheating? - tactical squads, plasma guns and checking range.
|
 |
Major
far away from Battle Creek, Michigan
|
Oh I agree with you 100%. He was cheating.
|
PROSECUTOR: By now, there have been 34 casualties.
Elena Ceausescu says: Look, and that they are calling genocide.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/12 12:52:29
Subject: is this cheating? - tactical squads, plasma guns and checking range.
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
If you dont declare that members of your unit ARENT firing, they are assumed to be firing - it is only reasonable.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/12 14:16:37
Subject: Re:is this cheating? - tactical squads, plasma guns and checking range.
|
 |
Focused Fire Warrior
Champaign IL
|
olympia wrote:Oh I agree with you 100%. He was cheating.
agreed
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/12 14:37:06
Subject: is this cheating? - tactical squads, plasma guns and checking range.
|
 |
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus
|
If you look at the "Which models can fire" heading on page 16 of the rulebook you will see that a player does not declare which models ARE firing, but rather which models AREN'T firing, so the RAW would actually support the idea that unless you say "model x is not firing" before checking range, then that model is assumed to be firing.
|
Interceptor Drones can disembark at any point during the Sun Shark's move (even though models cannot normally disembark from Zooming Flyers).
-Jeremy Vetock, only man at Games Workshop who understands Zooming Flyers |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/12 15:35:56
Subject: is this cheating? - tactical squads, plasma guns and checking range.
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
If the person was so adamant of the unit not firing, then Nobody has fired. It's either they all fired or nobody fired. Since he just set a presedence, next time he fires, you can say he didn't fire because he didn't declared that the unit was firing wich weapons. All he did was measure and roll dice. So he will have to next time say, I am firing 8 bolters. If he dosn't say hit did, then it didn't fire. Going by his rules you are.
|
Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.
Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?
Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong". |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/12 15:44:14
Subject: Re:is this cheating? - tactical squads, plasma guns and checking range.
|
 |
Mekboy Hammerin' Somethin'
|
What your sayin is right Solon but I take it this was a "friendly" game not a tournament or anything?
All you have to do is explain the rules to this guy and so the next time he doesn't do the same thing. If you sit there and try to force this guy to roll for Get's Hot the first time he did it, then you are on the path to becoming TFG
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/12 16:58:50
Subject: is this cheating? - tactical squads, plasma guns and checking range.
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
|
It's kind of a tricky case. I'm not going to say I'm not firing a Plasma Gun at when I'm shooting a Lascannon at an enemy Battlewagon 3 feet away, and wouldn't expect to have to roll for Gets Hot.
Seeing as he measured the Bolters, though, I'd say he declared firing for everything.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/12 17:04:40
Subject: Re:is this cheating? - tactical squads, plasma guns and checking range.
|
 |
Nurgle Predator Driver with an Infestation
|
You should declare what you're fireing at and with what weapons before you fire.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/12 17:20:02
Subject: is this cheating? - tactical squads, plasma guns and checking range.
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Exact opposite - you are firing everything unless you state otherwise
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/12 18:13:03
Subject: Re:is this cheating? - tactical squads, plasma guns and checking range.
|
 |
Focused Fire Warrior
|
I could be mistaken, but if his plasma was out of range does he have to check for "gets hot!" since the weapon can't be used? Don't really know the "gets hot!" rule since I play Tau and we don't use such barbaric weapons
|
Saddened on behalf of all the Ultramarines, Salamanders and White Scars players who got their Codex rolled into Codex: Black Templars. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/12 18:34:15
Subject: is this cheating? - tactical squads, plasma guns and checking range.
|
 |
Stormin' Stompa
|
Page 31 of the rulebook contains the rules for Gets Hot!....and your answer.
While you might not use plasma weapons, it is always smart to know how they work.
|
-------------------------------------------------------
"He died because he had no honor. He had no honor and the Emperor was watching."
18.000 3.500 8.200 3.300 2.400 3.100 5.500 2.500 3.200 3.000
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/12 18:41:31
Subject: is this cheating? - tactical squads, plasma guns and checking range.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I think it's a pretty basic axiom of gaming that you declare what you're doing before you do it. It's poor form to not declare a unit's shooting before pulling out the tape measure and measuring.
I played a game recently against an enthusiastic young man who push his toy soldiers and tossed a lot of dice without declaring what he was doing. I asked him simply to please state the reason dice were being rolled before he did so as I am old and slow. What is obvious to the person rolling the dice is not obvious to me. I'm not a mind reader.
In a friendly setting I'd just gently request that for your sake that actions be declared before dice roll or tape measures come out to check ranges. You might also gently inform them that in a tournament setting such actions could cause their opponents heartburn.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/12 23:02:31
Subject: is this cheating? - tactical squads, plasma guns and checking range.
|
 |
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus
|
MasterSlowPoke wrote:It's kind of a tricky case. I'm not going to say I'm not firing a Plasma Gun at when I'm shooting a Lascannon at an enemy Battlewagon 3 feet away, and wouldn't expect to have to roll for Gets Hot.
Seeing as he measured the Bolters, though, I'd say he declared firing for everything.
If you don't say either "The Plasma Gun isn't firing" or "The Lascannon is the only weapon firing" then you of course would have to roll for Gets Hot.
|
Interceptor Drones can disembark at any point during the Sun Shark's move (even though models cannot normally disembark from Zooming Flyers).
-Jeremy Vetock, only man at Games Workshop who understands Zooming Flyers |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/12 23:16:07
Subject: Re:is this cheating? - tactical squads, plasma guns and checking range.
|
 |
Blood-Raging Khorne Berserker
|
General_Chaos wrote:What your sayin is right Solon but I take it this was a "friendly" game not a tournament or anything?
All you have to do is explain the rules to this guy and so the next time he doesn't do the same thing. If you sit there and try to force this guy to roll for Get's Hot the first time he did it, then you are on the path to becoming TFG
Easy with the 'reasonable' there, General_Chaos. Much more of that and there wouldn't be any arguments around here at all and we wouldn't want that.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/12 23:31:35
Subject: is this cheating? - tactical squads, plasma guns and checking range.
|
 |
Focused Fire Warrior
|
Steelmage99 wrote:Page 31 of the rulebook contains the rules for Gets Hot!....and your answer. While you might not use plasma weapons, it is always smart to know how they work. Thanks a million dude! Much more helpful than just a simple yes and no... I'll just hop on my bike for the 100km bike ride to my BRB and I'll have it cleared up...
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2010/02/12 23:32:37
Saddened on behalf of all the Ultramarines, Salamanders and White Scars players who got their Codex rolled into Codex: Black Templars. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/12 23:57:13
Subject: is this cheating? - tactical squads, plasma guns and checking range.
|
 |
Mutilatin' Mad Dok
New Zealand
|
If I have a unit of tac marines with a plasma gun and a las cannon, and there's a monolith right in front of me, I say "Firing las cannon at that", gesture towards the 'lith and roll one dice.
Cheating or not?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/13 00:01:46
Subject: is this cheating? - tactical squads, plasma guns and checking range.
|
 |
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
Pika_power wrote:If I have a unit of tac marines with a plasma gun and a las cannon, and there's a monolith right in front of me, I say "Firing las cannon at that", gesture towards the 'lith and roll one dice.
Cheating or not?
No.
|
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/13 00:03:34
Subject: is this cheating? - tactical squads, plasma guns and checking range.
|
 |
Sneaky Kommando
|
@pika_power
That depends. If you miss or don't glance/pen do you then pick up a die and say "Firing plasma gun at that"?
I think the easiest way to go about it is to say "I'm going to fire everything but the plasma gun at the monolith. I'm not going to roll for my bolters since they can't do anything." While that looks a lot longer, it's only two sentences, it takes 5 - 10 secs to say that and avoid a whole lotta confusion. Of course if you said "I'm only going to fire my las cannon," then there should be no problem also.
|
MeanGreenStompa wrote:The idea of Land Raider rarity is a lie, there are millions of them, they reproduce like tribbles. Ask the Blood Angels, they have so many they even throw them out of thunderhawks moving at high speed to try and reduce the numbers.
DR:80+SGM-B+I--Pw40k09#+D++A+/hWD350R++T(M)DM+
My Army
Orks 2500+ pts |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/13 00:22:50
Subject: Re:is this cheating? - tactical squads, plasma guns and checking range.
|
 |
Member of the Malleus
|
Zatch, I would say that in this case that is excessive. If my opponent said I was risking offing one of my own troops to shoot at something it cant hurt instead of the logical weapon I would assume either they just wanted to get upset to be upset or were being sneaky about trying to get me disqualified.
|
The greater good needs some moo. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/13 00:29:20
Subject: is this cheating? - tactical squads, plasma guns and checking range.
|
 |
Sneaky Kommando
|
@rocklord
I took the "right in front of me" to mean "extremely close", so I assumed all his weapons were in range. I can see how you interpreted it. If the 'lith was obviously out of range of the plasma gun and he said "firing las cannon at that" and then rolled the one die, then yeah, I'd have no problem with that. In fact, I have no problem with the way he stated it to begin with. It wouldn't bother me at all, but like I said, if he misses and then goes "firing plasma gun" then I have an issue.
|
MeanGreenStompa wrote:The idea of Land Raider rarity is a lie, there are millions of them, they reproduce like tribbles. Ask the Blood Angels, they have so many they even throw them out of thunderhawks moving at high speed to try and reduce the numbers.
