Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

don_mondo wrote:Or you can go with the INAT answer,

ORK.62C.01 – Q: Can an Independent Character (such as a Warboss on a bike) join Snikrot‟s unit before the game and arrive with them via „Ambush‟?
A: No, as Snikrot‟s ability is a special rule that does not specify it affects other ICs joined to his unit, it does not

INAT is as arbitrary as an other group of human beings decisions, and therefore just as capable of making gross errors. At tourneys...you're stuck with their word (or the TO), but in friendly games...you can agree to a sensible calling on the rules.

MasterSlowPoke wrote:

Che-Vito wrote:INAT is as arbitrary as an other group of human beings decisions, and therefore just as capable of making gross errors. At tourneys...you're stuck with their word (or the TO), but in friendly games...you can agree to a sensible calling on the rules.

It's best to be consistent, which at the very least the INAT is. I'd also say that this is a sensible ruling.

When it suits INAT, then yes...it can be. But that isn't consistent, now is it?

MasterSlowPoke wrote:What do you think is inconsistent?

My Macbook crashed a few weeks ago (quite literally, just stopped working. I didn't drop it or anything, but they said the motherboard had shorted out and they wanted to charge $700 to replace.). On my Windows desktop, I cannot open the PDF INAT file, so I cannot look at it and provide specific response at the moment.

As soon as I can, I'll open a new thread on the very subject. It will be debated, people will flame, and ultimately Yakface will show up and comment that his ruling makes sense, or that he was the lone voice of dissent against the decision...but he was just outnumbered. (think Leonidas trying to hold back the Persian hordes in "300")

Krellnus wrote:INAT, apparently.

Yes.