Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/25 05:35:28
Subject: Rage
|
 |
Blood Angel Terminator with Lightning Claws
Sioux Falls, SD
|
if the tyranids in this example are under the affects of the rage USR, would they charge the crisis suits if a single tyrnaid is closer or would they go for the fire warriors who are farther from the bottom tyranid but closer to the rest of the group?
bassicly do you measure for rage from a single model in the squad or do you go with the majority for rage?
|
Blood for the bloo... wait no, I meant for Sanguinius! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/25 05:50:56
Subject: Rage
|
 |
Shas'o Commanding the Hunter Kadre
|
Personally, they would multi-assault here, since it's tough to tell. If we had to go rules verbatim, then they would attack the fire warriors since more nids are closer to them.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/25 05:53:53
Subject: Re:Rage
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
See page 3 of the rulebook, Measuring Distances, paragraph two of that section for the answer:
"When measuring distances between two units, ..."
Hint: There's no "majority distance".
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/25 16:48:15
Subject: Rage
|
 |
Lord of the Fleet
|
Although I don't know the exact rules, I would go for this as a compromise:
Whichever unit is closer to the majority of the models is the unit they have to charge under Rage.
Valk
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/25 16:55:46
Subject: Rage
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Rage does NOT require that you assault.
ALL rage requires you to do is a) move towards the enemy and b) if Running do so towards the enemy and c) consolidate towards the enemy.
Page 76, BRB.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/25 19:09:50
Subject: Rage
|
 |
Cackling Chaos Conscript
England
|
nosferatu1001 wrote:Rage does NOT require that you assault.
ALL rage requires you to do is a) move towards the enemy and b) if Running do so towards the enemy and c) consolidate towards the enemy.
Page 76, BRB.
soo (i think) your ASSAULT move does not have to be towards the closest enemy; you can choose between the two units. someone care to correct me?
|
sons of the tempest 10/1/1 WDL. 1000 points
Raynor's Raiders
WIP starcraft themed army, currently in buying stages
Unnamed Daemons
Glubzog Nutcracka's green tide
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/25 19:13:02
Subject: Rage
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
You dont have to assault at all.
If you DO assault, then you can simply choose who to assault.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/25 19:26:56
Subject: Rage
|
 |
Cackling Chaos Conscript
England
|
yep. of course, in that particular situation i can't think why you WOULDN'T assault
|
sons of the tempest 10/1/1 WDL. 1000 points
Raynor's Raiders
WIP starcraft themed army, currently in buying stages
Unnamed Daemons
Glubzog Nutcracka's green tide
|
|
 |
 |
|