Switch Theme:

Tiny bit of proposed rules ( super heavy outside of apocalypse)  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in au
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests






Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.

Canonness Rory wrote:First part, no, a lot of super heavies use apocalypse rules, like strength D weapons and whatnot, which would mean more complicated 40k rules.


Then just ban things with Strength D.

Duh.

There are many super heavies that are either really terrible (Malcador) or are eclipsed by non-Superheavies (Macharius vs Land Raider). The existance of Strength D shouldn't invalidate these units in regular games.

Industrial Insanity - My Terrain Blog
"GW really needs to understand 'Less is more' when it comes to AoS." - Wha-Mu-077

 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K Proposed Rules
Go to: