Switch Theme:

Single player or Co-Op?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Poll
Single Player or Co-Op
Single Player
Co-Op

View results
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Battleship Captain






Which do you prefer?

I'm more of a single player person, as I'm just not good with others.
But against someone else, I can do.

This goes for anygame that has the option, as well as any platform on which to play it.

However, on games where it is meant for multiplayer, or the multiplayer is exceptionally good (Borderlands, Lost Planet 2, Army of two, Gears of War, Halo)
I have do play multiplayer. As long as my partner isn't an idiot.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/06/13 02:44:08


 
   
Made in us
Veteran ORC







If most games would NOT have a crappy netcode, I would be VS, but as I have the best internet available to me, and the games lag like a mother.... I definatly have to go SP.

I've never feared Death or Dying. I've only feared never Trying. 
   
Made in au
Killer Klaivex






Forever alone

Single player for me.

So ronery.

People are like dice, a certain Frenchman said that. You throw yourself in the direction of your own choosing. People are free because they can do that. Everyone's circumstances are different, but no matter how small the choice, at the very least, you can throw yourself. It's not chance or fate. It's the choice you made. 
   
Made in us
Battleship Captain






Cheese Elemental wrote:Single player for me.

So ronery.



   
Made in au
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests






Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.

Single-Player.

The increasing amount of games that now have single-player 'tacked on' (the recent Call of Duty offerings spring to mind) make me mad.

Industrial Insanity - My Terrain Blog
"GW really needs to understand 'Less is more' when it comes to AoS." - Wha-Mu-077

 
   
Made in us
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor






Gathering the Informations.

I dig single player...but much prefer coop.

Operation Flashpoint: Dragon Rising was far, far more fun with coop than the chore it felt like as single player.

Army of Two: 40th Day was the same way, as was the Spec Ops mode for Modern Warfare 2.
   
Made in se
Yellin' Yoof





Sweden


The best game to find out what U are , single or co-op is Gear“s of War 2 and then U play Horde ...( well I think so )

And the one that needs most help is for sure a single player . But in these sort of games U also develop a certain role depending with who U are playing with .

Try it out with 4 friends in the same room ( 2+2 sets )

I bet there will be a lot of "leadership-tests"

 
   
Made in gb
Lone Wolf Sentinel Pilot





London, England

Depends on what game.

For example the co-op in Conviction was brilliant. The co-op, even though it was a primarily single player game, in Halo CE and Halo 3 was also amazingly fun with 2-3 people - 4 was a bit far but still great. Stuff like RTS's I cannot play with other people, the only exception being Supreme Commander (1, mind) because the epicness means that huge coordinated Land/Sea/Air battles with 200 bombers each and swarms of tanks and mechs all converging from two sides is just too awesome to pass up.

Otherwise most of co-op to me is gak. CoD5 wasn't bad though, now you mention it.

sA

My Loyalist P&M Log, Irkutsk 24th

"And what is wrong with their life? What on earth is less reprehensible than the life of the Levovs?"
- American Pastoral, Philip Roth

Oh, Death was never enemy of ours!
We laughed at him, we leagued with him, old chum.
No soldier's paid to kick against His powers.
We laughed - knowing that better men would come,
And greater wars: when each proud fighter brags
He wars on Death, for lives; not men, for flags. 
   
Made in nl
Decrepit Dakkanaut






Split screen co-op, something that game developers seem to frown upon these days, the bastards.
   
Made in gb
Lone Wolf Sentinel Pilot





London, England



XBOX LIVE!

Who wantsa play wid real peoples?

sA

My Loyalist P&M Log, Irkutsk 24th

"And what is wrong with their life? What on earth is less reprehensible than the life of the Levovs?"
- American Pastoral, Philip Roth

Oh, Death was never enemy of ours!
We laughed at him, we leagued with him, old chum.
No soldier's paid to kick against His powers.
We laughed - knowing that better men would come,
And greater wars: when each proud fighter brags
He wars on Death, for lives; not men, for flags. 
   
Made in us
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor






Gathering the Informations.

I wouldn't say it's the developers exclusively who frown upon it.

