| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/05/22 04:35:29
Subject: Inquisitor Plus 2x Mystics for IG . . .Really that great?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
I see a lot of complaints on this board and others about releasing an =I= codex that will get rid of inquisitor and mystic allies. So I bought into the tears and played a few games of inq + mystics against a deepstriking BA army. Long story short I either rolled under the 4d6, whiffed, or did not do damage to the deepstrikers 100% of the time. It didn't deter my opponent from dropping several squads of troops directly onto my face.
My question is then, what is the real use of this loadout? Is it worth the points even? It bums me out because winning a game for IG is often credited to the 'stupid DH ally system'
Anyway, /rant off, what do you all think?
|
Gwar: I'm going to quit while I can.
Meh, close enough |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/05/22 04:42:04
Subject: Inquisitor Plus 2x Mystics for IG . . .Really that great?
|
 |
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
I wouldn't worry about it. This unit isn't going to exist in a few months time.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/05/22 04:44:51
Subject: Inquisitor Plus 2x Mystics for IG . . .Really that great?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
So I keep hearing. Most people think this is a big deal, and I just wanna know why. They have been nothing but a waste of points when I use them.
|
Gwar: I'm going to quit while I can.
Meh, close enough |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/05/22 04:49:24
Subject: Inquisitor Plus 2x Mystics for IG . . .Really that great?
|
 |
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
Because it allows you to attack Deep Striking units easily and for free without 'using up' your shooting phase. It's a good way to disrupt armies that rely heavily on Deep Striking (Drop Pod and Daemons armies).
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/05/22 04:55:22
Subject: Inquisitor Plus 2x Mystics for IG . . .Really that great?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Do you see it as so out of balance when used with the IG codex that it needed to be 'fixed' out of the DH update? It just seems like a nifty gimmick to me, not a real game changer. What it boiled down to for me was for my opponent to deepstrike his Dread 7" from my melta guardsmen instead of 6".
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/05/22 04:56:21
Gwar: I'm going to quit while I can.
Meh, close enough |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/05/22 07:53:38
Subject: Inquisitor Plus 2x Mystics for IG . . .Really that great?
|
 |
Lord of the Fleet
|
What were you shooting at them with? If you were doing it rigt then they'll be parked next to a battery of medusas or a pair of executioners. 10 plasma cannon shots will ruin anyone's day. eta- it's not that great against deepstriking jumppackers as they can deploy 18"+ away. Where it shines is against deepstriking melta units.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/05/22 07:55:03
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/05/22 21:33:11
Subject: Inquisitor Plus 2x Mystics for IG . . .Really that great?
|
 |
Monster-Slaying Daemonhunter
Grand Rapids Metro
|
It's also the unlimited psychic hood they love...but kiss it goodbye soon boys...
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|