DR:80+SGM-B+I--Pw40k09#+D++A+/hWD350R++T(M)DM+
My Army
Orks 2500+ pts |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/13 01:16:15
Subject: is this cheating? - tactical squads, plasma guns and checking range.
|
 |
Mutilatin' Mad Dok
New Zealand
|
zatchmo wrote:@pika_power
That depends. If you miss or don't glance/pen do you then pick up a die and say "Firing plasma gun at that"?
I think the easiest way to go about it is to say "I'm going to fire everything but the plasma gun at the monolith. I'm not going to roll for my bolters since they can't do anything." While that looks a lot longer, it's only two sentences, it takes 5 - 10 secs to say that and avoid a whole lotta confusion. Of course if you said "I'm only going to fire my las cannon," then there should be no problem also.
In truth, I'd probably gesture at the two units, say "lascannon" and roll one dice.
The plasma cannot hurt the AV14 Monolith. Everything is within six inches.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/13 02:19:30
Subject: is this cheating? - tactical squads, plasma guns and checking range.
|
 |
Sneaky Kommando
|
@pika
Ah, well in that case, sure, your sentence was fine as originally written. I had (erroneously) assumed that the plasma could hurt the 'lith. I would be ok with what you said in every capacity then.
|
MeanGreenStompa wrote:The idea of Land Raider rarity is a lie, there are millions of them, they reproduce like tribbles. Ask the Blood Angels, they have so many they even throw them out of thunderhawks moving at high speed to try and reduce the numbers.
DR:80+SGM-B+I--Pw40k09#+D++A+/hWD350R++T(M)DM+
My Army
Orks 2500+ pts |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/13 09:32:11
Subject: is this cheating? - tactical squads, plasma guns and checking range.
|
 |
Stormin' Stompa
|
Gorlack wrote:Steelmage99 wrote:Page 31 of the rulebook contains the rules for Gets Hot!....and your answer.
While you might not use plasma weapons, it is always smart to know how they work.
Thanks a million dude! Much more helpful than just a simple yes and no... I'll just hop on my bike for the 100km bike ride to my BRB and I'll have it cleared up...
You are welcome.
I am firmly in the "teach a man to fish..."-camp. Had you stated that you didn't have your rule book on hand, instead of implying that you couldn't be bothered to look it up (as your weapons don't Get Hot), my answer might have been different.
|
-------------------------------------------------------
"He died because he had no honor. He had no honor and the Emperor was watching."
18.000 3.500 8.200 3.300 2.400 3.100 5.500 2.500 3.200 3.000
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/13 09:36:18
Subject: is this cheating? - tactical squads, plasma guns and checking range.
|
 |
Mutilatin' Mad Dok
New Zealand
|
If you own it, you should have a legal backup of the book in PDF format. If you don't have a PDF of it, you should get one.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/13 11:57:41
Subject: is this cheating? - tactical squads, plasma guns and checking range.
|
 |
Courageous Questing Knight
|
chaos, it was a friendly game, but on that same basis, shouldn't he not cheat?
I just think thats weaseling out of taking a 3/36 chance of dieing.
|
DR:90S+++G++MB+I+Pw40k096D++A+/areWD360R+++T(P)DM+
3000 pt space marine 72% painted!
W/L/D 24/6/22
2500 pt Bretons 10% painted
W/L/D 1/0/0
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/337109.page lekkar diorama, aye? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/13 12:07:44
Subject: is this cheating? - tactical squads, plasma guns and checking range.
|
 |
Mekboy Hammerin' Somethin'
|
Captain Solon wrote:chaos, it was a friendly game, but on that same basis, shouldn't he not cheat?
I just think thats weaseling out of taking a 3/36 chance of dieing.
The question would be was he cheating, being forgetful, or did he not understand the rules?
Did happen more than once?
Did you explain the rules to him?
Did you ask him to roll for Get's Hot?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/02/13 12:42:02
Subject: is this cheating? - tactical squads, plasma guns and checking range.
|
 |
Power-Hungry Cultist of Tzeentch
|
I wouldn't shoot a plasma gun @ a monolith, its only str 7
|
|
|
 |
 |
|