Split-screen coop is a pain in the ass, even with a good sized TV.
   
Made in gb
Lone Wolf Sentinel Pilot





London, England

And with modern games, it's just fething hard to do. The system has to render the whole world 2, 3, even 4 times. With higher end games that's just not possible, because nowadays even 1 screen's pushing it.

sA

My Loyalist P&M Log, Irkutsk 24th

"And what is wrong with their life? What on earth is less reprehensible than the life of the Levovs?"
- American Pastoral, Philip Roth

Oh, Death was never enemy of ours!
We laughed at him, we leagued with him, old chum.
No soldier's paid to kick against His powers.
We laughed - knowing that better men would come,
And greater wars: when each proud fighter brags
He wars on Death, for lives; not men, for flags. 
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut






Sheffield, City of University and Northern-ness

It depends on who I'm playing with:

If I'm at home, then I'll play on my own, because I find it annoying constantly having to shout at my brother "go right! No RIGHT! No that's left, Good, that's right... NO DON'T walk off the cliff!"

If I can play with freinds, then I'll play Co-op, the Spec-ops portion of Modern Warfare 2 springs to mind, because most of my freinds who I play with aren't complete muppets.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/06/13 20:01:30


   
Made in gb
Massive Knarloc Rider





Exeter

Co-op

It might ruin the atmosphere of the game, or it could drastically reduce your chance of completion (No paul, dont throw the bomb at me) but its still an incredible laugh.

Check out my (new) blog at https://neonrust.home.blog
 
   
Made in nl
Decrepit Dakkanaut






Yea, like.. halo co-op, usually ends up with us trying to rush at some hard part without shooting, to see who can run the farthest.

Though we'v completed halo 1 on legendary without firing a single shot.(except for rocketing/grenading the reactor) the rest of the game was either ran through, or clubbed to death with our guns.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2010/06/13 21:33:45


 
   
Made in us
Sinewy Scourge







Single player...
The only one of my friends who isnt a d-bag on an FPS has got 15 days in TF2 and somewhere around 10 in CS: Source.
Basically spec-ops for Modern Warfare 2 is him sniping and actually hitting stuff and me spraying LMGs all over.
So yeah, single player is more comfortable for me.
Also, considering the NPCs are fail compared to people on multiplayer, it makes me feel like a pro.

Kabal of the Void Dominator - now with more purple!

"And the moral of the story is: Appreciate what you've got, because basically, I'm fantastic." 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





dead account

Most of the games I play now a days are multiplayer... I'd have to say co-op though I miss the occasional single player experience now and then.
   
Made in us
Battleship Captain






Soladrin wrote:Yea, like.. halo co-op, usually ends up with us trying to rush at some hard part without shooting, to see who can run the farthest.

Though we'v completed halo 1 on legendary without firing a single shot.(except for rocketing/grenading the reactor) the rest of the game was either ran through, or clubbed to death with our guns.


My buds and I did that in Halo 2, during the Arbiter level with the flood. See who could run the farthest away without fighting while on legendary.
The record? ABout twenty two feet.
   
Made in au
Killer Klaivex






Forever alone

H.B.M.C. wrote:Single-Player.

The increasing amount of games that now have single-player 'tacked on' (the recent Call of Duty offerings spring to mind) make me mad.

While I agree that CoD's single-player feels 'tacked on', it's still quite good. The story isn't that good but it gets really challenging.

People are like dice, a certain Frenchman said that. You throw yourself in the direction of your own choosing. People are free because they can do that. Everyone's circumstances are different, but no matter how small the choice, at the very least, you can throw yourself. It's not chance or fate. It's the choice you made. 
   
Made in nl
Decrepit Dakkanaut






I don't play single player for the challenge if the game has MP, theres plenty of challenge there.
   
Made in us
Stubborn Temple Guard






I prefer to do single screen co-op on the 360. That way my poor friends can play without buying copies of games they might not play single player.

27th Member of D.O.O.M.F.A.R.T.
Resident Battletech Guru. 
   
 
Forum Index » Video Games
Go to: