Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Hello. I would ask you for this rule that maybe had been bad translated in my language.

When a unit assaul a vehicle that it moved by 12" you can hit that at 6. and that's we all know.
In my turn i moved my landraider by 12, and in the turn after my opponent immobilized it on his fire phase, then he assaulted it, it is still 6 to hit or it's autohit b/c it is immobilized?

Sorry for this noob answer. I really think it's still hit on 6 but my opponent wants to have another answers....

In the English rulebook it is:

"IS immobilised" - in other words, if, when you hit it, the vehicle is immobilised you hit it automatically. You *also* hit it on 6s -however this is fairy irrelevant!

To read the wrong interpretation, please see my answer:

ok, so we do not considered that it has moved by 12. Ok. thanks

If it already is immobilized when you hit it, you hit automatically.

SilverMK2 wrote:I believe that you still need 6's to hit if he was assulting it in that turn, since in the previous turn it moved 12. It was only at the start of his turn that it counted as immobilised.

So if you moved 12 in turn 1, then he immobilise it at the start of his turn 1, he would need to wait until his turn 2 to be able to hit it automatically. If he charged it on his turn 1, he would still need 6's to hit.

That is my interpretation of it anyway.

Your interpretation is completely wrong, however.

In that case, I withdraw my wrongness

Ok thanks for the explanation. In the italian book. Rule as written you read like i said before thanks owever.